Complaint Review: Chapin Law Office - Robert William Chapin - Lincoln Nebraska
- Chapin Law Office - Robert William Chapin 421 South 9th Street Suite 245 Lincoln, Nebraska United States of America
- Phone: 441-5858
- Web:
- Category: Attorneys & Legal Services
Chapin Law Office - Robert William Chapin, Excepted a 6000.00 dollar retainer to represent this wrongfully accused man. Purposely neglects the case, gives you No professioal help at trial, Chapin Law Office--Lincoln, Nebraska. Takes your retainer, then forgets why you hired him. Completely neglects your case, gives you no professional legal assistance. Omaha, Nebraska
*Consumer Comment: Should of hired a Better Attorney 2020-21
*Consumer Comment: Nebraska Judge Drops Hammer on Iron Thunder. (Thunder Represented by Robert Wm Chapin Jr / Bill Chapin)
*Consumer Comment: Bill Chapin, Chapin Law Office, Lincoln Nebraska
*Consumer Comment: Attorney Bill Chapin, billchapinlaw.com, Robert Wm. Chapin, Chapin Law Office. Lincoln Ne. Different names same Loser.
*Consumer Comment: Attorney Bill Chapin, billchapinlaw.com, Robert Wm. Chapin, Chapin Law Office. Different names same Loser.
*Consumer Comment: Orders Imposed Against Nebraska Attorneys
*Consumer Comment: He did amazing for me!!
*Consumer Comment: 2015 Still Ripping People Off With Botched legal services.
*Consumer Comment: Terrible and ignorant or just Crooked.
*Consumer Comment: If you work for your money? Don't throw it in the toilet!
*Consumer Comment: CROOKED BANKRUPTCY ATTORNEY!
*Consumer Comment: Martindale-Hubbell Ratings (1.6 out of 5) Rotten Lawyer
*Author of original report: Disciplinary actions.
listed on other sites?
Those sites steal
Ripoff Report's
content.
We can get those
removed for you!
Find out more here.
Ripoff Report
willing to make a
commitment to
customer satisfaction
Click here now..
I hired Robert William Chapin to represent me in a criminal trial in Seward County Nebraska. I was arrested on some private farmland and taken to jail from that location. The Nebraska State patrol with the help of the Seward county sheriffs department drove the defendants vehicle off the private farmland to the Seward Motorfreight parking lot of the I-80 exit.
After a month in jail the preliminary hearing was held, I then found out that I was being charged with various crimes which happen at this parking lot in Seward. Also charged with driving to this location. I have never been to or drove to this location in my life.
I hired Robert William Chapin of Lincoln. {Bill Chapin} He told me he would prove this arrest and arrest location were fabricated by law officials.
Walking up to the court house he informs me that he didn't have enough time to prepare for trial. Says everthing he can to try and get you to fire him that day.
The Seward County attorney Wendy Elston put fabricated witness's on the stand, which gave false testimony to the jury placing the defendant at this Seward Motor freight parking lot. Chapin would not impeach these witness's with available evidence. He would not help me obtain the dispatch records from the State Patrol or Seward County Communications which would prove I was arrested at a different location.
He helps the prosection to cover up a crooked trial. He subpoena witness's for you on your behave. While there in the hall way of the court house. The judge will close the trial for the day. Chapin will go out and release the witness's from the subpoena. The next day your wonder where your witness's are, he'll tell you I don't know.
He asked for six continuances threw out the trial because he was not prepared and there are loop holes in the discovery turned over to the defense. But he does not file a affidavit with these continuance motions per NEBRASKA LAW.
I have never been to this arrest location in my life. But thanks to Robert William Chapin I went to prison for it. Lost my appeal because he filed no affidavit with these continuance motions. Court of appeals said he had time to prepare. A Competant lawyer could of proved the State was lying, impeached State witness's, made arguments at trial which could of been appealed and won.
Don't end up studying the law in prison. I will give anybody who reads this the best advice in the world. The legal system is not honest, jurys believe lying state officials and cops. You have one chance to prove your innocent in trial, don't ruin your chance by hiring a crooked lawyer like Chapin Law office. He's done helping you the day you pay him money!!
This report was posted on Ripoff Report on 08/16/2009 12:16 PM and is a permanent record located here: https://www.ripoffreport.com/reports/chapin-law-office-robert-william-chapin/lincoln-nebraska-68508/chapin-law-office-robert-william-chapin-excepted-a-600000-dollar-retainer-to-represent-480683. The posting time indicated is Arizona local time. Arizona does not observe daylight savings so the post time may be Mountain or Pacific depending on the time of year. Ripoff Report has an exclusive license to this report. It may not be copied without the written permission of Ripoff Report. READ: Foreign websites steal our content
If you would like to see more Rip-off Reports on this company/individual, search here:
#13 Consumer Comment
Should of hired a Better Attorney 2020-21
AUTHOR: - (United States)
SUBMITTED: Friday, July 30, 2021
JAMES YOUNG, Appellee,
v.
JUSTINA M. ZOBRIST, Appellant.
No. A-20-796.
Court of Appeals of Nebraska.
Filed June 1, 2021.
Appeal from the District Court for Sarpy County: STEFANIE A. MARTINEZ, Judge. Affirmed.
Robert Wm. Chapin, Jr., of Chapin Law Office, for appellant.
INTRODUCTION
Justina M. Zobrist appeals from an order of the District Court for Sarpy County granting James Young's motion to vacate an order allowing Zobrist to proceed in forma pauperis. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm.
CONCLUSION
For the reasons set forth above, we conclude that the district court had jurisdiction to hear Young's motion to vacate the order allowing Zobrist to proceed in forma pauperis. Further, we conclude that the court did not preclude Zobrist from exercising her statutory remedies following the vacation of the order. Accordingly, we affirm.
{ Robert Chapin for appellant Justina M. Zobrist Waste of money LOST }
Mohamed K., appellant, and
Abak R., appellee and cross-appellant.
No. S-20-342.
Supreme Court of Nebraska.
Filed February 12, 2021.
Appeal from the Separate Juvenile Court of Lancaster County: LINDA S. PORTER, Judge. Affirmed.
Robert Wm. Chapin, Jr., of Chapin Law Office, Lincoln, for appellant.
ASSIGNMENTS OF ERROR
Mohamed assigns that the juvenile court erred by finding (1) that Prince lacked proper parental care by reason of his faults or habits and (2) that his actions placed Prince at a definite risk of harm. On cross-appeal, Abak assigns that the juvenile court erred by making the same determinations with respect to her.
CONCLUSION
We find that the juvenile court did not err by adjudicating Prince as a child that lacked proper parental care by reason of the fault or habits of both Mohamed and Abak. Accordingly, we affirm.
{ Robert Chapin for Appellant Mohamed K. Waste of Time and Waste of Money LOST }
29 Neb.App. 881
STATE OF NEBRASKA, Appellant,
v.
THOMAS N. SAILORS, SR., Appellee.
No. A-20-050.
Court of Appeals of Nebraska.
Filed May 25, 2021.
Appeal from the District Court for Gage County: RICKY A. SCHREINER, Judge. Affirmed in part, and in part reversed and remanded with directions.
Robert Wm. Chapin, Jr., for appellee.
INTRODUCTION
The State of Nebraska appeals the order of the Gage County District Court granting the motion for absolute discharge of Thomas N. Sailors, Sr., which motion was based upon the violation of his right to a speedy trial.
CONCLUSION
In sum, we affirm that part of the district court's order finding that in performing a speedy trial calculation, the court should combine all nonexcludable time in cases Nos. CR 17-183 and CR 19-106. However, having determined that the district court erred in failing to perform a speedy trial calculation, we reverse the judgment and remand the cause with directions for the district court to perform a speedy trial calculation.
{ Robert Chapin for Appellee Thomas N. Sailors. The District Court granted Sailors motion for absolute discharge, the State of Nebraska Appealed. Sailors hires Robert Chapin. Now Sailors is on his way back to the district court for a recalculation of his speedy trial. Who gave him Chapin’s number the State. }
BENJAMIN M., appellant,
v.
JERI S., appellee.
No. S-19-1144.
Supreme Court of Nebraska.
Filed November 6, 2020.
Appeal from the District Court for Lancaster County: SUSAN I. STRONG, Judge. Reversed and remanded for further proceedings.
Robert Wm. Chapin, Jr., Lincoln, for appellee.
NATURE OF CASE
Benjamin M. filed an action to establish paternity, custody, support, and parenting time. Benjamin later filed two notarized acknowledgments of paternity contemporaneously with an amended complaint to establish custody, support, and parenting time. The district court dismissed the amended complaint based on statute of 385*385 limitations grounds. Benjamin appeals and argues that the district court erred in failing to give proper legal effect to the notarized acknowledgments of paternity. We agree and reverse the district court's order and remand the cause for further proceedings.
{Robert Chapin for Appellee Jeri S. Appears the District court ruled in favor of Jeri S. Appellant appealed this ruing and Jeri S hired Robert Chapin. Now This Court ruled in favor of Appellant. Hope Jeri S hires a different attorney on her way back to court}
#12 Consumer Comment
Nebraska Judge Drops Hammer on Iron Thunder. (Thunder Represented by Robert Wm Chapin Jr / Bill Chapin)
AUTHOR: NCFD - (United States)
SUBMITTED: Thursday, October 31, 2019
Nebraska Judge Drops Hammer on Iron Thunder. Iron Thunder Represented by Robert Wm. Chapin / Bill Chapin
Who gave Iron Thunder Robert Wm. Chapin Jr Telephone number the roomate? When will people figure out what a Big Mistake Is.
#11 Consumer Comment
Bill Chapin, Chapin Law Office, Lincoln Nebraska
AUTHOR: Anonymous - (United States)
SUBMITTED: Wednesday, December 13, 2017
(Consumer Update) 2017?
SHAWN DARNALL AND STEPHANIE DARNALL, Appellants, v. PARRISH PROJECT, L.L.C., Appellee. No. A-16-672. Court of Appeals of Nebraska. Filed June 13, 2017. Robert Wm. Chapin, Jr., for appellants. LOST
#10 Consumer Comment
Attorney Bill Chapin, billchapinlaw.com, Robert Wm. Chapin, Chapin Law Office. Lincoln Ne. Different names same Loser.
AUTHOR: Lincoln - (USA)
SUBMITTED: Monday, May 15, 2017
BE-AWARE FOR YOU (Consumer Update) When will be learn?
Filed March 24, 2017. State v. Artis, 296 Neb. 172 - Neb: Supreme Court 2017. Arits sentence 17 years to 22 years. Judgement affirmed. Hope he didn't spend all his money on Chapin Law office. Published LOST.
Filed Tuesday, May 24, 2016 Cruise v. Department of Insurance, S-15-0372 Robert Wm. Chapin, Jr. The district court affirmed a decision of the Department of Insurance (DOI) revoking Appellant’s insurance license for failing to disclose on his application that he had been previously disbarred from the practice and law and publicly reprimanded as a Parenting Act Mediator. Unpublished LOST AGAIN
Filed June 21, 2016. State v. Hall. No. A-15-548. Court of Appeals of Nebraska. Chapin Law Office. Robert Wm. Chapin, Unpublished LOST
November 17, 2015. State v. Parson. No. A-15-304. Court of Appeals of Nebraska. Chapin Law Office. Robert Wm. Chapin, Unpublished LOST
November 17, 2015. State v. Parson. No. A-15-306. Court of Appeals of Nebraska. Chapin Law office. Robert Wm. Chapin, Unpublished LOST
#9 Consumer Comment
Attorney Bill Chapin, billchapinlaw.com, Robert Wm. Chapin, Chapin Law Office. Different names same Loser.
AUTHOR: Lincoln, NE - (USA)
SUBMITTED: Sunday, October 02, 2016
BE-AWARE FOR YOU (consumer update)
Filed Tuesday, May 24, 2016 Cruise v. Department of Insurance, S-15-0372 Robert Wm. Chapin, Jr. The district court affirmed a decision of the Department of Insurance (DOI) revoking Appellant’s insurance license for failing to disclose on his application that he had been previously disbarred from the practice and law and publicly reprimanded as a Parenting Act Mediator. Unpublished LOST AGAIN
Filed June 21, 2016. State v. Hall. No. A-15-548. Court of Appeals of Nebraska. Chapin Law Office. Robert Wm. Chapin, Unpublished LOST
November 17, 2015. State v. Parson. No. A-15-304. Court of Appeals of Nebraska. Chapin Law Office. Robert Wm. Chapin, Unpublished LOST
November 17, 2015. State v. Parson. No. A-15-306. Court of Appeals of Nebraska. Chapin Law office. Robert Wm. Chapin, Unpublished LOST
#8 Consumer Comment
Orders Imposed Against Nebraska Attorneys
AUTHOR: Lincoln - (USA)
SUBMITTED: Wednesday, April 27, 2016
State Of Nebraska Judicial Branch
Public Orders Imposed Against Nebraska Attorneys
Name | Month / Year | Supreme Court Opinion # | Action Taken Case # | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Chapin, Robert William Jr. | Jun 2005 | 270 Neb. 56 |
Hit on case # to view report. Robert Chapin has a history of misconduct. His misconduct has never stopped. Warning
#7 Consumer Comment
He did amazing for me!!
AUTHOR: kt anonymous - (USA)
SUBMITTED: Wednesday, March 16, 2016
Bill did an amazing job on my case, he got everything I asked for and didn't charge me for most of the work!! I couldn't be happier with the work Bill Chapin did!
#6 Consumer Comment
2015 Still Ripping People Off With Botched legal services.
AUTHOR: Consumer - (USA)
SUBMITTED: Friday, February 05, 2016
Unpublished. State v. Parson A-15-304, A-15-306 Robert Wm. Chapin, Jr., for Appellant.
Robert wm. Chapin files two Meritless appeals. In fact the Court States that Chapin has not cited any case, and their research has uncovered nothing in support of Chapins arguments! That in fact case law suggests otherwise.
Some Crooks walk into the Bank armed with a Check and a Smile.
Criminal Defense Law Firm - Backed By 20+ Years Of Experience. Ripping People Off !
#5 Consumer Comment
Terrible and ignorant or just Crooked.
AUTHOR: Lancaster County - ()
SUBMITTED: Saturday, September 28, 2013
Wood v. KHAN HOTELS LLC Dist. Court, D. Nebraska, 2013 - Quoting Judges order "Rather, the attorney must stand his ground and refuse to act in a manner that flies in the face of the relevant ethics rules", "the lawyer who proceeds recklessly.....must foot the bill" ......U.S District Court confirms that Reckless Robert Wm Chapin must pay defendants attorney fee's personally. LOST--Another lost Case plus attorneys fees.
818 F.Supp.2d 1153 Donald E. WRIGHT, Plaintiff, v. Kathleen SEBELIUS, Secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services, and Saint Elizabeth Regional Medical Center, Inc., Defendants. Robert Wm Chapin for Plaintiff.
Because Plaintiff has failed to satisfy the nonwaivable presentment requirement, he has failed to exhaust the administrative remedies required by § 405(g) and (h), and this court lacks subject-matter jurisdiction over this matter. LOST – wasted Plaintiff’s money and time.
Counsel For Discipline v. Chapin 699 N.W.2d 359 Violation of oath of office--
Kearney v. Kearney, 644 N.W.2d 171 Robert Wm. Chapin LOST--
T.Carmicheal v. T.Rollings, 280 Neb.59 Robert Wm. Chapin LOST--
State of Neb. v. Manning, 18 Neb.App 545 Robert Wm. Chapin LOST--
State v. Roe, 646 N.W.2d 264 Robert Wm. Chapin LOST--
State v. Rudnick, A-06-625 Neb.App Robert Wm. Chapin LOST--
State v. LeGrand, 541 N.W.2d 380 Robert Wm. Chapin LOST--
State v. Anglemyer, 269 Neb 237 Robert Wm. Chapin LOST--
Ways v. Shively, 264 Neb 250 Robert Wm. Chapin LOST--
Guardianship of Sophia M, 710 N.W.2d 312 Robert Wm. Chapin LOST-- Baltensperger v. U.S Dept Agriculture, 549 N.W.2d 651 R. Chapin LOST-- State v. Plymate, 598 N.W.2d 65 Robert Wm. Chapin LOST--
Percival v. Dep of Corrections, 446 N.W.2d 211 Robert Wm. Chapin LOST-- Rubin v. Rubin, 434 N.W.2d 329 Robert Wm. Chapin LOST--
Neb.Assoc Public Employees, 374 N.W.2d 46 Robert Wm. Chapin LOST-- Recek v. Dep. of Public Instit., 404 N.W.2d 414 Robert Wm. Chapin LOST-- Mc Manaman In Interest of, 383 N.W.2d 45 Robert Wm. Chapin LOST-- Howard v. City of Lincoln, 497 N.W.2d 53 Robert Wm. Chapin LOST-- Woodward v. Hoover Group, 985 F.2d 421 8th Cir. Robert Chapin LOST-- Reich v. Stewart, 121 F.3d 400 8th Cir. Robert Wm. Chapin LOST--
Radecke v. Joura, 177 F.3d 694 8th Cir. Robert Wm. Chapin LOST--
Ways v. City of Lincoln, 331 F.3d 596 8th Cir. Robert Wm. Chapin LOST-- Many more lost cases, can't imagine how many in unpublished opinions!
On March 4, 2011 the Nebraska Supreme Court disbarred Lincoln attorney Peter T Thew. Robert William Chapin 'Chapin law office' represented Thew in this proceedings. Chapin stated to the Supreme court he could not comment on all of Thew's misconduct because he an Thew were partners on some of these dealings! You can view this proceedings on the Nebraska supreme court web site.
#4 Consumer Comment
If you work for your money? Don't throw it in the toilet!
AUTHOR: Jenny S - (United States of America)
SUBMITTED: Sunday, February 03, 2013
You are just throwing good money away when seeking legal help with this office.
#3 Consumer Comment
CROOKED BANKRUPTCY ATTORNEY!
AUTHOR: Concerned Resident - (United States of America)
SUBMITTED: Saturday, April 21, 2012
The high court neglected this Question !! Would this family of had a chance to save their family farm if, {Chapin law office, Bill Chapin would of showed up at the Scheduled bankruptcy hearing like he was hired to do} The fact is if this lazy incompetent attorney would of showed up at the hearing the family might of had a chance of saving this farm. I would guess someone wanted this farm and payed Chapin law office more money then his client not to show up at this hearing, mabe the bank. This lawyer would sell out his own family for more money, he's a lowlife crook!
#2 Consumer Comment
Martindale-Hubbell Ratings (1.6 out of 5) Rotten Lawyer
AUTHOR: Columbus Resident - (United States of America)
SUBMITTED: Saturday, February 18, 2012
Criminal Law, Family Law
1.6 out of 5.0
1.5
Communication Ability
1.5
Responsiveness
2.0
Quality of Service
1.5
Value for Money
#1 Author of original report
Disciplinary actions.
AUTHOR: Innocent man found guilty - (USA)
SUBMITTED: Wednesday, June 23, 2010
Click below! Read 6/23/2010 report concerning disciplinary actions and prior lost cases.
Advertisers above have met our
strict standards for business conduct.