X
What do hackers,
questionable attorneys and
fake court orders have in common?
...Dishonest Reputation Management Investigates Reputation Repair
Free speech rights compromised

WATCH News
Segment Now
Ripoff Report | Bank Of America Review - North Windham, Maine
Ripoff Report Needs Your Help!
X  |  CLOSE
Report: #381967

Complaint Review: Bank Of America - North Windham Maine

  • Submitted:
  • Updated:
  • Reported By: Cornish Maine
  • Author Confirmed What's this?
  • Why?
  • Bank Of America 772 Roosevelt Trail North Windham, Maine U.S.A.
  • Phone: 207-892-4318
  • Web:
  • Category: Banks

Show customers why they should trust your business over your competitors...

Is this
Ripoff Report
About you?
Click here now..

My payroll check is drawn on Bank of America. Since I do not have a bank account I go to cash my check. Last week they charged me $6.00 to cash my check. How is this legal?

Tcamp
Cornish, Maine
U.S.A.

This report was posted on Ripoff Report on 10/16/2008 03:40 PM and is a permanent record located here: https://www.ripoffreport.com/reports/bank-of-america/north-windham-maine/bank-of-america-charging-6-check-cashing-fee-windhamnorth-windham-maine-381967. The posting time indicated is Arizona local time. Arizona does not observe daylight savings so the post time may be Mountain or Pacific depending on the time of year. Ripoff Report has an exclusive license to this report. It may not be copied without the written permission of Ripoff Report. READ: Foreign websites steal our content

Search for additional reports

If you would like to see more Rip-off Reports on this company/individual, search here:

Report & Rebuttal
Respond to this report!
What's this?
Also a victim?
What's this?
Repair Your Reputation!
What's this?

Updates & Rebuttals

REBUTTALS & REPLIES:
0Author
11Consumer
0Employee/Owner

#11 Consumer Suggestion

Ken's got it right...

AUTHOR: J G Shrugged - (U.S.A.)

POSTED: Monday, October 20, 2008

Right now I think only CA has made this illegal (but it's up to the employer to handle it, not the banks). But your employer should pay the difference.

Respond to this report!
What's this?

#10 Consumer Comment

California law...

AUTHOR: Edgeman - (U.S.A.)

POSTED: Monday, October 20, 2008

If the OP were in California, the employer would be obligated to make an arrangement for a place where the employee could cash the paycheck without a fee. I have no idea if there is a similar law in Maine. If not, I see no reason why the employer is obligated to give the OP another $6.

The employer pays the bank to look after their money and administrate transactions. The bank is not obligated to cash checks for each and every employee without a fee.

Respond to this report!
What's this?

#9 Consumer Comment

The service

AUTHOR: Ken - (U.S.A.)

POSTED: Monday, October 20, 2008

The service is to the account holder. They pay the bank to honor their checks, that's the point of holding an account...they get to give you a paper check which is a promise of payment, and the holder of the check should be able to see the check honored.

There is legislation under review to outlaw this practice, it is fairly recent to the industry, and it only getting by now through a loophole.

The person who cashed the check should go back to his employer and ask for his $6 back, since the employer in effect negotiated a check to him that was worth $6 less than the face amount.

Respond to this report!
What's this?

#8 Consumer Comment

Not seeing the ripoff...

AUTHOR: Edgeman - (U.S.A.)

POSTED: Sunday, October 19, 2008

The bank told you their terms for cashing the check- a $6 fee. At that point you were free to accept or decline those terms. If you declined you could easily have gone to your own bank, a check cashing place (with higher fees), a grocery store (which would have had a fee or require you to spend a certain amount), or even WalMart (who would have charged a fee).

Respond to this report!
What's this?

#7 Consumer Comment

Service

AUTHOR: Lenny - (U.S.A.)

POSTED: Sunday, October 19, 2008

They are providing a service to you. You are not a customer so why should you be able to cash a check for free?

Respond to this report!
What's this?

#6 Consumer Suggestion

no rip off

AUTHOR: Cat - (U.S.A.)

POSTED: Sunday, October 19, 2008

Big deal! They charge a fee since you have no account there. Wj? Mostly cause of the HIGH rate for bad checks. IT s a simple fix.........either one, open an acct there and then it's free or two.....go to your bank. Not that hard. Most banks charge a fee now, which is why I have a bank account..........I do not have to worry about a charge!

Respond to this report!
What's this?

#5 Consumer Comment

Not Only Is It Legal

AUTHOR: Jim - (U.S.A.)

POSTED: Saturday, October 18, 2008

It is a universal practice throughout the banking industry. I would encourage you to try this at any bank - I can assure you they would charge you as a non-customer to perform that service. The fact the payroll check is drawn against Bank of America is irrelevant. What if your employer failed to fund their payroll account? Bank of America would not be aware of that when you cashed the check.

The fee as a non-customer is a way for the bank to mitigate the risk that the check is no good. See, if you were a customer and the check were no good, the check would bounce and they could debit your account. However, if you aren't a customer and the check bounces, the bank has no recourse against you.

I would highly recommend going to your own bank and cashing your check there, or better yet - get Direct Deposit. Then, you don't have to go to the bank to deposit your check since it's already there.

Respond to this report!
What's this?

#4 Consumer Comment

Not Only Is It Legal

AUTHOR: Jim - (U.S.A.)

POSTED: Saturday, October 18, 2008

It is a universal practice throughout the banking industry. I would encourage you to try this at any bank - I can assure you they would charge you as a non-customer to perform that service. The fact the payroll check is drawn against Bank of America is irrelevant. What if your employer failed to fund their payroll account? Bank of America would not be aware of that when you cashed the check.

The fee as a non-customer is a way for the bank to mitigate the risk that the check is no good. See, if you were a customer and the check were no good, the check would bounce and they could debit your account. However, if you aren't a customer and the check bounces, the bank has no recourse against you.

I would highly recommend going to your own bank and cashing your check there, or better yet - get Direct Deposit. Then, you don't have to go to the bank to deposit your check since it's already there.

Respond to this report!
What's this?

#3 Consumer Comment

Not Only Is It Legal

AUTHOR: Jim - (U.S.A.)

POSTED: Saturday, October 18, 2008

It is a universal practice throughout the banking industry. I would encourage you to try this at any bank - I can assure you they would charge you as a non-customer to perform that service. The fact the payroll check is drawn against Bank of America is irrelevant. What if your employer failed to fund their payroll account? Bank of America would not be aware of that when you cashed the check.

The fee as a non-customer is a way for the bank to mitigate the risk that the check is no good. See, if you were a customer and the check were no good, the check would bounce and they could debit your account. However, if you aren't a customer and the check bounces, the bank has no recourse against you.

I would highly recommend going to your own bank and cashing your check there, or better yet - get Direct Deposit. Then, you don't have to go to the bank to deposit your check since it's already there.

Respond to this report!
What's this?

#2 Consumer Comment

Not Only Is It Legal

AUTHOR: Jim - (U.S.A.)

POSTED: Saturday, October 18, 2008

It is a universal practice throughout the banking industry. I would encourage you to try this at any bank - I can assure you they would charge you as a non-customer to perform that service. The fact the payroll check is drawn against Bank of America is irrelevant. What if your employer failed to fund their payroll account? Bank of America would not be aware of that when you cashed the check.

The fee as a non-customer is a way for the bank to mitigate the risk that the check is no good. See, if you were a customer and the check were no good, the check would bounce and they could debit your account. However, if you aren't a customer and the check bounces, the bank has no recourse against you.

I would highly recommend going to your own bank and cashing your check there, or better yet - get Direct Deposit. Then, you don't have to go to the bank to deposit your check since it's already there.

Respond to this report!
What's this?

#1 Author of original report

Bank of America, North Windham, Maine

AUTHOR: Tcamp - (U.S.A.)

POSTED: Thursday, October 16, 2008

When I cashed my payroll check which is drawn on this bank, they charged me $6.00. When I protested, they suggested I open an account. I declined to do so because I hate the policies of this bank. Specifically, they won't allow "non" customers to use the drive through. Aren't we all customers if we have to do business here? I also hate the policy of fingerprinting even though I have provided my drivers license and/or passport?

How can this be legal?

Respond to this report!
What's this?
Featured Reports

Advertisers above have met our
strict standards for business conduct.