arby's okeechobee, fl the most abusive disgusting black wench female who works at this location, abuses, mistreats customers, shoudlnt be allowed to interact with people she is so mean and pathetic okeechobee, Florida

This Robert from Buffalo is a stalker. He obsesses over stalking people that complain about big business on ROR. I've seen him many, many times filing rebuttals that always contradict the OP. It doesn't matter what the complaint is, he is on here purely to make big business always look like they are in the right. I'm glad to see someone finally stepping up to point out that he is a stalker. How does he have such a grand life if all he ever does is sit on the internet, complaining about Ripoff Reports posted by other people? And obsessing over the reports with multiple, convoluted rebuttals? He pops up too often with the same tired arguments to not be on welfare and constantly camped out in front of the internet. He has nothing else in his life besides ROR.

The author is merely stating that all of the rude managers and workers that he's interacted with at fast food places just happen to be of the same ethnicity. What's really "evil" here is people calling him names and assuming he's a bigot when he is just going over facts. Facts do not equal racism. 

Why post your response here?

PayPal has nothing to do with me and the OP. Nothing has anything to do with me and the OP.

However, what the common denominator is...is the insanity of it all.

I know you have seen some posts where I am accused of being a PayPal employee or owner, but there is a recent one that is that approaches the insanity of this report...

Allow me to paste a part of it...

Report: #665031

Category:

Internet Services

Submitted:

Tuesday, November 23, 2010

Last posting: Thursday, November 25, 2010

Paypal



TO: Ronny G. of Paypal- I know you are a crook too that works for Paypal, so I'm sure you will respond with a bunch of Paypal LIES!! Consumers, he is a crooked too.

What does Paypal have to do with the OP and Ronny G?

I wish this site allowed signatures. It seems I need a disclaimer on the website. It would read something to the effect...

DISCLAIMER: I, who is known by the name of Ronny G on this forum, does not now work for, nor have I ever worked for, or am/was ever the owner of PayPal.

..our buddy Karl...Happy Turkey song!!...And happy Thanksgiving to you also Stacey, and everyone else.

Now agreed..some of us have took it upon ourselves to change the topic of this report.

Let me see if I get this right. In a "nut" shell..it seems we should avoid Arbys in Okeechobee and possibly all Arbys coast to coast because the angry black woman is working the drive through, or could be. Yes, that is what this report apparently suggests.

I have had wrong orders and cold food before from fast foods..that is no surprise..But how can anyone but a special nut case create so much drama just from the ordering process? That is a "special" gift.

Ironically, they had no Turkey.

seems to be an appropriate song for everyone to sing on this day, right?

Sometimes I thing the OP must be a troll and then I think maybe she's just a seriously disturbed person.  I don't know.

One thing I do believe is that - if she's real - she is not a good match for anyone, I wouldn't even wish her on Karl. 

Have a great Thanksgiving as well as Robert, Edgeman and all the lunatics! Kidding -

As for the nutty OP - well the saga will continue - I think she is the perfect fit for the other psycho who makes all these posts about Keith the Smoothie guy!

....kidding aside, I agree with ramjet.

I plead GUILTY to my part in this childish back and forth nonsense..

If anyone really feels this OP is a suitable mate for me..simply have her kill my current girlfriend, and maybe I will give her a go. Does anyone know if she's hot?

You guys sound like a bunch of Middle School kids and it's as much a waste of time as Karl's silliness. 

Good grief, let it go.

We can start all over..Lets "pretend" it went another way..and see if we get an "honest" answer...

Sure, I could have ignored Edgeman's comment..heck, I might have even missed it if I did not decide to read the report. But I happen to like Arby's and have not been to one in a long time..so I clicked it..

If I had not seen Edgemans reply, I probably would have got in on the fun of blasting the nutcase OP...But it went another way. So..let's have a "do-over".

I see this comment from Edgeman.."Have you considered my offer to introduce you to this guy in North Hollywood? You two would really hit it off. Youcould even get Karl to recite poetry at your wedding."

Now bear in mind..I have seen him post something similar to this in another report. Do not recall the specifics, but I am pretty sure it was to the same OP.

So..I could have left this..

"Edgeman, I see you mention North Hollywood, are you referring to me?"

If I would have handled it this way..tell me Edgeman, what would have been your response?

Now..to Robert from Irvine..an EASY debunk..

Glad you find this report "interesting". I find it rather insane. The only thing I find "interesting", is the obsession with me..and considering I have nothing to do with this report from it's inception.

I did not "turn" this report into anything. I was provoked..or "baited" as our friend Edgeman so plainly puts it, into this report. Somehow our dear friend Edgeman .., has stated here on THIS very report...that the actual "TOPIC" is.. finding a date or spouse for the OP.

So..granted..I took the "bait". Yes... I was "baited"..or "provoked" as I prefer to call it, and thusly responded.

You know they say if you kick a dog..you may get bit. Well I decided to bite and not just ignore it. I have no regrets. I used the FACT, that I was correct in the old bank rip off debates, in my attempt much like his own attempt to discredit me..to discredit Edgeman based on past old news, since this is documented proof that the ONLY reason he would want to "bait", or provoke me..is because the cry baby can not get over the fact..that he LOST against me.

Just like yourself and the other Robert..and a few others like "I am the Law", that we hear so very little from these days. I would have lumped "Stacey" into the group, but recently I have found her to be quite reasonable, and likable. We understand that we do not see eye to eye on every topic..but when all is said and done..we agree for the most part that right is right, and wrong is wrong. I can do anything but have the utmost respect for that. Hence..I consider myself on her team. I would hope she feels the same way.

So..it is irrelevant that Edgeman said "guy from Hollywood"..as if my accusations and suspect were wrong..he could have simply stated he was not referring to me..and in all logic (you know what that means Robert?).. would not have stated I took any "bait". You see, a fish does not know "bait" from a real provocation, but anyone with half a brain..does.

I did not come to this site to be anyone's lab rat..or to make anyone else my lab rat..the circumstances on the other hand... simply caused it to be so.

More "regulars" gang attacking me. I kind of missed it. I guess that I may derive some kind of pleasure out of debunking the victim kickers. Since I was proven 100% correct from back in the days when the bank defenders were debating with me, that this would all stop if the banks stopped ripping customers off..I guess it has come down to the few "stragglers", that still want to clutch at straws to discredit me..and still FAIL miserably.

Let us begin the debunking process...Edgeman first...

Call me Roz or whatever. no one cares really. Lets deal with FACTS...


"That isn't true, Ronny. You didn't even know if I was referring to you when you first replied in this thread. You weren't provoked. You stepped in of your own accord."

Okay..I will let this one slide for now..continue...


"I use "once again" when somebody does something multiple times. You have shown poor reading comprehension on multiple occasions so I used "once again" when you misinterpreted a post in this thread."

All well and good. I have poor comprehension when responding to your nonsense..I

"I was only pointing out that some of your vitriol is similar to what we have seen from the OP. To be fair, she is a bit further gone than you are but you two definitely have something in common.Just imagine you two sitting next to each other on the couch typing away here on ROR!"

What do we have in common? I know you get some kind of kick out of finding a use for the word "vitriol"..but care to expand? Are you proposing that just becuase we both have lodged reports against a bank (although you have utterly FAILED to porduce any evidence of a bank report from either of us), that this was the justification for the provocation? Oh wait..you state it is "not true" (can we assume that means falese?) and that I didn't even know if you were referring to me..I stepped in it of my "own accord?" Fine, I can go with this..let us continue..

"No diversion here. I pretty much came right out and asked the OP if she would like to meet you. That is being straight up. Yes, since the OP has bailed the topic is now about whether or not you two would be a good match for each other."

Meet ME?? Can we then CONCLUDE 100% positive..that you were in fact provoking ME?? Or, like Ex President Clinton..do you only use the literal definitions of words how YOU see fit..and not what they actually mean? Let us continue..

"No, Ronny. I made a very vague reference and then you came into this thread all butthurt. That's not defensive, that is called pushing your buttons. And you blundered into this thread right on cue".

"Butthurt" Can you define that one? I think the last time I used that term was in 2nd grade. Regardless...what does "right on cue" mean? Could it possibly mean there was any intent to provoke me? Or is this all something that I an just assuming and that as YOU state and I quote verbatim.." You weren't provoked. You stepped in of your own accord."

"See, this is where your lack of education shines through. I simply wrote that you sat in Edward's virtual lap and yapped continuously. That means you were Edward's virtual lap dog and considering how many of his points you repeated, it was an accurate description"

Uhhh...all I "see"... is a crock of BS. If you choose to insult my intelligence, or education here on a public forum...would it be asking to much to provide evidence of such BS..or to at least confront me like a MAN..and debate of contest the specifics? I didn't think so. Yes I post a lot..and I can make a mistake here and there..but do you have ANY evidence to back up what you are saying here? My statements came from my mind..to keyboard..or pasted from a source that CERTAINLY was not Edward. Continue...

"Goodness, no! Nobody wants you to leave this site or "roll over and die" as you put it. You are far too funny to lose! You need to keep posting here! If for no other reason than to add to your long, long job history."

Care to present any evidence of my "job history"? Maybe you can advance to the level of psycho internet obsessed stalker like Robert from Buffalo and spend you dying days trying to discredit me. Don't get me wrong..I am kind of flattered that a handful of you are so obssed with me..but if you are going to make a blanket statement like this..kindly present evidence at the very least. What do you know of my "job history" that concludes it is "long, long"??? Let us continue..

"Do you remember your earlier postings? You were quite the nasty person without being provoked. You would even call out for civil discussion and then promptly return to name calling and hostile behavior. One time you tried to claim that didn't count because you had been drinking".

OHHHHHH.."One time" I said I was drinking? Can you show us where I stated it didn't count? If not...don't make statements which you can not back up..or, you look as bad as Karl and Robert from Buffalo.

"That is really funny considering how many massive posts you make and often several times a day. Pot calling the kettle black?"

Glad you got a chuckle. But what does this statement mean? That perhaps I do the same thing as the few losers who have nothing better to do then obsess over what I post here? I can back up ANY accusation made against me. I can also admit when I make a mistake or was wrong. But if I am simply being slandered or attacked for no reason..or i feel my point in a debate is worth arguing...I will certainly do so until it is settled. I will not apologize for being a competitive person who enjoys a heated debate and can speak my mind..and if it bothers anyone so much, will I will pass them a Kleenex.

"I didn't bring you into this thread. You came here all on your own without even knowing who I was referring to. You took the bait, plain and simple"

Hmmm..plain and simple?? Okay..maybe I am an idiot..so explain this contradiction to me like I am a 3 year old. If I took the "bait"..then what else is it your are trying to prove other then I was provoked "into" this thread, by YOU.. with INTENT?

"Bank fees and processing methods are disclosed... in the terms and conditions. It is an unfortunate fact that too many people chose not to read those. I'm afraid that it is quite possible to post a legitimate report regarding bank OD fees now."

Mr. Terms and conditions. Didn't seem to hold up in a court of LAW now..did it? So I guess myself and the courts being I agree 100% with the verdicts are just being reasonable and realistic? Or did I read this right? Did you mean to say it is quite "possible"..or "impossible" to post a legitimate report regarding OD fees now? I can not debate what I do not understand.

"What an idiotic comment, even for you. You were the one complaining about dealing with Karl. I pointed out that you do so of your own free will."

It was not so much "complaining", but in response to the provocations. I simply meant to imply that I do not need any more nutcases in my life since I deal enough with them on this website with Karl..and living in LA.

Did I actually "complain" about dealing with Karl? No..I clearly stated that I DEAL with him. Sure I am not happy that he is here hijacking threads..but I will not deny that I choose to, with my own free will, deal with him. I stated the reasons why.

"I didn't complain about dealing with you or the OP. You two generate too many laughs"

Glad you find this all amusing. I do as well. But I still after all this waste of web space, how I have anything in common with this poster? I just do not feel you have made a good case..nor presented a SHRED of evidence..other then BS. AND, I feel it is concluded, that the ONLY reason you CHOSE to provoke, "bait" or however you wish to term it..is simply because you HATE that I had an opposing view to you ...and even WORSE, I was proven correct of the outcome. I feel you should just get over it, continue with no having to kick poster like this..or perhaps victims of psychics..and LEAVE ME OUT of anything I have nothing to do with..and I promise in return..to not bring you up on any unrelated posts.

"No, but your old habit of attributing false statements and thoughts to me does imply that you are nuts."

What was false in my statements or thoughts. If I ever made a mistake I would admit it. I am not some kind of pretentious dousche that can not admit when I am wrong. I will admit I may overstate when I am passionate about a topic..but that is a far cry from the insinuation that I lie by leaving false statements. If I have done so with intent..present the evidence at allow me the chance to make good. Otherwise..go suck on an egg.

"See, this is another example of you attributing false postings to me. I did not imply that you were homosexual. I assumed that you were into women and offered to introduce you to the OP. You got all butthurt which was extremely irrational of you. I begged forgiveness if you weren't into women but preferred men. That isn't an implication".

"Butthurt" again? Actually I like that word..the immature side of me just likes it. But to the point..This is what YOU stated..and I quote.."She might surprise you. If women aren't your thing we could hook you up with Chuckles but I made the presumption that you would prefer the OP. If I was wrong then please forgive me."

So..I forgave you. Why kick a dead horse? Oh wait..I forgot that is actually ALL we are doing here.

I don't make any claims as to my own intelligence.

Yes, you do. I have it documented my friend.


However, I can spot the limits of your own intelligence and that is one reason why you are so much fun. That isn't personal animosity, that is just fun.

I can say the SAME thing bucko. The ONLY thing you have going for you..is a few of the other PROVEN WRONG victim kicking bank defenders, who are obsessed with me, happen to be on your side, and are "group" attacking me. I can stand up to all of you FOOLS!!! You can all go pound sand where the sun don't shine for all I really care. I will wake up tomorrow morning, and life will still be good.

As for the lab rat... well, you do tend to be very predictable.

Uhhh..okay, then why don't YOU do something "unpredictable", and stop being a d**k?

Okay that was rude, but really..why not leave all this crap for me to respond to? If I was any less predictable then you...well I think it would be a lot quieter around here..make sense?

..does he not? What, does he spend his life studying every post I ever stated here and embellish it to discredit me? The sicko practically posted my resume here. Cyber stalker. I actually think HE would make a good match for the OP..if we wasn't so obsessed with me.

Now again for the record..I will counter his attacks, and nonsense. If he or anyone care to question me on any of it..ask away. Or ignore it..choose not to believe it, no skin off my back.

But to be a maniac like him and list everything I have done for years and years and post it all here in one post is not right. However, none of my statements regarding my accomplishments are in any way far fetched, or unlike many other lifetime accomplishments by who chooses to do more then one thing in their lifetime.

Robert is simply a NUT CASE..another Karl..sadly. I guess if I posted that I ride bicycles he would accuse me of claiming to be Lance Armstrong. Putz.

"Old auto restorer, international auto exporter,"

Yes, this is my hobby. I know you could never figure out how to fix up a car, post an ad on ebay Motors to sell it, and have it shipped. But for me it's easy.

"ASE certified electronics technician, publications contributor,"

Yes, I took the A6 ASE cert test and passed. Not that difficult for me. And anyone can contribute to a publication..moron.

"Best Buy District Trainer,"

Correct. I said I was in the electronics industry. Guess what Best Buy sells you half wit?

" touring rock star,"

I said I was a rock star?  This is pure nonsense. I have done a few tours playing bass and guitar. I have been playing since I was child. I guess it is hard for you to believe someone can have talent? I think you are just a jealous or envious perhaps? All it takes to go on tour is to call some promoters, a van, and some talent. Idiot. Oh wait..Robert probably has no talent other then cyber stalking so he could never play in a band. Was not that hard for me.

"EBay seller evaluator, celebrity autograph dealer, and misidentified used pen peddler (my personal favorite!)"

What the heck is an eBAy seller evaluator? I am NOT a celebrity autograph dealer. When did I claim that? I have sold autographed items a couple of times for friends using my eBay account, that does not make me a dealer. Why are you making stuff up? I live in Hollywood, yes. beleive it or not people can get autographed stuff here and throw it on eBay. Lots of people do it..it is easy for me.

And where the heck are you getting that I claimed I am a used pen peddler? What is that? I did inherit an antique pen collection from my father when he died and sold some on my eBAy account. I misidentified one because I am NOT a pen dealer, pen expert or peddler. So why is that your personal favorite Rozbert the stalker? Is that so far fetched? Take a picture of a pen, describe it, post the ad, get paid, send it out....ohhhh...yes, I need to lie about this? Moron.

Look you idiot. It IS NOT hard to sell stuff on eBay. You take a picture and post an ad.ship item to buyer. You might even be able to do it...but I have my doubts. How would YOU have time for anything else when it appears you have DEVOTED your life...to me? I seriously feel you need evaluation.

I think you really want to be with me..but you are much better suited for the nut case OP.

 

"How can anyone expect the "Greatest Expert ROR has ever seen" to have time for dating?"

Not that I need to date anyone..but I would have time. I don't do all these things at once you retard. I do them, or have done them... in an order or schedule.

I do not think I am the greatest expert on anything. It seems however is this is what YOU think about me..sad really.

Stop stalking me please. If you do not like or believe what I post, look away, or debate ME. Don't be a coward.

This is a very interesting report, as it had me thinking that only Ronny could turn a report(using that term very loosely in this case) about a Fast Food Restaurant into a thread attempting to debate bank issues. And yes Ronny as much as you probably don't want to admit it, you were the first one to bring up banks in this report.

Because all Edgman said was that he wanted to introduce Alice to a guy in North Hollywood. That was it..no names..nothing about banks..just that he wanted to introduce her. YOU took that as being about you, and brought in your predictable "rant" on banks.

So unless Ronny is going to claim that he used various psychic powers to get Edgeman to post his original comment. You really have to ask who is who's "lab rat"?

First of all, we have this line...

"I replied here ONLY because I was provoked."

That isn't true, Ronny. You didn't even know if I was referring to you when you first replied in this thread. You weren't provoked. You stepped in of your own accord.

Now on to your response to me...

"Using the "once again" when I am caught making a mistake is a good tactic to hurt credibility. It implies that I have on several occasions failed to comprehend a statement. Nice move. But it is just a technicality. In all honesty I did not care enough to pay that much attention to the nonsense which is unfounded. But, if you wish to kick this dead horse back to life..here goes, I am more then game."

I use "once again" when somebody does something multiple times. You have shown poor reading comprehension on multiple occasions so I used "once again" when you misinterpreted a post in this thread.

"Regardless of if, where, and when I used the term "evil" in the past.. would have nothing to do with my compatibility with this OP as a spouse, or even to date. It only suggests that perhaps, based on nothing other but what YOU state.. that at some time in the past I have used the same common word has another person. Perhaps "context" should be a consideration? Nah...that would be fighting fair and we can't have that now..can we?"

I was only pointing out that some of your vitriol is similar to what we have seen from the OP. To be fair, she is a bit further gone than you are but you two definitely have something in common.Just imagine you two sitting next to each other on the couch typing away here on ROR!

Fighting? Really? It's more like teasing a cat with a laser pointer. I shine the light on the floor and right on cue you pounce and try to catch it.

"I also notice YOU want to get this thread back on topic. Is the topic really trying to set the OP up on a date with me? Or, just a diversion? Edgeman use a diversion???..nah...couldn't be. Who else do we know who does this?"

No diversion here. I pretty much came right out and asked the OP if she would like to meet you. That is being straight up. Yes, since the OP has bailed the topic is now about whether or not you two would be a good match for each other.

"Maybe I am toying with you? Ever think? As evidenced by this thread..you tried to insult me unprovoked, and when I responded..you went right on the defense leaving a lengthy reply instead of being a man and simply apologizing."

No, Ronny. I made a very vague reference and then you came into this thread all butthurt. That's not defensive, that is called pushing your buttons. And you blundered into this thread right on cue.

"False info. I have nothing to do with Edward other then having the passion to stand up to some who were belittling victims of the banks unethical and illegal tactics, and for some reason it just bothered you. As a matter of fact, Edward and I do not see eye to eye on every issue. The first time I ever saw a post by him, was when I rebutted the fact that he stated all banks are forcing OD protection on the debit cards..I stated to him something to the effect "where the hell are you getting this info from?". As my bank did allow me to opt out..granted with reluctance and a bit of a fight."

See, this is where your lack of education shines through. I simply wrote that you sat in Edward's virtual lap and yapped continuously. That means you were Edward's virtual lap dog and considering how many of his points you repeated, it was an accurate description.

"And the so called "yapped continuously"...hmmm..could this possibly have been due to the and in response to the "continuous" belittling, berating, accusations, implications, provocation and debate directed at me by yourself, and others? Sorry if I did not just roll over and die to appease you and some others. YOU, and anyone else could have simply chose not provoke debate, and then not a peep would have been heard from me."

Goodness, no! Nobody wants you to leave this site or "roll over and die" as you put it. You are far too funny to lose! You need to keep posting here! If for no other reason than to add to your long, long job history.

Do you remember your earlier postings? You were quite the nasty person without being provoked. You would even call out for civil discussion and then promptly return to name calling and hostile behavior. One time you tried to claim that didn't count because you had been drinking.

"This is something YOU are manufacturing out of lack of anything better to do..and YOU are the one who brought me into this..not anything stated in her nut case report."

That is really funny considering how many massive posts you make and often several times a day. Pot calling the kettle black?

I didn't bring you into this thread. You came here all on your own without even knowing who I was referring to. You took the bait, plain and simple.

"And you will continue to. I never stated or meant to imply there were not "any" irresponsible account holders who report here. But go ahead..man up...paste a report number here since the regulation change..even ONE that has to do with a complaint regarding the "topic"... bank re sequencing and fees due to failure to disclose regarding OD protection with the debit card. It won't happen unless the report is a hoax..has I stated time and time again back in the days of yore when we were debating this on a regular basis, the it will be IMPOSSIBLE to lodge a "legitimate" report against the banks regarding this once it is dealt with..and I was proven 100% correct, to wit."

Bank fees and processing methods are disclosed... in the terms and conditions. It is an unfortunate fact that too many people chose not to read those. I'm afraid that it is quite possible to post a legitimate report regarding bank OD fees now.

"And you chose to deal with me..this OP..and who knows who else."

What an idiotic comment, even for you. You were the one complaining about dealing with Karl. I pointed out that you do so of your own free will.

I didn't complain about dealing with you or the OP. You two generate too many laughs.

"I do not care about this OP's stance on banks. This OP has never responded to my report, nor have I noticed any of hers...other then this one which is either a hoax to mess with you, or she is completely deranged. I on the other hand am quite articulate. If you do not agree with me on an issue, does not mean I am a nut, or you are a nut. It means we disagree. I judge people based on the content of their character only. And the only way I can judge that here, is based on how they treat and respond to others. It is self evident."

No, but your old habit of attributing false statements and thoughts to me does imply that you are nuts.

"I can forgive you for implying I am homosexual. I really do not care what you think about my sexuality, but if you care to know..women are my sexual preference only. But no one you would ever recommend to me, that is for SURE."

See, this is another example of you attributing false postings to me. I did not imply that you were homosexual. I assumed that you were into women and offered to introduce you to the OP. You got all butthurt which was extremely irrational of you. I begged forgiveness if you weren't into women but preferred men. That isn't an implication.

"The only thing that seems "apparent" on this thread..is that you show animosity towards me personally since you know..that I know...that you are not nearly as smart as you want everyone else here to believe. You are just as much my "lab rat", as you think I am yours."

I don't make any claims as to my own intelligence. However, I can spot the limits of your own intelligence and that is one reason why you are so much fun. That isn't personal animosity, that is just fun.

As for the lab rat... well, you do tend to be very predictable.

Im sorry folks.  I forgot to mention some other professions that should be included on the Great and Powerful Rozs resume:

 

Old auto restorer, international auto exporter, ASE certified electronics technician, publications contributor, Best Buy District Trainer, touring rock star, EBay seller evaluator, celebrity autograph dealer, and misidentified used pen peddler (my personal favorite!)

 

How can anyone expect the "Greatest Expert ROR has ever seen" to have time for dating?

Here we go again..the personal attacks from RoZbert from buffalo chips. The copyright attorney and software developer from before they even had software.

Okay..first off...if you find anything here is pollution, change the channel..no one is forcing you to be here.

Next..I don't have to date, I have a girl friend..but my personal life is not your business. Somehow you want to get personal with me..I have no idea why. I replied here ONLY because I was provoked.  Did you actually read this report? And call me pollution? Jackass...So..it is okay for anyone else to frequent this site and give their opinions...but when I do it..somehow this means I deserve personal attacks or there is something wrong with me? The pot calling the kettle black much?

Now..if you find it so hard to believe I am in the electronics industry..was an electronics teacher (and YES, I wrote a text book)..and went to school for electronics, so be it...And that I have a side business selling on eBay, including a hobby of restoring cars that has made me money selling the vehicles after restoration on eBay Motors...I don't know what to say. It wasn't that difficult for me to do..and you find it hard to believe? I guess you are an underachiever? I can't help that. I choose to do more then one thing..yeah..I am the only one..right?

I am not going to expose to a fruit cake like you and a few others who frequent this site my true identity, but if you wish to question or debate me on ANY of those topics..go right ahead, I will make you look like a BIGGER fool then you are doing by yourself with this unwarranted personal attack against me. And other times you have done the same thing. Get over me already.

As far as the tax issue (how do you know so much about me..some kind of sicko cyber stalker?), it was settled today. I owe NOTHING and may even get a refund. The IRS reported to the state that I was working here, when it was actually Florida. All the correct forms to file are on the way. Too bad the first time I called the state regarding this...I was told to just pay it and worry later. Not this guy. Didn't take much time genius..two phone calls, done. There was ineptness on the part of the IRS, and the first state FTB employee I spoke to...big surprise. Okay..so now you do not have to bring it up again. Case closed

I am not a self-"annointed" (did you mean to type appointed?) anything, I come here with the same rights as anyone else. Don't like what I have to say...stay away and stop stalking me or maybe I will have to report you. Or, rebut/debate me like a normal human if you feel the need and stop with the personal attacks.

I don't expect a response actually, he is a coward. Or maybe he well "pollute" this post with the spamming links he has used before where I am simply debating like everyone else and standing my ground. Or..the one where he calls me a liar regarding a McDonalds post..but yet the moron does not realize..one is a report lodged by me..and one is from a time I replied as a consumer comment around a year apart..and even state in the reply it is a McDonalds from a DIFFERENT city..and unrelated to my report. Two entirely complete different incidents..The man can not even investigate this himself before posting it and using it to imply he caught me in a lie.. to see how wrong he is..and hence.. he is the fraud. He proves this HIMSELF.

Now BACK OFF!!

When the heck is this pollution going to stop?   Shees!

We all know that the Wizard of Roz has no time for dating!  How could he?  Between working for a company that "installs a lot" of satellite radios, being a teacher, text book author, electrical engineer, electrician, inventor, and he still manages to be in the auto and camera industries as well as having several "legitimate" businesses as well as buying and selling on Ebay.  Not too mention all that time needed to prevent the California Franchise Tax Board from levying his money.

Oh, and let's not forget self-annointed ROR commentator, editor, and all around penny auction researcher!

What's a poor fellow to do???  There simply isn't enough hours in the day!  Dating will simply have to wait for his resurection in another life!

Disclaimer: "Once again", this is an excessively long comment. Scroll past if it bothers you. It is in DIRECT RESPONSE to a consumer comment directed at me by "Edgeman" and I have the to right to respond back. Thank you for understanding. If anyone chooses to read through it.. it should take a up a minute or two of your time at most.

Using the "once again" when I am caught making a mistake is a good tactic to hurt credibility. It implies that I have on several occasions failed to comprehend a statement. Nice move. But it is just a technicality. In all honesty I did not care enough to pay that much attention to the nonsense which is unfounded. But, if you wish to kick this dead horse back to life..here goes, I am more then game.

Regardless of if, where, and when I used the term "evil" in the past.. would have nothing to do with my compatibility with this OP as a spouse, or even to date. It only suggests that perhaps, based on nothing other but what YOU state.. that at some time in the past I have used the same common word has another person. Perhaps "context" should be a consideration? Nah...that would be fighting fair and we can't have that now..can we?

I also notice YOU want to get this thread back on topic. Is the topic really trying to set the OP up on a date with me? Or, just a diversion? Edgeman use a diversion???..nah...couldn't be. Who else do we know who does this?

Lets go over the rather "lengthy" previous replies YOU left to me, and allow me in all fairness, to respond...

"Geez, Ronny! I was just trying to introduce you to somebody you might want to spend some time with? Have you read her postings on banks? Go check it out... her vitriol is so apparent you may even become aroused while reading it."

No, I have not read her postings on banks. Why?..were they bitter like the 12,700+ other consumers who lodged reports regarding how the bank ripped them off? Leave us some report numbers so everyone can see for themselves. However I doubt I will read them. They have nothing to do with me, and I would doubt the credibility of this OP on any other report as well.

"I do not have any animosity towards you. You are a predictable and amusing person to toy with and it doesn't take much to get you going...as evidenced by this thread."

Maybe I am toying with you? Ever think? As evidenced by this thread..you tried to insult me unprovoked, and when I responded..you went right on the defense leaving a lengthy reply instead of being a man and simply apologizing.

"You haven't debunked a thing. You talked around the points made by other people and sat in Edward's virtual lap and yapped continuously."

False info. I have nothing to do with Edward other then having the passion to stand up to some who were belittling victims of the banks unethical and illegal tactics, and for some reason it just bothered you. As a matter of fact, Edward and I do not see eye to eye on every issue. The first time I ever saw a post by him, was when I rebutted the fact that he stated all banks are forcing OD protection on the debit cards..I stated to him something to the effect "where the hell are you getting this info from?". As my bank did allow me to opt out..granted with reluctance and a bit of a fight.

And the so called "yapped continuously"...hmmm..could this possibly have been due to the and in response to the "continuous" belittling, berating, accusations, implications, provocation and debate directed at me by yourself, and others? Sorry if I did not just roll over and die to appease you and some others. YOU, and anyone else could have simply chose not provoke debate, and then not a peep would have been heard from me.

"Really? It turned out that I was correct to unless you care to debunk the fact that there is simply no reason to pay overdraft fees by responsible account management?"

What I agree with..is exactly what Wells Fargo was convicted of recently in the class action lawsuit in California that they LOST, not settled mind you..but LOST. And, what the current defendants in the class action lawsuits being conducted in Miami against many of these banks who are being charged with the exact same crimes. I of course would agree and not attempt to debunk that a responsible account holder should not have to pay fees. Of course they should not, my only reply to that one would be to ask the bank why this happens.

Most irresponsible account holders on the other hand end up without an account altogether. My intention was not and never was to defend irresponsible account holders per say..but place PERSONAL responsibility on those banks that were scamming all their customers who were subject to the "engineered" ripoff that the bank admitted to, and testified to in the hearings. Exactly what any bank that chose to operate this way is currently dealing with by the pissed off customers who decided to fight back.

"If you wish to do so, then start a new thread. The purpose of this thread is to hook you up to the OP so that you won't be so lonely."

Oh..so that is the purpose of this thread? Who died and made you moderator here? Actually I do not know what the purpose of this thread is. Ask the OP..perhaps she knows. I do not see in any of her report that she came here looking to be set up with a date or a spouse. This is something YOU are manufacturing out of lack of anything better to do..and YOU are the one who brought me into this..not anything stated in her nut case report.

"Really? I still see reports by irresponsible account holders."

And you will continue to. I never stated or meant to imply there were not "any" irresponsible account holders who report here. But go ahead..man up...paste a report number here since the regulation change..even ONE that has to do with a complaint regarding the "topic"... bank re sequencing and fees due to failure to disclose regarding OD protection with the debit card. It won't happen unless the report is a hoax..has I stated time and time again back in the days of yore when we were debating this on a regular basis, the it will be IMPOSSIBLE to lodge a "legitimate" report against the banks regarding this once it is dealt with..and I was proven 100% correct, to wit.

"You deal with Karl because you choose to do so. You could simply choose to ignore him if you wanted to."

And you chose to deal with me..this OP..and who knows who else. But I deal with Karl because I feel he is hijacking legitimate reports that I take seriously..by injecting diversions and nonsense. He, like yourself chooses to attack me. Seems you guys have something in common..provoking me. Do I see a future "bromance" in the makings? You seem to have provoking me in common with him..and there is a chance you both have used the same word in a post...see how silly this is? Pathetic comes to mind actually.

"Go back and read the OP's stance on banks and compare it with some of your own writings where you have suggested that one user may be a racist and others are "evil". You two may have more in common than you think. Give her a chance, Ronny! She might surprise you. If women aren't your thing we could hook you up with Chuckles but I made the presumption that you would prefer the OP. If I was wrong then please forgive me."

I do not care about this OP's stance on banks. This OP has never responded to my report, nor have I noticed any of hers...other then this one which is either a hoax to mess with you, or she is completely deranged. I on the other hand am quite articulate. If you do not agree with me on an issue, does not mean I am a nut, or you are a nut. It means we disagree. I judge people based on the content of their character only. And the only way I can judge that here, is based on how they treat and respond to others. It is self evident.

If I suggested a "user" may be a racist, it was on a reply left regarding another "consumer comment" and everyone could see who I was referring to, and why.

I can forgive you for implying I am homosexual. I really do not care what you think about my sexuality, but if you care to know..women are my sexual preference only. But no one you would ever recommend to me, that is for SURE.

The only thing that seems "apparent" on this thread..is that you show animosity towards me personally since you know..that I know...that you are not nearly as smart as you want everyone else here to believe. You are just as much my "lab rat", as you think I am yours.

"Now I don't recall any specifics of me using the word "evil" in my own "writings"..it is not a word I use often. But if I have ever used the word to describe the actions of a bank..well I will post the definitions that I would have intended the word to mean in my writings."

Read my post again, Ronny. I know that you must have read it since you copied and pasted it. I wrote that you referred to some users here as "evil". Not a bank. Let me spell it out for you so that even you can understand:

"Users" and "bank" refers to two different entities.

Now, to get this thread back on topic... If we can get the OP to agree to a date with you, when will you be free?

Yes,I know this reply and the last is long..if someone does not like it..scroll by. I am simply responding to someone who confronted me..I have that right..everyone else as the right to read it, or not, to agree or not. Thank you.


From Edgemans last reply to me..

Go back and read the OP's stance on banks and compare it with some of your own writings where you have suggested that one user may be a racist and others are "evil".

I addressed the racist, I have no idea how you are tying that into anything I ever said about a bank...it does not fit..it is a false reply..now for the "evil"..

I don't no where this comes from that because another person has used the word "evil"..and perhaps I may have ..well I imagine lots of people use the word now and again.

I don't think just because people may use the same word means they are suited for marriage.

Now I don't recall any specifics of me using the word "evil" in my own "writings"..it is not a word I use often. But if I have ever used the word to describe the actions of a bank..well I will post the definitions that I would have intended the word to mean in my writings.

I should state for the record that I do not think all banks a evil..as a matter of fact I recall in some of the mockery I have been subjected to by bank defenders..have called me "Chase Boy"...(remember that one?), because I was suggesting to some posters that their policies for a free checking account debit card user were by FAR the most consumer friendly for a low balance account customer who likes to use the debit card in lieu of carrying cash. Yep, that is all it took for be to be "labeled" by some on this site who seem to despise me, for simply not agreeing with them..and standing my ground, and doing so quite articulately.

Now..has anyone read the courts order from the WF lawsuit in California?
A copy of the Court's order can be found here.  <--- active link, click it.

Check it out..and see for yourself (by the banks own admissions and testimony) the following definitions of evil that I got from an online dictionary..could be quite accurately used as a word used to describe what was discovered..and what I have been stating since DAY one on this site regarding the issue, what the banks have done on their part to bring down the economy and causing a horrible reccession...and what some banks seem to be doing now to a bunch of homeowners...If anyone can think of a better word to describe this..I would use that as well. Greed comes to mind..

1. Morally bad or wrong
   
2. Causing ruin, injury, or pain; harmful:
   
3. Characterized by or indicating future misfortune;
   
4. Bad or blameworthy by report; infamous
   

...looks like you did detect the truth on this one.

Granted some of us do not see eye to eye on every issue. But just because someone does not agree with me or chooses to debate me, does not conclude they are a nut case.

I do hold those accountable (ALL parties) when they screw up.

I have NEVER blamed race for anything.

I have NEVER lodged a report even closely resembling the report of this nut case.

I do however agree, that this "Charles" and other names I have seen him use on this website so obviously apparent by the writing style of the posts...is certainly a match made in heaven with samantha p, aka, aka, aka, whatever.

There is a big difference between someone who does not actually live in "reality", vs. knowing how to have some fun by messing with others who "think" they are the only ones.

Everyone needs to lighten up a bit. The only thing on this website..is words. Nothing more, nothing less. How seriously the READER takes them..and how seriously the reader believes the writer takes them..is what separates true "reality"... from living in a "virtual" fantasy.

Geez, Ronny! I was just trying to introduce you to somebody you might want to spend some time with? Have you read her postings on banks? Go check it out... her vitriol is so apparent you may even become aroused while reading it.

As to the rest of your post.

"I understand you have a bit of animosity towards me"

I do not have any animosity towards you. You are a predictable and amusing person to toy with and it doesn't take much to get you going...as evidenced by this thread.

"with all the debunking I did to you on the old bank posts"

You haven't debunked a thing. You talked around the points made by other people and sat in Edward's virtual lap and yapped continuously.

"..where it turns out I was correct about what the banks were doing, the lawsuits..and not to mention the FACT that the debit card OD disclosure regulation change I guess "

Really? It turned out that I was correct to unless you care to debunk the fact that there is simply no reason to pay overdraft fees by responsible account management?

If you wish to do so, then start a new thread. The purpose of this thread is to hook you up to the OP so that you won't be so lonely.

""magically" caused all the "deadbeats" and irresponsible non register using bank customers to vanish into thin air never to be heard from again on this website?"

Really? I still see reports by irresponsible account holders.

"How do you "debate" that one?"

There is no need to as I see reports by irresponsible account holders.

"Grow up. Don't involve me with the wackos you have a past with on this site..I deal enough with Karl."

You deal with Karl because you choose to do so. You could simply choose to ignore him if you wanted to.

Go back and read the OP's stance on banks and compare it with some of your own writings where you have suggested that one user may be a racist and others are "evil". You two may have more in common than you think. Give her a chance, Ronny! She might surprise you. If women aren't your thing we could hook you up with Chuckles but I made the presumption that you would prefer the OP. If I was wrong then please forgive me.

This crazy lady seems a match made in Heaven with Charles in AL.

Both completely unaccountable no matter how much they screw up.

Both blame race for EVERYTHING.

Both more exposed for what they are than a hippie at a nudist camp.

Charles(AKA Chuckles) and Samantha(Too many AKA's to list) seemed to "go away" at about the same time.  They also resurfaced at about the same time, as we just heard from Chuckles a few days ago as well.

Perhaps they already do "know" each other.

So Edgeman, are you talking about me by any chance?

On what grounds do you base that I would hit it off with this nutcase?

I understand you have a bit of animosity towards me what with all the debunking I did to you on the old bank posts..where it turns out I was correct about what the banks were doing, the lawsuits..and not to mention the FACT that the debit card OD disclosure regulation change I guess "magically" caused all the "deadbeats" and irresponsible non register using bank customers to vanish into thin air never to be heard from again on this website?

How do you "debate" that one?

Grow up. Don't involve me with the wackos you have a past with on this site..I deal enough with Karl.

Thanks. Just sayin.

Maybe she and Chuckles are one and the same person! lol Now talk about scarey stuff! lol

Is Chuckles still around? I thought that he bailed?

In any case, I think it would be legal for her to have two husbands in Alabama...

Couple of things. It's been a "while" since we've been exposed to her posts. Maybe she was "released" or her meds ran out. I also find it interesting that she's "rehashing" events that allegedly happened YEARS AGO. Maybe they didn't let her out, she just got access to a computer at the institution or she relapsed. Interesting her use of psychological terms towards OTHERS. Who knows. "Some times you feel like a nut, sometimes you don't".

I thought the plan was to hook her up with Chuckles from Alabama?  I must have missed a memo or something.

You say "this is not about race" yet everything you posted is racial.  You have issues.  Get help fast.  Find another venue to occupy your time.  You are not doing any justice to your argument with these psychotic rantings.

Hey Rachel/ Alice/ Melissa/ Samantha/ Anonymous,

Have you considered my offer to introduce you to this guy in North Hollywood? You two would really hit it off. Youcould even get Karl to recite poetry at your wedding.

You should think about it. You're not getting any younger. Just sayin'.

Melissa aka Alice aka Fajita girl - guess you need to stop eating out since every place you go has nasty, evil, sociopaths.