Complaint Review: Better Business Bureau of Middle TN - Nashville Tennessee
- Better Business Bureau of Middle TN 201 Fourth Ave. North, Ste 100 Nashville, Tennessee USA
- Phone: 6152424222
- Web: bbb.org
- Category: Consumer Services
Better Business Bureau of Middle TN Arbitrator sided with the member company. I requested BBB hearing recording and verified improprieties. Notified BBB and National office no response. Nashville Tennessee
*General Comment: Pay to grade...
listed on other sites?
Those sites steal
Ripoff Report's
content.
We can get those
removed for you!
Find out more here.
Ripoff Report
willing to make a
commitment to
customer satisfaction
Click here now..
I had an arbitration hearing August 2014, to resolve an issue I had with a time share advocacy group. I attended the hearing via telephone and the company owner and his attorney attended in person. This hearing was a farce and waste of my time. Obviously, the arbitrator was newly trained and the only thing she remembered was find in favor of the BBB member. Before I proceed, I would like to make note of the fact that I requested, and recceived, a copy of the arbitration hearing recording that will substantiate and prove my accusations. To date, the Middle TN BBB has never responded to my letter of complaint regarding this hearing. I sent a complaint to The Council of Better Business Bureau in Arlington, VA.
They returned my large manilla envelope unopened. What is most upsetting is the FACT the arbitrator had a private meeting with the company before or after our Hearing. There are situations in the "Reasons for Decisions" not brought up or discussed during the Hearing that I attended. For example, there are references to people and statements that were not discussed during the Hearing. The arbitrator relied on statements, as truth, attributed to a company employee, who did not attend the meeting, nor was he conferenced in. Although he was my primary contact at the company. Thus, he should have been present in some form. I presented tons of emails sent to the company as acknowledged by the arbitrator. She asked were there any emails sent by the company to me because she didn’t see any.
Questions went unanswered by the company owner and not once was he directed to answer the questioin. There was no reference to this issue in the Reasons for Decisions. The company was always present and able to respond to all of my statements. Part of my proof of non-service by the company was a series of correspondence I wrote. I was beyond shocked when the company claimed authorship of my correspondence. The owner stated, I was provided with the wording for the letters. I received one letter from the company that was so unprofessional and badly written I used the "send to" information only. Although, I sent copies of every piece of correspondence sent and received to the company for their records.
In addition, I was to recieve 308,000 vacation points, that I paid for, and didn't get. I was offered them at the hearing and I declined. The money I was refunded for these points ($2,695.00) was also an insult. Had I known beforehand, accepting the points would have been a beter option. Although, the company handling the points was in court on racketeering charges. So, I just envisioned myself continuing the battle for the points. I was awarded this pittance by the arbitrator and didn't receive a check, as expected, until my hearing complaint letter to the TN BBB. This was the only part of the complaint letter that was responded to. I notified the BBB that I considered the decision, as rendered by the arbitrator, null and void due to the improprieties and membership bias.
The arbitrator went overboard in trying to justify and defend her decision. It reminded me of a defense attorney making closing arguments. She even included a point, she felt valid for the company, but stated it was not included in the issues, yet was included in her determination letter. There was no thought given to the fact that verbal statements were made and accepted as truth when I was not present. I had a right to refute the company's statements that had an impact on the final decision of this hearing, had it been a true impartial hearing. I engaged the services of this company after they approached me and upon checking their rating with the BBB. I will never, ever trust the BBB in any state and have learned my lesson. Don't trust the rating the BBB gives it's members becuase they are purchased with membership dues.
This report was posted on Ripoff Report on 04/22/2015 07:41 AM and is a permanent record located here: https://www.ripoffreport.com/reports/better-business-bureau-of-middle-tn/nashville-tennessee-37219/better-business-bureau-of-middle-tn-arbitrator-sided-with-the-member-company-i-requeste-1224042. The posting time indicated is Arizona local time. Arizona does not observe daylight savings so the post time may be Mountain or Pacific depending on the time of year. Ripoff Report has an exclusive license to this report. It may not be copied without the written permission of Ripoff Report. READ: Foreign websites steal our content
If you would like to see more Rip-off Reports on this company/individual, search here:



#1 General Comment
Pay to grade...
AUTHOR: Tyg - (USA)
SUBMITTED: Wednesday, April 22, 2015
It doesnt matter what state you are in the BBB has NO TEETH!! Its a "pay for a grade" system. Of course they are going to side with the business, the business PAYS THEM!! YOU however DO NOT!!!!!Money talks, whining walks. Thats thier motto. And not to put too fine of a point on this but there is ALWAYS a winner and a loser in ANY legal proceeding. YOU lost and nothing more. All YOU have done is defame them BECAUSE you lost and NOT from any wrong doing. If YOU couldnt be bothered to show up IN PERSON to a LEGAL EVENT, how can you sit there and complain about it. YOU CHOSE to use a telephone instead of showing up in person.
So YOU have no idea WHAT was presented or said. Had YOU been there in person YOU would have had a better chance to repute THIER paperwork. YOU cannot NOW complain about it. The excuses YOU give have zero bearing on the situation. While not very nice the reality is that since YOU could not or would not show up IN PERSON you have no ability to refute what was presented as physical proof on THIER part. Had YOU attended in person, YOU would have been able to go over thier presented information. All YOU are currently doing is giving THEM more ammo since YOU took this and put it on a media outlet and YOU have presented your opinions as fact in the issue. YOU are under the very same laws that EVERY printed publication MUST follow or face fines.


Advertisers above have met our
strict standards for business conduct.