Complaint Review: Full Throttle Legal Messenger Service - Orting Washington
- Full Throttle Legal Messenger Service 117 Van Scoyoc Ave SW # 1365 Orting , Washington United States
- Phone: (253) 778-9229
- Web: https://www.fullthrottlelegalservic...
- Category: Legal , Courier Services
Full Throttle Legal Messenger Service Lynda J. Allen Legal messenger courier service Orting Washington
*REBUTTAL Owner of company: Follow up
*REBUTTAL Owner of company: Response
listed on other sites?
Those sites steal
Ripoff Report's
content.
We can get those
removed for you!
Find out more here.
Ripoff Report
willing to make a
commitment to
customer satisfaction
Click here now..
I contacted Lynda Allen on Tuesday June 27th around 3pm. She agreed to assist me in serving a no-contact order to an individual who has been harassing me, my family and friends for the previous two weeks. I told her this was my first and only time serving/filing a no-contact order and asked for her help and professional guidance. She stated that she had been in this business for 30yrs so I trusted she would be able to help. I sent her the legal documents that night for delivery the next day, Thursday. I included the court order excluding the original legal no-contact petition because it included my personal contact information that I was trying to protect. Due to the nature of this harassment, I expressed to Lynda that I did not want the opposing party to have my personal contact information such as home address, DOB, phone number and email. Instead of advising me to redact this information from the petition and proceed, Lynda spent the entire day sending me over 20 emails that made little sense and only made this stressful situation even more stressful.
She was absolutely horrible to work with, unprofessional and failed to complete the service I paid her almost $100 for. Her endless emails were condescending, inaccurate, rude and disrespectful. The entire interaction was a waste of an entire day. She called my case “nonsense”, actually defended the opposing party, and took advantage of this being the first and only time I’ve ever needed a service company. She even offered to go over to the offenders home and tell them to “knock it off” which I found be be absolutely appalling. She threatened me when I said I'd be leaving her a review and refused a refund due to “cost of printing 3-5 pages of paper”. She called me an incompetent fraud on her last email then threatened to report me to the county courthouse.
I found another local service company that same Thursday who got the job done right away and were wonderful. Lynda at Full Throttle Legal Messenger Serve is a threat to the community and shouldn’t be allowed to bully paying customers this way.
This report was posted on Ripoff Report on 07/01/2023 11:14 AM and is a permanent record located here: https://www.ripoffreport.com/report/full-throttle-legal-messenger/orting-washington-lynda-j-1527285. The posting time indicated is Arizona local time. Arizona does not observe daylight savings so the post time may be Mountain or Pacific depending on the time of year. Ripoff Report has an exclusive license to this report. It may not be copied without the written permission of Ripoff Report. READ: Foreign websites steal our content
If you would like to see more Rip-off Reports on this company/individual, search here:
#2 REBUTTAL Owner of company
Follow up
AUTHOR: Lynda - (United States)
SUBMITTED: Monday, July 24, 2023
Emily Paige Azzara Turnbull reports; "I found another local service company that same Thursday who got the job done right away and were wonderful.."
What is hilarious about her own statement is that at her own court hearing, per the MINUTE RECORD - "THE COURT FINDS SERVICE IMPROPER. PETITION WAS NOT SERVED ONTO THE RESPONDENT. HEARING RESCHEDULED."
That was exactly what I told her would happen and that was the basis of this whole issue. For knowing what the rule says and attempting to educate her I'm deemed to be "Lynda at Full Throttle Legal Messenger Serve is a threat to the community and shouldn’t be allowed to bully paying customers this way" - that's what you call an incopentant, mean spirited imbecile.
Last, I would like this false, defaming and damaging report removed. I don't mind accurate reviews even if they are not happy with service, however that is not the case here. Emily Paige Azzara Turnbull's disgruntled review is written with vindictive malicious ill will with a spiteful desire to cause damage to a 5 star business all because she didn't want to follow the court's rules.
#1 REBUTTAL Owner of company
Response
AUTHOR: Lynda - (United States)
SUBMITTED: Thursday, July 06, 2023
The short response to this inaccurate and defaming complaint is that Emily Paige Azzara Turnbull emailed me an incomplete packet for service on a first-time restraining order. The King County District Court provided her with a *complete packet for service*, pursuant to the court rules for service.
Emily Turnbull then removed the Petition for service and sent me the packet and said, verbatim “We just spoke, thanks again for your help. *This is everything the judge sent me today for the temporary no contact order. I am sure you know how this works better than I do so I am sending you everything I have. I am not 100% sure what document gets served to her but I am hoping you can help me out.*”
I told her the packet was incomplete for service, that the Petition was missing. I proceeded to provide her with the link to the rule that clearly says, “The person you are asking to be protected from (the “respondent”) must be given a copy of your petition.” Which is found right on the King County website at: KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON Rule – highlighted in lavender.
While your at the above link, click the Instructions for Proof of Service – you’ll see: “The law requires that all parties have a fair chance to go to their hearings and to receive all evidence that the court sees. The respondent to a case must be served with a petition and notice of the hearing (usually contained in the temporary order). If the respondent is not served correctly, the court cannot decide the case. Also, a protection order cannot be enforced unless the respondent knows about it. You must prove that the other party was properly given the petition, notice of hearing, temporary order, and all evidence that you want the court to review. If you don’t, your case can be delayed or even dismissed.”
Emily Turnbull proceeded to tell me “The judge told me yesterday that I need to serve her with the Temp. Protection Order and Hearing Notice. So, I am not sure why we need to include the Petition.”
Unfortunately, Emily Paige Azzara Turnbull just wanted to waste time arguing about the clearly spelled out court rules for service and tell me she did not want to follow the court rules. She even lied and said “the Petition has my personal information. It has my DOB, drivers license, home address, phone number, email, etc.” – Even the King County Court Clerk told her “The petition shouldn’t include sensitive information, but the “Law Enforcement Confidential Information Form” should. The service agency needs this form in order to locate and serve the respondent.
I told her I could affect service if she provided me with the complete set of documents by a certain time and she failed to do so. Despite her tardiness, (she emailed me at 2pm), As a courtesy, I waived the rush fee and stopped along my route to print what should have been provided in the first email. My attempt on the Defendant was 4pm and by now the Defendant was not home. At this point Emily had a full-blown temper tantrum. She asked to cancel service. I was happy to oblige her request and promptly blocked her from emailing me further, at this point, she had sent me 27 emails.
I don't make money by sending emails. I did it out of necessity because she claimed to “not have any idea how the process worked and what was needed”, and I had to educate her. I initially thought she was just a slow learner but later discovered she is scandalous. I invested a great amount of time trying to get the service completed and her uncooperativeness exacerbated that and made it to the point that even the $85 she paid me wasn't enough for all the time I invested in trying to deal with her. I would be happy to supply anyone interested in the email chain so they can verify the accuracy of my rebuttal.
Last, I would like this false, defaming and damaging report removed. I don't mind accurate reviews even if they are not happy with service, however that is not the case here. Emily Paige Azzara Turnbull's disgruntled review is written with vindictive malicious ill will with a spiteful desire to cause damage to a 5 star business all because she didn't want to follow the court's rules.
Advertisers above have met our
strict standards for business conduct.