X  |  CLOSE
Report: #1476063

Complaint Review: STATE OF NEVADA OFFICIALS - Nevada

  • Submitted:
  • Updated:
  • Reported By: Peter — Nevada United States
  • STATE OF NEVADA OFFICIALS Nevada United States

Show customers why they should trust your business over your competitors...

Is this
Ripoff Report
About you?
Ripoff Report
A business' first
line of defense
on the Internet.
If your business is
willing to make a
commitment to
customer satisfaction
Click here now..

https://pjsovereignjedioflaw.blogspot.com/2019/03/notice-demand-with-rescissionwithdrawal.html

Notice & Demand With Rescission/Withdrawal Of Signature

Nunc Pro Tunc 08/24/1994

WIDELY ADVERTISED PUBLIC RECORD 

NOTICE TO AGENTS IS NOTICE TO PRINCIPALS

NOTICE TO PRINCIPALS IS NOTICE TO AGENTS

SILENCE IS ACQUIESCENCE; ACQUIESCENCE IS ESTOPPEL; YOU HAVE THIRTY (30) DAYS!!!


March 24, 2019 - 12:40 EST

To the Secretary of State, Governor; and other officials,

To whom this may concern.

I, Peter - Jason: Helfrich, one of the people domiciled on the land, now declares on and for the record, I am the authorized signature for (PETER JASON HELFRICH(c)082494) the usufruct trust created for my benefit at my birth, by the United States. This usufruct trust which was created without my knowledge and without my consent; (due to the 1933 bankruptcy) the United States use of the trust has been of great harm to me (PETER JASON HELFRICH(c)082494). So with no other option left I must demand pursuant to the following law, the secretary of state send notice of Peter - Jason: Helfrich standing/status to the courts.

8 U.S.C. § 1502 : Certificate of nationality issued by Secretary of State for person not a naturalized citizen of United States for use in proceedings of a foreign state.

FOR THE RECORD: "The Partner (Government) of my Partner (PETER JASON HELFRICH(c)082494) is NOT my (Peter - Jason: Helfrich) Partner, applies herein and is in FULL FORCE AND EFFECT."

The Secretary of State is authorized to issue, in his discretion and in accordance with rules and regulations prescribed by him, a certificate of nationality for any person not a naturalized citizen of the United States who presents satisfactory evidence that he is an AMERICAN NATIONAL and that such certificate is needed for use in judicial or administrative proceedings in a foreign state. Such certificate shall be solely for use in the case for which it was issued and shall be transmitted by the Secretary of State through appropriate official channels to the judicial or administrative officers of the FOREIGN STATE in which it is to be used.





19 Corpus Juris Secundum § 883, [t]he United States government is a FOREIGN CORPORATION with respect to a state.

8 USC § 1101(a)(21), [t]he term "national" means a person owing permanent allegiance to a state."

8 USC § 1101(B)(22), [t]he term "national of the United States" means (A) a citizen of the United States, or (B) a person who, though not a citizen of the United States, owes permanent allegiance to the United States. This highlighted section of law is I, John/Jane Doe, who is not a 14th Amendment US citizen bound by statutes, codes, and regulation thus not subject to the jurisdiction.

American national ≠ national/citizen of the United States. These are TWO distinct status’ within the American system. The latter is a free American National; the former is a voluntary slave subject to the jurisdiction thereof created by section 1 of the 14th Amendment. It is a FEDERALLY CREATED capacity/title that owes allegiance to it and is a subject/citizen of the United States.

That I, Peter - Jason: Helfrich, am not a Government employee nor is Peter - Jason: Helfricha part of the body politic.



I, Peter - Jason: Helfrich, have signed no such contract knowingly, and I, Peter - Jason: Helfrich, have the 11th Amendment immunity. Since such per ponderous fraud has been being done against me. I, Justin Edward Nolan, must and am rescinding/withdrawing my signature from all documents; and demanding the dissolution of the Usufruct Trust; as first and for most, the usufruct was created without my knowledge, more importantly without my parent’s knowledge at my birth; hence no full disclosure has taken place.

I, Peter - Jason: Helfrich, hereby demand the return of all e quitable assets, monies, land patents, and so forth, as any claim of contract is null & void under law. I, Peter - Jason: Helfrich, have been forced in to this action by the officials of "Massachusetts" who have repeatedly refused to arrest corrupt officials (judges, lawyers, prosecutors) and obstructed my access to a grand jury to prosecute the criminals who repeatedly break law. I, Peter - Jason: Helfrich, will lay out the clear sedition and treason being committed by members of the Communist BAR/lawyers Guild, (deemed such by the 81st Congress in 1950 lawyers guild report) while the international bankers who created the BAR, Guarantees the rigged vote, never allows a competent official in office. While they, (the international bankers) and the UN, (another banker creation) are controllers of the courts. On December 9, 1945, the International Organization Immunities Act relinquished every public office of the United States to the United Nations. This law makes all public officials foreign citizens, barring them from judicial power. All public officials are administrative agents of the US Corporation. They have no judicial power whatsoever.

The courts; have been under and is UN controlled. While the courts, are operated and controlled by the communist BAR; which helps to destroy America by leaning the trust and creating sureties which make the national debt appear larger than it is and there by also destroy the American People’s FREEDOM with fraudulent claims of crime. When there is no corpus delecti which is required for a crime to exist.

Another troubling issue Black's Law Dictionary provides the following definition: Capitis Diminutio Maxima; (meaning a maximum loss of status) – The very highest, or most comprehensive loss of status. This occurred when a man's condition was changed from one of freedom to one of bondage, when he became a slave. It swept away with it all rights of citizenship and all family rights.

This is the very action the BAR and it’s members claims upon the American people due to our names being written in all capitalized letters on the certificate of birth/receipt for the Usufruct trust. This action shows a clear mental insanity to believe one can be made another’s slave through capitalized letters upon a receipt/certificate. If any American made such a claim; to purport the ability of making one their slave; by capitalizing another’s name, that natural and/or private person would surely be deemed mad/insane and lock away, for the safety of society; as there is no telling what such a person might do. Please see the attach copy of certificate of birth. This action being done purports to make a living man’s status the same as a corporation as only corporations are put in all capital letters in law. In effect this creates a corporate soul for the living man if he uses this to contract or do any other things in the world, the law society claim his status to be that of a corporation. This means he is now CIVILITER MORTUUS meaning one who is civilly dead; one who is considered as if he were naturally dead, so far as his rights are concerned.

Verses one being, Capitis Diminutio Minima (meaning a minimum loss of status). The very lowest; or least comprehensive degree of loss of status. This occurred where a man's family relations alone were changed. It happened upon the arrogation [pride] of a person who had been his own master, (sui juris,) [of his own right, not under any legal disability] or upon the emancipation of one who had been under the patria potestas. [Parental authority] It left the rights of liberty and citizenship unaltered. See Inst. 1, 16, pr.; 1, 2, 3; Dig. 4, 5, 11; Mackeld. Rom.Law, 144.

Or one being Sui Juris: "Of his own right; possessing full social and civil rights; not under any legal disability to act for one’s self. (See Emancipation: Majority) [Black’s Law Dictionary, 6th Ed., pg. 1434] & in their Propria Persona = Lat. 'In ones own proper person.' To present, one’s self in court without assistance of an attorney, at least 'on the record.' Often shortened to 'in pro per.’

Yet a further question who gave the members of the law society the right to bastardize the English written language then not tell the people in front of them the words being used may or may not mean what one believed them to mean. This deception clearly causes fraudulent entrees upon the court record. . This is a direct violation of 18 U.S. Code § 3501 - Admissibility of confessions; also a violation of 29 USC sec 401-531 as plaintiff has been denied his right to be Propria Persona as attorneys are forced on everyone. All these actions violate peoples Unalienable rights ~ Things which are not in commerce, as public roads, are in their nature unalienable...

THE NATURAL RIGHTS OF LIFE AND LIBERTY & THE PURSUIT OF HAPPINESS ARE UNALIENABLE. ~Bouvier's 1856

-Statutes, codes and regulations are not law, merely a point in fact of law, and statutes, codes, and regulations are the law of Government, not man. Please see the following case cites.

-"A "Code’ or Statute’ is not a Law," (Flournoy v. First Nat. Bank of Shreveport, 197 La. 1067, 3 So.2d 244, 248),

A concurrent or ‘joint resolution ‘of legislature is not "Law," (Koenig v. Flynn, 258 N.Y. 292, 179 N. E. 705, 707;

Ward v State, 176 Okl. 368, 56 P.2d 136, 137; State ex rel. Todd v. Yelle, 7 Wash.2d 443, 110 P.2d 162, 165).

All codes, rules, and regulations are for government authorities only, not human/Creators in accord with God’s Laws. "All codes, rules, and regulations are unconstitutional and lacking due process of Law."

(Rodriques v. Ray Donavan, U.S. Department of Labor, 769 F.2d 1344, 1348 (1985)); …lacking due process[of law], in that they are ‘void for ambiguity’ in their failure to specify the statutes’ applicability to ‘natural persons,’ otherwise depriving the same of fair notice, as their construction by definition of terms aptly identifies the applicability of such statutes to "artificial or fictional corporate entities or ‘persons’, creatures of statute, or those by contract employed as agents or representatives, departmental subdivisions, offices, officers, and property of the government, but not the ‘Natural Person’ or American citizen Immune from such jurisdiction of legalism.

"The Common Law is the real law, the Supreme Law of the land. The codes, rules, regulations, policy and statutes are "not the law."

(Self v. Rhay, 61 Wn 2d 261), They are the law of government for internal regulation, not the law of man, in his separate but equal station and natural state, a sovereign foreign with respect to government generally.)

With such overwhelming case law there is no question about the fact of the claim made here statutes are not law. Plaintiff/the court now challenges prosecution and Magistrate to prove the statutes apply to John/Jane Doe. I, Peter - Jason: Helfrich, deny being a government employee. If the prosecution or state or Magistrates wish to say different then prove I have been a paid employee of federal or state Government produce the pay roll records. Add in the fact Peter - Jason: Helfrich, is not a part of the body politic.

The Clear Fraud; Sedition, And Treasonous Acts Of The BAR

This fraudulent, /seditious, & treasonous act, of the Courts’/BAR members telling plaintiff and defendants alike, that the Court; was appointing an attorney, in plaintiff’s/defendants benefit. This fraud is an outrage and now known to be patently false/a lie on its face. Please see the following it explains far better the fraud/sedition, and treason. That an attorney’s presence is to put one in the state court’s jurisdiction, so they can prevent one from challenging the jurisdiction putting the people at the magistrates non-existing mercy as the BAR’s clear objective is the over throw of America’s form of Government by convicting the people of fictional crimes to remove their right of gun ownership, so the American people can be Concorde and enslaved without a shot fired. Even case law denotes the truth. Please see:

The U.S. Supreme Court observed in its unanimous decision in Kay v. Ehrler, 499 U.S. 432, that a lawmaking body may instead prefer to discourage attorneys from electing to appear in Propria Persona because such self re-presentation may often conflict with the general public and legislative policy favoring the effective and successful prosecution of meritorious claims. The high court observed that 'Even a skilled lawyer who represents himself is at a disadvantage in contested litigation. Ethical considerations may make it inappropriate for him to appear as a witness. He is deprived of the judgment of an independent third party in framing the theory of the case, evaluating alternative methods of presenting the evidence, cross-examining hostile witnesses, formulating legal arguments, and in making sure that reason, rather than emotion, dictates the proper tactical response to unforeseen developments in the courtroom. The adage that 'a attorney who represents himself has a fool for a client' is the product of years of experience by seasoned litigators.. Id. at 437-438

An appearance may be in "Propria Persona" and need not be by attorney.

Obs. 'In his own person.' It is a rule in pleading those pleas to the jurisdiction of the court must be pleaded in Propria Persona, because, if pleaded by an attorney, they admit the jurisdiction, as an attorney is an officer of the court, and he is presumed to plead after having obtained leave, which admits the jurisdiction).

This ruling is clear proof the attorneys only role is to fraudulently aide the BAR member/judge’s court in getting jurisdiction. The following rulings explain the criminal acts in much greater detail the rulings shown; leave no doubt of the subversive actions of the bar and its member’s intention of destroying America from within. Please see the following:

"The attorney’s first duty is to the courts...not to the client." U.S.v Franks D.C.N.J. 53F.2d 128). Here again people have been repeatedly told the attorney is for their benefit to insure a fair and impartial hearing; this is clear fraud.

"Clients are also called "wards of the court" in regard to their relationship with their attorneys."Spilker v. Hankin, 158 F.2d 35, 58U.S.App.D.C. 206. This ruling clearly shows the attorney’s presence does not guarantee a fair and impartial hearing but rather secures/guarantees defendants or plaintiffs are at the mercy of the Magistrate. The preponderance of fraud will only grow as you will see.

(Wards of court. are Infants and persons of unsound mind). Davis Committee v. Loney, 290 Ky. 644, 162 S.W.2d 189, 190.

Did you get that? An Attorneys first duty is not to the people they are supposedly representing, and when you have an Attorney you are either considered insane or an infant.

This is an incredible fraud/sedition & treason being perpetrated on the American people, by members of the BAR who perform such fraud/sedition treason daily there is no doubt, who the real criminals are now!?! This violates 18 U.S.CODE§2384-SEDITIOUS CONSPIRACY and is clearly sedition against the American people and the United States of America. The BAR members repeatedly ignores the Constitution of the United States in open court violating Title 18 USC 2381 Capitol Felony Treason. They claim that saying our paper work is fugitive allows them the right to ignore the US Constitution.

I, Peter - Jason: Helfrich, hereby also demand that with the above stated law the Secretary of State notify the clerk in case numbers CR 7411 A, CV 37593 A, in "Nye County" , "Nevada" , of my, Peter - Jason: Helfrich's standing, as an American National with 11th Amendment immunity.

It is no wonder as to why the 81st congress deemed the BAR/lawyers guild a Communist Organization in 1950; in the congressional report on the lawyer’s guild. When one reads the report it becomes quickly understood the BAR was acting in support of Adolph Hitler, as the BAR was caught red handed, shipping ammunitions, & attacking the American public school system, in order to dumb down American children. Yet despite all the facts members of the BAR are still practicing their fraudulent/seditious & treasonous acts daily & even seem proud, of their historical ties with the world’s 2nd largest mass murderer in history Adolph Hitler 1st being the International Bankers of course, which the present financial crisis has shown the historical connections here as well, being the BAR was founded and started by the bankers who can be shown to have a death toll over 100 million people directly, as a result of actions taken by the international bankers from WW 2 ‘till today. So it’s clear, the BAR and its members seek not justice, but domination, and the death, of all who will not be put upon bended knee, to them, and their creators (The International Bankers).

18 U.S.C. § 4. Such activity has been a federal crime since the First Congress, for "the common law recognized a duty to raise the `hue and cry’ and report felonies to the authorities. . . . It is apparent from this statute, as well as from our history and that of England, that concealment of crime and agreements to do so are not looked upon with favor. Such conduct deserves no encomium." Branzburg v. Hayes,408 U.S. 665, 696-97 (1972) (citation omitted).

Misprision of Felony involves both knowledge of a crime and some affirmative act of concealment or participation, and the Courts have concluded that ‘misprision of felony’ is a crime of moral turpitude because it necessarily involves an affirmative act of concealment or participation in a felony, behavior that runs contrary to accepted societal duties and involves dishonest or fraudulent activity. The Supreme Court observed that: Concealment of crime has been condemned throughout our history… Although the term "misprision of felony" now has an archaic ring, gross indifference to the duty to report known criminal behavior remains a badge of irresponsible citizenship.

THE FOLLOWING IS PART OF WHAT IS ON PAPER WORK WHICH HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE COURTS AND BAR MEMBERS THEY HAVE SAID THEY ARE NOT REQUIRED TO ABIDE BY THE CONSTITUTION FEDERAL LAW OR SUPREME COURT RULINGS.

1st claim and fact.

The FACTS OF LAW already say child support has been declared unconstitutional. So for the defendant’s cause of action against plaintiff/the court. There is no jurisdiction in the matter, as child support was declared unconstitutional in (STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS C7-97-926 C8-97-1132 C7-97-1512 C8-98-33, Filed June 12, 1998). The decision was up held in the Supreme Court. (STATE OF MINNESOTA IN SUPREME COURT C7-97-926 C8-97-1132 C9-98-33 C7-97-1512,) Filed: January 28, 1999. This alone constitutes that no jurisdiction could exist. Because child support was found to be lacking, any provision for the separation of powers act in the US Constitution in both the Federal and the state law.

 

The following rulings state this applies to the instant case. Mills v. Duryee, 1t1 U.S. (7 Cranch) 481 (1813), the United States Supreme Court ruled that the merits of a case, as settled by courts of one state, must be recognized by the courts of other states; state courts may not reopen cases which have been conclusively decided by the courts of another state. Later, Chief Justice John Marshall suggested that the judgment of one state court must be recognized by other states' courts as final. Also Ableman v. Booth 62 U.S. 506 where the higher court stated the lower courts were bound by all federal court rulings. As well Howlett V. Rose, 496 U.S. 356 (1990) Federal Law and Supreme Court cases apply to State court cases. (Cooper v. Aaron, 358 U.S. 1) (1958)--States are bound by United States Supreme Court Case decisions. Also Article 4 of the U.S. Constitution states that each state shall give full faith and credit to the other states laws this would include case law.

Plaintiff/the court (challenges the jurisdiction under Article 1 sec. 8 clause 17, & demands to know the nature & cause of the action) also pursuant to Indiana trial rule 12 .(B) (1) Lack of jurisdiction over the subject matter, 12 (B) (2) Lack of jurisdiction over the natural/private person, 12 (B) (8) The same action pending in another state court of this state. Since, the plaintiff/court is challenging the jurisdiction, of the Magistrate. So plaintiff decided to see what case law on this matter denotes. (Basso v Utah power & light company 495, F 2d 906 910) Jurisdiction can be challenged at any time and must be proven not assumed.

(Latana v Hopper 102 2d 188) (Chicago v New York 37 F SUPP 150) The court must prove on the record all jurisdiction facts related to the jurisdiction asserted.

Further more the following laws have not been met or upheld to allow jurisdiction please see the following:

1. No information/charging document has been lawfully issued to obtain the appearance of any Defendant in this matter as required pursuant to IC 35-34-1-2. Without the existence of lawful information/charging document, plaintiffs/the court makes only a special appearance before this Magistrate to inform the Magistrate of error in this matter.

2. Plaintiffs/court has not been served an information/charging document supported by any first hand material fact witness, affidavit of probable cause, or ANY instrument from which any reasonable natural/private person could determine probable cause, thereby initiating the court's jurisdiction in compliance with IC 35-34-1-2 and in compliance with the 4th, 5th, and 6th amendment protections. See State v. Kaahaaina, 2001 Haw. App. LEXIS 204 (Haw. Ct. App. Oct. 17, 2001) Holding that the State failed to properly initiate the criminal proceeding against the defendant because the defendant was never formally charged orally or by written complaint supported by sworn statement or affidavit and thus failed to initiate jurisdiction in the District Court. Plaintiff hereby demands a verified criminal complaint if none exist Magistrate/commissioner has no choice but to dismiss the matter with prejudice.

3. Without sufficient and lawful process as directed per IC 35-34-1-2; at minimum, the court's jurisdiction cannot be invoked and, therefore, no matter is before this court and this matter is void AB INITIO. This failure to follow IC 35-34-1-2 violated the Defendant’s due process rights. See State v. Kaahaaina, 2001 Haw. App. LEXIS 204 (Haw. Ct. App. Oct. 17, 2001) Holding that defendant was improperly charged because the information charging document used by the officer failed to comply with HRS § 805-1 and HRPP Rule 7 (d).

4. This state court is without jurisdiction, precludes the judge from making an offer of a plea to the defendant in error without, in so doing, putting fraud upon the Magistrates court..

5. The Prosecutor in this matter knew or should have known that without the issuance of sufficient process, there is no charge or complaint against the falsely accused or defendant.

6. The person acting as magistrate in this matter, who has had this matter brought before him/her in this court, knew or should have known that the court is patently, unambiguously, and wholly without jurisdiction because the insufficiency of process used in this matter precludes initiating the court’s jurisdiction.

7. In light of the facts before the court, the person acting as judge must act minister ally and should, sua sponte, dismiss or remove this matter from the court with prejudice as it is void AB INITIO.

Therefore, the Nye County Court, STATE OF NEVADA is given mandatory judicial notice under rule 201 of the FRCP by plaintiffs/court, in light of the foregoing lawful and valid facts, that there is no matter before this court and that any and all parties who pursue any trial of this matter are acting in fraud and misrepresentation and in violation of clearly established law, procedures, rules of evidence, and of the rights of this court in error.

FACTS WHICH MUST BE ADDRESSED

1. Claimant has identified themselves as STATE OF NEVADA; therefore this court is improperly set due to the fact that in All Cases … in which a State shall be a Party, The Supreme Court shall have original Jurisdiction.

2. Should this court allow this action to be brought before it, the proceeding will be biased, bigoted, warped, lopsided, and in violation of the laws of due process in that the Respondent cannot receive a fair and impartial hearing before a court wherein:

a. The "law", complete with monetary penalties and pseudo "criminal" penalties, was manufactured by the claimant/state;

b. The court belongs to the claimant/state;

c. The judge receives remuneration from the claimant/state;

d. The judge is subject to the regulatory agencies of the claimant/state;

e. The witnesses are on the payroll of the claimant/state;

f. For Magistrate to hear the case would violate subject matter jurisdiction and be a conflict of interest as the magistrate represents the state and the state is the claimant "unlawfully" see Hoke v Henderson 15, N.C. 15,25 AM DEC 677." That statute which would deprive a person of person or property without a regular trial according to the use and custom of common law would not be the law of the land." There is a common law principle which states that for there to be a crime, there must first be a victim, corpus delecti. In the absence of a victim there can be no crime. The state cannot be the victim nor can the state sue on behalf of another.

3. If the STATE OF NEVADA insists on being a party to the action, then let it bring its action in the court of original jurisdiction which is set forth in Article III, Section 2 of the Constitution for the United States of America, to which the claimant/state is contractually bound.

One need only look to the American Jurisprudence to see what has been decided prior on any unconstitutional law and the duties of a court officer.

American Jurisprudence 2nd 1964 vol. 16 CONSTITUTIONAL LAW

§ 177 Generally statute leaves the question that it purports to settle just as it would be had the statute not been enacted. Since an unconstitutional law is void, the general principles follow that it imposes no duties, confers no rights, creates no office, bestows no power or authority on anyone, affords no protection, and justifies no acts performed under it. A contract which rests on an unconstitutional statute creates no obligation to be impaired by subsequent legislation.

No one is bound to obey an unconstitutional law and no courts are bound to enforce it. Indeed, insofar as a statute runs counter to the fundamental law of the land, it is superseded thereby. It is said that all persons are presumed to know the law, meaning that ignorance of the law excuses no one; if any person acts under an unconstitutional statute, he does so at his peril and must take the consequences. Pg. 403 – 405

16Am Jur 2d., Const. Law Sec. 70:

"No public policy of a state can be allowed to override the positive guarantees of the U.S. Constitution."

63C Am.Jur.2d, Public Officers and Employees, §247

"As expressed otherwise, the powers delegated to a public officer are held in trust for the people and are to be exercised in behalf of the government or of all citizens who may need the intervention of the officer. [1] Furthermore, the view has been expressed that all public officers, within whatever branch and whatever level of government, and whatever be their private vocations, are trustees of the people, and accordingly labor under every disability and prohibition imposed by law upon trustees relative to the making of personal financial gain from a discharge of their trusts. [2] That is, a public officer occupies a fiduciary relationship to the political entity on whose behalf he or she serves. [3] and owes a fiduciary duty to the public. [4] It has been said that the fiduciary responsibilities of a public officer cannot be less than those of a private individual. [5] Furthermore, it has been stated that any enterprise undertaken by the public official which tends to weaken public confidence and undermine the sense of security for individual rights is against public policy.[6]

2nd claim and fact.

Plaintiff’ Peter - Jason: Helfrich is the court as defined in the following. (COURT = The person and the suit of the sovereign the place where the sovereign sojourns with his regal retinue, where ever that may be.)

Black’s law dictionary 5th edition page 318.

Being plaintiff has a counter claim, plaintiff/the court has suit which means, plaintiff is the court. With this fact now proven and as clearly denoted in the maxims of law that following applies here. Rights never die. [Bouvier’s 1856 Law Dictionary. Also It is a general rule that the sovereign cannot be sued in his own court without consent and hence no direct judgment can be rendered against him therein for cost, except in the manner and on the condition he has proscribed.

40 La. Ann. 856," Bouvier’s Law Dictionary Vol. 1(1897). So clearly the magistrate needs consent of the private/natural person. The court does not and will not consent.

"Bouvier's Law Dictionary (1914),"Maxim,"p.2149, (No legislative body or man can convey any authority or jurisdiction he does not possess over common Rights vested by God in another. Because legislative powers are limited, all powers derived from legislative acts are limited). The Court has now established the fact it cannot be sued in its own court & consent is needed The Court has not consented to the Magistrate. Thus no authority exists for Magistrate to make any order.

"The rights of the individuals are restricted only to the extent that they have been voluntarily surrendered by the "citizenship" to the agencies of government."

City of Dallas v Mitchell, 245 S.W. 944

At the revolution the Sovereignty devolved on the people; and they are truly the sovereigns of the country, but they are sovereigns without subjects ......and have none to govern but themselves; the citizens of America are equal as fellow citizens, and as joint tenants in the sovereignty." Chisholm v Georgia, 2 Dall. 440, at pg 471; The Basic principle here is if one doesn’t agree with the body politic they cannot be held liable to the body politics suggestions as to what they should do. Unless a jury of their peers decides it is such an atrocious act they must do it, a jury of 12 peers. One’s peer is above all one who thinks in similar terms and understands who they are an American National not a US Citizen, and understands what law is. Yet the people are regularly told we have no right of trial by jury. This is a clear sign on the wall America has become; and is a Communist Country. Because of the treasonous bars actions; its failure to hold members accountable; and their subversion of true law.

The history shows clearly these same tactics was used in Germany; during WW2 by the BAR in Germany. There however the BAR members paid for their treason to the German people. Little known fact of WW2 was Hitler executed all but three BAR members, who escaped Germany. Two of which died shortly after, of their ordeals endured while escaping. One should always keep in mind how history repeats due to man’s inability to learn from the past.

Declaration of Independence:

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.--That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed.

I, Peter - Jason: Helfrich, should think it clear, that I, Justin Edward Nolan, will not consent, nor have I, Peter - Jason: Helfrich, ever consented willfully. Consent has always been obtained by threat and intimidation. Which violates 42 U.S.CODE§3617 INTERFERENCE, COERCION, OR INTIMIDATION.

The laws broken thus are too numerous to mention here; as some 84 different laws are applicable. A question all should ask. If you must threaten and intimidate people, breaking law; to get what you desire. Then how are "you" any better than the real criminals of the world, or are those doing this just that; "the real criminals of the world"?

NOTICE AND DEMAND TO CEASE AND DESIST!


The mere suggestion of, including but not limited to, Notice, warrant, arrest and kidnapping, or any other action by any foreign Crown Temple B.A.R. Agent as Pro-Se-Cutis, Magistrate, "Judge" in a black robe moves against me without an injured party bearing an affidavit of the harms done them by me, or a lawful international contract with me, or proof with records of payroll for my employment with their Private Member Association, or any attempt to enforce commercial codes/statutes/color of law, or to coerce me into the Office of the Person, or use an off-shore I.R.S. Trust trafficked JOHN HENRY DOE person, or use impressment, or barratry, or criminal conversion, or legalese, or dog-latin, or any other similarly related derivation of the "business-as-usual" trafficking by the Crown Temple B.A.R. and/or their armed Contractors with badges, or be called a Sovereign citizen, simply because I know the crimes and harms done Me, SHALL BE PROSECUTED by Me.

The prosecution against them for their crimes shall include, but not be limited to, international tort claim, international law NOTICE OF CLAIM/LIEN, ultimately leading to the admission and intent and conspiracy to perpetrate crimes against me, shall also include full loss of their Estate, be reported by international public notice to all credit report agencies, insurance carriers, bond agents, every Secretary of State across the land, every BAR Association, and every Mainstream MEDIA and alternative MEDIA source, for their crimes, and shall be with their fully informed consent for daring to move forward with their piracy against me. My prosecution will be without the United States, against them in their private capacity as criminals act, and NOT in any de facto court where they might benefit from the help of fellow BAR Agents.

Hereof, fail not to respect this warning. I, Peter - Jason: Helfrich have learned of all your despicable crimes and counterfeiting of securities. I, Peter - Jason: Helfricham not, including but not limited to, an en legis fictional person, slave, citizen, denizen, subject, strawman, U.S. person, state employee, taxpayer, corporate entity, debtor, or property of any bank or attorner/broker. Any attempt to enforce color of law or wrongfully prosecute me ever again shall instantaneously become the recipient of one or more lawful claims against them by me for 22.5 million real dollars each, meaning each offender and each individual crime. Crown Temple B.A.R. Attorners were born on this land, grew up on this land, and have families and friends on this land, yet they work in the shadows like rats to rob, rape, pillage, and kidnap, and commit Human Rights Violations against formerly fellow Americans for the unjust enrichment of the Bloody Crown. I have no words that can adequately describe their devotion to darkness and mayhem against our country and people. For the life of me, I cannot fathom the deep human sickness required to traffic American people, persons, and babies for FEDERAL RESERVE Instruments of DEBT. If I get dragged into a court or jail by anyone, after I’ve harmed no one, I shall use all my resources to make them pay heavily for their dirty crimes. YOU HAVE BEEN WARNED! You are to CEASE AND DESIST from your crimes against me, immediately, or you agree to lose all that you have. The wisest suggestion I can offer is for you to burn that filthy BAR Union Card and throw it in the toilet for a more respectable position in your life. Lose the career of crime. If you cannot stop yourselves, I’ll do it for you. You need to find something to do beside ruin lives. We do not need the B.A.R. on this land.

-

I, Peter - Jason: Helfrich, declare, swear and affirm under penalty of perjury that, to the best of my knowledge and belief, the information herein is true, correct, and complete.

https://pjsovereignjedioflaw.blogspot.com/2019/03/notice-demand-with-rescissionwithdrawal.html

---------------------END--OF--NOTICE----------------NEW--AFFIDAVIT--BEGINS--BELOW-----------------------

---------------------------MORE TO COME; THIS IS A WORK IN PROGESS----------------------------------------

 

 

This report was posted on Ripoff Report on 03/27/2019 09:36 AM and is a permanent record located here: https://www.ripoffreport.com/report/state-nevada-officials/ficials-attempted-murder-1476063. The posting time indicated is Arizona local time. Arizona does not observe daylight savings so the post time may be Mountain or Pacific depending on the time of year. Ripoff Report has an exclusive license to this report. It may not be copied without the written permission of Ripoff Report. READ: Foreign websites steal our content

Search for additional reports

If you would like to see more Rip-off Reports on this company/individual, search here:

Report & Rebuttal
Respond to this report!
Also a victim?
Repair Your Reputation!

Updates & Rebuttals

REBUTTALS & REPLIES:
5Author
0Consumer
0Employee/Owner

#5 Author of original report

COMMERCIAL AFFIDAVIT v.s. Cynthia Castillo: Public Record / Widely Advertised

AUTHOR: Peter - (United States)

POSTED: Friday, March 29, 2019

https://www.copblock.org/forums/threads/state-of-nevada-officials-attempted-murder-kidnapping-retaliation-fraud-theft-etc-nye-county.113/

When Recorded, Mail To:

Peter - Jason: Helfrich
c/o: 1538 Woodward Heights Way
North Las Vegas, Nevada Republic [89032]
Non-Domestic

COMMERCIAL AFFIDAVIT

AFFIDAVIT OF NOTICE,

DECLARATION,

AND DEMAND

FAIR NOTICE

AND WARNING OF COMMERCIAL GRACE

NOTICE OF NON-JUDICIAL PROCEEDING

THIS IS A TITLE 15 U.S. S.E.C. TRACER FLAG,

NOT A POINT OF LAW

United States District Court of Nevada Case #: 2:19-CV-524-JAD-GWF

CERTIFIED MAIL NUMBER:_________________________________________________

NOTICE TO FILING CLERK OF THE ABOVE COURT [#2:19-CV-524-JAD-GWF]: TWO [2] TITLE PAGE 1's PROVIDED; AFFIANT REQUIRES A FILE STAMPED TITLE PAGE 1 BE MAILED AT THE ABOVE AFFIANT'S [Peter – Jason: Helfrich] MAILING ADDRESS. FURTHER NOTICE TO SAID CLERK IS GIVEN THAT THE CHANGE OF LEGAL MAIL ADDRESS FROM P.O. BOX 650, Indian Springs, Nevada; IS NOW: In Care Of: 1538 Woodward Heights Way, North Las Vegas, Nevada.

A SECURITY (15 USC)
------------------------
COMMERCIAL AFFIDAVIT
U.S. S.E.C. TRACER FLAG
NOT A POINT OF LAW

YOU HAVE 30 DAYS! SILENCE IS ACQUIESCENCE; ACQUIESCENCE IS ESTOPPEL!!!

READ attached APPENDIX A

STATE OF [state] )

) ss:

COUNTY OF [county] )

 

TO: Cynthia Castillo, etc., et.al.; Respondent(s)

Director at Summit Mental Health

Ms. Cynthia Castillo, President

2810 W. Charleston Blvd. #77,

Las Vegas, Nevada 89102

Phone: (702) 823-3910

Additional Phone Number: (702) 821-6494

CIVIL REMEDIES; PRESERVATION: The omission to specify or affirm in this Code any liability to damages, penalty, forfeiture, or other remedy imposed by law and allowed to be recovered or enforced in any civil action or proceeding, for any act or omission declared punishable herein, does not affect any right to recover or enforce the same.

I, Peter - Jason: Helfrich, the Undersigned Trustee, Beneficiary, Real Party In Interest, Injured Party, Authorized Representative, and Attorney In Fact In Behalf Of PETER HELFRICH(c)082494, do solemnly swear, declare, and depose:

  1. THAT I am competent to state to the matters set forth herein.
  2. THAT I have personal knowledge of the facts stated herein.
  3. THAT all the facts stated herein are true, correct, and certain, admissible as evidence, and if called upon as a witness, I will testify to their veracity.
  4. THAT the eternal, unchanged principles of Commercial Law are:
  5. a) A workman is worthy of his hire. (thou shalt not steal)
    b) All are equal under the law. (no one is above the law)
    c) In Commerce, truth is sovereign. (thou shalt not bear false witness)
    d) Truth is expressed in the form of an affidavit.
    e) An unrebutted affidavit stands as truth in Commerce.
    f) An unrebutted affidavit becomes the judgment in Commerce.
    g) All matters must be expressed to be resolved.
    h) He who leaves the battlefield first loses by default.
    i) Sacrifice is the measure of credibility (no willingness to sacrifice = no liability, responsibility, authority or measure of conviction)
    j) A lien or claim can be satisfied only through an affidavit by a point-for-point rebuttal, resolution by jury or payment.
  6. THAT Commercial processes (including this Affidavit and the required responses to it) ARE NON-JUDICIAL and pre-judicial because:
  7. a) No judge, court, government or any agencies thereof, or any other third parties whatsoever, can abrogate anyone's affidavit of truth; and
    b) Only a party affected by an affidavit can speak and act for himself/herself and is solely responsible for responding with his own affidavit of truth, which no one else can do for him/herself.
  8. THAT the lawful seizure, collection, and transfer of ownership of money or property must be effected by a valid Commercial Lien which must contain certain elements in order to be Commercially valid, to wit:
  9. a) The lien instrument must obviously, patently, and evidently be a LIEN by being clearly and explicitly titled "LIEN," "CLAIM OF LIEN," or "DECLARATION OF LIEN," and mandatorily, by its exhaustive Commercial content (full disclosure) as follows in b), c) and d);
    b) The lien instrument MUST CONTAIN a notarized hand-signed affidavit, for which the issuer is commercially liable, containing a plain statement of fact disclosing how the obligation of the lien was created, attesting that the commercial condition is true, correct, and certain;
    c) The lien instrument MUST CONTAIN a ledger or bookkeeping statement connecting purchases, services rendered, and/or injuries sustained, with a claim of obligation such that each purchase, service, and/or injury is presented in a one-to-one correspondence with its partial claim of obligation. The partial obligations are then totaled to obtain the total obligation. This is called a "True Bill in Commerce."
    d) The lien instrument MUST CONTAIN a statement, either specific or general, of the property being seized from the lien debtor to satisfy, or to guarantee satisfaction of, the obligation of the lien.
    e) A NOTICE OF LIEN to be valid MUST CONTAIN a clear statement as to where the lien is filed, where it can be found and how a copy can be obtained.
  10. THAT I am not the creation or chattel property of any person or any government agency whatsoever. I am not under any obligation whatsoever to any governmental agency, state or federal, or any of their self-passed laws, statutes, regulations or policies.
  11. THAT any and all of the various papers, documents, adhesion contracts, or "agreements" I may have signed with any government agency or entity or any others that might be construed to indicate a conclusion contrary to my herein-below assertions were made, signed by me on the basis of mistake due to lack of full disclosure creating a deliberate lack of full knowledge, a deliberate action of fraud, non-disclosure, concealment of material fact, and misrepresentation. Such action thereby creates a stressful situation of duress and intimidation, vitiating all documents by such action of fraud.
  12. THAT it is the sincerest belief, religious and spiritual conviction of this Affiant that slavery and peonage are immoral, are violations of the First Precept of Commercial Law (a workman is worthy of his hire, "Thou shalt not steal"), that fraud, misrepresentation, nondisclosure, intimidation, deceit, concealment of material fact, lying, and treachery are morally wrong.
  13. THAT I have absolutely no desire whatsoever to be a "client" (slave) of any governmental agency, state or federal or international, or any of their Principals/Agents, etc., "State of Nevada" or the "United States," or the “United Nations”, the “Vatican”, etc., or to incur any debts or obligations to said entities for whatever "benefits" said entities might purpose to provide or seek to provide to this Affiant, or be directed by, subject to, or accountable to any parties other than my own conscience and best judgement for the purpose of preserving inviolate my unalienable/inalienable rights to life, liberty, freedom and property while engaging in the honorable, productive, and non-harmful activities of my life.
  14. THAT I, Peter - Jason: Helfrich, am the sole and absolute owner of myself, my body, and my estate, and possess unconditional, allodial, sovereign title thereto, and that I abjure, renounce, forsake, and disavow utterly and absolutely now and forever all presumptions of power, authority, or right by any governmental agency, its Principals, over the rights, life, liberty, freedom or property of this Affiant from whatever source presumed or derived.
  15. THAT NO COMMERCIAL PAPERWORK or COMMERCIAL AFFIDAVITS have been furnished or supplied to me, Peter - Jason: Helfrich, by Cynthia Castillo, nor the Governor nor the Attorney General of Nevada [past or present; dating back to 8/6/2013 to present] or any others that created the so-called liability.

[***SEE AFFIDAVIT INSERTS / SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS, etc.***]

 

 

  1. MAXIM’S OF LAW TO FATHER'S RIGHTS

 

Maxim’s of Interest that apply to Fathers Rights

 

  1. MAXIM

 

a.

An established principle or proposition. A principle of law universally admitted, as being just and consonant With reason.

 

Maxims in law are somewhat like axioms in geometry. 1 Bl. Com. 68. They are principles and authorities, and part of the general customs or common law of the land; and are of the same strength as acts of parliament, when the judges have determined what is a maxim; which belongs to the judges and not the jury. Terms do Ley; Doct. & Stud. Dial. 1, c. 8. Maxims of the law are holden for law, and all other cases that may be applied to them shall be taken for granted. 1 Inst. 11. 67; 4 Rep. See 1 Com. c. 68; Plowd. 27,

 

 

b.

The application of the maxim to the case before the court, is generally the only difficulty. The true method of making the application is to ascertain bow the maxim arose, and to consider whether the case to which it is applied is of the same character, or whether it is an exception to an apparently general rule.

The alterations of any of the maxims of the common law are dangerous. 2 Inst. 210. The following are some of the more important maxims.

 

Regula pro lege, si deficit lex. In default of the law, the maxim rules. [FROM: Bouvier’s 1856 Law Dictionary]

A communi observantia non est recedendum. From common observance there should be no departure; there must be no departure from common usage. A maxim formerly applied to the practice of the courts, to the ancient and established forms of pleading and conveyancing, and to professional usage generally. Lord Coke applies it to common professional

opinion. [Blacks Law, 6th Ed.]

 

OWNERSHIP OF CHILDREN—

Partus sequitur ventrem. "The offspring follow the condition of the mother, This is the case of slaves and animals.; 1 Bouv. Inst. n. 167,

502; but with regard to freemen, children follow the condition of the father."

 

Trying to split children:

Here be two maximes of the common law. First, that no man can hold one and the same land immediately of two several lords. Secondly, that one man cannot of the same land be both lord and tenant. And it is to be observed, that it is holden for an inconvenience, that any of the maximes of the law should be broken, though a private man suffer loss; for that by infringing of a maxime, not only a general prejudice to many, but in the end a public uncertany and confusion to all would follow.” Section 152b. Maxim’s of Lord Coke

 

[Nemo potest esse tenes et dominus. No man can be at the same time tenant and landlord of the same tenement.

 

Idem agens et patiens esse non potest. One cannot be agent and patient, in the same matter. Jenk. Cent. 40.

 

Meaning: You are either your child’s Father, or the judge is.

 

No man can hold the same land immediately of two several landlords. Co. Litt. 152.]

 

Meaning: There can only be one Father (one main guardian of the child—NOT TWO!)

 

Haeres est alter ispe, et filius est pars patris. An heir is another self, and a son is a part of the father.

 

Duo non possunt in solido unam rem possidere. "Two cannot possess one thing in its entirety." Blacks Law Dictionary, Sixth Edition, pg. 502

 

Meaning: Only one person can own the child. There is only four (4) choices: 1.) Father

2.) State 3.) Mother (but she needs subsidy, thereby can’t really own the child) or 4.)

the child (as an unemancipated minor).

 

Haeredem Deus facit, non homo. God and not man, make the heir.

 

Haeris est nomen juris, filius est nomen naturae. Heir is a term of law, son a term of nature.

 

Haeres est eadem persona c*m antecessore. The heir is the same person with the ancestor. Co. Litt. 22.

 

Haeres haeredis mei est meus haeres. The heir of my heir is my heir.

 

Haeres legitimus est quem nuptiae demonstrant. He is the lawful heir whom the marriage demonstrates.

 

RIGHTS OF FATHERS

 

 Rights never die. [Bouvier’s 1856 Law Dictionary]

 

 

Nulli enim res sua servit jure servitutis. “No one can have a servitude over his own property.” Dig 8, 2, 26; 17 Mass. 443; 2 Bov. Inst. n.

1600.

 

Defendit vim et injuriam. He defends the force and injury.

 

Remisus imperanti melius paretur. “A [father] commanding not too strictly is best obeyed.” 3 Co. Inst. 233.

 Qui providet sibi, providet haredibus. He who provides for himself, provides for his heirs.

 

Vir et uxor consentur in lege una persona. Husband and wife are considered one person in law. Co. Litt. 112.

Privilegium est beneficium personale et extinguitur c*m person . A

privilege is a personal benefit and dies with the person. 3 Buls. 8.

Patria potestas in pietate debet, non in atrocitate consistere. Paternal power should consist in affection, not in atrocity.

Nemo potest sibi devere. No one can owe to himself. See Confusion of

Rights.

 

 Matrimonia debent esse libera. Marriages ought to be free.

 

Nemo de domo sua extrahi debet. “A citizen cannot be taken by force from his house to be conducted before a judge or to prison. Dig. 50, 17.

 

 Where two rights concur, the more ancient shall be preferred.

 

Omnia quae sunt uxoris sunt ipsius viri. All things which are of the wife, belong to the husband. Co. Litt. 112.

 

 "Invito beneficium non datur- No one is obliged to accept a benefit against his consent." Bouvier's Law Dictionary (1914), "Maxim," p,

2140).[No officer can compel any Good and Lawful Man to get a license, benefit, or privilege in commerce.]

 

Nemo praesumitur alienam posteritatem suae praetulisse. NO one is presumed to have preferred another's posterity to his own.

 

Quicpuid acquiritur servo, acquiritur domino. Whatever is acquired by the servant, is acquired for the master. 15 Bin. Ab. 327.

 

Quod ad jus naturale attinet, omnes homenes aequales sunt. All men are equal before the natural law. Dig. 50, 17, 32.

 

Nuptias non concubitas, sed consensus facit. Cohabitation does not make the marriage, it is the consent of the parties. Dig 50, 17, 30; 1

Bouv. Inst. n. 239; Co. Litt. 33.

 

Matrimonium subsequens tollit peccatum praecedens. A subsequent marriage cures preceding criminality.

 

Pater is est quem nuptiae demonstrant. The father is he whom the marriage points out. 1 Bl. Com. 446; 7 mart. N. S. 548, 553; Dig. 2, 4, 5;

1 Bouv. Inst. n. 273, 304, 322.

 

Qui jure suo utitur, nemini facit injuriam. He who uses his legal rights, harms no one.

 

Pecata contra naturam sunt gravissima. “Offenses against nature are the gravest. 3 Co. Inst. 20.

 

Patria Potestas “In Roman law, paternal authority; the paternal power. This term denotes the aggregate of those peculiar powers and rights which by the civil law of Rome, belonged to the head of a family

in respect to his wife, children (natural or adopted), and any more remote descendants who sprang from him through males only. Anciently, it was of very extensive reach, embracing even the power of life and death, but was gradually curtailed, until finally it amounted to little more than a right in the paterfamilias to hold as his own any property or acquisitions of one under his power. [Blacks Law Dictionary, 6th Ed., pg. 1127]

 

Sui Juris: “Of his own right; possessing full social and civil rights; not under any legal disability to act for one’s self. (See Emancipation: Majority) [Black’s Law Dictionary, 6th Ed., pg. 1434]

 

 

RIGHTS OF CHILDREN

 

 

Si quis custos fraudem pupillo fecerit, a tutela removendus est. “If a guardian behave fraudulently to his ward, he shall be removed from guardianship Jenk. Cent. 39.

 

Solus Deus haeredem facit. God alone makes the heir.

 

The Child knows his Fathers bed the best.

 

 Qui doit inheritoer al p re, doit inheriter al fitz. He who ought to inherit from the father, ought to inherit from the son.

 

Qui in utero est, pro jam nato habetur quoties de ejus commodo quaeritur. He who is in the womb, is considered as born, whenever it is for his benefit. (There can be no abortions due to this maxim.)

 

 

 Pueri sunt de sanguine parentum, sed pater et mater non sunt de sanguine puerorum. Children are of the blood of their parents, but the father and mother are not the blood of their children. 3 Co. 40.

 

FRAUD

 

Once a fraud, always a fraud. 13 Vin. Ab. 539.

 

Jus et fradem numquam cohabitant. “Right and fraud never go together.

 

Malum hominun est obviandum. The malice of men is to be avoided. 4

Co. 15.

 

Fraus est celare fraudem. It is a fraud to conceal a fraud. 1 Vern. 270.

 

Fraus est odiosa et non praesumenda. Fraud is odious and not to be presumed. Cro. Car. 550.

 

Fraus et dolus nemini patrocianari debent. Fraud and deceit should excuse no man. 3 Co. 78.

 

Fraus et jus numquam cohabitant. Fraud and justice never agree together. Wing. 680.

 

Fraus latet in generalibus. Fraud lies hid in general expressions

 

Fraus meretur fraudem. Fraud deserves fraud. Plow. 100. This is very doubtful morality.

 

Frustr legis auxilium quaerit qui in legem committit. Vainly does he who offends against the law, seek the help of the law.

 

Quod initio vitiosum est, non potest tractu temporis convalescere. “Time cannot render valid, an act void in its origin.” Dig. 50, 17, 29.

 

Qui semel malus, semper prasumitur esse malus in eodem genere. He who is once bad, is presumed to be always so, in the same degree. Cro. Car. 317.

 

 

Qui per fraudem agit, frustra agit. He who acts fraudrlently acts in vain. 2 Roll. R. 17.

 

MOTHERS OBTAIN BENEFIT OF CUSTODY OF CHIDLREN MUST BEAR BURDEN:

 

 Accouchement-- “The act of a woman in giving birth to a child. The fact of the accouchement, which may be proved by the direct testimony of one who was present, as a physician or midwife, is often important evidence in proving parentage. [Blacks Law, 6th Ed. p. 18]

 

Secundum naturam est, commoda cujusque rei eum sequi, quem sequentur incommoda. It is natural that he who bears the charge of a thing, should receive the profits. Dig. 50, 17, 10.

 

Faemina ab omnibus officiis civilibus vel publicis remotae sunt.

Women are excluded from all civil and public charges or offices. Dig.

50, 17, 2.

 

Nemo plus juris ad alienum transfere potest, quam ispe habent. One cannot transfer to another a right which he has not. Dig. 50, 17, 54; 10

Pet. 161, 175.

 

 "Non dat qui non habet---He gives nothing who has nothing.

"Bouvier's Law Dictionary (1914),"Maxim,"p.2149, [No legislative body

 

or man can convey any authority or jurisdiction he does not possess over common Rights vested by God in another. Because legislative powers

are limited, all powers derived from legislative acts are limited.]

 

Nul ne doit s'enrichir aux depens des autres. No one ought to enrich himself at the expense of others.

 

Qui ex damnato coitu nascuntur, inter liberos non computantur. He who is born of an illicit union, is not counted among the children. Co. Litt. 8. See 1 Bouv. Inst. n. 289.

 

CLEAN HANDS

 

Qui accusat integrae famae sit et non criminosus. Let him who accuses be of a clear fame, and not criminal. 3 Co. Inst. 26.

 

He who does not have clean hands, cannot benefit from the law.

 

Jus ex injuria non oritur. “A right cannot arise from a wrong.” 4 Bin

639.

 

Qui primum peccat ille facit rixam. He who first offends, causes the strife.

 

 He who has committed iniquity, shall not have equity. Francis' Max., Max. 2.

 

Qui male agit, odit lucem. “He who acts badly, hates the light. 7 Co. 66.

 

Nemo ex suo delecto melioroem suam conditionem facere potest. “No one can improve his condition by a crime.” Dig. 50, 17, 137.

 

Nemo punitur pro alieno delecto. “No one is to be punished for the crime or wrong of another. Bouviers Law Dictionary, pg 38.

 

Nul ne doit s’enrichir aux depens des autres. “no one ought to enrich himself at the expense of others.”

 

Nul prendra advantage de son tort demesne. “No one shall take advantage of his own wrong.”

 

Que sentit commodum, sentiere debet et onus. “He who derives a

benefit from a thing, ought to feel the disadvantages attending it.” 2 Bouv. Inst. n. 1433.

 

 

Omne actum ab intentione agentis est judicandum. “Every act is to be estimated by the intention of the doer.” Bouvier’s Dictionary, 1856, pg.

45.

 

Nul prendra advantage de son tort demesne. No one shall take advantage of his own wrong.

 

Nullus commodum capere potest de injuri su propri . No one shall take advantage of his own wrong. Co. Litt. 148.

 

EVERY SOVEREIGN MUST KNOW THE LAW (Natural/Common Law)

 

Idem est scire aut scire debet aut potuisse. To be able to know is the same as to know. This maxim is applied to the duty of every one to know the law.

 

Id possumus quod de jure possumus. We may do what is allowed by law. Lane, 116.

 

Ignorantia excusatur, non juris sed facti. Ignorance of fact may excuse, but not ignorance of law. See Ignorance.

 

Ignorantia legis neminem excusat. Ignorance of fact may excuse, but not ignorance of law. 4 Bouv. Inst. n. 3828.

 

Impotentia excusat legem. Impossibility excuses the law. Co. Litt. 29.

 

In criminalibus, probationes bedent esse luce clariores. In criminal cases, the proofs ought to be clearer than the light. 3 Co. inst. 210.

 

Non in legendo sed in intelligendo leges consistunt. The laws consist not in being read, but in being understood. 8 co. 167.

 

In judiciis minori aetati sucuritur. In judicial proceedings, infancy is aided or favored.

 

Non nasci, et natum mori, pari sunt. Not to be born, and to be dead born, is the same.

 

Mortuus exitus non est exitus. To be dead born is not to be born. Co.

Litt. 29. See 2 Paige, 35; Domat, liv. pr l. t. 2, s. 1, n. 4, 6; 2 Bouv. Inst. n. 1721 and 1935.

 

JUDGES

 

Judicium a non suo judice datum nullius est momenti. “A judgement given by an improper judge is of no moment. 11 Co. 76.

 

Judici oficium suum excedenti non paretur. “To a judge who exceeds his office or jurisdiction no obedience is due. Jenk. Cent. 139.

Judex non potest inuriam sibi datum punier. “A judge cannot punish a wrong done to himself.” 12 Co. 113.

 Judex non potest esse testis in propri caus. A judge cannot be a witness in

his own cause. 4 Co. Inst. 279.

 

 No one may be judge in his own cause.

 

Testis nemo in su caus esse potest. No one can be a witness in his own cause. [Bouvier’s 1856]

 

Judex est lex loquens. The judge is the speaking law. 7 co. 4.

 

Ubi non est condendi auctorias ibi non est parendi necessitas. “Where there is no authority to enforce, there is no authority to obey.” Dav. 69.

 

Officia magistratus non debent esse venalia. The offices of magistrates ought not to be sold. Co. Litt. 234.

 

Factum judice quod ad ujus officium non spectat, non ratum est. An act of a judge which does not relate to his office, is of no force. 10 Co.

76.

 

Pirata est hostis humani generis. A pirate is an enemy of the human race. 3 Co. Inst. 113.

 

Praxis judicim est interpres legum. The practice of the judges is the interpreter of the laws. Hob. 96.

 

Officium nemini debet esse damnosum. An office ought to be injurious to no one.

 

Si meliores sunt quos ducit amor, plures sunt quos corrigit timer. If many are better led by love, more are corrected by fear. Co. Litt. 392.

Optimam esse legem, quae minimum relinquit arbitrio judicis; id quod certitudo ejus praestat. That law is the best which leaves the least discretion to the judge; and this is an advantage which results from certainty. Bacon, De Aug. Sc. Aph. 8.

 

Optimus judex, qui minimum sibi. He is the best judge who relies as little as possible on his own discretion. Bac. De Aug. Sci. Aph. 46.

 

BLACK'S LAW DICTIONARY, 6th Ed. (13th Reprint 1998), p.

756 reads:

 

Impossibilium nulla obligatio est. There is no obligation to do impossible things.

 

1.) "Nemo debet esse judex in propria causa.----No one should be judge in his own cause."

 

2.) "Nemo debet esse judex in propria sua causa----No man can be judge in his own cause."

 

3.) "In propria causa nemo judex----No one can be judge in his own cause."

 

Officia magistrates non debent esse venalia. “The offices of magistrates ought not to be sold.” Col.Litt. 234.

Quaelibet jurisdictio cancellos suos habet. Every jurisdiction has its bounds.

Paen ad paucos, metus ad omnes perveniat. A punishment inflicted on a few, causes a dread to all. 22 Vin. Ab. 550.

 

Optima est lex, quae minimum relinquit arbitrio judicis. That is the

best system of law which confides as little as possible to the discretion of the judge. Bac. De Aug. Sci. Aph. 46.

 

Nemo praesumitur donare. No one is presumed to give.

 

Nemo praesumitur malus. No one is presumed to be bad.

 

NO ONE CAN BE PUNISHED FOR ANOTHER PERSON’S CRIME

 

Nemo punitur pro alieno delicto. No one is to be punished for the crime or wrong of another.

 

Mora reprobatur in lege. Delay is disapproved of in law.

 

EFFECT OF LAW

 

Lex semper dabit remedium. “The law always gives a remedy.” 3

Bouv. Inst. n. 2411.

 

 Lex semper dabit remedium. The law always gives a remedy. 3 Bouv. Inst. n. 2411.

 

Lex nemini facit injuriam. “The Law does wrong to no one.”

 

Lex nemini operatur inquum, nemini facit injuriam. “The law never works an injury, or does him a wrong. Jenk. Cent. 22.

 

Melius est recurrere quam malo currere. “It is better to recede than to proceed in evil.” 4 Inst. 176.

 

FIFTH AMENDMENT—RIGHT OF DEFENSE

 

Nemo admittendus est inhabilitare seipsum. “No one is allowed to incapacitate himself.” Jenk. Cent. 40

 

Nemo tenetur sssseipsum accusare. “No man is bound to accuse himself.” Bouviers Law Dictionary, 1856, pg 40.

 

Nemo prohibetur pluribus defensionibus uti. No one is restrained from using several defences. Co. Litt. 304.

 

 “The pig does not skin himself.”

 

 

Nemo Cogitur rem suam vendere, etiam justo pretio. “No one is bound to sell his property, even for a just price.” Sed vide Eminent Domain. 2 Inst. 66.

 

 Majus est delictum seipsum occidare quam alium. it is a greater crime to kill one's self than another.

 

Nemo tenetur armare adversarum contra se. No one is bound to arm his adversary.

 

 No man is presumed to do anything against nature. 22 Vin. Ab. 154.

 

 One may not do an act to himself.

 

IMPOSSIBILITY

 

A l'impossible nul n'est tenu. No one is bound to do what is impossible.

1 Bouv. Inst. n. 601.

 

Nemo tenetur ad impossibile. No one is bound to an impossibility.

 BLACK'S LAW DICTIONARY, 7th Ed. (1999), Appendix A, pp.

1615-1701 lists legal maxims, among which I found, at p. 1653:

Lex non cogit ad impossibilia. The law does not compel to impossible ends.

Lex non intendi aliquid impossibile. The law does not intend anything impossible.

 

Lex neminem cogit ad vana seu inutilia peragenda. The law forces no one to do vain or useless things.

Nihil quod inconveniens est licitum est. Nothing inconvenient is lawful.

 

IMPRISONMENT FOR A DEBT EVEN FOR THE SHORTEST TIME, FULLY DISCHARGES THE DEBT

 

Minima paena corporalis est major qualibet pecuniari . The smallest bodily punishment is greater than any pecuniary one. 2 Inst. 220.

Nulli enim res sua servit jure servitutis. “No one can have a servitude over his own property.” Dig 8, 2, 26; 17 Mass. 443; 2 Bov. Inst. n. 1600.

 

TRUTH MUST PREVIAL IN COURT

 

Nihil possumus contra veritatem. We can do nothing against truth.

Doct.& Stu. Dial. 2, c. 6.

 

Lex est norma recti. Law is a rule of right.

 

Malum non praesumitur. Evil is not presumed. 4 Co. 72.

 

Malus usus est abolendus. An evil custom is to be abolished. Co. Litt.

141.

 

Praetextu liciti non debet admitti illicitum. Under pretext of legality, what is illegal ought not to be admitted. 10 Co. 88.

 

Ipsae legis cupiunt ut jure regantur. The laws themselves require that they should be governed by right. Co. Litt. 174.

 

Qnicquid est contra normam recti est injuria. Whatever is against the rule of right, is a wrong. 3 Buls. 313.

 

 

Malum quo communius eo pejus. The more common the evil, the worse.

 

Quod per recordum probatum, non debet esse negatum. “What is proved by the record, ought not to be denied.” Bouviers Law Dictionary, 1856, pg. 62.

 

Facta sunt potentiora verbis. Facts are more powerful than words.

 

Lex punit mendacium. “The law punishes falsehood.”

 

 

A verbis legis non est recedendum. From the words of the law there must be no departure. Broom's Max. 268; 5 Rep. 119; Wing. Max. 25.

 

Factum negantis nulla probatio. Negative facts are not proof.

 

Rei turpis nullum mandatum est. A mandate of an illegal thing is void.

Dig. 17, 1, 6, 3.

 

Ratio potest allegari deficiente lege, sed vera et legalis et non apparens. Reason may be alleged when the law is defective, but it must be true and legal reason, and not merely apparent. 6 Co. Litt. 191.

 

Qui non libere veritatem pronunciat, proditor est verilatis. He who does not willingly speak the truth, is a betrayer of the truth.

 

Perspicua vera non sunt probanda. Plain truths need not be proved.

Co. Litt. 16.

 

 

Non faciat malum, ut inde veniat bonum. You are not to do evil that good may come of it. 11 Co. 74.

 

Nemo punitur sine injuria facto, seu defalto. “No one is punished unless for some wrong act or default.” 2 Co. Inst. 287.

 

Non videtur consensum retinuisse si quis ex praescripto minantis aliquid immutavit. “He does not appear to have retained his consent, if he have changed anything through the means of a party threatening.” Bacon’s Max. Reg. 33.

 

BLACK'S LAW DICTIONARY, 6th Ed. (13th Reprint 1998), p. 756 reads:

 

Impossibilium nulla obligatio est [pronunciation omitted]. There is no obligation to do impossible things.

 

1.) "Nemo debet esse judex in propria causa----No one should be judge in his own case."

 

2.) "Nemo debet esse judex in propria sua causa----No man can be judge in his own cause."

 

3.) "In propria causa nemo judex----No one can be judge in his own cause."

 

REASON MUST BE IN THE LAW

 

Ratio est legis anima, mutata legis ratione mutatur et lex. Reason is the soul of the law; the reason of the law being changed, the law is also changed.

 

Ratio est radius divini luminis. Reason is a ray of divine light. Co. Litt. 232.

Ratio et auctoritas duo clarisima mundi limina. Reason and authority are the two brightest lights in the world. 4 Co. Inst. 320.

Ratio in jure aequitas integra. Reason in law is perfect equity.

 

Ratio legis est anima legis. The reason of the law is the soul of the law.

 

Ratio non clauditur loco. Reason is not confined to any place.

Nihil quod est contra rationem est licitum. Nothing against reason is lawful. Co. Litt. 97.

 

LAW

 

Lex semper dabit remedium. The law always gives a remedy. 3 Bouv. Inst. n. 2411.

Liberum corpus aestimationem non recipit. The body of a freeman does not admit of valuation.

Lex semper intendit quod convenit ratione. The law always intends what is agreeable to reason. Co. Litt. 78.

Lex plus laudatur quando ratione probatur. The law is the more praised when it is consonant to reason.

Lex non deficit in justitia exibenda. The law does not fail in showing justice.

Lex non intendit aliquid impossibile. The law intends not anything impossible. 12

Co. 89.

Lex non praecipit inutilia, quia inutilis labor stultus. The law commands not useles things, because useless labor is foolish. Co. Litt. 197.

 

Lex non cogit ad impossibilia. The forces not to impossibilities. Hob. 96. Lex nemini facit injuriam. The law does wrong to no one.

 

Saepe viatorim nova non vetus orbita fallit. Often it is the new road, not the old one, which deceives the traveller. 4 Co. Inst. 34.

 

Lex est ratio summa, quae jubet quae sunt utilia et necessaria, et contraria prohibet. Law is the perfection of reason, which commands what is useful and necessary and forbids the contrary. Co. Litt. 319.

 

Lex est dictamen rationis. Law is the dictate of reason. Jenk. Cent. 117.

Solemnitas juris sunt observandae. “The solemnities of law are to be observed.” Jenk.Cent. 13.

 

Legibus sumptis disinentibus, lege naturae utendum est. When laws imposed by the state fail, we must act by the law of nature. 2 Roll. R.

298.

A Privilegium est quasi privata lex. A privilege is, as it were, a private law. 2 Buls. 8.

 

Regula pro lege, si deficit lex. “In default of the law, the maxim rules.” Bouviers

Law Dictionary, 1856, pg. 65.

 

 

Leges humanae nascuntur, vivunt et moriuntur. Human laws are born, live and die.

7 co. 25.

 

Le contrat fait la loi. The contract makes the law.

 

Fiat justitia ruat caelum. Let justice be done, though the heavens should fall.

 

 

 

STRICT CONSTRUCTION OF THE LAW

 

Potestas stricte interpretatur. “Power ought to be strictly interpreted.” Bouvier’s Law Dictionary, 1856, pg. 52.

 

A verbis legis non est recedendum. From the words of the law there must be no departure. Broom's Max. 268; 5 Rep. 119; Wing. Max. 25.

 

Paena ad paucos, metus ad omnes perveniat. “A punishment inflicted on a few, causes a dread to all.” 22 Vin. Ab. 550.

 

 Mandata licita recipiunt strictam interpretationem, sed illicita latam et extensam. Lawful commands receive a strict interpretation, but unlawful, a wide or broad construction. Bacon's Max. Reg. 16.

 

 

 When the common law and statute law concur, the common law is to be preferred. 4 Co. 71.

 

Statuta pro publico commodo late interpretantur. Statutes made for the public good ought to be liberally construed. Jenk. Cent. 21.

 

 

Sequi debet potentia justitiam, non praecedere. Power should follow justice, not precede it. 2 Co. Inst. 454.

 

Non alio modo puniatur aliquis, quam secundum quod se habet condemnatio. A person may not be punished differently than according to what the sentence enjoins. 3 Co. Inst. 217.

 

 

Potestas strict interpretatur. Power should be strictly interpreted.

 

 

Si a jure discedas vagus eris, et erunt omnia omnibus incerta. If you depart from the law, you will wander without a guide, and everything will be in a state of uncertainty to every one. Co. Litt. 227.

 

Non faciat malum, ut inde veniat bonum. You are not to do evil that good may come of it. 11 Co. 74.

 

 

Paenae potius molliendae quam exasperendae sunt. Punishments should rather be softened than aggravated. 3 Co. Inst. 220.

 

Paci sunt maxime contraria, vis et injuria. Force and wrong are greatly contrary to peace. Co. Litt. 161.

 

 

 

 

THREE (3) ELEMENTS OF EVERY CRIME: “Every” crime must have all three of these following elements in which to be a crime under law. Not two of the three. Not one of the three—but all three. (Failure to provide 99.9% of the time does not meet this requirement (Father is either forced or driven out of child’s life, Father is usually poor and financially debilitated, or Father does not owe as either a crime or great dishonor has been committed against him).

 

 

1.) Mens Rea -- “An element of criminal responsibility: a guilty mind; a guilty or wrongful purpose; a criminal intent. Guilty knowledge and wilfulness. United

States v. Greenbaum, C.C.A.N.J., 138 F2d 437, 438. See Model Penal Code Section

2.02. See also Criminal (Criminal Intent). [Blacks Law Dictionary, 6th Ed. p. 985]

 

 

2.) Actus reus -- “The guilty act.” A wrongful deed which renders the actor criminally liable if combined with mens rea. The actus reus is the physical aspect of a crime, whereas the mens rea (guilty mind) involves the intent factor. [Blacks Law, 6th Ed. p. 36]

 

 

3.) Corpus Delecti -- “The body of a crime. The body (material substance) upon which a crime has been committed, e.g., the corpse of a murdered man, the charred remains of a house burned down. In a derivative sense, the objective proof or substantial fact that a crime has been committed. The “corpus delecti” of a crime is the body, foundation or substance of the crime, which ordinarily includes two elements, the act and the criminal agency of the act. State v. Edwards, 49 Ohio St.2d 31, 358 N.E.2d 1051, 1055. [Blacks Law Dictionary,

6th Ed. 344]

 

Act malum in se (See malum in se) [REAL CRIME] “A wrong in itself; an act or case involving illegality from the very nature of the transaction, upon principals of natural, moral, and public law. Grindstaff v. State, 214 Tenn. 58, 377 S.W.2d 921,

926; State v. Shedoudy, 45 N.M. 516, 118 P.2d 280, 287. An act is said to be

malum in se when it is inherently and essentially7 evil, that is, immoral in its nature and injurious in its consequences, without any regard to the fact of its being noticed or punished by the law of the state. Such are most or all of the offenses cognizable

 

at common law (without the denouncement of a statute; as murder, larceny, etc.

Compare Malum Prohibitum. [Blacks Law Dictionary, 6th Ed., p. 959]

 

 

 

Act malum prohibitum (See Malum prohibitum). [A CRIME JUST BECAUSE GOVERNMENT MAKES IT A CRIME] “A wrong prohibited; a thing which is wrong because [it is] prohibited; an act which is not inherently immoral, but becomes so because its commission is expressly forbidden by positive law; an act involving an illegality resulting from positive law. [Blacks Law Dictionary, 6th Ed., pg. 960]

 

 

 

 

OLD LAW—NOT NEW LAW IS TO BE PREFERRED AND PROTECTED

 

Quae praeter consuetudinem et morem majorum fiunt, neque placent, necque recta videntur. “What is done contrary to the custom of our ancestors, neither pleases nor appears right.” 4 Co. 78.

 

 

Quae contra ratioonem juris introducta sunt, non debent trahi in consequentiam. “Things introducted contrary to the reason of the law, ought not to be drawn into precedents.” 12 Co. 75.

 

 

 “When the common law and the stature law concur, the common law is to be preferred.” 4 Co. 71.

 

Quod initio vitiosum est, non potest tractu temporis convalescere. "Time cannot render valid an act void in its origin." Dig. 50, 17, 29.

 

 

Periculosum est res novas et inusitatas inducere. “It is dangerous to introduce new and dangerous things.” Co.Litt. 379.

 

 

 

SILENCE—NOT RESPONDING TO ATTACKS BY GOVERNMENT

 

Qui tacet consentire videtur. He who is silent appears to consent. Jenk.

Cent. 32.

 

Quod per me non possum, nec per alium. What I cannot do in person, I

cannot do by proxy. 4 Co. 24.

 

 

Qui non propulsat injuriam quando potest, infert. He who does not repel a wrong when he can, induces it. Jenk. Cent. 271.

 

Melius est recurrere quam malo currere. It is better to recede than to proceed in evil. 4 Inst. 176.

 

Melius est omnia mala pati quam malo concentire. It is better to suffer every wrong or ill, than to consent to it. 3 Co. Inst. 23.

 

 

Nihil simul inventum est et perfectum. Nothing is invented and perfected at the same moment. Co. Litt. 230.

 

Statutum generaliter est intelligendum quaudo verva statuti sunt specialia, ratio autem generalis. When the words of a statute are special, but the reason of it general, it is to be understood generally. 10 Co. 101.

 

PROCEEDURE OF LAW

 

Origo rei inspici debet. The origin of a thing ought to be inquired into. 1 Co. 99.

 

Sensus verborum est anima legis. The meaning of words is the spirit of the law. 5

Co. 2.

 

 

Semper necessitas probandi incumbit qui agit. The claimant is always bound to prove: the burden of proof lies on him.

 

Finis rei attendendus est. The end of a thing is to be attended to. 3 Co. Inst. 51.

 

Finis finem litibus imponit. The end puts an end to litigation. 3 Inst. 78.

 

 

Firmior et potentior est operatio legis quam dispositio hominis. The disposition of law is firmer and more powerful than the will of man. Co. Litt. 102.

 

Forma legalis forma essentialis. Legal form is essential form. 10 Co. 100.

 

Forma non observata, inferiur adnullatio actus. When form is not observed a nullity of the act is inferred. 12 Co. 7.

 

 

 

Sublato fundamento cadit opus. “Remove the foundation, the structure or work fall.” Bouviers Law Dictionary, 1856, pg. 72.

 

Sublato principali tollitur adjunctum. “If the principal be taken away, the adjunct is also taken away.” Co.Litt. 389.

 

 

 

 

Actio tutelae -- Action founded on the duties or obligations arising on the relation analogous to that of guardian and ward. [Blacks Law, 6th Ed. p. 32]

 

Actio stricti juris -- An action of strict right. The class of civil law personal actions which were adjudged only by the strict law, and in which the judge was limited to

the precise language of the formula, and had no discretionary power to regard and bona fides of the transaction. [Blacks Law, 6th Ed. p. 32]

 

Actus Dei nemini facit injuriam -- The act of God does injury to no one. 1

Bl.Comm. 122. A thing which is inevitable by the act of God, which no industry

can avoid, nor policy prevent, will not be construed to the prejudice of any person in whom there was no laches.

 

Actore non probante reus absolvitur -- When the plaintiff does not prove his case the defendant is acquitted (or absolved).

 

 

Nihil tam naturale est, qu m eo genere quidque dissolvere, quo colligatum est. It is very natural that an obligation should not be dissolved but by the same principles which were observed in contracting it. Dig. 50, 17, 35. See 1 Co. 100; 2 Co. Inst.

359.

 

Cujusque rei potissima pars principium est-- The principal part of everything is in the beginning.

 

 

 

Potior est conditio defendentis. Better is the condition of the defendant, than that of the plaintiff.

 

 

Non observata forma, infertur adnullatio actus. When the form is not observed, it is inferred that the act is annulled. 12 Co. 7.

 

Omne testamentum morte consummatum est. Every will is consummated by death. 3

Co. 29.

 

Praetextu liciti non debet admitti illicitum. Under pretext of legality, what is illegal ought not to be admitted. [Blacks Law 6th Ed., pg. 1175]

 

 

 

REBUTTAL TO THOSE WHO SAY “I’M ONLY DOING MY JOB.”

 

 

Qui potest et debet vetare, jubet. He who can and ought to forbid, and does not, commands.

 

 

Qui non prohibit quod prohibere potest assentire videtur. He who does not forbid what he can forbid, seems to assent. 2 Inst. 305.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

PROPERTY

 

 

Prohibetur ne quis faciat in suo quod nocere possit alieno. It is prohibited to do on one's own property that which may injure another's. 9 co. 59.

 

Potior est conditio possidentis. Better is the condition of the possessor.

 

 

Privatorum conventio juri publico non derogat. Private agreements cannot derogate from public law. Dig. 50, 17, 45, 1.

 

 

Potest quis renunciare pro se, et suis, juri quod pro se introductum est. A man may relinquish, for himself and his heirs, a right which was introduced for his own benefit. See 1 Bouv. Inst. n. 83.

 

Possession is a good title, where no better title appears. 20 Vin. Ab. 278.

 

 

Parte quacumque integranta sublata, tollitur totum. An integral part being taken away, the whole is taken away. 3 Co. 41.

 

Pacta privata juri publico derogare non possunt. Private contracts cannot derogate from the public law. 7 Co. 23.



 

























  1. THAT I, Peter - Jason: Helfrich, the Undersigned, herewith and herein demand of ALL PARTIES involved in anyway in this so-called cause of action, who attempt or continue to proceed against me or my properties in the instant cause of action in any way, furnish answers to the following:
  2. a) Where is the real and true Commercial Paperwork bearing on this instant matter that made me liable?
    b) Where are the real, true, proper and lawful assessments bearing on this instant matter that I am said to be liable?
    c) Where is the itemized statement, ledger and accounting for services rendered with respect to this instant matter?
    d) What or who are the Parties engaging in fair business practices in the instant matter?
    e) Where is the full disclosure bearing on all matters pertaining to this instant matter?
    f) Where is the clean hands?
    g) Where is the good faith action?
    h) Where are the truth, mercy, grace, and all similar just and virtuous qualities and proceedings based on them that are supposed to inhere in commerce and the Uniform Commercial Code?
  • Where is the contract(s) that clearly states this Affiant gave away his daughter Shelldekai: Helfrich to Cynthia Castillo, and/ or the the "State of Nevada" and/or the "United States" and/or the “United Nations” and/or the “Vatican” knowingly, voluntarily, willingly and intentionally?
  1. THAT all parties who act against this Affiant on their alleged basis must produce the Commercial Affidavits of TRUTH, sworn by the claimants to be "true, correct, and complete (certain)," which prove the origin and foundation of their claims and include providing the contract(s) or agreement(s) with the signature of this Affiant thereon wherein this Affiant has knowingly, intentionally, and voluntarily, in full legal and lawful capacity, agreed to waive or surrender rights to Father / Parent/ and Attorney In Fact In Behalf Of Shelldekai: Helfrich, to Cynthia Castillo, the "State of Nevada" its Principals/Agents, etc., or the "United States”, or the “United Nations”, or the “Vatican”, or agreed to become subject to or the slave or property of said entities in any way or in any jurisdiction whatsoever.
  2. In order for a crime to exist, four elements must exist; there must be a defined crime, there must be a victim, that the victim must have been damaged, and the intent must be established on the part of the accused. Without proof of all four elements, no crime can said to have been committed. In this Affidavit, crimes are defined, the Affiant is the victim, this Affidavit verifies the damages, and the intent is established at the end of the thirty (30) day grace period, if the respondents fail to rebut (respond to) the wrongs they have been a party to as noted herein.
  3. NOTICE is hereby given, and demands made, on all Claimants -- Cynthia Castillo [parties/Respondent(s)], [ANY & ALL other Officials, Attorneys, Judges, etc.], and any other involved Parties, that:
  4. a) ALL properties (etc.) taken unlawfully = Shelldekai: Helfrich, removed in violation of commerce, or otherwise converted, sold, or seized by Cynthia Castillo, etc., et.al.

, or other Parties in collusion therewith, Shelldekai: Helfrich

be immediately returned IN FULL VALUE ($ ) PLUS 10% to Peter - Jason: Helfrich

, the Undersigned Affiant, justly possessing the lawful and legal title and Power of Attorney In Fact In Behalf of Shelldekai: Helfrich thereto; OR
b) All Parties who proceed to act or assist in said actions, against this Affiant, Peter - Jason: Helfrich, without thorough, verifiable, point-by-point rebuttal of each and every point set forth in this Affidavit shall be immediately charged with criminal fraud, theft, conspiracy against rights, kidnapping, and commercial liens shall be placed against all their real and personal properties

(kidnapping, criminal conspiracy, United States Criminal Code Title 18 Section 4 misprision of felony, 241 conspiracy against the rights of citizens,1001 fraud and false statements, and other such crimes as are related to issues of RACKETEERING 18 USC 1961, plus such Constitutional violations not listed in the Criminal Codes combined and described simply as TREASON); and
c) All court costs and legal fees [including, but not limited to my hourly Fee / Rate of $250 per hour for my time, effort, labor, etc.] relating to this instant case shall be paid by those who have drawn the undersigned Affiant Peter – Jason: Helfrich into this instant matter; AND

  1. THAT failure to respond as herein required to this Affiant, within the herein a prescribed time of thirty (30) days will be deemed by this Affiant to invoke the doctrine of acquiescence and admission, to recover, in commerce, the lost or damaged properties plus damages, penalties and costs.
  2. THAT in light of the foregoing declarations, all alleged contracts and agreements between this Affiant, Peter – Jason: Helfrich, Cynthia Castillo, the “State of Nevada”, its Principals/Agents, etc., or the "United States", or the “United Nations”, or the “Vatican”, etc., are unconscionable and baseless. I herein, hereby and herewith revoke, disavow, and renounce my signature on any and all documents, instruments, or forms I may have ever signed with Cynthia Castillo, the “State of Nevada”, its Principals/Agents, etc., or the "United States," or any other parties or entities whatsoever that might purport to have furnished any contractual agreement or nexus between myself and Cynthia Castillo, the “State of Nevada”, its Principals/Agents, etc., or the "United States, or the “United Nations”, or the “Vatican”, etc.".
  3. THAT this Commercial Affidavit, Notice and Warning of Commercial Grace, is the ONE AND ONLY such Notice and Warning. If Shelldekai: Helfrich is not returned to Peter – Jason: Helfrich, and /or any other actions against me on their basis are not abated within thirty (30) days, or if at any time in the future anyone or “anything” attempts to/or succeeds in kidnapping Shelldekai: Helfrich from her Natural Father and Power of Attorney In Fact Peter – Jason: Helfrich, or any other legal action(s), etc., based thereon are reinstituted against me, it shall be considered a willful disregard for this Notice and Warning, and such shall engender the immediate filing of Criminal Complaints (Affidavits of Information) and Commercial Liens (Affidavits of Obligation) against all parties involved.



  1. THAT the foundation of Commercial Law, being based on certain eternally just, valid, and moral precepts, has remained unchanged for at least six (6) millennia. Said Commercial Law forms the underpinnings of Western Civilization if not all Nations, Law, and Commerce in the world, is NON-JUDICIAL, and is prior and superior to, the basis of, and cannot be set aside or overruled by, the laws and statutes of any governments, legislatures, quasi-governmental agencies, or courts. It is therefore an inherent obligation on all Authorities, Officials, Governments, Legislatures, Governmental or Quasi-governmental Agencies, Courts, Judges, Attorneys, and all aspects and Agents of all Law Enforcement Agencies to uphold said Commercial Law, without which said entities are violating the just basis of their alleged authority and serving to disintegrate the society they allegedly exist to protect.



  1. FEE & BILLING SCHEDULE UPON LIST OF VIOLATIONS; & INVOICE

*Per Official, Officer, Principal, Agent, or Any Other Law Merchant Involved = state, federal, or international, etc. *; $ = Lawful Gold or Silver Coin

  1. *Kidnapping offspring: $100,000,000 PLUS [+] $75,000 per hour pursuant to Trezevant v. City of Tampa, 746 F.2d 815 (11th Cir. 1984)

× Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Filed: October 11th, 1984

Precedential Status: Precedential

Citations: 746 F.2d 815

Docket Number: 83-3038



  1. *Violations of Rights: $2,000,000.00 (Two Million) lawful US Silver Dollars per occurrence, per officer, or agent involved.

{per Right violated}

  1. *Conspiring Against Rights:$2,000,000.00 (Two Million) lawful US Silver Dollars per occurrence, per officer, or agent involved.

 

  1. *Cruel and Unusual Punishment:$2,000,000.00 (Two Million) lawful US Silver Dollars per occurrence, per officer, or agent involved.
  2. *Retaliation: $2,000,000.00 (Two Million) lawful US Silver Dollars per occurrence, per officer, or agent involved.

 

  1. Peter – Jason: Helfrich's Hourly Rate of $250 for Legal / Secretarial (etc.) work related to this Commercial Affidavit, and all related effort(s); PLUS:
  2. Costs related to Printing, Mailing, Service, etc., and anything else related to prosecuting this Commercial Affidavit, etc.

 

SEE ALSO ATTACHED FEE SCHEDULE BELOW

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

UCC-1 Recorded in California - Secured Transaction Registry Number- On File In Supreme Court of Nevada Clerk of Court's Office; 9th Circuit Court Clerk's Office, etc.

 

ATTENTION AND WARNING!

THIS IS A LEGAL NOTICE AND DEMAND

 

FIAT JUSTITIA, RUAT COELUM

 

(Let right be done, though the heavens should fall)

 

 

EFFECTIVE NUNCE PRO TUNC 8/24/1994

 

 

 

NON WAR POWERS To: All State, Federal and International Public Officials, by and through NEVADA SECRETARY OF STATE Barbara K. Cegavske;

ACT FLAG

and UNITED STATES SECRETARY OF STATE Mike Pompeo

 

TAKE NOTICE IGNORANCE OF THE LAW IS NO EXCUSE

THIS IS A CONTRACT IN ADMIRALTY JURISDICTION

 

Take a moment to read this before you proceed any further.

I do not wish to speak to you under any circumstances excluding federal judicial review

 

THIS TITLE IS FOR YOUR PROTECTION!

 

(1) I, one Peter – Jason: Helfrich, free man, the undersigned, herein request that you present anything that you say to me in writing, signed under penalty of perjury as required by your law as shown in this instrument. Notice to Agent is Notice to Principal. Notice to Principal is Notice to Agent. Attachments are included and are part of this contract.

 

(2) This Notice is in the nature of a Miranda Warning. Take due heed of its contents. If, for any reason, you do not understand any of these statements or warnings, it is incumbent upon you to summon a superior officer, special prosecutor, federal judge, or other competent legal counsel to immediately explain to you the significance of this presentment as per your duties and obligations in respect to this private, formal, notarized, registered Statute Staple Securities Instrument. As per Title 11 USC 501(a), 502(a), 11 USC 7001, 7013, and Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Sections 8-A, AND 13-A, the claim or presumption that I, Peter – Jason: Helfrich, am a DEBTOR to the “UNITED STATES” or any of its agencies or sub-corporations is forever rebutted by this contract. This rebuttal is a counterclaim in Admiralty.

 

 

 

(3) Your Failure to timely do so leaves you in the position of accepting full responsibility for any and all liabilities for monetary damages, as indicated herein, that I incur by any adversely affecting injuries caused by your overt or covert actions, or the actions of any of your fellow public officers and agents in this or any other relevant matters as described herein. You have Thirty (30) days, from the date that this document is received by the Clerk of the Public Record, to respond and rebut the presumptions of this contract by submitting to me signed, certified, authenticated documents of the laws that rebut these presumptions point by point, On and For the Record under penalties of the law including perjury. This document will be on file in the public record; and the clerk in charge of the public record is charged to distribute this to any and all responsible parties, i.e., officers of the court, and/or law enforcement officers including local, state, federal, international, multi-jurisdictional, or any and all officers, representatives, contractors, agencies, or any such entity or person that may bring any type of action, whether civil or criminal or other, against me, and whether in this county, state, region, area, country, corporation, federal zone, or in any venue and/or jurisdiction. Your failure to timely rebut the statements and warnings herein constitute your complete, tacit agreement with all statements and warnings contained herein. Your presumptions that I, the undersigned, am a “Corporate Fiction” or “Legal Entity” and under your corporate “UNITED STATES” jurisdiction are now and forever rebutted.

 

 

4) I, the undersigned, tendering this document, am a Private People of Posterity; a Sovereign Personam Sojourn; by fact; not a 14th amendment citizen or surety within; or subject for; or allegiance to; your corporate “UNITED STATES”; or to any de facto, compact, corporate, commercial states contracting therein; only to the “united States of America,” nonetheless carrying with me exclusive, original, sovereign jurisdiction and venue having one supreme court and United States Court of International Trade. This is a matter of public record, tendered by way of certified mail to NEVADA SECRETARY OF STATE. These pages are also recorded in locations for Public Notice including, but not limited to, Clark County Nevada County Recorders Office.

 

(5) I, the undersigned, now tendering this legally binding Legal Notice and Demand in hand am not a surety under your jurisdiction nor a subject under your corporate veil “Color of Law Venue,“ being acknowledged by silence and acquiescence of Barbara K. Cegavske , respectfully NEVADA SECRETARY OF STATE, also but not limited to any public officers, agents, contractors, assigns, employees, and subsidiaries of your office, regarding my Legal Notice and Demand tendered by certified mail with the public filing location notated.

 

(6) Silence of Corporate Office SECRETARY OF STATE ratifies severances of any nexus or relationship to de facto, corporate, commercial state offices; being fraudulent conveyance by operating under “Color of Authority” upon affiant. Let this be known by the “Good Faith (Oxford) Doctrine” to all men and women. I do not consent to any warrantless searches, or searches that are not compliant with the “Constitution for the united States of America” and/or all of the amendments of the Honorable “Bill of Rights,” whether of my dwellings, cars, land craft, watercraft, aircraft, me, mine, current location, property, hotel rooms, apartments, business records, businesses, or my machinery, vehicles, equipment, supplies, buildings, grounds, land in my private possession or control, past, present, and future, now and forevermore, so help me God.

 

(7) By this record let it be known that I do not at any time waive any rights or protections, as acknowledged by the aforementioned Constitution and/or Honorable “Bill of Rights,” nonetheless, demanding that you protect these as you swore an oath to do so. I accept your lawfully required Oath of Office, bonds of any type, insurance policies, and property of any type for my protection and making whole. Furthermore, should you witness any public officers at this time, or any time past, present, or future violating any of my rights or protections, it is your sworn duty (of oath) to immediately arrest, or have them arrested. You are legally required to charge them as you should any law breaker, regardless of officer’s title, rank, uniform, cloak, badge, position, stature, or office; or you shall henceforth be accountable for monetary damages from, but not limited to, your monetary liability, your corporate bond, your law-required private bond, compensatory costs, punitive procurements, and sanctioned-by-attorney attributions.

 

(8) Note: A true and correct, notarized copy of this Statute Staple Securities Instrument is safely deposited on public record and can be found at Clark County Nevada County Recorders Office. It is my policy to present this document to any officer, agent, or representative that has any interaction with me. I have a lawful right to travel, by whatever means, via land, sea, or air, without any officer, agent, employee, attorney, or judge willfully causing adverse affects or damages upon me by an arrest, detainment, restraint, or deprivation. I will be granted the status and treatment of a foreign Sovereign, a foreign diplomat, by all officials. This document or the deposited copy becomes an evidentiary document certified herein, as if now fully reproduced, should any court action be taken upon me as caused by your acts under color of law with you, your officers, and employees. Take note: You are now monetarily liable in your personal and corporate capacity. I, Peter – Jason: Helfrich, Free man, the undersigned, a Sovereign, notwithstanding anything contrary, abide by all laws in accordance with the aforementioned Constitution and Honorable “Bill of Rights” which are applicable to Sovereigns. I, Peter – Jason: Helfrich, wish no harm to any man. You agree by your non-response to uphold my “Right to Travel”; or you must rebut my presumption by lawfully documented evidence in law On and For the Record, Under Oath and penalty of perjury, within the Thirty (30) days as aforementioned in this Admiralty Contract.

 

(9) BE WARNED, NOTICED, AND ADVISED that I rely upon, in addition to constitutional limits of the “Constitution for the united States of America” and/or the Honorable “Bill of Rights,” governmental authority, the rights and protections guaranteed under Uniform Commercial Codes, common equity law, laws of admiralty, and commercial liens and levies pursuant to, but not limited, to Title 42 (Civil Rights), Title 18 U.S.C.A. (Criminal Codes), Title 28 U.S.C.A. (Civil Codes), and additional Nevada, and / or united states of America constitution penal codes, in as much as they are in compliance with the aforementioned Constitution and/or "Bill of Rights." There can be no violation of any of these laws unless there is a victim consisting of a natural, flesh and blood man or woman who has been damaged. When there is no victim, there is no crime or law broken. Unless this is rebutted within the time limit contained herein, and the conditions of the rebuttal are met, you, or any representative in any capacity of any agency, government, corporation, or the like, agree to abide by this contract anytime that you interact with me. I, Peter – Jason: Helfrich , free man, the undersigned, am of lawful majority age, clear head, and sound mind.

 

(10) Remember, you took a solemn binding oath to protect and defend the original "Constitution for the united States of America" (1787) adopted circa 1791. Violations of said oath are perjury, being a bad-faith doctrine by constructive treason and immoral dishonor. I accept said Oath of Office that you have sworn to uphold. I declare that any and all presumptions that I am a citizen, subject, resident, participant, legal entity, strawman, fiction, or any such thing, of any and all jurisdictions of the UNITED STATES OR ANY OF ITS SUBDIVISIONS, AGENCIES, ENTITIES, DEPARTMENTS, SUBSIDIARIES are now and forever rebutted. You may rebut my presumptions by submitting certified copies of lawful documents that have been certified by a NEVADA state’s attorney while under oath and on the official record and under penalty of perjury and waiving all immunities from prosecution. You have Thirty (30) days to rebut my statements as indicated herein; or my statements will stand as true, lawful, and legal in all of your courts and/or hearings.

 

(11) This legal and timely notice, declaration, and demand is prima facie evidence of sufficient Notice of Grace. The terms and conditions of this presentment agreement are a quasi-contract under the Uniform Commercial Code and Fair Debt Collection Practices Act. These terms and conditions are not subject to any or all immunities that you may claim, should you in any way violate my rights or allow violations by others. Your corporate commercial acts against me or mine and your failures to act on behalf of me or mine are ultra vires and injurious by willful and gross negligence.

 

(12) The liability is upon you, and/or your respondent superior, and upon others including any and all local, state, regional, federal, multi-jurisdictional, international, and/or corporate agencies, and/or persons of the foregoing, involved directly or indirectly with you via any nexus acting with you; and said liability shall be satisfied jointly and/or severally at my discretion. You are sworn to your Oath of Office, and I accept your Oath of Office and your responsibility to uphold the rights of me and mine at all times.

 

 

BILLING COSTS ASSESSED WITH LEVIES AND LIENS UPON VIOLATIONS SHALL BE:

 

(13) Unlawful Arrest, Illegal Arrest, or Restraint, or Distraint, Trespassing/Trespass, without a lawful, correct, and complete 4th amendment warrant: $75,000 per hour lawful US Silver Dollars, per occurrence, per officer, or agent involved.

 

Excessive Bail, Fraudulent Bond, Cruel and Unusual Punishment, Violation of Right to Speedy Trial, Violation of the Right of Freedom of Speech, Conspiracy, Aiding and Abetting, Racketeering, or Abuse of Authority as per Title 18 U.S.C.A., §241 and §242, or definitions contained herein: $2,000,000.00 (Two Million) lawful US Silver Dollars, per occurrence, per officer, or agent involved.

 

Assault or Assault and Battery without Weapon: $3,000,000,000.00 (Three Billion) lawful US Silver Dollars, per occurrence, per officer, or agent involved.

Assault or Assault and Battery with Weapon: $3,000,000,000.00 (Three Billion) lawful US Silver Dollars, per occurrence, per officer, or agent involved.

Unfounded Accusations by Officers of the Court, or Unlawful Determination: $2,000,000.00 (Two Million) lawful US Silver Dollars, per occurrence, per officer, or agent involved.

 

(14) Denial and/or Abuse of Due Process: $2,000,000.00 (Two Million) lawful US Silver Dollars, per occurrence, per officer, or agent involved.

Obstruction of Justice: $2,000,000.00 (Two Million) lawful US Silver Dollars, per occurrence, per officer, or agent involved.

 

Unlawful Distraint, Unlawful Detainer, or False Imprisonment: $5,000,000.00 (Five Million) lawful US Silver Dollars,per day, per occurrence, per officer, or agent involved, plus 18% annual interest.

Reckless Endangerment, Failure to Identify and/or Present Credentials and/or Failure to Charge within 48 (Forty-Eight) Hours after being detained: $2,000,000.00 (Two Million) lawful US Silver Dollars per occurrence, per officer, or agent involved.

 

Counterfeiting Statute Staple Securities Instruments: $2,000,000.00 (Two Million) lawful US Silver Dollars per occurrence, per officer, or agent involved.

(15) Unlawful Detention or Incarceration:$75,000 per hour lawful US Silver Dollars, per occurrence, per officer, or agent involved. See TREZEVANT v. CITY OF TAMPA

Incarceration for Civil or Criminal Contempt of Court without lawful, documented-in-law, and valid reason: $2,000,000.00 (Two Million) lawful US Silver Dollars per day, per occurrence, per officer, or agent involved.

Disrespect by a Judge or Officer of the Court: $2,000,000.00 (Two Million) lawful US Silver Dollars per occurrence, per officer, or agent involved.

Threat, Coercion, Deception, or Attempted Deception by any Officer of the Court: $2,000,000.00 (Two Million) lawful US Silver Dollars per occurrence, per officer, or agent involved.

Unnecessary Restraint: $2,000,000.00 (Two Million) lawful US Silver Dollars, per occurrence, per officer, or agent involved.

Refusal of Lawful Bailment as provided by the aforementioned Constitution and/or Honorable "Bill of Rights”: $2,000,000.00 (Two Million) lawful US Silver Dollars per day of confinement, to be prorated by the hour as per Traficant vs. Florida, per occurrence, per officer, per agent involved.

Coercion or Attempted Coercion of the Natural Man or Woman to take responsibility for the Corporate Strawman against the Natural Man or Woman Secured Party’s Will: $2,000,000.00 (Two Million) lawful US Silver Dollars per occurrence, per officer or agent involved.

The Placing of an Unlawful or Improper Lien, Levy, Impoundments, or Garnishment against any funds, bank accounts, savings accounts, retirement funds, investment funds, social security funds, intellectual property, or any other property belonging to the Natural Man or Woman Secured Party by any agency: $2,000,000.00 (Two Million) lawful US Silver Dollars per occurrence, and $100,000.00 (One Hundred Thousand) lawful US Silver Dollars per day penalty until liens, levies, impoundments, and/or garnishments are ended and all funds reimbursed, and all property returned in the same condition as it was when taken, with 10% annual interest upon the Secured Party’s declared value of property.

Destruction, Deprivation, Concealment, Defacing, Alteration, or Theft, of Property, including buildings, structures, equipment, furniture, fixtures, and supplies belonging to the Natural Man or Woman Secured Party will incur a penalty of total, new replacement costs of property as indicated by Owner and Secured Party, including but not limited to purchase price and labor costs for locating, purchasing, packaging, shipping, handling, transportation, delivery, set up, assembly, installation, tips and fees, permits, replacement of computer information and data, computer hardware and software, computer supplies, office equipment and supplies, or any other legitimate fees and costs associated with total replacement of new items of the same type, like, kind, and/or quality, and quantity as affected items. The list and description of affected property will be provided by the Owner and Secured Party and will be accepted as complete, accurate, and uncontestable by the agency or representative thereof that caused such action. In addition to the aforementioned cost, there will be a $200,000.00 (Two Hundred Thousand) lawful US Silver Dollars per day penalty until property is restored in full, beginning on the first day after the incident, as provided by this contract.













AFFIDAVIT OF FEE SCHEDULE ADDENDUM

NOTICE TO AGENT IS NOTICE TO PRINCIPAL.

NOTICE TO PRINCIPAL IS NOTICE TO AGENT.

NOTICE TO INDIVIDUAL, NATURAL LIVING SOUL IS

NOTICE TO ALL HUMAN BEINGS, and NOTICE TO ALL HUMAN BEINGS IS

NOTICE TO INDIVIDUAL, NATURAL LIVING SOUL.

 

WHEREAS this is a formal notice of a fee schedule for all lawful and unlawful matters relating to their office. For unlawful solicited/unsolicited interference in my private matters and or commercial affairs, the following administrative fees apply:

  1. For each unsolicited phone call---$7,000.00
  2. For each unsolicited letter of harassment---$7,000.00
  3. For each letter that I have to write to RESPONDENTS and/or AGENTS/third parties of due to solicited and/or unsolicited meetings, letters of harassment, or a breach of the Common Law---$7,000.00
  4. For each letter I receive from the commissioner’s office regarding RESPONDENTS/AGENTS/third parties or unlawful letters of harassment---$7,000.00
  5. For each letter I have to write to the Office of Fair Trading---$7,000.00
  6. For each letter I have to write to court services---$25,000.00
  7. For each letter I have to write to Trading Standards---$7,000.00
  8. For each letter I have to write to the police---$50,000.00
  9. For each court appearance---$150,000,000.00
  10. For each phone call I have to make to relevant bodies---$7,000.00 (plus $500 per hour or part thereof-$5.00 per minute)
  11. For each and any lawful/legal counter claim---$150,000,000
  12. For each meeting scheduled or arranged without my consent---$20,000.00
  13. For each HUMAN rights breach---$150,000,000.00
  14. For each individual failure to provide per individual requested evidence, items, documents, proof of certified public oaths, or other lawfully required and requested items/documents for Sovereign Beneficiary’s full, personal inspection, the fee of $15,000.00 per individual breach of this notice shall apply. It is your tacit agreement that these fees become automatically subscribed to by the RESPONDENT (named in due course) if all requested and named items are not sent to the Sovereign Beneficiary with proof of receipt by recorded delivery and signed for within (30) days after receiving this notice.
  15. For each individual failure to perform a directive given by the Sovereign Beneficiary---$150,000,000.00
  16. For each and every use of my privately owned and copyrighted LEGAL NAME---$15,000.00 (or as the fee schedule is otherwise defined on the recorded Copyright Affidavit)
  17. For every direct order given to the Sovereign Beneficiary by a magistrate, a judge, or any so-called government official---$25,000.00

Written permission is required for the express use of my LEGAL NAME, and I do not authorize its use by you or your AGENTS/ third parties. [additional fees apply; keep reading]

It is agreed upon that these fees shall be added together with standard compensation claims, and in all cases, the standard compensation shall also be due to my partner or me for any and all breaches of this Notice, international human rights, the UCC, and/or the Common Law.

This fee schedule is effective from the date of this Notice and will initiate upon any failure to comply with any and directives given to the RESPONDENT by the PEACE and/or Sovereign Beneficiary, receipt of any further unsolicited letters or communications including emails, calls, etc. from RESPONDENTS/AGENTS/THIRD PARTIES, or in the event of any unlawful assault/death/killing/trespass/damages/perjury/liable, injury, loss or harm, any other unlawful activities or action/inaction.

THIS CONTRACT IS LEGALLY AND LAWFULLY BINDING AND IS NON-NEGOTIABLE AND IS ACTIVATED AND SUBSCRIBED TO AUTOMATICALLY BY THE RESPONDENT(s) NAMED IN DUE COURSE BY ALL NAMES RESPONDENTS AND ALL EMPLOYEES, THIRD PARTIES, AGENTS, OR REPRESENTITIVES OF.

ALL RIGHTS RESERVED WITHOUT RECOURSE, I RESERVE THE RIGHT TO ALTER THIS FEE SCHEDULE AT ANY TIME AT THE DISCRETION OF SOVEREIGN BENEFICIARY, MASTER Peter - Jason: Helfrich©, A.K.A. PETER JASON HELFRICH©™ , and any and all derivatives thereof.

Please be advised that these are my fees only and that further compensation from your insurance bonding as well as liens on your personal assets will also be required should you continue to harass and intimidate Me or my family. Failure to confirm ALL correspondence by wet blue ink signature and in writing only will be construed as your non-response. All correspondence must be labeled with full names, titles, and the name and address of your office.

Failure to correctly identify and sign every document in wet ink that is sent by you will be used as evidence that you are not who you say you are, that you attempting to deceive the Sovereign Beneficiary, and that you are attempting to impersonate a Public Official, contrary to Law.

This is a Notice of Fee Schedule and Remedy for Protection from Federal/State/County/City/Municipal/Corporation Employees. I, Peter - Jason: of the family Helfrich [Father: Helfrich] and of the family of Finnegan [Mother: Finnegan], holder of the office of the People in the state known as Nevada or in any other state, am hereby, as a gesture of peace, giving proper notice to the STATE OF NEVADA or any state/corporation, to the UNITED STATES CORPORATION, etc., and to all municipal corporations and other Corporations of the following:

As a peaceful man desiring to avoid conflict and live lawfully with ALL of my freedoms, I am providing you with this Fee Schedule and Remedy for Protection from Federal/State/County/City/Municipal/Corporation Employees as a courtesy to you and as a remedy should you decide to trespass upon Me or my Family. Failure to know or obey any/all of your thousands of corporate regulations does not constitute a crime absent a victim, damaged property, or fraud (A.K.A. corpus delecti ).

If you should face a jury, you should know that the jury has sworn duty to judge the Law and the facts, and the jury can provide just remedy for the People. In every criminal prosecution, it is necessary to establish the “corpus delecti” (i.e., the body or elements of the crime). “The corpus delecti consists of two elements- namely, (1) the injury or loss of harm; and (2) a criminal agency causing them to exist.” (People v. Frey, 165 Cal. 140, 146 [131 P. 127]. People v. Lopez, etc.) Please note that this self-defense Notice of Fee Schedule and Remedy for Personal Protection from Federal/State/County/City/Municipal/Corporation Employees is just and modest and well below the precedent set by Trezevant v. City of Tampa wherein the damages established were $25,000 for 23 minutes of unlawful arrest. This particular remedy calculates to more than $1.5 million per day. Here is my modest Fee Schedule for basic trespass to be considered to by a lawful jury of the People. Lawyer fees and other fees (including applicable late fees) are not included in the following Fee Schedule: [additional fees apply; keep reading];

  1. One Troy ounce of .999 pure gold (or its equivalent in Federal Reserve Notes) per hour for any of my time consumed in detention, imprisonment, or attempts by any law enforcement officer, judge, magistrate, corporate agent, and/or citizen to establish their statutory jurisdiction upon Me or my family without expressed, written consent [additional fees apply; keep reading];
  2. One Troy ounce of .999 pure gold (or its equivalent in Federal Reserve Notes) per hour for violating and of my unalienable rights or any of my family’s unalienable rights under any and all circumstances by any law enforcement officer, judge, magistrate, corporate agent, and/or citizen [additional fees apply; keep reading];
  3. One Troy ounce of .999 pure gold (or its equivalent in Federal Reserve Notes) per detention initiated by any law enforcement officer, judge, magistrate, corporate agent, and/or citizen [additional fees apply; keep reading];
  4. My body’s and that of Shelldekai: Helfrich's weight in .999 pure gold (or its equivalent in Federal Reserve Notes) for the taking of my life and kidnapping my offspring [additional fees apply; keep reading]. This lawful paper is to be honored by the People of the fifty states and the people of the United States for the protection of the People on the land known as any of the fifty states which make up the union known as the Unites States of America. This lawful paper must be honored in any court with any of the fifty states which make up the union known as the Unites States of America. [additional fees apply; keep reading]

The Unites States Supreme Court has stated in “U.S. v. Cruikshank” (92 U.S. 542 at 551) that between the People of the United States, any resident within any state, or any other national that there need be no conflict between any of them. The powers which one possess, the other does not. They are established for different purposes and have separate jurisdictions. Together, they make one whole and furnish the People of the United States with a complete government, ample for protection of all of their rights at home and abroad. It may sometimes happen that a “person” is amenable to both jurisdictions for the same act. It is the natural consequence of a citizen which owes allegiance to two sovereignities and claims protection from both.

The citizen cannot complain because he/she has voluntarily submitted themselves to such a form of government. The opinion in this case is 100% correct as long as one is referring to the People of the United States. Not I, my partner, nor my sons or daughters are of the UNITED STATES, We are of God, the Almighty Creator. Let it be clear that a people is not a person, and a person is not a people. True sovereignty is within the People who have all rights, but citizens, on the other hand, are subjects (by their own voluntary choice) of the state government and of local and federal government corporations in exchange for privileges and rights. Let it be clear that not I or any people of my family are persons/citizens/employees/subjects of any corporation which may, under color of law, act as a legal government. Let it be clear that we have only one Sovereignty, and that Sovereignty is God.

LAW OF NATURE

The Law of Nature is that which God, the Sovereign of the world, has prescribed to man not by any formal promulgation but by the internal dictate of reason alone. It is discovered by a just consideration of the agreeableness of human actions to the nature of Man, and it comprehends all the duties which we owe either to the supreme being, to ourselves, or to our neighbors as reverence to God, self-defense, temperance, honor to our parents, benevolence to all strict adherence to our engagements, gratitude, and the like. In the Constitution for the United States, we find the 11th article, Amendment 9: “The enumeration in the constitution of certain rights shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the People.” Affected parties and people wishing to dispute the claims and truths made herein or make their own claims upon Me or my family must respond within thirty (30) days after service of this Notice of the action and request a Common Law court to empanel a Common Law Jury of twenty-five (25) indigenous, free men to hear their case against Me. All responses must be signed and witnessed no later than thirty (30) days from the date of original service as attested to by way of certificate of service.

Failure to notify Me and failure to register a dispute against this lawful Notice made herein will always result in an automatic default judgment and permanent, irrevocable estoppel by acquiescence, barring the bringing of charges under any statute/regulation/act or legal action against Me, my family, my guest, or another People. Failure to honor this lawful notice will make each of the People acting as federal/state/county/city/municipal/corporation employees liable for the sum of five (5) ounces of .999 pure gold or its equivalent in Federal Reserve Notes plus my fee schedule, and such sum will be required to be paid to Peter - Jason: of the family Helfrich, upon your receipt of the Invoice and by its assigned due date. [additional fees apply; keep reading]

 

 

 

CAVEAT

 

(16) The aforementioned charges are billing costs deriving from, but not limited to, Uniform Commercial Codes and Fair Debt Collection Practices Act and this contract. These charges shall be assessed against persons, governmental bodies, and corporate entities supra, or any combination thereof when they individually and/or collectively violate my natural and/or civil rights as an American by declaration. The aforementioned Constitution and/or the Honorable “Bill of Rights” establishes jurisdiction for you in your normal course of business. All violations against me, the undersigned, will be assessed per occurrence, per officer, representative, or agent of any agency that is involved in any unlawful action against me.

(17) By your actions, you shall lack recourse for all claims of immunity in any forum. Your officers' knowing consent and admission of perpetrating known acts by your continued enterprise is a violation of my rights. This Statute Staple Securities Instrument exhausts all state maritime Article 1 administrative jurisdictions and protects my Article III court remedies including but not limited to Title 42 U.S.C.A, Title 18 U.S.C.A., Title 28 U.S.C.A., and Title 18 U.S.C.,§ 242.

 

 

 

 

 

 

IGNORANCE OF THE LAW IS NO EXCUSE!

 

 

(18) I, one Peter – Jason: Helfrich, Free man, the undersigned, am the principal; and you are the agent! Fail not to adhere to your oath, lest you be called to answer before one God and one Supreme Court Exclusive Original Jurisdiction, which is the court of first and last resort, not excluding my “Good Faith (Oxford) Doctrine” by my conclusive Honorable “Bill of Rights.”

 

 

 

 

 

  • This Statute Staple Securities Instrument is not set forth to threaten, delay, hinder, harass, or obstruct, but to protect guaranteed Rights and Protections assuring that at no time my Unalienable Rights are ever waived or taken from me against my will by threats, duress, coercion, fraud, or without my express written consent of waiver. None of the statements contained herein intend to threaten or cause any type of physical or other harm to anyone. The statements contained herein are to notice any persons, whether real or corporate, of their potential, personal, civil, and criminal liability if and when they violate my Unalienable Rights as protected by the original Constitution of 1787, adopted circa 1791, and/or the Honorable “Bill of Rights.” A bona fide duplicate of this paperwork is safely archived with those who testify under oath that it is my standard policy to ALWAYS present this notice to any public or private officer attempting to violate me and my rights. It is noted on the record that by implication of said presentment, this notice has been tendered by way of certified mail &/or Fax to NEVADA SECRETARY OF STATE Barbara K. Cegavske. This is prima facie evidence of your receipt and acceptance of this presentment in both your corporate and individual capacity, jointly and severally for each and all governmental, political, and corporate bodies. Any other individuals who have been, are, or hereafter become involved in the instant actions or any future actions against me shall only correspond to me in writing while signing under penalty of perjury pursuant but not limited to Title 28 U.S.C.A. § 1746. This document is now on public record at, Clark County Nevada Recorders Office, supra. See also Affidavit of Certificate of Service.

SUMMATION

(20) Should you move against me in defiance of this presentment, there is no immunity from prosecution available to you or to any of your fellow public officers, officials of government, judges, magistrates, district attorneys, clerks, or any other persons who become involved in the instant actions, or any future actions, against me by way of aiding and abetting. Take due heed and govern yourself accordingly. Any or all documents tendered to me, lacking bona fide ink signatures or dates per title 18 U.S.C.A. § 513-514, are counterfeit security instruments causing you to be liable in your corporate and individual capacity by fraudulent conveyance now and forevermore. If and when you cause any injury and/or damages to the Natural Man Secured Party by violating any of the rights, civil rights, privileges, or any terms herein, you agree to voluntarily, with no reservation of rights and defenses, at the written request of the Natural Man Secured Party, surrender, including but not limited to, any and all bonds, public and/or corporate insurance policies, and CAFR funds as needed to satisfy any and all claims as filed against you by the Natural Man Secured Party. This applies to any and all agents, or representatives, individually and severally, of the "UNITED STATES" or any of the subdivisions thereof, as described herein.

 

NOTICE TO AGENT IS NOTICE TO PRINCIPAL AND

NOTICE TO PRINCIPAL IS NOTICE TO AGENT



(21) This document cannot be retracted by any employee, agent, representative, or officer of the court, or any individuals, excluding the Natural Man Secured Party on this registered document, for one hundred years from date on this legally binding Statute Staple Securities Instrument.



Attention: All Agents, Representatives, or Officers, or such as, of the "UNITED STATES" or its subdivisions including local, state, federal, and/or international or multinational governments, corporations, agencies, and the like: You have Thirty (30) days to rebut any portion of this document, or you stand in total agreement. Non response is agreement. Partial response is agreement. Rebuttal must be in written form with legal/lawful, verified, certified documentation in law, with copies of said law enclosed. This documentation must be provided under penalty of perjury. Notice to Agent is Notice to Principal. Notice to Principal is Notice to Agent. Ignorance of the law is no excuse.

(22) All other corporations including but not limited to telephone companies, cable companies, utility companies, contractors, builders, maintenance personnel, investors, journeymen, inspectors, law enforcement officers, officers of the court, manufacturers, wholesalers, retailers, and all others, including all persons, are bound by all paragraphs, terms, and conditions herein regardless of nature of limited liability corporations or affiliations as “DBAs,” “AKAs,” incorporations, or any types of businesses in commerce as deeded by this securities agreement and decree.



(23) YOU ARE NOTICED having been given knowledge of the law and your personal financial liability in event of any violations of my rights and/or being. This Statute Staple Securities Instrument now in your hand constitutes timely and sufficient warning by good faith, notice, and grace.











(24) Dated this 29th day of March, in the year of our Lord, two thousand-nineteen. This contract being of honor is presented under the "Good Faith (Oxford) Doctrine." I accept the Oath of Office of all officers of the court, including but not limited to the clerk of the court; all judges and attorneys from all jurisdictions; all local, state, federal, international law enforcement officers, and all agents of the "UNITED STATES" or any subdivisions thereof.



(25) Any agent, law enforcement officer, employee, contractor, representative, or the like of the "UNITED STATES" or any of its subsidiaries or sub-corporations, SHALL NOT ENTER, AT ANY TIME, FOR ANY REASON, ANY PROPERTY AT WHICH I AM LOCATED, or LEASE, OWN, or CONTROL, WITHOUT MY EXPRESS WRITTEN PERMISSION. Violation of this notice will be considered criminal trespass and will be subject to a $2,000,000.00 (Two Million) lawful US Silver Dollar penalty plus damages, per violation, per violator.



(26) Attention: Any and all lending institutions, brokerage firms, credit unions, depository institutions, insurance agencies, credit bureaus, and the officers, agents and employees therein: You have now been notified of the law as to your corporate and individual financial liability in the event of any violations upon the rights and/or being of Peter – Jason: Helfrich. This Statute Staple Securities Instrument constitutes timely and sufficient warning by Good Faith Notice of your liability regardless of your political affirmations. All penalties contained herein will be subject to a penalty increase of $1,000,000.00 (One Million) lawful US Silver Dollars per day, plus interest, while there is any unpaid balance for the first thirty (30) days after default of payment. This penalty will increase by 10% per each day until balance is paid in full, plus 18% annual interest, beginning on the thirty-first (31st) day after default of payment. All penalties in this document are assessed in lawful money and are to be paid in one troy ounce US Silver Dollars that are .999 fine silver or equivalent par value if paid in legal tender or fiat paper money. Par value will be determined by the value established by a one troy ounce .999 fine silver coin at the US MINT, or by law, whichever is higher value at the time of the incident. Any dispute over the par value will be decided by the Secured Party, or his designee. All definitions in Attachment “B” are included as a part of this contract and will be applied as written herein. Any dispute of any definition will be decided by the Secured Party. There is no contradiction of terms as written within the confines of this title pursuant to the “Constitution for the united States of America.” If any contradiction is found, the meaning will be determined by the Secured Party. Definitions as they apply to this contract are enclosed in Attachment “B" and are included as a legal part of this contract.



Peter – Jason: Helfrich, Secured Party Creditor













NOTICE TO LAS VEGAS / CLARK COUNTY REGISTER OF DEEDS CLERK (27) Pursuant to Title 18 U.S.C., chapter 101 § 2071(b), “Whoever, having the custody of any such record, proceeding, map, book, document, paper, or other thing, willfully and unlawfully conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates, falsifies, or destroys the same, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both; and shall forfeit his office and shall be disqualified from holding any office under the United States.”







 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Affidavit of Notice of Understanding and Intent and Claim of Right

 

I, Peter- Jason: of the Helfrich family, hereinafter known as Peter - Jason Helfrich, a flesh and blood human being in possession of a sovereign and individual spirit, a living soul, do hereby make Oath and state the following is My Truth and My Law:

 

[010] Whereas it is my understanding that in terms of earthly existence there is no species more supreme than a living, breathing, imaginative human being blessed with a living soul, and

 

[020] Whereas it is my understanding that it is impossible to distinguish one soul from any other, and therefore all souls must at all times and in all situations be considered equal in all respects in any fair, just and reasonable context, and

 

[030] Whereas it is my understanding that anything and everything must in practice derive from the aforesaid axioms, and

 

[040] Whereas it is my understanding that any numerical grouping of such souls can be referred to as 'people', and

 

[050] Whereas it is my understanding that a society is, in essence, nothing more than a grouping of like-minded souls since it is defined as a number of people joined by mutual consent to deliberate, determine and act for a common goal, and

 

[060] Whereas it is my understanding a statute is defined as a legislated rule of a society, and

 

[070] Whereas it is my understanding a legislated rule of a society can be given the force of law to act upon, or lawfully bind, all members of that society, and

 

[080] Whereas it is my understanding if a living soul chooses by free will not to be a member of any society then statutes created by said society do not bind that soul to said statute law, and

 

[090] Whereas it is my understanding a living soul who chooses by free will not to be a member of any society can be referred to as a Freeman-on-the-land, and

 

[100] Whereas it is my understanding a Freeman-on-the-land remains entirely and solely under Common Law jurisdiction, and

 

[110] Whereas I Peter- Jason: Helfrich am a Freeman-on-the-land, and

 

[120] Whereas it is my understanding that all authority possessed by elected representatives must inherently derive from those who elect said representation, and

 

[130] Whereas it is my understanding that if I have the right to empower representation by casting a vote then I am empowered to represent myself, and

 

[140] Whereas it is my understanding that the right of empowe1ment does not derive from

 

any government otherwise it would be possible for a government to revoke it, and

 

[150] Whereas it is my understanding that if the right to empower representation were revoked then no representation would thereafter be possible, and

 

[160] Whereas it is my understanding the only form of government recognized as lawful in the United States of America is a representative one, and,

 

[170] Whereas it is my understanding representation requires mutual consent, and

 

[180] Whereas it is my understanding that in the absence of mutual consent neither representation nor governance can exist, and

 

[190] Whereas it is my understanding the United States of America is a Common Law jurisdiction enjoying the protection of Common Law, and

 

[200] Whereas it is my understanding equality before the law is paramount and mandatory, and

 

[210] Whereas it is my understanding that for something to exist legally it must have a name, and

 

[220] Whereas it is my understanding that the UNITED STATES is in reality a corporation in Chapter 11 bankruptcy and thus still allowed to trade, and

 

[230] Whereas it is my understanding that by virtue of my birth within the boundaries of my Country, the United States of America I am a single share owner in said UNITED STATES CORPORATION, and

 

[240] Whereas it is my understanding all Acts are statutes restricted in scope and applicability by the Constitution of the United States of America and Common Law, and

 

[250] Whereas it is my understanding a statute being defined as a legislated rule of a society is, within the United States of America, in fact a rule of said UNITED STATES CORPORATION, and

 

[260] Whereas it is my understanding rules of a corporation are limited in applicability to those who are agents of said corporation, and

 

[270] Whereas it is my understanding those who have a National Insurance Number &/or Social Security Number are in fact employees of the government and thus are bound by the statutes created by the said government, and

 

[280] Whereas it is my understanding that it is lawful to abandon one's National Insurance Number &/or Social Security Number while at the same time not affecting the right to any pension claim based on Social Security Insurance Contributions previously paid, and

 

[290] Whereas it is my understanding people in the United States of America have a right

to revoke or deny consent to be represented and thus governed, and

 

[300] Whereas it is my understanding if anyone does revoke or deny consent they exist free of government control and statutory restraints, and

 

[310] Whereas it is my understanding that a claim of right establishes a lawful excuse, and

 

[320] Whereas it is my understanding that if one has lawful excuse one may choose to not obey a court, tribunal, statute, Act or order, and

 

[330] Whereas a Freeman-on-the-Land has lawfully revoked consent and does exist free of statutory restrictions, obligations, and limitations, and

 

 

[340] Whereas it is my understanding that I, Peter- Jason: Helfrich as a Freeman-on-the-Land, acting peacefully within community standards, would not in that capacity breach the peace, and

 

[350] Whereas it is my understanding that all existing courts and governments are de facto only and not de jure, and

 

[360] Whereas it is my understanding that the terms of the Treaty of Rome are counter in many respects to the "respective laws and customs" of those nations of which said woman is Queen including England which is my not Country of birth, and

 

[370] Whereas it is my understanding that anyone who participates in allowing or by culpable neglect enabling my Country to be governed in any way by any foreign power (i.e.: The Royal Crown, The United Nations, The Vatican, etc.) is an act of treason as defined by the Constitution for the United States of America, and

 

[380] Whereas it is my understanding that as a Freeman-on-the-Land in this common law jurisdiction that I have the duty to stand in defense of the United States of America and

its people against foreign armed troops who attempt to invade, govern or police me or my

Country, and

 

[390] Whereas it is my understanding that this duty is not affected by agreements made by treasonous and de facto government agents, and

 

[400] Whereas it is my understanding that agreements made on behalf of the United States &/ or the United Kingdom &/or the United Nations, &/or the State of Nevada, etc., et. al., by traitors to the united states of America, etc. do not bind the people of united states of America, etc., and

 

[410] Whereas I do firmly and truly believe the aforementioned agreement is an overt act of treason, and

 

[420] Whereas I honorably refuse to be bound by agreements made by traitors such as the Bush Crime Syndicate, Bill Clinton, Barry Sorento, a.ka. Barack Obama, Brian Sandoval, Catherine Marie Cortez Masto, Adam Paul Laxalt, Stephen F. Sisolak, Robert Lane, David Gamble etc., et.al., in collusion with the then Prime Minister Edward Heath, and/or Theresa Mary May, etc., et. al.,

 

[430] Whereas it is my understanding that any peace officer who co-operates with foreign armed troops to govern or regulate the population is also committing treason, and

 

[440] Whereas it is my understanding that historically the purpose of a national armed force was to ensure that foreign powers never invaded and governed under a gun, and

 

[450] Whereas it is my understanding that the existence of armed foreign troops patrolling and policing our streets would be evidence of a war fought unsuccessfully, and

 

[460] Whereas it is my understanding that agreeing or conspiring to agree to allow armed foreign troops to patrol and police our streets is an act of treason, and

 

[470] Whereas it is my understanding that any action for which one can apply for and receive a license must itself be a fundamentally lawful action, and

 

[480] Whereas as I not a child and I an1 a Freeman-on-the-Land who operates with full responsibility and I do not see the need to ask permission to engage in lawful and peaceful activities, especially from those who claim limited liability, and

 

[490] Whereas it is my understanding that I have a right to use my property without having to pay for the use or enjoyment of it, and

 

[500] Whereas it is my understanding that all 'public transportation' is in fact and actuality public property to which I have the right of use and access without having to pay, and

 

[510] Whereas it is my understanding peace officers have a duty to distinguish between statutes and law and those who attempt to enforce statutes against a Freeman-on-the-Land are in fact breaking the law, and

 

[520] Whereas it is my understanding that I have the power to refuse intercourse or

interaction with peace officers who have not observed me breach the peace, and

 

[530] Whereas it is my understanding that permanent estoppel by acquiescence barring any peace officer or prosecutor from bringing charges against a Freeman-on-the-Land under any Act is created if this claim is not responded to in the stated fashion and time, and

 

[540] Whereas it is my understanding that the Common Law right to travel on the highways without license provided one is not engaging in commerce thereupon is lawful and still exists although it does appear to have been deceptively hidden, and

 

[550] Whereas the Road Traffic Acts of the United States of America do make it possible for peace officers in the role of policy enforcement officers to stop an automobile in order to provide services and demand something of value, and

 

[560] Whereas it is my understanding that if they are not providing a service they have no

 

reason to stop any one and if proof of registration, insurance and license is not valuable they have no need to ask for it, and

 

[570] Whereas it is my understanding that I have the right to refuse to interact or co­ operate with criminals, de facto government agents or grossly negligent peace officers, and

 

[580] Whereas it is my understanding that if I have the power to elect a representative and empower them to appoint peace officers then I also have the power to appoint directly,

and

 

[590] Whereas it is my understanding that if I have the power to appoint directly or by proxy I must have the power to fulfill those duties my self, and

 

[600] Whereas it is my understanding that the United States Police Force although having an illustrious history has had members recently acting in a grossly criminal manner which does tarnish the previous history and record, and

 

[610] Whereas it is my understanding that the Law provides remedy at all times, even against rogue or negligent peace officers and de facto governments apparently hijacked by soulless corporate interests, and

 

[620] Whereas it is my understanding that in order to be a peace maker and deal with rogue and possibly armed police officers who fail to act with respect to the code of Common Law I will need use of and access to firearms of equal or greater power then those people who act criminally have access to, and

 

[630] Whereas it is my understanding that the act of registering the birth of a baby creates a legal entity called a person that exists in association with that baby and that the manner in which offspring are registered transfers superior guardianship rights over that offspring to the government, and I am the blood I birth Father of Shelldekai: Helfrich; Born

8/6/2013. For the Record, this Affiant's name is NOT on the Fraudulent Birth Certificate

of SHELLDEKAI HELFRICH. Peter - Jason: Helfrich refused/refuses to register his offspring.

 

[640] I, Peter- Jason: Helfrich Claim the Right of Power of Attorney In Fact In Behalf Of

Shelldekai: Helfrich till her 18th Birthday I Anniversary of Birth; “Nunc Pro Tunc 08/06/2013”.

 

[650] Whereas it is my understanding that this creation of a person and transfer of authority is not fully disclosed to the parents and if it was all good parents would refuse to register their offspring; and it is my understanding that Shelldekai: Helfrich's birth mother [Silvia Castillo] is mentally incompetent and suffers from various well documented mental illnesses, and taking into account the stresses of childbirth coupled with her then incarceration; Silvia Castillo was not mentally competent at the time (8/6/2013) State Agent(s) hoodwinked and coerced Silvia Castillo into registering Shelldekai: Helfrich, because coercion, fraud, imprisonment, etc., create a hostile environment of duress which vitiates [voids] any and all contracts, etc.

[660] Whereas it is my understanding that the person and the human being to which it is associated are two very separate and different things and that the people playing roles in government only have the right to act upon the person, and

 

[670] Whereas it is my understanding that if I do not exist in association with a person I

cannot be lawfully governed by the people playing roles in government, and

 

[680] Whereas it is my understanding a by-law is defined as a rule of a corporation, and

 

[700] Whereas it is my understanding corporations are legal fictions and require contracts in order to claim authority or control over other parties, and

 

[71OJ Whereas it is my understanding that a summons is merely an invitation to attend and those issued by the Ministry of Justice I a.k.a. so - called "Courts" or its franchises which are de facto corporations create no obligation or dishonor if ignored, and

 

[720] Whereas it is my understanding legal fictions lack a soul and cannot exert any control over those who are thus blessed and operate with respect to that knowledge as only a fool would allow soulless fictions to dictate one's actions, and

 

[730] Whereas it is my understanding that the people in the governn1ent are merely playing roles, and

 

[740] Whereas I AM NOT PLAYING, and

 

[750] Whereas it is my understanding that I am not obliged to obey the orders of any one claiming to be a Pope or Queen or King or Esquire or any Title of Nobility or those acting on behalf of such an insane entity, as no one who does make preposterous claims that abandon and erode the concept of equality has any authority over me, and

 

[760] Whereas it is my understanding that I can use a Notary Public to perform duties found under any Act including thus they have the power to hold court and hear evidence and issue binding lawful judgments, and if I cannot afford a Notary Public's services I may elect to place my Right Thumbprint "Seal" near my blue ink signature so as to prove my true identity. My fingerprints are on file with N.C.I.C. should anyone wish to argue I contest my signature and seal.

[770] Whereas it is my understanding that a Notary Public can also be used to bring criminal charges to bear against traitors, even if they hold the highest office, and

 

[780] Whereas it is my understanding that there may be more of this to follow; and that I

reserve my right to amend this Affidavit at any time, as needed, and

 

[790] Therefore be it now known to any and all interested, concerned or affected parties, that I, Peter- Jason: Helfrich am a Freeman-on-the-Land and do hereby serve notice and state clearly specifically and unequivocally my intent to peacefully and lawfully exist free of all statutory obligations, restrictions and that I maintain all rights at law to trade, exchange or barter and exist without deceptive governance and to do so without limitations, restrictions or regulations created by others and without my consent.

 

[800] Be it also now known to any and all interested, concerned or affected parties, that I, Peter- Jason: Helfrich as a Freeman-on-the-Land and do hereby serve notice and state clearly specifically and unequivocally that I would never conspire nor would I in any way entreat others to disobey the Common Law of the Land which ensures peaceful co-existence.

 

[810] Furthermore, I claim that these actions are not outside my communities' standards and will in fact support said community in our desire for truth and maximum freedom.

 

[820] Furthermore, I claim the right to engage in these actions and further claim that all property held by me is held under a claim of right, including but not limited to my offspring [Shelldekai: Helfrich].

 

[830] Furthermore, I claim that anyone who interferes with my lawful activities after having been served notice of this claim and who fails to properly dispute or make lawful counterclaim is breaking the law, cannot claim good faith or colour of right and that such transgressions will be dealt with in a properly convened court de jure. My Fee Schedule upon list of Violations is a matter of Public Record.

 

[840] Furthermore, I claim it is my right and solemn duty not only to keep the peace My Self but also to intervene wherever may be necessary to ensure that the peace is kept in a situation where peace officers are not present or are unwilling for whatever reason to uphold their sworn and solemn duty so to do.

 

[850] Furthermore, I claim that the identity of My Self is forever possible to establish correctly by my Presence as a living, breathing, Human Being with a soul together as may be necessary sworn attestations from friends, family, and other associates. Furthermore I claim that this supersedes any necessity to obtain or carry any form of external token such as an Identity Card for any lawful purpose of establishing my true identity for the simple reason that no such token can ever represent the sovereign soul with which I am blessed.

 

[860] Furthermore, I claim that the courts in The United States are de-facto and bound by the Law and Equity Acts and are in fact in the profitable business of conducting, witnessing and facilitating the transactions of security interests and I further claim they require the consent of both parties prior to providing any such services.

 

[870] Furthermore, I claim all transactions of security interests require the consent of both parties and I do hereby deny consent to any transaction of a security interest issuing under any Act for as herein stated as a Freeman-on-the-Land I am not subject to any Act. My Denial of Consent to the SHELLDEKAI HELFRICH Birth Certificate does not waive my Unalienable Rights to Father I Parent I Power of Attorney In Fact In Behalf of Shelldekai: Helfrich.

 

[880] Furthermore I claim ownership of my single share in the corporation known as the UNITED STATES and demand a copy of said share such that I will become the shareholder and thereby be in the position of exercising my own voting rights.

 

Furthermore I claim to receive the corresponding dividends for as long as said UNITED STATES operates under the illusion that 'money has some value' (notwithstanding the fact that 'money has no value' has been a matter of fact since the early to mid 1930's to the best of my knowledge. Evidence of this admission can be supplied, and is anyway publicly available).

 

[890] Furthermore I claim that my inalienable Natural Right to Trial By Jury for any apparent transgressions on my part, including an inalienable Natural Right of Habeas Corpus, and these shall not under any circumstances be infringed.

 

[900] Furthermore I claim the right to be entirely free to determine my own and my offspring's medication needs at all times and never under any circumstances be forced to ingest or otherwise receive into my I my offspring's body by way of vaccination, electro-magnetic energy, audio or visual energy or any other method any substance or alien energies I do not consent to accept.

 

[910) Furthermore, I claim the right to convene a proper court de jure in order to address any potentially criminal actions of any peace officers, government principals or agents or justice system participants, etc., who having been served notice of this claim fail to

dispute or discuss or make lawful counterclaim and then interfere by act or omission with the lawful exercise of properly claimed and established rights and freedoms.

 

[920] Furthermore, I claim the right to fulfill my duty to shoot any foreign troops in the United States of America who are armed and attempting to police or govern me or my fellow countrymen without consent and to view them as an invading force which must be lawfully attacked. And I further claim to right to nominate as many deputies as may be necessary who by their own free will and consent are prepared to assist me in fulfillment of this duty to my Country.

 

[930] Furthermore, I claim the law of agent and principal applies and that service upon one is service upon both.

 

[940) Furthermore, I claim the Universal Maxim of Law that the Partner (Government) of my Partner (PETER HELFRICH(c)082494 is NOT my (Peter - Jason: Helfrich) Partner applies herein and is in FULL FORCE AND EFFECT.

 

[950) Furthermore, I claim the right to deal with any counterclaims or disputes publicly and in an open forum using discussion and negotiation and to capture on video tape said discussion and negotiation for whatever lawful purpose as I see fit.

 

[960] Furthermore, I claim my SCHEDULE for any transgressions by peace officers, government principals or agents or justice system participants or agents of the medical profession or any other parties who trespass upon and thus unlawfully hinder My Peaceful Self, Peter- Jason: of the Helfrich family, as defined in my Fee Schedule; see also

attached Schedule A.

 

[970] Furthermore I claim the right to use a Notary Public to conduct due process of the aforementioned SCHEDULE against any transgressors who by their actions or omissions

harm me or my interests, directly or by proxy in any way.

 

 

Affected parties wishing to dispute the claims made herein or make their own counterclain1s must respond appropriately within THIRTY (30) days of service of notice of this action. Responses must be under Oath or Attestation, upon full commercial liability and penalty of perjury and registered at the Place of Claim of Right provided no later than thirty days from the date of original service as attested to by way of certificate of service. Schedule B is available for the resolution of any objections.

 

Failure to register a dispute against the claims made herein in thirty (30) days and then successfully defeating these claims in a proper court of law will result in an automatic default judgment securing forevermore all rights herein claimed and establishing permanent and irrevocable estoppel by acquiescence barring the bringing of charges under any statute or Act or regulation against My Self, Freeman-on-the-Land Peter - Jason: Helfrich for exercising these lawful and properly established rights, freedoms and duties.

 

Witness my Seal from my Living Sovereign Hand, this 29th of March, 2019.

 

28 U.S.C. 1746 (1); "Executed without the UNITED STATES",

 

ALL RIGHTS RESERVED WITHOUT PREJUDICE"

 

 

 

 

Claimant: Peter - Jason: of the Helfrich family

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Additional Claims. See Attached Commercial Affidavit

 

Schedule A

 

Penalty term of imprisonment to apply to each and every individual reasonably involved in the transgression, including all senior officers or line managers as accomplices in law.

 

Transgression Penalty term of Imprisonment

 

 

 

My Self I my offspring being questioned, interrogated or in any way detained, harassed or otherwise regulated

1 year

My Self I my offspring handcuffed, transported, incarcerated or subjected to any adjudication process that is outside Common Law jurisdiction

2 years

My Self I my offspring forced to suffer the effects of what has come to be known as a non-lethal or less-than-lethal weapon such as a Taser

5 years

My Self I my offspring forced to undergo any ingestion of energies or substances forced onto or into my body, whether under to guise of medication or not, without my expressly notarized consent

10 years

My Self I my offspring being attributed anything I /or they did not actually speak or write in the event that I I my offspring written or spoken communications are shown to be tampered with

5 years.

















LEGAL NOTICE AND DEMAND DEFINITIONS

Unlawful Arrest: Means restricting a man’s or woman’s right to move about freely without the proper use of a lawful 4th amendment warrant signed by a judge of competent jurisdiction while under oath. This includes unnecessary use of restraint devices, traffic stops, raids, or any other type of interaction, when an officer is presented with and ignores a “Notice and Demand,” “Public Servant’s Questionnaire,” “Right to Travel” Documents, or other documents notifying the officer of the sovereign, lawful rights of the Natural Man or Woman Secured Party, created by God, who is not to be confused with the Corporate Fiction “Strawman” which was created by the state. This includes arrest when a Natural Man or Woman Secured Party is incarcerated for refusing to sign any citation; arrest due to contempt of court when he or she is not violent or a physical threat to the court; arrest by Internal Revenue Service for failure to produce books, records, or other documents; arrest and refusal of Habeas Corpus; arrest for conspiracy of any kind without lawfully documented affidavits from at least three (3) eye witnesses, signed under oath and penalty of perjury.

 

 

 

 

 

Illegal Arrest: Means same as above item # 1, “Unlawful Arrest.

 

Unlawful Detention: Means restraining a Natural Man or Woman Secured Party’s freedom of movement, and/or Right to Travel, against his will for more than sixty (60) seconds without a properly authorized lawful 4th amendment warrant signed by a judge of competent jurisdiction while under oath. This includes routine traffic stops, raids, random identification checks, security checks, only after the officer, agent, or representative has been notified by the Natural Man or Woman Secured Party of his status and after the officer has been given documents to prove said status, along with up to ten (10) minutes for officer to examine said documents.

 

Unlawful Distraint: Means seizure or taking of any property that is lawfully owned or in possession of the Natural Man or Woman Secured Party without proper probable cause, and/or due process, and lawful 4th amendment warrant. This includes any seizure by any officer, agent, representative, in any capacity, or relationship with the “UNITED STATES” or any of its agencies, contractors, subdivisions, subsidiaries, or the like.

 

Lawful 4th Amendment Warrant: Means a warrant that follows the provisions of the 4th amendment to the original “Constitution for the united States of America.” This warrant must not deter from the exact procedures as outlined by the 4th Amendment.

 

Right to Speedy Trial: Means trial will commence within 90 days of the date of arrest.

 

Interstate Detainer: Means the same as unlawful detainer as when involving a Natural Man or Woman Secured Party and involving more than one agency or state of the corporation, or any representative, agent, or officer who has any agreement with, contract with, or permission to act on behalf of any municipal corporation of the “UNITED STATES” or any subsidiary or sub-corporation thereof.

 

Unlawful Restraint: Means any action by any officer, agent, representative, contractor, associate, officer of the court, or the like, to prevent, coerce, intimidate, hinder, or in any way limit the right of a Natural Man or Woman Secured Party from any type of freedom of legal/ lawful speech, travel, movement, action, gesture, writing, utterance, or enjoyment of any right or privilege that is commonly enjoyed by any member of the public, or any Sovereign.

 

Freedom of Speech: Means the right to speak open and plainly without the fear of reprisal. This includes the right of a Natural Man or Woman Secured Party to speak at hearings and trials, before magistrates, judges, and officers of the court, agents, representatives, or the like, of the “UNITED STATES.” It also means that no attempt to suppress this right will be made by any officer of the court or of the “UNITED STATES” corporation. No judge or officer of any court or tribunal will threaten contempt of court for free speech by any Natural Man or Woman Secured Party.

 

US Dollars: Means the currently recognized medium of exchange as used by the general public at the time of offense, at par value, equal to a one ounce silver dollar equivalent per each dollar unit, as represented in a claim. All claims and damages will be paid at par value as indicated. Par value will be established by written law or the value established by the US MINT, whichever is higher at the time of the offense, for the purchase of an official, one troy ounce, .999 fine silver coin.

Obstruction of Justice: Means any attempt by any officer of the court or representative of any agency that represents the “UNITED STATES,” or any of its subdivisions, agencies, contractors, etc., to deprive, hinder, conceal, coerce, or threaten a Natural Man or Woman Secured Party in an attempt to prevent any and every opportunity to legally/lawfully defend himself by attempting to produce and file lawful documents and or testimony to agents, officers, judges, magistrates, the court, clerk of the court, representatives, or investigators in order to settle any legal/lawful controversy. This also includes any attempt by a judge or officer of the court to hinder the Natural Man or Woman Secured Party from filing, recording, admitting, presenting, discussing, questioning, or using any evidence, document, paper, photographs, audio and/or video recordings, or any other type of evidence that he desires to submit as evidence in any type of court proceeding. The determination of what is evidence and what will be admitted is to be solely determined by the Natural Man or Woman Secured Party. Any evidence will be tried on merits of the lawful content and validity. Any judge or officer of the court who attempts to suppress or dismiss legal or lawful evidence will voluntarily surrender all bonds, insurance, property, corporate property, bank accounts, savings accounts, or any corporate property of value to the Natural Man or Woman Secured Party upon written demand and surrender all rights to and defenses against said property. This also includes evidence that is supported by case law. This includes attempts by any officer of the court to make motions, to issue orders such as gag orders, or to use any other means of keeping information suppressed from the public or the official record. The determination of whether the acts of the court are an attempt to suppress evidence will be solely determined by the Natural Man or Woman Secured Party. This also includes the provision as indicated in item # 18 “Racketeering.”

 

Excessive Bail: Means any amount of bail set at an unreasonable rate as per the 8th Amendment of the “Constitution for the united States of America.” This also means bail in excess of the amount of the fine, penalty, or penal sum that is associated with the alleged crime committed. This also means that if a Natural Man or Woman Secured Party has lived as an upstanding member in a community or area for more than one year, works a regular job, or is a member of or involved with a church group, civic group, community enterprise, or can produce at least two affidavits from members of his community or area stating that he is involved with his community, he cannot be held without bail as a flight risk or a threat to society. If the Natural Man or Woman Secured Party can produce at least four (4) affidavits stating that he lives, works, and is involved in his community, or the prior community in which he lived, he must be released on his own recognizance without any bail required. This provision does not apply to anyone charged with rape, murder, or violent crimes.

 

Cruel and Unusual Punishment: Means physical violence of any type or form that is used against a Natural Man or Woman Secured Party and that causes invisible or undetectable or visible physical injury, e.g., marks, scrapes, scratches, bruises, abrasion, avulsions, fractures, sprains, restraint marks, dislocations, punctures, cuts, loss of blood, loss of body fluids, etc. This includes any other type of physical stress to the body or any chemically-induced, altered mental state of the Natural Man or Woman Secured Party. This also includes any attempt to incarcerate; restrain; question; detain; withhold food when requested; withhold drink when requested; withhold medications as requested; withhold use of bathroom facilities and supplies when requested; withhold reading and writing materials; withhold communication with friends, family, legal counsel, and religious counsel; withhold legal library and internet access; withhold proper clothing as needed for comfort; withhold blankets when requested; withhold hot and cold water for showers; withhold freedom when requested. This also includes ridicule, coercion, threats, verbal insults, rude and offensive language, veiled threats, or any other type of mental stress or anguish.

 

Conspiracy: Means the cooperation of two or more persons working together to restrict, suppress, inhibit, or in any way deprive a Natural Man or Woman Secured Party of any right, benefit, or privilege that would ordinarily be offered by the “Constitution for the united States of America” and the Honorable “Bill of Rights” to any member of the general American public, or to a Sovereign. This also includes the provisions in item # 18, “Racketeering.”

 

Victim: Means any Natural Man or Woman Secured Party who has received direct damages to himself or his property as the result of an unlawful or illegal act by another.

 

Victimless Laws: Means any law that is passed or presumed to be passed that creates a violation of law in which no Natural Man or Woman has been damaged. This includes any statute, ordinance, regulation, policy, or color of law provision. These types of laws will not be used in any action, of any kind, against any Natural Man or Woman Secured Party.

 

Aiding and Abetting: Means the efforts of any officer, agent, or representative of the “UNITED STATES” or officer of the court to assist another of the same to hinder, coerce, restrict, resist, suppress, or deprive in any way, a Natural Man or Woman Secured Party from receiving any and all rights, benefits, or privileges, as provided by the “Constitution for the united States of America,” and/or the Honorable “Bill of Rights,” or that would normally be offered to the general American public, or to a Sovereign. This also includes the provisions as provided in item # 18 “Racketeering” and suppression of evidence.

 

 

 

Racketeering: Means any attempt by any two or more officers of the corporation to restrict, suppress, coerce, manipulate, inhibit, or in any way deprive a Natural Man or Woman Secured Party from receiving every right, benefit, or privilege that is outlined by the “Constitution for the united States of America,” and/or the Honorable “Bill of Rights.” This also includes any effort by the officers of the court to hinder in any way the introduction of evidence, law, facts, affidavits, statements, witness testimony, or any information that is considered relevant by the Natural Man or Woman Secured Party, or any attempt to prevent a jury from hearing this evidence. This also includes any attempt to prevent this evidence from being heard in a public forum and before any and all members of the general public, as many as can be accommodated by the main courtroom. All hearings, tribunals, or trials will be held in a public place; and any and all members of the general public will be allowed to attend, without restriction. This also includes questioning and/or interrogation by police officers before, during, and after an arrest.

 

Federal Zone: Means any land, property, building, area, zone, 911 zone, or postal zone that is presumed to be within the territorial jurisdiction of the “UNITED STATES” or any of its representatives as defined herein. This does not include any land, property, building, structure, dwelling, area, zone that is held by deed, title, warranty deed, contract, or any written or verbal agreement, or any such thing by a Natural Man or Woman Secured Party who is located outside of THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA and WASHINGTON, D.C. proper. All privately held properties of any type that are being held by any Natural Man or Woman Secured Party are excluded from any federal zone or any jurisdiction of any representatives of the “UNITED STATES” or any of its territories. This is fact and may be presented in any court by affidavit of any Natural Man or Woman Secured Party of interest involved in any interaction with the “UNITED STATES” or any of its representatives, as outlined in this contract.

 

State: Means any of the forty-eight areas known as states of the “united States of America” which is not the same as the “UNITED STATES” corporation. These forty-eight states are designated by Upper and Lower Case spelling of the name of each state, vs. UPPER CASE spelling. The ALL UPPER CASE NAME denotes a STATE that is a part of the “UNITED STATES” corporation, whereas the spelling of the Upper and Lower Case Name denotes that it is not a part of the “UNITED STATES.” This will be determined by the Natural Man or Woman Secured Party as a condition of this contract. The Natural Man or Woman Secured Party will also determine whether or not his state is a part of the jurisdiction of the “UNITED STATES”; and his decision shall not be challenged by any representative of the “UNITED STATES.” The Natural Man or Woman Secured Party will determine if the alleged offense occurred within the limits of the “UNITED STATES.” A violation of this provision will be Unlawful Determination and punishable as indicated by this contract agreement.

 

Trespassing/Trespass: Means the entry into or onto the domain, property, residence, area, location, grounds, dwellings, buildings, barns, sheds, factories, warehouses, garages, shops, caves, structures, lands, storage areas, tunnels, automobiles, trucks, safe houses, underground shelters, automobiles, motor vehicles, recreational vehicles, boats, planes, trains, ships, containers, vans, heavy equipment, farm implements, culverts, driveways, trees, yards, real property, real estate, land, etc., of the Natural Man or Woman Secured Party without his express written permission, or without a lawfully executed (4th) amendment warrant. Any and all agents or representatives of the corporation will fully and completely observe any and all protections as outlined in the “Constitution for the united States of America” and/or the Honorable “Bill of Rights.” Any personal property that is damaged, lost, stolen, or misplaced, etc., will be recoverable as indicated in this Notice and Demand document. I solemnly swear and affirm that I do not have any illegal contraband on my property; I have never had any illegal contraband on or around my property and never will. Any contraband, if it is found on my property, would have been placed there by the officers or agents during the time of trespass. I simply do not allow it on my property. Contraband or illegal items if they are found in a search do not belong to me and may not be used in any attempt in any claim against me. Any and all officers, agents, and representatives of the corporation will be held individually liable for the full amount of damages as outlined in this Notice and Demand document for trespassing.

 

Natural Man or Woman Secured Party: Means any flesh and blood, living, breathing Man or Woman, created by God, who notifies any representative of the corporation, verbally or in writing, that he is a Sovereign, Non “UNITED STATES” corporate citizen, free man or free woman, and not subject to the jurisdiction of the corporation or any of its representatives. This is not to be confused with the Fictitious Legal Entity that was created by the state and is represented by an ALL CAPITAL LETTER NAME. Any attempt to notify any officer, agent, or representative of the status of the Natural Man or Woman Secured Partywill be sufficient notice. Sufficient notice will be determined by oath, statement, or affidavit by the Natural Man or Woman Secured Party; and the validity of such will not be challenged by any officer of the court.

 

County or City: Means any subdivision of any state of the “united States of America.” This subdivision excludes any jurisdiction, zone, or territory of the “UNITED STATES” corporation that is described by the Natural Man or Woman Secured Party in ALL CAPITAL LETTERS. Any dispute over any errors contained in spelling or grammar will be resolved at the discretion of the Natural Man or Woman Secured Party and will not be challenged by any representative of the corporation.

 

 

 

Agency, Entity, Department, Subdivision, Subsidiary, Contractor, Employee, Inspector, Investigator, Organization, Officer, Agent, Authorized Representative, Policeman, Participant: Means any person, corporation, or entity of any kind which works for, is compensated all or in part by, receives funds from, collects funds for, contracts with, receives any benefit from, receives any privilege from, participates with, has allegiance to, or in any way has a relationship with the “UNITED STATES” or any of its subsidiaries, sub-corporations, departments, or agencies, etc.

 

Contract: Means any agreement in writing that has been offered for review and acceptance by another party wherein the offering party has ten (10) days or more, or as stipulated in the contract, to review, respond, accept, or rebut any provisions of the contract as indicated in the contract. Non response on the part of the receiving party or agent of the receiving party will be a lawful offer and acceptance of all the terms and conditions contained in said contract. Rebuttal by the receiving party of any provision of the contract by any other means than is indicated in the contract will be non response. Return of the contract unopened and/or without review will be acceptance of all conditions of said contract. Recording the contract with the clerk of court or any public records officer will be a lawful offer and notification and will be presentment to all officers of the court in that state or county. Notice to Agent is Notice to Principal. Notice to Principal is Notice to Agent.

 

False Imprisonment: Means any attempt by any officer of the court or corporation to incarcerate any Natural Man or Woman Secured Party against his will and/or against any and all protections of the laws and provisions of the “Constitution for the united States of America” and/or the Honorable “Bill of Rights”.

 

Representative: Means any agent, agency, department, officer, investigator, entity, subsidiary, sub-corporation, contractor, employee, inspector, individual, or corporation that has any affiliation or association with, collects or distributes funds for, does any task for, receives any benefit or privilege from, of, or for the “UNITED STATES." This includes anyone or anything that represents the interests of, or is being funded by, or receives funds from, or has any attachment to the “UNITED STATES” or any of its subdivisions or sub-corporations.

 

Corporation: Means any representative, agency, sub-corporation, contractor, or any person or entity that is employed by, receives or distributes funds for, receives any benefit or privilege from, or has any relationship of any kind with the “UNITED STATES” corporation.

 

Interpretation: Means if any conflict arises concerning the definition of any of the terms and/or conditions of this contract, the conflict concerning the meaning of the term or condition will be decided by the Natural Man or Woman Secured Party. His decision will be final and not subject to review or argument. No liability or penalty will be incurred by the Natural Man or Woman Secured Party due to his interpretation of such terms and or conditions.

 

Corporate Capacity: Means acting for, or on behalf of, a corporation, or government entity, while under law or color of law.

 

Legal Counsel: Means anyone that a Natural Man or Woman Secured Party chooses to have as legal assistance of counsel, whether counsel is licensed or not, or a member of the Bar Association. Counsel may assist, represent, speak on behalf of, write cases for, or perform any act in or out of court for the Natural Man or Woman Secured Party without any hindrance, threat, prosecution, charge, repercussion, etc., from any officer of the court, or representative of the “UNITED STATES” corporation, or any representative, officer, or agent thereof.

 

Abuse of Authority: Means anyone who denies, withholds, refuses, deprives, limits, inhibits, counteracts, conceals any right, benefit, protections, or privilege, as protected by the “Constitution for the united States of America” and/or the Honorable “Bill of Rights.” This includes arrest or detainment without documented evidence that a lawful crime has been committed by the Natural Man or Woman Secured Party. This includes use of restraint devices on a Natural Man or Woman Secured Party and/or physical abuse that makes or does not make any marks, scars, cuts, abrasions, or the like. This also includes denial of lawful Due Process, Habeas Corpus, Excessive Bail, Unlawful Arrest, Unlawful Detention, or the like, as outlined in this contract.

 

Verbal Abuse: Means the use of offensive and/or threatening, spoken words, body language, and non-verbal gestures or actions by any representative of the corporation as defined herein upon a Natural Man or Woman Secured Party. If a controversy arises about an incident, the version told by the Natural Man or Woman Secured Party will be accepted as truth and will not be contested.

 

 

 

 

 

Assault and Battery with Weapon: Means any actual, threatened, or perceived use of any weapons, by any representative of the “UNITED STATES” corporation, against the Natural Man or Woman Secured Party, that creates an atmosphere of fear for the Natural Man or Woman Secured Party. This includes non lethal weapons such as tasers, stun guns, mace, pepper spray, any chemical used to incapacitate, rubber bullets, shock force weapons, electronic weapons, or any other type of weapon that may be used to control or to create fear. If a conflict arises about the events, the version told by the Natural Man or Woman Secured Party will be accepted as truth and will not be contested.

 

Unfounded Accusations: Means any accusation, charge, or claim, civil or criminal or in admiralty, that is alleged or made by any representative of the “UNITED STATES” corporation as defined herein that is not proven by written, documented evidence presented under oath and penalty of perjury by an authorized agent or representative of the corporation. The accuser has eight (8) hours to provide said documents to be reviewed and to put them into the possession of the Natural Man or Woman Secured Party; and failure to do so will be Unfounded Accusations and subject to the penalties contained herein.

 

Encroachment: Means to invade, intrude, or in any way prevent a Natural Man or Woman Secured Party the full and complete use of property, including trespass or impeding ingress / regress /or egress to the property of a Natural Man or Woman Secured Party; and to limit the ability of a Natural Man or Woman Secured Party to freely access, claim, hold, possess, use, convey, sell, rent, lease, barter, exchange, or in any way make full and unfettered use of his property. This includes the application of unlawful liens and encumbrances of any and all property including wages; salaries; stocks; bonds; bank accounts (foreign or domestic); savings accounts; contents of safety deposit boxes; gold; silver; notes; insurance funds; annuities; retirement accounts; social security benefits; motor vehicles; automobiles; recreational vehicles; land; real estate; homes; structures; roads; driveways; personal property of any kind that is held by title, deed, contract, lease, agreement (written or verbal), or is in possession of a Natural Man or Woman Secured Party. This includes, but is not limited to, traffic stops; searches of vehicles; home invasion; confiscation of any lawful property owned by, in possession of, or under the control of the Natural Man or Woman Secured Party.

 

Assault and Battery without a Weapon: Means the verbal abuse or physical contact, of any kind, upon a Natural Man or Woman Secured Party without his express voluntary written consent. If a conflict arises about the facts involving the incident, the version as told by the Natural Man or Woman Secured Party will be accepted as truth, without question, and will not be contested.

 

Abuse of Due Process: Means any action against a Natural Man or Woman Secured Party, when said action does not abide by all the rights and defenses contained in or represented by the “Constitution for the united States of America” and/or the Honorable “Bill of Rights.” This includes any charge, or claim, civil or criminal, or in admiralty, that is alleged or made by any representative of the “UNITED STATES” corporation.

 

Denial of Due Process: Means any attempt by any officer of the court and or corporation to deny, deprive, restrict, prevent, or in any way inhibit the proper Due Process to any Natural Man or Woman Secured Party as outlined in the “Constitution for the united States of America” and/or the Honorable “Bill of Rights.” Any public law, statute, regulation, ordinance, home rule, etc., that is incompatible with the aforementioned Constitution and/or Honorable “Bill of Rights” is null and void and will not be used in any action against any Natural Man or Woman Secured Party.

 

Unlawful Detainer: Means any attempt by any officer of the court or representative of the corporation to arrest, check, hinder, delay, possess, hold, keep in custody, restrain, retard, stop, withhold a Natural Man or Woman Secured Party without affording him every protection as outlined by the “Constitution for the united States of America” and/or the Honorable “Bill of Rights.” Any public law, statute, regulation, ordinance or the like will be null and void and will not be used in any action in which a Natural Man or Woman Secured Party is involved.

 

Reckless Endangerment: Means any attempt by any officer of the court or corporation as defined herein to endanger, attempt or threaten to attempt to endanger the life or property of any Natural Man or Woman Secured Party. This includes dangerous driving in a car, use or threatened use of lethal or non lethal weapons or chemicals, improper use of restraint devices, use of restraint devices on a non-combative Natural Man or Woman Secured Party. If a conflict arises as to whether or not reckless endangerment has occurred, the version of the Natural Man or Woman Secured Party will be considered as truth.

 

Failure to Respond: Means any attempt by any officer or representative of the corporation to ignore, inhibit, withhold, delay, or deny a request for information from a Natural Man or Woman Secured Party.

 

 

 

Failure to Charge within Forty Eight (48) Hours: Means any attempt by any officer or representative of a corporation to delay, inhibit, prevent, or in any way stop a Natural Man or Woman Secured Party from being lawfully charged by the court within forty-eight (48) hours of arrest.

 

Failure to Identify: Means any time a Natural Man or Woman Secured Party has interaction with any officer or representative of the court or corporation, the officer or representative must, upon request of the Natural Man or Woman Secured Party, provide proper identification, written proof of authority, state what his business is with the Natural Man or Woman Secured Party, complete a “Public Servant’s Questionnaire” in advance of arrest or detention, provide documentation properly identifying the officer or respondeat superior’s name and contact information, and any other relevant information as requested by the Natural Man or Woman Secured Party. The officer may not detain the Natural Man or Woman Secured Party for more than ten (10) minutes while he obtains and provides this information.

 

Counterfeiting Statute Staple Securities Instruments: Means any attempt by any officer or representative of a corporation to copy, duplicate, replicate any document that has “Statute Staple Securities Instrument” typed, printed, or hand written anywhere on the document, without the express, written, voluntary permission of the document’s owner who is the Natural Man or Woman Secured Party who filed said document in the public record, or is in possession of said document, or who is the maker of said document. If a dispute about permission to duplicate arises, the statements of the Natural Man or Woman Secured Party will be accepted as fact without question and will not be contested.

 

Coercion or Attempt to Coerce: Means any attempt by any officer or representative of a corporation to threaten, intimidate, deprive, conceal, or in any way prevent a Natural Man or Woman Secured Party from receiving and/or enjoying any right or privilege that is granted, outlined, or secured by the “Constitution for the united States of America” and/or the Honorable “Bill of Rights," or allow another to do so.

 

Purchase Price: Means the new replacement costs of items of property at the time of replacement. This includes locating, packing, shipping, handling, delivery, set up, installation, and any other fee associated with total replacement of property.

 

Destruction of Property: Means any alteration, damage, deprivation, defacing, removing, changing, breaking, separating, removing parts from, erasing of files from, throwing, shooting, kicking, stomping, smashing, crushing, or the like of any property belonging to or in possession of the Natural Man or Woman Secured Party.

 

Deprivation of Rights or Property: Means the concealment of, keeping from, hiding of, obstructing of any rights, property, or privileges that are outlined or protected by the “Constitution for the united States of America” and/or the Honorable “Bill of Rights.”

 

Concealment: Means withholding or keeping information that should normally be revealed, about property and/or rights from a Natural Man or Woman Secured Party. This includes keeping evidence or law from a jury that could favorably alter the outcome of a case to the benefit of the Natural Man or Woman Secured Party. No officer of any court or representative of any corporation may conceal any law and/or any evidence of any kind that is considered relevant by the Natural Man or Woman Secured Party, and/or fail to disclose any law that benefits the Natural Man or Woman Secured Party.

 

Defacing: Means the changing or altering the appearance of an item. This also includes changing or altering the meaning of laws, rights, property, documents, or any other thing that has value as determined by the Natural Man or Woman Secured Party.

 

Constitution: Means, for the purpose of this contract, “The Constitution for the united States of America” circa 1791, as opposed to the “Constitution of the UNITED STATES” corporation circa 1868.

 

Bill of Rights: Means, for the purposes of this contract, the original, Honorable “Bill of Rights” circa 1791.

Rights and Defenses: Means one’s legal and/or lawful right and/or ability to defend himself in any action. Upon agreement, the defendant in an action may give up his right to defend himself in a given action. This includes tacit agreement or agreement by default; and the Natural Man or Woman Secured Party is never the defendant.

 

Willingly: Means that a Natural Man or Woman Secured Party is in full knowledge, understanding, agreement, and full consent, at all times, without fear of reprisal, threat, or coercion, during any interaction in which he is involved with any agent, officer, or representative of any court or corporation, including incorporated governments.

 

Individual Capacity: Means acting on one's behalf to do a thing. The officer, representative, agent, or the like may be acting under law or color of law and go outside of the capacity of the law and take on a personal liability.

 

 

Artificial Person: Means a fictitious entity that was created by the state for transacting commerce. This Artificial Man or Strawman is represented by the ALL CAPITAL LETTER NAME that appears to be spelled the same as the name of the Natural Man or Woman and the Natural Man or Woman Secured Party. When the Artificial Person is used in commerce by the Natural Man or Woman Secured Party, it is a transmitting utility.

 

Agreement: Means any contract which is expressed in writing by letters or marks, or expressed orally in spoken words or utterances by a Natural Man or Woman Secured Party. Any question of any agreement or contract will be resolved by an affidavit from the Natural Man or Woman Secured Party. His affidavit will be considered fact in any action or dispute, without question by any officer, agent, or representative of any corporation including incorporated governments.

 

Unlawful Determination: Means any statement, speech, gesture, writing, presentment, or the like that suggests an idea that negatively represents the character, actions, plans, procedures, customs, ways of a Natural Man or Woman Secured Party, or group of Natural Men or Women Secured Parties, that is not proven by documented, authorized, certified, evidence, on and for the record under penalty of perjury. This includes off color statements, accusations, or remarks by a judge or other officer of the court and any other representative of any corporation including incorporated governments.

 

Statute Staple Securities Instrument: Means an edict or proclamation from a Natural Man or Woman Secured Party.

 

Clerk of the Public Record: Means any clerk who records or files documents in the public record who is employed by a city, county, state, municipality, federal government, and/or international, multi-national, or multi-jurisdictional corporation, including incorporated governments.

 

Public Record: Means any document or record that is filed or recorded into the public record by the Natural Man or Woman Secured Party. For example, when this document is recorded at a Registrar of Deeds Office, it becomes a public record.

 

Presumption: Means legal assumption or inference that places the burden of proof or burden of production on the other party, but never on the Natural Man or Woman Secured Party. No presumption shall prevail against the Natural Man or Woman Secured Party without lawful, documented evidence that supports the presumption which is certified by the officers of the court, on and for the record under penalty of perjury.

 

Unalienable Rights: Means Natural Rights given by God as acknowledged by the Law of Nations and incorporated into the “Bill of Rights,” such as, but not limited to, Right to Bear Arms; Freedom of Speech; Right to Trial by a Jury of one’s Peers; Right to Due Process; Right of Habeas Corpus; Right to be Exempt from Levy as a Natural Man or Woman Secured Party Creditor; Right to be Secure in One’s Private Papers and Effects.

 

Right to Travel: Means the right to freely move about and/or control any type of craft by whatever means, via land, sea, or air, without any interference by any officer, agent, employee, attorney, or judge that in any manner willfully causes adverse affects or damages upon the Natural Man or Woman Secured Party by an arrest, inhibition, detainment, restraint, deprivation, prevention, etc.

Disrespect: Means anything said or written to any Natural Man or Woman Secured Party, about him or his, that he does not like, including body language, or anything that makes him or any reasonable man uncomfortable or fearful.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The Placing or Filing of an Unlawful Lien, Levy, Garnishment, or Attachment: Means any attempt by any officer, agent, or representative of a corporation to place a lien, levy, garnishment, or attachment on the property or collateral of a Natural Man or Woman Secured Party, herein referred to as Secured Party. Any said officer, agent, or representative must first prove his authority to do so by lawfully documented evidence, furnishing all documents, forms, and papers as necessary to prove his authority to do so to a neutral, three (3) Notary Panel, hereinafter referred to as The Panel, selected by the Secured Party. Said officer, agent, or representative must guarantee in writing that the officer, agent, or representative signing said documents will be personally liable for any damages due to his unlawful and/or illegal actions. He must supply bonds or other lawful funds to be held in trust by The Panel until The Panel determines if any actions of the officer, agent, or representative have violated any laws or caused damage to the Secured Party. The Panel will have the sole power to determine if any damage has occurred and will release the funds according to The Panel’s adjudication. The decision of The Panel will be final with no recourse. The surety bonds and/or funds held in escrow by The Panel must be at least four (4) times the estimated value of the property that is liened, levied, garnished, or attached. The assessment of value will be recorded via affidavit by the Secured Party and delivered to The Panel. The Panel’s determination and the assessment thereof will be accepted as truth without question or recourse. Said officer, agent, or representative agrees to surrender, including, but not limited to, any and all surety bonds, public and/or corporate insurance policies, CAFR funds, or corporate property as needed to satisfy any and all claims and/or assessments as filed against said officer, agent, or representative by the Secured Party. Said officer, agent, or representative agrees that any and all property or collateral with a current or existing lien will remain in the custody and control of the Secured Party until such time as a determination has been made by a jury of twelve of the Secured Party’s Peers as defined herein. In the event that a jury of twelve of the Peers cannot be convened or has not been convened within sixty (60) days from the date of the order of the lien, levy, attachment, or garnishment, any action against the Secured Party shall be dismissed with prejudice; and every lien, levy, attachment, or garnishment shall be released within ten (10) days and all property rights restored, unencumbered. The officer, agent, or representative who has authorized said lien, levy, attachment, or garnishment agrees to surrender any and all surety bonds, public and/or corporate insurance policies, CAFR funds, or corporate property as needed to satisfy any and all claims and/or assessments as filed against said officer, agent, or representative by the Secured Party.

 

Peer: Means a Natural Man or Woman Secured Party who has recorded into the public record documents to prove his sovereign status.

 

Ignore: Means to refuse or in any way to deny a lawful request by the Natural Man or Woman Secured Party to have an officer, agent, or representative provide completed legal documents.

 

Natural Man or Woman: Means a flesh and blood, living, breathing, biological man or woman created by God, as represented by the Upper and Lower Case Name, including "Natural Man or Woman," or "Real Man," or "Real Woman," or "Real Man/Woman." This is not to be confused with the Fictitious Legal Entity that was created by the STATE and that is represented by the ALL CAPITAL LETTER NAME.

 

DEBTOR: Means the Fictitious Legal Entity that was created by the STATE and that is represented by the ALL CAPITAL LETTER NAME.

 

The AUTHORITY FOR FINES (DAMAGES) CAUSED BY CRIMES BY GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS,OFFICERS, PERPETRATORS INCLUDING AUTHORIZING BODIES, CAPTAINS, CHIEFS, SUPERVISORS, EMPLOYERS, AGENTS, CLERKS, ADMINISTRATORS, PRINCIPALS/AGENTS, etc., et.al.
These Damages, in part, were determined by GOVERNMENT itself for the violation listed:
Breach Penalty Authority, per occurrance, per day {unless specified otherwise}; PAYMENT IN GOLD OR SILVER COIN:
VIOLATION OF OATH OF OFFICE $250,000.00 18 USC 3571, 28 USC 3002(15)
ARMED ABUSE OF OFFICE $200,000.00
ARMED ABUSE OF AUTHORITY $200,000.00
ARMED USE OF EMERGENCY LIGHTING
IN A NON-EMERGENCY $200,000.00

 

 

 

 

 

ARMED USE OF EMERGENCY SIREN
IN A NON-EMERGENCY $200,000.00
ARMED OR UNARMED ASSAULT AND BATTERY $3,000,000,000
ARMED THREAT OF VIOLENCE $200,000.00
ARMED COERCION $200,000.00
DENIED PROPER WARRANT(S) $250,000.00 18 USC 3571
DENIED RIGHT OF REASONABLE
DEFENSE ARGUMENTS $250,000.00 18 USC 3571
DEFENSE EVIDENCE (RECORDS) $250,000.00 18 USC 3571
DENIED RIGHT TO TRUTH IN EVIDENCE $250,000.00 18 USC 3571
ARMED VIOLATION OF DUE PROCESS $200,000.00
SLAVERY (Forced Compliance to contracts not held) $250,000.00 18 USC 3571
DENIED PROVISIONS IN THE CONSTITUTION $250,000.00 18 USC 3571
ARMED TREASON, WAR AGAINST AMERICANS $250,000.00 18 USC 3571
GENOCIDE AGAINST HUMANITY $1,000,000.00 18 USC 1091
APPARTIDE $1,000,000.00
ARMED DEPRIVATION OF RIGHTS
UNDER COLOR OF LAW $200,000.00 18 USC 242
EMOTIONAL DISTRESS $200,000.00 32 CFR 536.77(a)(3)(vii)
MENTAL ANGUISH ABUSE $200,000.00 42 CFR 488.301
PEONAGE (Felony) $200,000.00 18 USC 1581, 42 USC 1994
UNLAWFUL INCARCERATION $75,000 per hour
MALICIOUS PROSECUTION $200,000.00
DEFAMATION OF CHARACTER $200,000.00
SLANDER $200,000.00
LIBEL $200,000.00
ARMED TRESPASS $200,000.00
NEGLECT/FAILURE TO PROTECT/ACT $200,000.00 18 USC 1621, 42 USC 1986
ARMED GANG PRESSING $200,000.00
ARMED LAND PIRACY/PLUNDER $200,000.00
UNAUTHORIZED BOND PRODUCTION $200,000.00
ARMED FORGERY $200,000.00
ARMED EMBEZZLEMENT $200,000.00
ARMED STALKING $200,000.00
ARMED IMPERSONATING A PUBLIC OFFICIAL $200,000.00
ACTING AS AGENTS OF FOREIGN PRINCIPLES $200,000.00 18 USC 219
ARMED TORTURE $200,000.00
ARMED OPERATING STATUTES WITHOUT BOND $200,000.00
EXPLOITATION OF A LEGAL JUSTICE MINORITY GROUP
BY BAR CLOSED UNION COURTS- CIVIL RIGHTS $1,000,000.00
BAR VIOLATION OF ANTI-TRUST LAWS $200,000.00

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

FICTICIOUS CONVEYANCE OF LANGUAGE $200,000.00 Chap. 2b 78FF
MISAPPROPRIATION OF TAXPAYER FUNDS $200,000.00 18 USC 641-664
VIOLATIONS OF THE UNIVERSAL DECLARATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS
ARMED BREACH OF TRUST $200,000.00
ARMED DISTURBING THE PEACE $200,000.00
ARMED KIDNAPPING $200,000.00 18 USC 1201
ARMED MALFEASANCE/MALPRACTICE $200,000.00 22 CFR 13.3
ARMED MISREPRESENTATION/PERSONAGE $200,000.00
MISPRISON OF FELONY $500.00 18 USC 4
ARMED CONSPIRACY AGAINST RIGHTS OF PEOPLE $200,000.00 18 USC 241
ARMED CRIMINAL EXTORTION/
ECONOMIC OPPRESSION $200,000.00 18 USC 141, 872, 25 CFR 11.417
ARMED EXTORTION OF RIGHTS $200,000.00 Title 15
ARMED ROBBERY $200,000.00
ARMED THEFT BY FORCED REGISTRATION $200,000.00
MAIL THREATS $5,000.00 18 USC 876
MAIL FRAUD $10,000.00 18 USC 1341
ARMED FRAUD $10,000.00 18 USC 1001
ARMED VIOLATION OF LIEBER CODE
AGAINST NON-COMBATANTS $200,000.00
ARMED WRONGFUL ASSUMPTION
OF STATUS/STANDING $200,000.00
ARMED FALSIFICATION OF DOCUMENTS/RECORD $10,000.00 18 USC 1001, 26 USC 7701(a)(1)
ARMED FICTITIOUS OBLIGATIONS $200,000.00 18 USC 514
ARMED PERJURY $2,000.00 18 USC 1621
ARMED SUBORDINATION OF PERJURY $2,000.00 18 USC 1622
To determine multiply number of counts by damage
ARMED RACKETEERING (Criminal, Felony) $200,000.00 18 USC 1961-1968
ARMED RACKEREERING (Civil) $200,000.00
Wages Taken $x3= 18 USC 1964 (c)
(Sustained Damages [total] x3); (If Respondents go into Default on payment = $x3)
The lien debtors will be responsible for any IRS obligations resulting from the discharge or cancellation of any debts, as well as earned income resulting from accepted settlements.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Bilateral Social Compact Agreement by and between the people for

The United States of America

 

Preamble:

The people agree that the great and essential principles of liberty and freedom are recognized and established within The united states of America, the essential rights and Liberty for the people within the metes and bounds and seaward boundaries of The United States of America within their respective States of the Union are hereby accepted and acknowledged with this Bilateral Social Compact Agreement in and for a republic form of Government within separate spheres in perpetual Union, and Article 1

 

The people agree that all people for The united states of America, when they form a social compact, are equal; and have certain inherent and indefeasible immunities from other Independent States of the Union, among which are those of enjoying and defending life and liberty; of acquiring, possessing, and protecting property and reputation; and of pursuing their own happiness; and Article 2

 

The people agree that all political power is inherent in the people for The united states of America, and all republics are founded on the authority of the people, and established for the benefit and general welfare of the people that formed said republic; and, therefore, the people have, at all times, an unalienable and indefeasible right to alter or abolish Government, in such manner as may be deemed expedient; and Article 3

 

The people agree that all people have a natural and unalienable right to worship in accordance to their own conscience and according to the dictates of their own conscience; and that no preference shall ever be given by law to any religious establishment, or mode of worship in any republic form of Government within the States of the Union of The united states of America; and Article 4

 

The people agree that all elections shall be free and equal within each body politic formed as derived from this Bilateral Social Compact Agreement; and that no property qualification is required for eligibility to office, or for the right of suffrage shall not be required within the republic form of Government within the States of the Union within The united states of America; and Article 5

 

 

 

The people agree that as signatories of this Bilateral Social Compact Agreement may freely speak, write, and publish sentiments on all subjects, being responsible for the abuse of that liberty; and no law shall ever be passed to curtail, abridge, or restrain the liberty of speech or of the press; and Article 6

 

 

The people agree that the right of trial by jury of their peers in the same jurisdiction and venue shall forever remain inviolate regardless of separate spheres; and Article 7

 

The people agree that the people shall be secure in their persons, dwellings, papers, and possessions from unreasonable seizures and searches; and that no warrant to search any place, or to seize any thing, shall issue without inscribing the place to be searched, and the person and thing to be seized, as nearly as may be, nor without probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation filed in the proper venue by the accuser; and Article 8

 

The people agree that no person, regardless of status shall be taken, imprisoned, or de-seized of freehold, liberties, outlawed, exiled, or in any manner destroyed or deprived of life, liberty, or property, but by the law written within the States statutes as derived from this Bilateral Social Compact Agreement; and Article 9

 

The people agree that Government shall be open for an injury done to persons, to property, goods, or reputation, and shall have remedy by due process of law; and right and justice administered without sale, denial, or delay; and Article 10

 

The people agree that in all criminal prosecutions, the accused hath a right to be heard with or without friend in counsel, or both; to demand the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in favor of the accused; and in all prosecutions by indictment or presentment formed by a Judicial Branch within this Bilateral Social Compact Agreement, a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of peers in accordance with Article 6, where the crime was committed; and shall not be compelled to give evidence against themselves; and Article 11

 

The people agree that all accused shall be bail able, where the proof is evident, or the presumption is strong; and the privilege of habeas corpus shall not be suspended, unless when, in case of rebellion or invasion, the public safety may require it, decided by the constituted authority as derived from this Bilateral Social Compact Agreement within each of the States of the Union respectively; and Article 12

 

The people agree that excessive bail shall in no case be required; nor shall excessive fines be imposed; nor shall cruel or unusual punishments be inflicted, nor the redemption of the Bond shall be required unless actual damage or injury has been proven in fact; and Article 13

 

The people agree that no person shall, for the same offense, be twice put in jeopardy of dissolution or accusation; and Article 14

 

The people agree that private property shall not be taken or applied to public use, unless just compensation be offered and accepted; and Article 15

 

The people agree that in all indictments of agreement, the truth may be given in evidence; and if it shall appear to the Great jury that the evidence is true, and published with good motives and for justifiable ends, the truth shall be a justification; and the Great jury shall be the judges of the law and facts; and Article 16

 

The people agree that no person shall be put to answer any criminal charge, but by presentment, indictment, or impeachment hereby established by the constituted authority as derived from this Bilateral Social Compact Agreement within each of the States of the Union respectively; and Article 17

 

The people agree that no conviction shall work corruption of blood, or forfeiture of estate; and Article 18

 

The people agree that retrospective laws, punishing acts committed before the existence of such laws, and by them only declared penal, or criminal, are oppressive, unjust, and incompatible with liberty; wherefore, no ex post facto law shall ever be made by any body politic within The united states of America; and Article 19

 

The people agree that no law impairing the obligation of contracts shall ever be passed nor shall any law be made to violate this Bilateral Social Compact Agreement; and

The people agree and have always been with the right, in a peaceable manner, to assemble together to consult for the general welfare, and pass laws in their assemblies to meet the requirements of consultation and collaboration for the general welfare of the people that are signatories of this Bilateral Social Compact Agreement; and

Article 21

 

The people agree that within this Bilateral Social Compact Agreement are with the unalienable right to keep and to bear arms, for common defense against enemies foreign and domestic; and Article 22

 

The people agree that monopolies are contrary to the genius of a republic form of

Government and are forbidden, and Article 23

 

The people agree that all offices held within the constituted authority derived from this Bilateral Social Compact Agreement shall be required to impose term limits on those elected to hold office; and Article 24

 

The people agree that no hereditary emoluments, privileges, or honors, shall ever be granted or conferred in a republic form of Government; and Article 25

 

The people agree that frequent recurrence to fundamental principles is absolutely necessary to preserve the blessings of liberty; and

The people agree that all signatories to this Bilateral Social Compact Agreement shall enjoy the full benefits of all of the Articles written within the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and reserve the right to examine and interpret each aforementioned Article within the fully constituted Judicial Branch as derived from this Bilateral Social Compact Agreement and bound to those determinations; and Article

  1. The people agree that to guard against transgressions upon the rights of the people declare that everything in this Bilateral Social Compact Agreement is accepted out of the general powers of Government, and shall forever remain inviolate; and that all laws contrary thereto, or to the aforementioned provisions thereof, shall be void; and

 

 

 

Definitions:

 

1: Person means: Declared Residents, and affirmed American Nationals within the

States of the Union within The united states of America.

 

2: The people means: DECLARED RESIDENT and affirmed American National within the States of the Union within the metes and bounds and seaward boundaries of The united states of America.

 

Ordained and Established through Silence of Respondent(s) in 30 Days!!!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dealing with claims of "Immunity"
Any claim of "Immunity" is a fraud because, if valid, it would prevent removal from office for crimes against the people, which removal is authorized or mandated under U.S. Constitution Article 2, Section IV; as well as 18 USC 241, 42 USC 1983, 1985, 1986, and other state Constitutions.
Precedents of Law established by Court cases, which are in violation of law, render violations of law legally unassailable. Such a situation violates several specifically stated intents and purposes of the Constitution set forth in the Preamble; to establish justice, insure domestic tranquility, and secure the blessings of liberty. For JUDGES, or anyone in any branch of government. Invoice shall be included in Notice of Fault and Opportunity to Cure and Contest Acceptance, and [an UPDATED /CURRENT VERSION] Notice of Default, and Notice of Lien[an UPDATED /CURRENT VERSION]. The total due fee(s), etc. cannot be quantified / totaled until the Default is ripe.

CONTRACT OF LIABILITY FOR ALLEGATIONS

  1. THAT if the Undersigned failed to rebut such claims or charges, the Respondent would immediately declare a default against the Undersigned and proceed to collect on the claims made as being in agreement with said claims or charges. The Respondents having made the claim or charge against the Undersigned, thereby creating an implied contract, the Undersigned having rebutted said claim or charge demanding proof of said implied contract, a true binding contract was thereby created.
  2. THAT the Respondents' attacks on the commercial or private liability of the Undersigned Affiant, and this Affidavit or response/rebuttal to said claims or charges, created the mutually voluntary, consensual, commercial, private contract by and between the Undersigned and Respondents. Failure of Respondents to prove their claims or charges against the Undersigned within thirty (30) days (or in the alternative simply return Shelldekai: Helfrich to Peter - Jason: Helfrich)

shall constitute deliberate criminal actions and willful breach of and default on a bilateral contract (Affidavit of Agreement) formed knowingly, intentionally, and voluntarily by and between the Undersigned and the Respondents.

  1. THAT I, Peter - Jason: Helfrich, the Undersigned Affiant, depose and certify that I have written the foregoing with intent and understanding of purpose, and believe the statements, allegations, demands and contents herein to be true, correct, and complete, commercially reasonable, and just, to the best of my knowledge and belief.




















NOTICE TO AGENTS IS NOTICE TO PRINCIPALS

NOTICE TO PRINCIPALS IS NOTICE TO AGENTS
EXODUS 20:15, 16.
FURTHER AFFIANT SAITH NOT.

WITNESS my Seal from my living Sovereign hand this On this 29th day of March, 2019



ALL RIGHTS RESERVED WITHOUT PREJUDICE



Sui Juris
Peter – Jason: Helfrich; UCC 1 - 308, Affiant, Sovereign, Beneficiary, Real Party In Interest, Injured Party, as well as Authorized Representative, and Attorney In Fact In Behalf Of PETER HELFRICH(c)082494

THE RIGHT TO AMEND AS NEEDED IS RESERVED “NUC PRO TUNC” 082494







EXPLANATION SHEET TO BE ATTACHED TO EVERY COMMERCIAL INSTRUMENT OF FILING BEARING THE U.S. S.E.C. TRACER FLAG CONTAINING THE PHRASE "A SECURITY -- 15 USC" ....This EXPLANATION SHEET is to be attached to all Commercial Affidavits, including Affidavits of Obligation (Commercial Liens), which are non-judicial consensual processes which arise out of a breach of special performance (e.g., for public officials' breach of oath of office, a violation of the Constitution for the United States of America and respective state Constitutions.)

The notice as follows below is included for the purposes of FULL DISCLOSURE (UCC), and as a warning noted by the flag for commercial grace at the top of the instrument.

COMMERCIAL AFFIDAVIT / AFFIDAVIT OF NOTICE, DECLARATION, AND DEMAND

FAIR NOTICE AND WARNING OF COMMERCIAL GRACE

THIS IS A U.S. S.E.C. TRACER FLAG, NOT A POINT OF LAW







A SECURITY (15 USC)
------------------------
COMMERCIAL AFFIDAVIT
THIS IS A U.S. S.E.C. TRACER FLAG
NOT A POINT OF LAW*
see attached instruction

* One definition of "A SECURITY" is "any evidence of debt."
****************** * * * * * * * * * *APPENDIX A

The Lien Claimant does NOT rely on Title 15 as a basis for the "Commercial Lien." ALL Commercial processes, by using or relying on notes or paper in Commerce (e.g. Federal Reserve Notes), must bear some sort of Federal tracking code, a County Recorder's number or a serial number, which process must be accessible for inspection at the nearest relevant County Recorder's Office or be widely advertised. When a Lien matures in three (3) months, ninety (90) days, by default of the Lien Debtor through the Lien Debtors failure to rebut the AFFIDAVIT OF OBLIGATION point-for-point categorically, it becomes an accounts receivable in the ordinary sense of a collectable debt upon which assignments, collateralization, and other commercial transactions can be based, hence becomes a Security subject to observation, tracking, and regulation by the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (hereinafter U.S. S.E.C.).

The notation "A Security -- 15 USC" is a flag in Commerce telling the U.S. S.E.C. that a speculation account is being established to enforce a lien. The U.S. S.E.C. can then monitor the process. As long as the process is truthful, open, and above-board (Full disclosure), the U.S. S.E.C. has no jurisdiction over it, for even the U.S. S.E.C. has no jurisdiction over the truth of testimony, depositions, affidavits, and affidavits of obligation (Commercial Liens), and an unrebutted affidavit stands as the truth in Commerce.

Legal Authority: Universal moral/existential truths/principles, expressed in Judaic (Mosaic) Orthodox Hebrew/Jewish Commercial Code, corollary to Exodus (chiefly Exodus 20:15, 16). This is the best known Commercial process in America.

When an Affidavit is so flagged in Commerce, it becomes a Federal Document because it could become translated into a Security (for example by being attached in support of a Commercial Lien), and not accepting and/or filing a Commercial Affidavit becomes a Federal offense.





















WITNESS my Seal from my living Sovereign hand this On this 29th day of March, 2019

Peter – Jason: Helfrich; UCC 1 - 308, SUI JURIS

 

 

 

 

STATE OF Nevada )

) :ss

)

COUNTY OF Clark )

On this 29th day of March, 2019





Respond to this report!

#4 Author of original report

PROOF OF SERVICE VIA EMAIL TO SECRETARY OF STATE OF NEVADA

AUTHOR: Peter - (United States)

POSTED: Thursday, March 28, 2019

Pete Helfrich <petehelfrich2018@gmail.com> Habeas Corpus Mailed Monday the 25th; did the Clerk Receive it?
2 messages Pete Helfrich <petehelfrich2018@gmail.com> Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 9:32 AM To: helpdesk Vegas <helpdesk_vegas@nvd.uscourts.gov>, fa1sef1ag.d33pstate@gmail.com, AgInfo@ag.nv.gov, "Share the Love With Ms. Jhen" <Cjhenjhen2@gmail.com>, Justin Nolan <ghosttribe@gmail.com>, Nsearch OfSouls <glenn@nsearch.com>, Brent Gunderson <Brent10@gmail.com>, Silvia Castillo <Kitkat30nyekindom@gmail.com>, sosmail@sos.nv.gov, nvsec@sos.nv.gov, support@nvsilverflume.gov Dear Clerk of Court:   A Habeas Corpus was mailed out to your Court this past Monday, March 25th, 2019. I, Peter - Jason: Helfrich, declare, swear and affirm under penalty of perjury that, to the best of my knowledge and belief, the information herein is true, correct, and complete. NOTICE TO AGENTS IS NOTICE TO PRINCIPALS NOTICE TO PRINCIPALS IS NOTICE TO AGENTS SILENCE IS ACQUIESCENCE; ACQUIESCENCE IS ESTOPPEL. YOU HAVE 45 DAYS... https://www.ripoffreport.com/reports/state-of-nevada-officials/nevada/state-of-nevada-officials-attempted-murder-kidnapping-retaliation-fraud-theft-etc-ne-1476063

https://pjsovereignjedioflaw.blogspot.com/2019/03/notice-demand-with-rescissionwithdrawal.html

  Please confirm receipt. See attached.
    COMPLETE-Federal-Parental-Rights-Habeas-Mailed.pdf
20293K SOS Customer Service <sosmail@sos.nv.gov> Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 11:33 AM To: Pete Helfrich <petehelfrich2018@gmail.com>

​Thank you for contacting the Secretary of State Barbara Cegavske's office. We are not the Clerk of the Court and our office will have no action to take on the document.    If you have any questions, please contact our office .      Office of Nevada Secretary of State Barbara K Cegavske 202 North Carson Street Carson City, NV 89701 Office:775-684-5708 email:sosmail@sos.nv.gov From: Pete Helfrich <petehelfrich2018@gmail.com>
Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2019 9:32 AM
To: helpdesk Vegas; fa1sef1ag.d33pstate@gmail.com; AgInfo@ag.nv.gov; Share the Love With Ms. Jhen; Justin Nolan; Nsearch OfSouls; Brent Gunderson; Silvia Castillo; SOS Customer Service; nvsec; NVsilverflume Support
Subject: Habeas Corpus Mailed Monday the 25th; did the Clerk Receive it?  

Respond to this report!

#3 Author of original report

FURTHER PROOF OF SERVICE BY EMAIL OF FEDERAL HABEAS CORPUS RELATED TO THIS REPORT!

AUTHOR: Peter - (United States)

POSTED: Thursday, March 28, 2019

Pete Helfrich <petehelfrich2018@gmail.com> from: helpdesk Vegas <helpdesk_Vegas@nvd.uscourts.gov> to: Pete Helfrich <petehelfrich2018@gmail.com>
date: Mar 28, 2019, 10:32 AM subject: RE: Proof of Service mailed-by: nvd.uscourts.gov signed-by: fedcourts.onmicrosoft.com security: Standard encryption (TLS) Learn more : Important mainly because you often read messages with this label. Pete Helfrich <petehelfrich2018@gmail.com> Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 10:04 AM

To: Pete Helfrich <petehelfrich2018@gmail.com>


    20190323_170238.jpg
3784K Pete Helfrich <petehelfrich2018@gmail.com> Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 10:08 AM

To: helpdesk Vegas <helpdesk_vegas@nvd.uscourts.gov>

Proof of Service of Federal Habeas Corpus by Mail Please Confirm Receipt.

 

Proof of Service of Federal Habeas Corpus by Mail Please Confirm Receipt.

28 U.S.C. 1746 (1); "Executed without the UNITED STATES", ALL RIGHTS RESERVED WITHOUT PREJUDICE

Peter - Jason: Helfrich; UCC 1 - 308

---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: Pete Helfrich <petehelfrich2018@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 10:04 AM
Subject: Proof of Service
To: Pete Helfrich <petehelfrich2018@gmail.com>



20190323_170238.jpg
3784K helpdesk Vegas <helpdesk_Vegas@nvd.uscourts.gov> Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 10:32 AM

To: Pete Helfrich <petehelfrich2018@gmail.com>

Morning,

 Email correspondence regarding cases before this Court are not proper or acceptable. All correspondence must filed with the Court in accordance with the local and federal rules. Your email will be terminated and not acted on.

 

[Quoted text hidden]

Respond to this report!

#2 Author of original report

Federal Habeas Corpus [Re.: Shelldekai: Helfrich] Mailed Monday the 25th, 2019

AUTHOR: Peter - (United States)

POSTED: Thursday, March 28, 2019

Habeas Corpus Mailed Monday the 25th; did the Clerk Receive it?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Pete Helfrich <petehelfrich2018@gmail.com
 

Attachments
9:32 AM (38 minutes ago)

 
 


 

 

to helpdesk, fa1sef1ag.d33pstate, AgInfo, Share, Justin, Nsearch, Brent, Silvia, sosmail, nvsec, support

 
 from: Pete Helfrich <petehelfrich2018@gmail.com
to: helpdesk Vegas <helpdesk_vegas@nvd.uscourts.gov>,
fa1sef1ag.d33pstate@gmail.com,
AgInfo@ag.nv.gov,
"Share the Love With Ms. Jhen" <Cjhenjhen2@gmail.com>,
Justin Nolan <ghosttribe@gmail.com>,
Nsearch OfSouls <glenn@nsearch.com>,
Brent Gunderson <Brent10@gmail.com>,
Silvia Castillo <Kitkat30nyekindom@gmail.com>,
sosmail@sos.nv.gov,
nvsec@sos.nv.gov,
support@nvsilverflume.gov
 
date: Mar 28, 2019, 9:32 AM
subject: Habeas Corpus Mailed Monday the 25th; did the Clerk Receive it?
mailed-by: gmail.com

 

 

 
 

 

 

 

 


 
 
 
 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 


Dear Clerk of Court:

 


A Habeas Corpus was mailed out to your Court this past Monday, March 25th, 2019.

I, Peter - Jason: Helfrich, declare, swear and affirm under penalty of perjury that, to the best of my knowledge and belief, the information herein is true, correct, and complete.

NOTICE TO AGENTS IS NOTICE TO PRINCIPALS

NOTICE TO PRINCIPALS IS NOTICE TO AGENTS

SILENCE IS ACQUIESCENCE; ACQUIESCENCE IS ESTOPPEL.

YOU HAVE 45 DAYS...

https://www.ripoffreport.com/reports/state-of-nevada-officials/nevada/state-of-nevada-officials-attempted-murder-kidnapping-retaliation-fraud-theft-etc-ne-1476063

https://pjsovereignjedioflaw.blogspot.com/2019/03/notice-demand-with-rescissionwithdrawal.html

 


Please confirm receipt. See attached.

Respond to this report!

#1 Author of original report

CORRUPT STATE OF NEVADA OFFICIALS Attempted Murder; Kidnapping; Retaliation; Fraud; Theft, etc.

AUTHOR: Peter - (United States)

POSTED: Wednesday, March 27, 2019

https://pjsovereignjedioflaw.blogspot.com/2019/03/notice-demand-with-rescissionwithdrawal.html

Notice & Demand With Rescission/Withdrawal Of Signature

Nunc Pro Tunc 08/24/1994

WIDELY ADVERTISED PUBLIC RECORD 

NOTICE TO AGENTS IS NOTICE TO PRINCIPALS

NOTICE TO PRINCIPALS IS NOTICE TO AGENTS

SILENCE IS ACQUIESCENCE; ACQUIESCENCE IS ESTOPPEL; YOU HAVE THIRTY (30) DAYS!!!


March 24, 2019 - 12:40 EST

To the Secretary of State, Governor; and other officials,

To whom this may concern.

I, Peter - Jason: Helfrich, one of the people domiciled on the land, now declares on and for the record, I am the authorized signature for (PETER JASON HELFRICH(c)082494) the usufruct trust created for my benefit at my birth, by the United States. This usufruct trust which was created without my knowledge and without my consent; (due to the 1933 bankruptcy) the United States use of the trust has been of great harm to me (PETER JASON HELFRICH(c)082494). So with no other option left I must demand pursuant to the following law, the secretary of state send notice of Peter - Jason: Helfrich standing/status to the courts.

8 U.S.C. § 1502 : Certificate of nationality issued by Secretary of State for person not a naturalized citizen of United States for use in proceedings of a foreign state.

FOR THE RECORD: "The Partner (Government) of my Partner (PETER JASON HELFRICH(c)082494) is NOT my (Peter - Jason: Helfrich) Partner, applies herein and is in FULL FORCE AND EFFECT."

The Secretary of State is authorized to issue, in his discretion and in accordance with rules and regulations prescribed by him, a certificate of nationality for any person not a naturalized citizen of the United States who presents satisfactory evidence that he is an AMERICAN NATIONAL and that such certificate is needed for use in judicial or administrative proceedings in a foreign state. Such certificate shall be solely for use in the case for which it was issued and shall be transmitted by the Secretary of State through appropriate official channels to the judicial or administrative officers of the FOREIGN STATE in which it is to be used.





19 Corpus Juris Secundum § 883, [t]he United States government is a FOREIGN CORPORATION with respect to a state.

8 USC § 1101(a)(21), [t]he term "national" means a person owing permanent allegiance to a state."

8 USC § 1101(B)(22), [t]he term "national of the United States" means (A) a citizen of the United States, or (B) a person who, though not a citizen of the United States, owes permanent allegiance to the United States. This highlighted section of law is I, John/Jane Doe, who is not a 14th Amendment US citizen bound by statutes, codes, and regulation thus not subject to the jurisdiction.

American national ≠ national/citizen of the United States. These are TWO distinct status’ within the American system. The latter is a free American National; the former is a voluntary slave subject to the jurisdiction thereof created by section 1 of the 14th Amendment. It is a FEDERALLY CREATED capacity/title that owes allegiance to it and is a subject/citizen of the United States.

That I, Peter - Jason: Helfrich, am not a Government employee nor is Peter - Jason: Helfricha part of the body politic.



I, Peter - Jason: Helfrich, have signed no such contract knowingly, and I, Peter - Jason: Helfrich, have the 11th Amendment immunity. Since such per ponderous fraud has been being done against me. I, Justin Edward Nolan, must and am rescinding/withdrawing my signature from all documents; and demanding the dissolution of the Usufruct Trust; as first and for most, the usufruct was created without my knowledge, more importantly without my parent’s knowledge at my birth; hence no full disclosure has taken place.

I, Peter - Jason: Helfrich, hereby demand the return of all e quitable assets, monies, land patents, and so forth, as any claim of contract is null & void under law. I, Peter - Jason: Helfrich, have been forced in to this action by the officials of "Massachusetts" who have repeatedly refused to arrest corrupt officials (judges, lawyers, prosecutors) and obstructed my access to a grand jury to prosecute the criminals who repeatedly break law. I, Peter - Jason: Helfrich, will lay out the clear sedition and treason being committed by members of the Communist BAR/lawyers Guild, (deemed such by the 81st Congress in 1950 lawyers guild report) while the international bankers who created the BAR, Guarantees the rigged vote, never allows a competent official in office. While they, (the international bankers) and the UN, (another banker creation) are controllers of the courts. On December 9, 1945, the International Organization Immunities Act relinquished every public office of the United States to the United Nations. This law makes all public officials foreign citizens, barring them from judicial power. All public officials are administrative agents of the US Corporation. They have no judicial power whatsoever.

The courts; have been under and is UN controlled. While the courts, are operated and controlled by the communist BAR; which helps to destroy America by leaning the trust and creating sureties which make the national debt appear larger than it is and there by also destroy the American People’s FREEDOM with fraudulent claims of crime. When there is no corpus delecti which is required for a crime to exist.

Another troubling issue Black's Law Dictionary provides the following definition: Capitis Diminutio Maxima; (meaning a maximum loss of status) – The very highest, or most comprehensive loss of status. This occurred when a man's condition was changed from one of freedom to one of bondage, when he became a slave. It swept away with it all rights of citizenship and all family rights.

This is the very action the BAR and it’s members claims upon the American people due to our names being written in all capitalized letters on the certificate of birth/receipt for the Usufruct trust. This action shows a clear mental insanity to believe one can be made another’s slave through capitalized letters upon a receipt/certificate. If any American made such a claim; to purport the ability of making one their slave; by capitalizing another’s name, that natural and/or private person would surely be deemed mad/insane and lock away, for the safety of society; as there is no telling what such a person might do. Please see the attach copy of certificate of birth. This action being done purports to make a living man’s status the same as a corporation as only corporations are put in all capital letters in law. In effect this creates a corporate soul for the living man if he uses this to contract or do any other things in the world, the law society claim his status to be that of a corporation. This means he is now CIVILITER MORTUUS meaning one who is civilly dead; one who is considered as if he were naturally dead, so far as his rights are concerned.

Verses one being, Capitis Diminutio Minima (meaning a minimum loss of status). The very lowest; or least comprehensive degree of loss of status. This occurred where a man's family relations alone were changed. It happened upon the arrogation [pride] of a person who had been his own master, (sui juris,) [of his own right, not under any legal disability] or upon the emancipation of one who had been under the patria potestas. [Parental authority] It left the rights of liberty and citizenship unaltered. See Inst. 1, 16, pr.; 1, 2, 3; Dig. 4, 5, 11; Mackeld. Rom.Law, 144.

Or one being Sui Juris: "Of his own right; possessing full social and civil rights; not under any legal disability to act for one’s self. (See Emancipation: Majority) [Black’s Law Dictionary, 6th Ed., pg. 1434] & in their Propria Persona = Lat. 'In ones own proper person.' To present, one’s self in court without assistance of an attorney, at least 'on the record.' Often shortened to 'in pro per.’

Yet a further question who gave the members of the law society the right to bastardize the English written language then not tell the people in front of them the words being used may or may not mean what one believed them to mean. This deception clearly causes fraudulent entrees upon the court record. . This is a direct violation of 18 U.S. Code § 3501 - Admissibility of confessions; also a violation of 29 USC sec 401-531 as plaintiff has been denied his right to be Propria Persona as attorneys are forced on everyone. All these actions violate peoples Unalienable rights ~ Things which are not in commerce, as public roads, are in their nature unalienable...

THE NATURAL RIGHTS OF LIFE AND LIBERTY & THE PURSUIT OF HAPPINESS ARE UNALIENABLE. ~Bouvier's 1856

-Statutes, codes and regulations are not law, merely a point in fact of law, and statutes, codes, and regulations are the law of Government, not man. Please see the following case cites.

-"A "Code’ or Statute’ is not a Law," (Flournoy v. First Nat. Bank of Shreveport, 197 La. 1067, 3 So.2d 244, 248),

A concurrent or ‘joint resolution ‘of legislature is not "Law," (Koenig v. Flynn, 258 N.Y. 292, 179 N. E. 705, 707;

Ward v State, 176 Okl. 368, 56 P.2d 136, 137; State ex rel. Todd v. Yelle, 7 Wash.2d 443, 110 P.2d 162, 165).

All codes, rules, and regulations are for government authorities only, not human/Creators in accord with God’s Laws. "All codes, rules, and regulations are unconstitutional and lacking due process of Law."

(Rodriques v. Ray Donavan, U.S. Department of Labor, 769 F.2d 1344, 1348 (1985)); …lacking due process[of law], in that they are ‘void for ambiguity’ in their failure to specify the statutes’ applicability to ‘natural persons,’ otherwise depriving the same of fair notice, as their construction by definition of terms aptly identifies the applicability of such statutes to "artificial or fictional corporate entities or ‘persons’, creatures of statute, or those by contract employed as agents or representatives, departmental subdivisions, offices, officers, and property of the government, but not the ‘Natural Person’ or American citizen Immune from such jurisdiction of legalism.

"The Common Law is the real law, the Supreme Law of the land. The codes, rules, regulations, policy and statutes are "not the law."

(Self v. Rhay, 61 Wn 2d 261), They are the law of government for internal regulation, not the law of man, in his separate but equal station and natural state, a sovereign foreign with respect to government generally.)

With such overwhelming case law there is no question about the fact of the claim made here statutes are not law. Plaintiff/the court now challenges prosecution and Magistrate to prove the statutes apply to John/Jane Doe. I, Peter - Jason: Helfrich, deny being a government employee. If the prosecution or state or Magistrates wish to say different then prove I have been a paid employee of federal or state Government produce the pay roll records. Add in the fact Peter - Jason: Helfrich, is not a part of the body politic.

The Clear Fraud; Sedition, And Treasonous Acts Of The BAR

This fraudulent, /seditious, & treasonous act, of the Courts’/BAR members telling plaintiff and defendants alike, that the Court; was appointing an attorney, in plaintiff’s/defendants benefit. This fraud is an outrage and now known to be patently false/a lie on its face. Please see the following it explains far better the fraud/sedition, and treason. That an attorney’s presence is to put one in the state court’s jurisdiction, so they can prevent one from challenging the jurisdiction putting the people at the magistrates non-existing mercy as the BAR’s clear objective is the over throw of America’s form of Government by convicting the people of fictional crimes to remove their right of gun ownership, so the American people can be Concorde and enslaved without a shot fired. Even case law denotes the truth. Please see:

The U.S. Supreme Court observed in its unanimous decision in Kay v. Ehrler, 499 U.S. 432, that a lawmaking body may instead prefer to discourage attorneys from electing to appear in Propria Persona because such self re-presentation may often conflict with the general public and legislative policy favoring the effective and successful prosecution of meritorious claims. The high court observed that 'Even a skilled lawyer who represents himself is at a disadvantage in contested litigation. Ethical considerations may make it inappropriate for him to appear as a witness. He is deprived of the judgment of an independent third party in framing the theory of the case, evaluating alternative methods of presenting the evidence, cross-examining hostile witnesses, formulating legal arguments, and in making sure that reason, rather than emotion, dictates the proper tactical response to unforeseen developments in the courtroom. The adage that 'a attorney who represents himself has a fool for a client' is the product of years of experience by seasoned litigators.. Id. at 437-438

An appearance may be in "Propria Persona" and need not be by attorney.

Obs. 'In his own person.' It is a rule in pleading those pleas to the jurisdiction of the court must be pleaded in Propria Persona, because, if pleaded by an attorney, they admit the jurisdiction, as an attorney is an officer of the court, and he is presumed to plead after having obtained leave, which admits the jurisdiction).

This ruling is clear proof the attorneys only role is to fraudulently aide the BAR member/judge’s court in getting jurisdiction. The following rulings explain the criminal acts in much greater detail the rulings shown; leave no doubt of the subversive actions of the bar and its member’s intention of destroying America from within. Please see the following:

"The attorney’s first duty is to the courts...not to the client." U.S.v Franks D.C.N.J. 53F.2d 128). Here again people have been repeatedly told the attorney is for their benefit to insure a fair and impartial hearing; this is clear fraud.

"Clients are also called "wards of the court" in regard to their relationship with their attorneys."Spilker v. Hankin, 158 F.2d 35, 58U.S.App.D.C. 206. This ruling clearly shows the attorney’s presence does not guarantee a fair and impartial hearing but rather secures/guarantees defendants or plaintiffs are at the mercy of the Magistrate. The preponderance of fraud will only grow as you will see.

(Wards of court. are Infants and persons of unsound mind). Davis Committee v. Loney, 290 Ky. 644, 162 S.W.2d 189, 190.

Did you get that? An Attorneys first duty is not to the people they are supposedly representing, and when you have an Attorney you are either considered insane or an infant.

This is an incredible fraud/sedition & treason being perpetrated on the American people, by members of the BAR who perform such fraud/sedition treason daily there is no doubt, who the real criminals are now!?! This violates 18 U.S.CODE§2384-SEDITIOUS CONSPIRACY and is clearly sedition against the American people and the United States of America. The BAR members repeatedly ignores the Constitution of the United States in open court violating Title 18 USC 2381 Capitol Felony Treason. They claim that saying our paper work is fugitive allows them the right to ignore the US Constitution.

I, Peter - Jason: Helfrich, hereby also demand that with the above stated law the Secretary of State notify the clerk in case numbers CR 7411 A, CV 37593 A, in "Nye County" , "Nevada" , of my, Peter - Jason: Helfrich's standing, as an American National with 11th Amendment immunity.

It is no wonder as to why the 81st congress deemed the BAR/lawyers guild a Communist Organization in 1950; in the congressional report on the lawyer’s guild. When one reads the report it becomes quickly understood the BAR was acting in support of Adolph Hitler, as the BAR was caught red handed, shipping ammunitions, & attacking the American public school system, in order to dumb down American children. Yet despite all the facts members of the BAR are still practicing their fraudulent/seditious & treasonous acts daily & even seem proud, of their historical ties with the world’s 2nd largest mass murderer in history Adolph Hitler 1st being the International Bankers of course, which the present financial crisis has shown the historical connections here as well, being the BAR was founded and started by the bankers who can be shown to have a death toll over 100 million people directly, as a result of actions taken by the international bankers from WW 2 ‘till today. So it’s clear, the BAR and its members seek not justice, but domination, and the death, of all who will not be put upon bended knee, to them, and their creators (The International Bankers).

18 U.S.C. § 4. Such activity has been a federal crime since the First Congress, for "the common law recognized a duty to raise the `hue and cry’ and report felonies to the authorities. . . . It is apparent from this statute, as well as from our history and that of England, that concealment of crime and agreements to do so are not looked upon with favor. Such conduct deserves no encomium." Branzburg v. Hayes,408 U.S. 665, 696-97 (1972) (citation omitted).

Misprision of Felony involves both knowledge of a crime and some affirmative act of concealment or participation, and the Courts have concluded that ‘misprision of felony’ is a crime of moral turpitude because it necessarily involves an affirmative act of concealment or participation in a felony, behavior that runs contrary to accepted societal duties and involves dishonest or fraudulent activity. The Supreme Court observed that: Concealment of crime has been condemned throughout our history… Although the term "misprision of felony" now has an archaic ring, gross indifference to the duty to report known criminal behavior remains a badge of irresponsible citizenship.

THE FOLLOWING IS PART OF WHAT IS ON PAPER WORK WHICH HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE COURTS AND BAR MEMBERS THEY HAVE SAID THEY ARE NOT REQUIRED TO ABIDE BY THE CONSTITUTION FEDERAL LAW OR SUPREME COURT RULINGS.

1st claim and fact.

The FACTS OF LAW already say child support has been declared unconstitutional. So for the defendant’s cause of action against plaintiff/the court. There is no jurisdiction in the matter, as child support was declared unconstitutional in (STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS C7-97-926 C8-97-1132 C7-97-1512 C8-98-33, Filed June 12, 1998). The decision was up held in the Supreme Court. (STATE OF MINNESOTA IN SUPREME COURT C7-97-926 C8-97-1132 C9-98-33 C7-97-1512,) Filed: January 28, 1999. This alone constitutes that no jurisdiction could exist. Because child support was found to be lacking, any provision for the separation of powers act in the US Constitution in both the Federal and the state law.

 

The following rulings state this applies to the instant case. Mills v. Duryee, 1t1 U.S. (7 Cranch) 481 (1813), the United States Supreme Court ruled that the merits of a case, as settled by courts of one state, must be recognized by the courts of other states; state courts may not reopen cases which have been conclusively decided by the courts of another state. Later, Chief Justice John Marshall suggested that the judgment of one state court must be recognized by other states' courts as final. Also Ableman v. Booth 62 U.S. 506 where the higher court stated the lower courts were bound by all federal court rulings. As well Howlett V. Rose, 496 U.S. 356 (1990) Federal Law and Supreme Court cases apply to State court cases. (Cooper v. Aaron, 358 U.S. 1) (1958)--States are bound by United States Supreme Court Case decisions. Also Article 4 of the U.S. Constitution states that each state shall give full faith and credit to the other states laws this would include case law.

Plaintiff/the court (challenges the jurisdiction under Article 1 sec. 8 clause 17, & demands to know the nature & cause of the action) also pursuant to Indiana trial rule 12 .(B) (1) Lack of jurisdiction over the subject matter, 12 (B) (2) Lack of jurisdiction over the natural/private person, 12 (B) (8) The same action pending in another state court of this state. Since, the plaintiff/court is challenging the jurisdiction, of the Magistrate. So plaintiff decided to see what case law on this matter denotes. (Basso v Utah power & light company 495, F 2d 906 910) Jurisdiction can be challenged at any time and must be proven not assumed.

(Latana v Hopper 102 2d 188) (Chicago v New York 37 F SUPP 150) The court must prove on the record all jurisdiction facts related to the jurisdiction asserted.

Further more the following laws have not been met or upheld to allow jurisdiction please see the following:

1. No information/charging document has been lawfully issued to obtain the appearance of any Defendant in this matter as required pursuant to IC 35-34-1-2. Without the existence of lawful information/charging document, plaintiffs/the court makes only a special appearance before this Magistrate to inform the Magistrate of error in this matter.

2. Plaintiffs/court has not been served an information/charging document supported by any first hand material fact witness, affidavit of probable cause, or ANY instrument from which any reasonable natural/private person could determine probable cause, thereby initiating the court's jurisdiction in compliance with IC 35-34-1-2 and in compliance with the 4th, 5th, and 6th amendment protections. See State v. Kaahaaina, 2001 Haw. App. LEXIS 204 (Haw. Ct. App. Oct. 17, 2001) Holding that the State failed to properly initiate the criminal proceeding against the defendant because the defendant was never formally charged orally or by written complaint supported by sworn statement or affidavit and thus failed to initiate jurisdiction in the District Court. Plaintiff hereby demands a verified criminal complaint if none exist Magistrate/commissioner has no choice but to dismiss the matter with prejudice.

3. Without sufficient and lawful process as directed per IC 35-34-1-2; at minimum, the court's jurisdiction cannot be invoked and, therefore, no matter is before this court and this matter is void AB INITIO. This failure to follow IC 35-34-1-2 violated the Defendant’s due process rights. See State v. Kaahaaina, 2001 Haw. App. LEXIS 204 (Haw. Ct. App. Oct. 17, 2001) Holding that defendant was improperly charged because the information charging document used by the officer failed to comply with HRS § 805-1 and HRPP Rule 7 (d).

4. This state court is without jurisdiction, precludes the judge from making an offer of a plea to the defendant in error without, in so doing, putting fraud upon the Magistrates court..

5. The Prosecutor in this matter knew or should have known that without the issuance of sufficient process, there is no charge or complaint against the falsely accused or defendant.

6. The person acting as magistrate in this matter, who has had this matter brought before him/her in this court, knew or should have known that the court is patently, unambiguously, and wholly without jurisdiction because the insufficiency of process used in this matter precludes initiating the court’s jurisdiction.

7. In light of the facts before the court, the person acting as judge must act minister ally and should, sua sponte, dismiss or remove this matter from the court with prejudice as it is void AB INITIO.

Therefore, the Nye County Court, STATE OF NEVADA is given mandatory judicial notice under rule 201 of the FRCP by plaintiffs/court, in light of the foregoing lawful and valid facts, that there is no matter before this court and that any and all parties who pursue any trial of this matter are acting in fraud and misrepresentation and in violation of clearly established law, procedures, rules of evidence, and of the rights of this court in error.

FACTS WHICH MUST BE ADDRESSED

1. Claimant has identified themselves as STATE OF NEVADA; therefore this court is improperly set due to the fact that in All Cases … in which a State shall be a Party, The Supreme Court shall have original Jurisdiction.

2. Should this court allow this action to be brought before it, the proceeding will be biased, bigoted, warped, lopsided, and in violation of the laws of due process in that the Respondent cannot receive a fair and impartial hearing before a court wherein:

a. The "law", complete with monetary penalties and pseudo "criminal" penalties, was manufactured by the claimant/state;

b. The court belongs to the claimant/state;

c. The judge receives remuneration from the claimant/state;

d. The judge is subject to the regulatory agencies of the claimant/state;

e. The witnesses are on the payroll of the claimant/state;

f. For Magistrate to hear the case would violate subject matter jurisdiction and be a conflict of interest as the magistrate represents the state and the state is the claimant "unlawfully" see Hoke v Henderson 15, N.C. 15,25 AM DEC 677." That statute which would deprive a person of person or property without a regular trial according to the use and custom of common law would not be the law of the land." There is a common law principle which states that for there to be a crime, there must first be a victim, corpus delecti. In the absence of a victim there can be no crime. The state cannot be the victim nor can the state sue on behalf of another.

3. If the STATE OF NEVADA insists on being a party to the action, then let it bring its action in the court of original jurisdiction which is set forth in Article III, Section 2 of the Constitution for the United States of America, to which the claimant/state is contractually bound.

One need only look to the American Jurisprudence to see what has been decided prior on any unconstitutional law and the duties of a court officer.

American Jurisprudence 2nd 1964 vol. 16 CONSTITUTIONAL LAW

§ 177 Generally statute leaves the question that it purports to settle just as it would be had the statute not been enacted. Since an unconstitutional law is void, the general principles follow that it imposes no duties, confers no rights, creates no office, bestows no power or authority on anyone, affords no protection, and justifies no acts performed under it. A contract which rests on an unconstitutional statute creates no obligation to be impaired by subsequent legislation.

No one is bound to obey an unconstitutional law and no courts are bound to enforce it. Indeed, insofar as a statute runs counter to the fundamental law of the land, it is superseded thereby. It is said that all persons are presumed to know the law, meaning that ignorance of the law excuses no one; if any person acts under an unconstitutional statute, he does so at his peril and must take the consequences. Pg. 403 – 405

16Am Jur 2d., Const. Law Sec. 70:

"No public policy of a state can be allowed to override the positive guarantees of the U.S. Constitution."

63C Am.Jur.2d, Public Officers and Employees, §247

"As expressed otherwise, the powers delegated to a public officer are held in trust for the people and are to be exercised in behalf of the government or of all citizens who may need the intervention of the officer. [1] Furthermore, the view has been expressed that all public officers, within whatever branch and whatever level of government, and whatever be their private vocations, are trustees of the people, and accordingly labor under every disability and prohibition imposed by law upon trustees relative to the making of personal financial gain from a discharge of their trusts. [2] That is, a public officer occupies a fiduciary relationship to the political entity on whose behalf he or she serves. [3] and owes a fiduciary duty to the public. [4] It has been said that the fiduciary responsibilities of a public officer cannot be less than those of a private individual. [5] Furthermore, it has been stated that any enterprise undertaken by the public official which tends to weaken public confidence and undermine the sense of security for individual rights is against public policy.[6]

2nd claim and fact.

Plaintiff’ Peter - Jason: Helfrich is the court as defined in the following. (COURT = The person and the suit of the sovereign the place where the sovereign sojourns with his regal retinue, where ever that may be.)

Black’s law dictionary 5th edition page 318.

Being plaintiff has a counter claim, plaintiff/the court has suit which means, plaintiff is the court. With this fact now proven and as clearly denoted in the maxims of law that following applies here. Rights never die. [Bouvier’s 1856 Law Dictionary. Also It is a general rule that the sovereign cannot be sued in his own court without consent and hence no direct judgment can be rendered against him therein for cost, except in the manner and on the condition he has proscribed.

40 La. Ann. 856," Bouvier’s Law Dictionary Vol. 1(1897). So clearly the magistrate needs consent of the private/natural person. The court does not and will not consent.

"Bouvier's Law Dictionary (1914),"Maxim,"p.2149, (No legislative body or man can convey any authority or jurisdiction he does not possess over common Rights vested by God in another. Because legislative powers are limited, all powers derived from legislative acts are limited). The Court has now established the fact it cannot be sued in its own court & consent is needed The Court has not consented to the Magistrate. Thus no authority exists for Magistrate to make any order.

"The rights of the individuals are restricted only to the extent that they have been voluntarily surrendered by the "citizenship" to the agencies of government."

City of Dallas v Mitchell, 245 S.W. 944

At the revolution the Sovereignty devolved on the people; and they are truly the sovereigns of the country, but they are sovereigns without subjects ......and have none to govern but themselves; the citizens of America are equal as fellow citizens, and as joint tenants in the sovereignty." Chisholm v Georgia, 2 Dall. 440, at pg 471; The Basic principle here is if one doesn’t agree with the body politic they cannot be held liable to the body politics suggestions as to what they should do. Unless a jury of their peers decides it is such an atrocious act they must do it, a jury of 12 peers. One’s peer is above all one who thinks in similar terms and understands who they are an American National not a US Citizen, and understands what law is. Yet the people are regularly told we have no right of trial by jury. This is a clear sign on the wall America has become; and is a Communist Country. Because of the treasonous bars actions; its failure to hold members accountable; and their subversion of true law.

The history shows clearly these same tactics was used in Germany; during WW2 by the BAR in Germany. There however the BAR members paid for their treason to the German people. Little known fact of WW2 was Hitler executed all but three BAR members, who escaped Germany. Two of which died shortly after, of their ordeals endured while escaping. One should always keep in mind how history repeats due to man’s inability to learn from the past.

Declaration of Independence:

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.--That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed.

I, Peter - Jason: Helfrich, should think it clear, that I, Justin Edward Nolan, will not consent, nor have I, Peter - Jason: Helfrich, ever consented willfully. Consent has always been obtained by threat and intimidation. Which violates 42 U.S.CODE§3617 INTERFERENCE, COERCION, OR INTIMIDATION.

The laws broken thus are too numerous to mention here; as some 84 different laws are applicable. A question all should ask. If you must threaten and intimidate people, breaking law; to get what you desire. Then how are "you" any better than the real criminals of the world, or are those doing this just that; "the real criminals of the world"?

NOTICE AND DEMAND TO CEASE AND DESIST!


The mere suggestion of, including but not limited to, Notice, warrant, arrest and kidnapping, or any other action by any foreign Crown Temple B.A.R. Agent as Pro-Se-Cutis, Magistrate, "Judge" in a black robe moves against me without an injured party bearing an affidavit of the harms done them by me, or a lawful international contract with me, or proof with records of payroll for my employment with their Private Member Association, or any attempt to enforce commercial codes/statutes/color of law, or to coerce me into the Office of the Person, or use an off-shore I.R.S. Trust trafficked JOHN HENRY DOE person, or use impressment, or barratry, or criminal conversion, or legalese, or dog-latin, or any other similarly related derivation of the "business-as-usual" trafficking by the Crown Temple B.A.R. and/or their armed Contractors with badges, or be called a Sovereign citizen, simply because I know the crimes and harms done Me, SHALL BE PROSECUTED by Me.

The prosecution against them for their crimes shall include, but not be limited to, international tort claim, international law NOTICE OF CLAIM/LIEN, ultimately leading to the admission and intent and conspiracy to perpetrate crimes against me, shall also include full loss of their Estate, be reported by international public notice to all credit report agencies, insurance carriers, bond agents, every Secretary of State across the land, every BAR Association, and every Mainstream MEDIA and alternative MEDIA source, for their crimes, and shall be with their fully informed consent for daring to move forward with their piracy against me. My prosecution will be without the United States, against them in their private capacity as criminals act, and NOT in any de facto court where they might benefit from the help of fellow BAR Agents.

Hereof, fail not to respect this warning. I, Peter - Jason: Helfrich have learned of all your despicable crimes and counterfeiting of securities. I, Peter - Jason: Helfricham not, including but not limited to, an en legis fictional person, slave, citizen, denizen, subject, strawman, U.S. person, state employee, taxpayer, corporate entity, debtor, or property of any bank or attorner/broker. Any attempt to enforce color of law or wrongfully prosecute me ever again shall instantaneously become the recipient of one or more lawful claims against them by me for 22.5 million real dollars each, meaning each offender and each individual crime. Crown Temple B.A.R. Attorners were born on this land, grew up on this land, and have families and friends on this land, yet they work in the shadows like rats to rob, rape, pillage, and kidnap, and commit Human Rights Violations against formerly fellow Americans for the unjust enrichment of the Bloody Crown. I have no words that can adequately describe their devotion to darkness and mayhem against our country and people. For the life of me, I cannot fathom the deep human sickness required to traffic American people, persons, and babies for FEDERAL RESERVE Instruments of DEBT. If I get dragged into a court or jail by anyone, after I’ve harmed no one, I shall use all my resources to make them pay heavily for their dirty crimes. YOU HAVE BEEN WARNED! You are to CEASE AND DESIST from your crimes against me, immediately, or you agree to lose all that you have. The wisest suggestion I can offer is for you to burn that filthy BAR Union Card and throw it in the toilet for a more respectable position in your life. Lose the career of crime. If you cannot stop yourselves, I’ll do it for you. You need to find something to do beside ruin lives. We do not need the B.A.R. on this land.

-

I, Peter - Jason: Helfrich, declare, swear and affirm under penalty of perjury that, to the best of my knowledge and belief, the information herein is true, correct, and complete.

https://pjsovereignjedioflaw.blogspot.com/2019/03/notice-demand-with-rescissionwithdrawal.html

---------------------END--OF--NOTICE----------------NEW--AFFIDAVIT--BEGINS--BELOW-----------------------

---------------------------MORE TO COME; THIS IS A WORK IN PROGESS----------------------------------------

01/24/2013 Murder Arrest Peter Helfrich

https://youtu.be/sGoMZYdTeKQ

05/08/2013 Peter Helfrich Murder Suspect Update:

https://youtu.be/1ucWHg983E4

 

Respond to this report!