Full Throttle Legal Messenger Service Lynda J. Allen Legal messenger courier service Orting Washington

Emily Paige Azzara Turnbull reports;  "I found another local service company that same Thursday who got the job done right away and were wonderful.."

What is hilarious about her own statement is that at her own court hearing, per the MINUTE RECORD - "THE COURT FINDS SERVICE IMPROPER.  PETITION WAS NOT SERVED ONTO THE RESPONDENT.  HEARING RESCHEDULED." 

That was exactly what I told her would happen and that was the basis of this whole issue.  For knowing what the rule says and attempting to educate her I'm deemed to be "Lynda at Full Throttle Legal Messenger Serve is a threat to the community and shouldn’t be allowed to bully paying customers this way"  - that's what you call an incopentant, mean spirited imbecile.

Last, I would like this false, defaming and damaging report removed.  I don't mind accurate reviews even if they are not happy with service, however that is not the case here.  Emily Paige Azzara Turnbull's disgruntled review is written with vindictive malicious ill will with a spiteful desire to cause damage to a 5 star business all because she didn't want to follow the court's rules.

The short response to this inaccurate and defaming complaint is that Emily Paige Azzara Turnbull emailed me an incomplete packet for service on a first-time restraining order.  The King County District Court provided her with a *complete packet for service*, pursuant to the court rules for service.

Emily Turnbull then removed the Petition for service and sent me the packet and said, verbatim “We just spoke, thanks again for your help. *This is everything the judge sent me today for the temporary no contact order. I am sure you know how this works better than I do so I am sending you everything I have. I am not 100% sure what document gets served to her but I am hoping you can help me out.*” 

I told her the packet was incomplete for service, that the Petition was missing.  I proceeded to provide her with the link to the rule that clearly says, “The person you are asking to be protected from (the “respondent”) must be given a copy of your petition.” Which is found right on the King County website at:  KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON Rule – highlighted in lavender. 

While your at the above link, click the Instructions for Proof of Service – you’ll see:   “The law requires that all parties have a fair chance to go to their hearings and to receive all evidence that the court sees. The respondent to a case must be served with a petition and notice of the hearing (usually contained in the temporary order). If the respondent is not served correctly, the court cannot decide the case. Also, a protection order cannot be enforced unless the respondent knows about it. You must prove that the other party was properly given the petition, notice of hearing, temporary order, and all evidence that you want the court to review. If you don’t, your case can be delayed or even dismissed.”

Emily Turnbull proceeded to tell me “The judge told me yesterday that I need to serve her with the Temp. Protection Order and Hearing Notice. So, I am not sure why we need to include the Petition.”

Unfortunately, Emily Paige Azzara Turnbull just wanted to waste time arguing about the clearly spelled out court rules for service and tell me she did not want to follow the court rules.  She even lied and said “the Petition has my personal information. It has my DOB, drivers license, home address, phone number, email, etc.” –  Even the King County Court Clerk told her “The petition shouldn’t include sensitive information, but the “Law Enforcement Confidential Information Form” should. The service agency needs this form in order to locate and serve the respondent.

I told her I could affect service if she provided me with the complete set of documents by a certain time and she failed to do so.   Despite her tardiness, (she emailed me at 2pm), As a courtesy, I waived the rush fee and stopped along my route to print what should have been provided in the first email.  My attempt on the Defendant was 4pm and by now the Defendant was not home.  At this point Emily had a full-blown temper tantrum.  She asked to cancel service.  I was happy to oblige her request and promptly blocked her from emailing me further, at this point, she had sent me 27 emails.

I don't make money by sending emails. I did it out of necessity because she claimed to “not have any idea how the process worked and what was needed”, and I had to educate her.  I initially thought she was just a slow learner but later discovered she is scandalous. I invested a great amount of time trying to get the service completed and her uncooperativeness exacerbated that and made it to the point that even the $85 she paid me wasn't enough for all the time I invested in trying to deal with her.  I would be happy to supply anyone interested in the email chain so they can verify the accuracy of my rebuttal.

Last, I would like this false, defaming and damaging report removed.  I don't mind accurate reviews even if they are not happy with service, however that is not the case here.  Emily Paige Azzara Turnbull's disgruntled review is written with vindictive malicious ill will with a spiteful desire to cause damage to a 5 star business all because she didn't want to follow the court's rules.