Arnon I. Sincoff, ESQ. #131586 He concealed a legal malpractice so that he could continue robbing my money & get away with his mistake. Whittier California

Supreme Court Document

The Supreme Court of California in the city of Whittier CA.
Agreed that he commited legal malpractice and concealed it to cover it up in order to defend his license to practice law.

Dear Tim:

No I was not drunk when I posted my report.

Yes I was drinking wine when the incident happened.

No I did not have a long list of anything on my record.

I judge from The Supreme Court of California has already agree that Mr. Sincoff committed Legal Malpractice while bleeding me for my money so that I could not hire anyone to go forward.

I have all my payperwork that clearly indicates why Mr. Sincoff was acting crazy in court, wait he is right he wasn't acting crazy, he was acting like a little b***h with a ripped pantyhose..

He had 6 months to summit the claim to the city but he was late 26 days because he did not know or forgot about it.

The city simply rejected the claim because he was 26 days late.
The rejection letters went to Mr. Sincoff's address NOT to me!

I have receipts and e-mails that indicate that even after his mistake!
He continue on decieving me by claiming that everything was under control.

I would still have the right to pursue it in state court for at least a year after the incident, and in federal court for at least two years after the incident.

Sure but with out a penny in My bank account! Thanks to Mr. Sincoff who made sure I ran out of money so that I could not re-act against all those entities including him self for malpractice!

The warrant was issue because Mr. Sincoff told me that I did not have to be in court day because he was going to be there to represent me, I did not needed to be there per Mr. Sincoff's own words.

But it seems as though I don't really understand what happened, what the effect of the 'rejection' was...

I hired Mr. Sincoff simply to deal with my inability to understand of the proper procedures of the law, to do it for me you understand?

Everything was going all right up to until he made the mistake, right after that he became distant and orally threatening..

Look I'm sure that as sonnest any one sees the payperwork generated by this whole mass they will understant better, even though I'm not to good at writting..

Oh! By the way the Police officers reached into my appartment to get me, I was inside at no threat to them, why they didn't shoot me instead if what they claimed is true?

Proper procedure is to:

Call the apartment rental company.
Figure out my Name and send me a disturbing the peace citation by certify mail.

Dear Tim:

No I was not drunk when I posted my report.

Yes I was drinking wine when the incident happened.

No I did not have a long list of anything on my record.

I judge from The Supreme Court of California has already agree that Mr. Sincoff committed Legal Malpractice while bleeding me for my money so that I could not hire anyone to go forward.

I have all my payperwork that clearly indicates why Mr. Sincoff was acting crazy in court, wait he is right he wasn't acting crazy, he was acting like a little b***h with a ripped pantyhose..

He had 6 months to summit the claim to the city but he was late 26 days because he did not know or forgot about it.

The city simply rejected the claim because he was 26 days late.
The rejection letters went to Mr. Sincoff's address NOT to me!

I have receipts and e-mails that indicate that even after his mistake!
He continue on decieving me by claiming that everything was under control.

I would still have the right to pursue it in state court for at least a year after the incident, and in federal court for at least two years after the incident.

Sure but with out a penny in My bank account! Thanks to Mr. Sincoff who made sure I ran out of money so that I could not re-act against all those entities including him self for malpractice!

The warrant was issue because Mr. Sincoff told me that I did not have to be in court day because he was going to be there to represent me, I did not needed to be there per Mr. Sincoff's own words.

But it seems as though I don't really understand what happened, what the effect of the 'rejection' was...

I hired Mr. Sincoff simply to deal with my inability to understand of the proper procedures of the law, to do it for me you understand?

Everything was going all right up to until he made the mistake, right after that he became distant and orally threatening..

Look I'm sure that as sonnest any one sees the payperwork generated by this whole mass they will understant better, even though I'm not to good at writting..

Oh! By the way the Police officers reached into my appartment to get me, I was inside at no threat to them, why they didn't shoot me instead if what they claimed is true?

Proper procedure is to:

Call the apartment rental company.
Figure out my Name and send me a disturbing the peace citation by certify mail.

Dear Tim:

No I was not drunk when I posted my report.

Yes I was drinking wine when the incident happened.

No I did not have a long list of anything on my record.

I judge from The Supreme Court of California has already agree that Mr. Sincoff committed Legal Malpractice while bleeding me for my money so that I could not hire anyone to go forward.

I have all my payperwork that clearly indicates why Mr. Sincoff was acting crazy in court, wait he is right he wasn't acting crazy, he was acting like a little b***h with a ripped pantyhose..

He had 6 months to summit the claim to the city but he was late 26 days because he did not know or forgot about it.

The city simply rejected the claim because he was 26 days late.
The rejection letters went to Mr. Sincoff's address NOT to me!

I have receipts and e-mails that indicate that even after his mistake!
He continue on decieving me by claiming that everything was under control.

I would still have the right to pursue it in state court for at least a year after the incident, and in federal court for at least two years after the incident.

Sure but with out a penny in My bank account! Thanks to Mr. Sincoff who made sure I ran out of money so that I could not re-act against all those entities including him self for malpractice!

The warrant was issue because Mr. Sincoff told me that I did not have to be in court day because he was going to be there to represent me, I did not needed to be there per Mr. Sincoff's own words.

But it seems as though I don't really understand what happened, what the effect of the 'rejection' was...

I hired Mr. Sincoff simply to deal with my inability to understand of the proper procedures of the law, to do it for me you understand?

Everything was going all right up to until he made the mistake, right after that he became distant and orally threatening..

Look I'm sure that as sonnest any one sees the payperwork generated by this whole mass they will understant better, even though I'm not to good at writting..

Oh! By the way the Police officers reached into my appartment to get me, I was inside at no threat to them, why they didn't shoot me instead if what they claimed is true?

Proper procedure is to:

Call the apartment rental company.
Figure out my Name and send me a disturbing the peace citation by certify mail.

Dear Tim:

No I was not drunk when I posted my report.

Yes I was drinking wine when the incident happened.

No I did not have a long list of anything on my record.

I judge from The Supreme Court of California has already agree that Mr. Sincoff committed Legal Malpractice while bleeding me for my money so that I could not hire anyone to go forward.

I have all my payperwork that clearly indicates why Mr. Sincoff was acting crazy in court, wait he is right he wasn't acting crazy, he was acting like a little b***h with a ripped pantyhose..

He had 6 months to summit the claim to the city but he was late 26 days because he did not know or forgot about it.

The city simply rejected the claim because he was 26 days late.
The rejection letters went to Mr. Sincoff's address NOT to me!

I have receipts and e-mails that indicate that even after his mistake!
He continue on decieving me by claiming that everything was under control.

I would still have the right to pursue it in state court for at least a year after the incident, and in federal court for at least two years after the incident.

Sure but with out a penny in My bank account! Thanks to Mr. Sincoff who made sure I ran out of money so that I could not re-act against all those entities including him self for malpractice!

The warrant was issue because Mr. Sincoff told me that I did not have to be in court day because he was going to be there to represent me, I did not needed to be there per Mr. Sincoff's own words.

But it seems as though I don't really understand what happened, what the effect of the 'rejection' was...

I hired Mr. Sincoff simply to deal with my inability to understand of the proper procedures of the law, to do it for me you understand?

Everything was going all right up to until he made the mistake, right after that he became distant and orally threatening..

Look I'm sure that as sonnest any one sees the payperwork generated by this whole mass they will understant better, even though I'm not to good at writting..

Oh! By the way the Police officers reached into my appartment to get me, I was inside at no threat to them, why they didn't shoot me instead if what they claimed is true?

Proper procedure is to:

Call the apartment rental company.
Figure out my Name and send me a disturbing the peace citation by certify mail.

Your report starts out with, at least, a sense of coherency. As it progresses, however, it gets increasingly nonsensical and unintelligible. By the end, you are sonehow engaged in an odd diatribe about the holocaust.

Were you drinking when you wrote this? Were you drinking when you were "assaulted" by Culver City police officers?

Here are some problems with your story that I was somehow able to spot among the nonsense:

1) You claim your attorney is liable for the $5000 bond. Might I point out that this was actually a 10% surety, and your actual bail was set at $50,000.00.

You ultimately entered the equivalent of a guilty plea. Innocent people don't do this, no matter how inept their attorney may be. So you basically admitted guilt to a crime that was either a) severe enough to warrant a $50,000.00 bail; or b) another in a long list of offenses.

Simply put, you would have never been entitled to a refund of that bond amount under any circumstance. So how can your attorney be liable for something you never had a claim to in the first place?

2) You state that your attorney filed a claim against Culver City six months and 26 days after the date of your arrest. You then state that Culver City rejected this claim because it was 26 days late.

I'm confused. If the claim was against Culver City, how did Culver City, as the defendant, "reject" it? That makes absolutely no sense under any conceivable legal procedure.

But, for the sake of argument, let's assume that this does make sense. Maybe this was a claim against the City's insurance or something to that effect. If the City rejected the claim, you would still have the right to pursue it in state court for at least a year after the incident, and in federal court for at least two years after the incident.

3) You claim that a warrant was issued for your arrest because your attorney failed to show up for a hearing. This is not accurate. The warrant was issued because YOU failed to show up. Your lawyer may have dropped the ball as well, but if you had shown up like you were supposed to, a warrant would not have been issued.

Your trying to lay an awful lot of blame on your attorney. But it seems as though you don't really understand what happened, what the effect of the "rejection" was, or why a warrant was issued for your arrest. And you certainly fail to take accountability for your own actions. Given that you clearly don't understand what happened, and given that you obviously have a problem with taking personal responsibility, you don't really have much room to point the blame at anybody.

If you think that you were the victim of legal malpractice, your obvious recourse is to hire another attorney to look over the matter. If you do in fact have a viable legal malpractice claim, he will let you know. But you clearly lack the perspective to judge make this judgment on your own.

Best of luck!