Ripoff Report Needs Your Help!
X  |  CLOSE
Report: #167475

Complaint Review: AUL Auto Warranty - Napa California

  • Submitted:
  • Updated:
  • Reported By: Long Beach California
  • Author Confirmed What's this?
  • Why?
  • AUL Auto Warranty 1325 Imola Ave. PMB 318, Napa, CA 94559 Napa, California U.S.A.

Show customers why they should trust your business over your competitors...

Is this
Report about YOU
listed on other sites?
Those sites steal
Ripoff Report's
content.
We can get those
removed for you!
Find out more here.
How to fix
Ripoff Report
If your business is
willing to make a
commitment to
customer satisfaction
Click here now..

I bought the estate coverage, mainly because I wanted protection on the used car a had bought. Don't get me wrong the car I bought is great, but it is used. I paid $1000.00 for the warranty. I figured $1000.00 isn't bad considering some repairs exceed that amount by quite a bit.

The first time I tried to file a claim with AUL, it was for a strut. The strut was malfunctioning and causing my right wheel to hop on acceleration. I had to fight tooth and nail to get AUL to pay for just the one strut, and then they wouldn't pay for the fine tuning and adjustment. I ended up paying $100 for the deductible and almost $300 for the fine tuning and alignment. AUL claimed that they could only pay for the part and labor (to install the part).

The second time I filed a claim was for a window motor. This time it wasn't so difficult. I am thinking it wasn't difficult, because it was a cheap fix. The deductible would have almost covered the cost of the fix.

The third time and the reason I am writing this is my transmission started to act up. Basically, I couldn't shift from 1st to 2nd and 2nd to 3rd without some kind of grinding and resistance. So, I immedately took my car to AAMCO to have it checked out. AAMCO diagnosed it as a transmission problem and that some parts in the transmission need to be replaced. I gave AAMCO the warranty paperwork so they could open the claim. A day went by and an inspector paid a visit to AAMCO. The inspector saw no parts broken and said it was normal wear and tear and the claim was denied.

Just out of curiosity, how can a wore out part be a result of only 20,000 miles of driving. On top of that, the care was not abused, the clutch has 15 to 20,000 miles left on it and there is not even a hint of it being burnt. It may be worn, but it's not normal wear. The inspector stated that there was no mechanical breakdown. If there isn't any mechanical breakdown, then how come I can't shift properly?

I called the AUL customer service line to plead my case, but I got nowhere. Every time I made a point, such as "if the transmission isn't working right, it's broken", the customer service rep. (more like dis-service rep.) stated "you are wrong sir." What ever happened to the customer's always right? I guess the customer's always wrong with AUL.

Since my car is my only mode of transportation, I had no choice but to have it fixed. The repairs are well North of $3000.00. I can't really afford to fork over that kind of cash, but if I want my car fixed I had to fork it over. I kind of feel like I got forked.

AUL along with a lot of other aftermarket warranty companies give the regular Joe like me and you a false sense of security. After this experience, I don't recommend using AUL. AUL is just out there to seperate you from your hard earned cash.

Bob
Long Beach, California
U.S.A.

This report was posted on Ripoff Report on 12/09/2005 11:39 PM and is a permanent record located here: https://www.ripoffreport.com/reports/aul-auto-warranty/napa-california-94559/aul-auto-warranty-do-not-honor-warranty-on-covered-autos-napa-california-167475. The posting time indicated is Arizona local time. Arizona does not observe daylight savings so the post time may be Mountain or Pacific depending on the time of year. Ripoff Report has an exclusive license to this report. It may not be copied without the written permission of Ripoff Report. READ: Foreign websites steal our content

Search for additional reports

If you would like to see more Rip-off Reports on this company/individual, search here:

Report & Rebuttal
Respond to this report!
What's this?
Also a victim?
What's this?
Repair Your Reputation!
What's this?

Updates & Rebuttals

REBUTTALS & REPLIES:
0Author
6Consumer
0Employee/Owner

#6 Consumer Comment

Serve and Take AUL Corp to court

AUTHOR: ETM - (USA)

POSTED: Wednesday, January 18, 2017

AUL is trying to get out of a drive train claim I have. They have a million excuses to get out of claims. I have a GMC Terrain with a 3.0 V6 and the Head is found Porous. AUL's excuse is oh all GM engines used Castech and were manufactured that way. I researched and only the 5.3 V8's some had Castech heads. When suing this company search for their registered agent and serve that department. Check out this registered PDF file under their registered agent listing https://businesssearch.sos.ca.gov/Document/RetrievePDF

Respond to this report!
What's this?

#5 Consumer Suggestion

glad it worked out for you - it did not work out for me :-(

AUTHOR: Jennifer - (U.S.A.)

POSTED: Monday, January 23, 2006

I am glad you were able to get satisfaction. I wanted to add to this report that I had a similar problem with this company and I would not recommend anyone getting this so-called warranty.

I bought a used car at a dealership (also located in Napa, btw) and spent, I believe, around $1400 for my warranty. About 6 months later, I rolled down the power window on the passenger side, and it would not go back up. This was in Oct. and the rainy season was right around the corner. Feeling confident that I had this warranty, I went to the local Chevy dealer and had them take a look at it. Turns out that it was the CABLE that pulls the window up and down that broke, not the MOTOR that powers the window. AUL informed me that the MOTOR was covered, if that were the problem, but since it was the CABLE, it was not covered. Apparently the cable falls into some other category that is not covered by the warranty.

The Chevy dealer told me that they could fix the cable but it would cost over $200, PLUS labor, and I was already going to be charged almost $200 just for the diagnosis of the problem! I could not afford any of this, and I would have just lived with the problem, but I was under the assumption that I would not have to pay to have something fixed that was supposedly covered by a warranty. I ended up arguing with the mechanic, I requested that he at least bolt the window into the upright position to keep the rain out, and he told me he could not do that, it was impossible (which I knew was a lie, because my husband had had that done on his car a year earlier). Finally convinced him to do it, and he charged me another $80 for this "courtesy."

Unfortunately, this was a few years ago, and I no longer own the vehicle. Perhaps with persistence I may have been able to get satisfaction as well, but oh well, lesson learned for me.

Again, I am glad you were able to have your situation resolved.

Respond to this report!
What's this?

#4 Author of original report

Persistance Pays off

AUTHOR: Bob - (U.S.A.)

POSTED: Monday, January 23, 2006

I continued to pressure the warranty company to pay for the transmission. I called and told them that I was going to sue if they didn't pay up. Finally, I wrote a letter of what I was intending to do and sure enough, a week after they received the letter they called to settle. Don't get me wrong, the letter wasn't the thing that did it, they still wanted to lowball me. It was my persistance on the phone and the continual threat to sue. My final comment to them was," I hope your CEO likes to travel, because I am going to serve him." the claims adjustor rolled over when I made that statement. I spoke to his supervisor, his supervisor asked where I'd like the check sent to. My final bit of advice, be persistant.

Respond to this report!
What's this?

#3 Author of original report

Persistance Pays off

AUTHOR: Bob - (U.S.A.)

POSTED: Monday, January 23, 2006

I continued to pressure the warranty company to pay for the transmission. I called and told them that I was going to sue if they didn't pay up. Finally, I wrote a letter of what I was intending to do and sure enough, a week after they received the letter they called to settle. Don't get me wrong, the letter wasn't the thing that did it, they still wanted to lowball me. It was my persistance on the phone and the continual threat to sue. My final comment to them was," I hope your CEO likes to travel, because I am going to serve him." the claims adjustor rolled over when I made that statement. I spoke to his supervisor, his supervisor asked where I'd like the check sent to. My final bit of advice, be persistant.

Respond to this report!
What's this?

#2 Author of original report

Persistance Pays off

AUTHOR: Bob - (U.S.A.)

POSTED: Monday, January 23, 2006

I continued to pressure the warranty company to pay for the transmission. I called and told them that I was going to sue if they didn't pay up. Finally, I wrote a letter of what I was intending to do and sure enough, a week after they received the letter they called to settle. Don't get me wrong, the letter wasn't the thing that did it, they still wanted to lowball me. It was my persistance on the phone and the continual threat to sue. My final comment to them was," I hope your CEO likes to travel, because I am going to serve him." the claims adjustor rolled over when I made that statement. I spoke to his supervisor, his supervisor asked where I'd like the check sent to. My final bit of advice, be persistant.

Respond to this report!
What's this?

#1 Author of original report

Persistance Pays off

AUTHOR: Bob - (U.S.A.)

POSTED: Monday, January 23, 2006

I continued to pressure the warranty company to pay for the transmission. I called and told them that I was going to sue if they didn't pay up. Finally, I wrote a letter of what I was intending to do and sure enough, a week after they received the letter they called to settle. Don't get me wrong, the letter wasn't the thing that did it, they still wanted to lowball me. It was my persistance on the phone and the continual threat to sue. My final comment to them was," I hope your CEO likes to travel, because I am going to serve him." the claims adjustor rolled over when I made that statement. I spoke to his supervisor, his supervisor asked where I'd like the check sent to. My final bit of advice, be persistant.

Respond to this report!
What's this?
Featured Reports

Advertisers above have met our
strict standards for business conduct.

X
What do hackers,
questionable attorneys and
fake court orders have in common?
...Dishonest Reputation Management Investigates Reputation Repair
Free speech rights compromised

WATCH News
Segment Now