Christopher W Livingston Esq chris livingston christopher w livingston esq, chris livingston, pig boy, christopher w livingston esq white oak, North Carolina

I am one of the individuals that Mr. Livingston is representing in this so called "frivolous and malicious" claim and I assure the readers that this is anything but frivolous to those of us who have lost large sums of money and our good credit ratings through the practices of the defendants.

Mr. Livingston is not now nor has he been in any danger of disbarment nor has he been cited for professional misconduct.

The  nickname of "pigboy" is an affectionate reference to his days in law enforcement befor becoming a lawyer.  PIG is an anacronym for Pride, Integrity, Guts.  I believe that this anacronym is entirely appropo when describing Christopher Livingston.

I have absolutely no personal knowledge of Mr. Livingston ever threatening another lawyer with firearms, however in the light of the recent intrusion to his office, and the theft of his computer and all of the files pertinent to this case, maybe he should be armed until the conclusion of this action. Besides, at this present time, It is the Right of American citizens to "bear Arms". 

As to filing cases for personal gain, Is that not the business practice of all lawyers?  I truly hope that the conclusion of this action DOES result in personal gain for Mr. Livingston because that means that I will have recieved retribution for the wrongs committed against myself and the other plaintiffs in this "false and malicious" RICO case.

 

Not sure who's writing this nonsense and it really doesn't matter.

What does matter is that Christopher Livingston is an excellent attorney. And I assure you that what you are reading about him is a far cry from the truth. The author (s) are at this point very frustrated and fearful because the truth is, and because Mr Livingston is such an excellent attorney.....they are up to their tushes in legal issues brought on by themselves, through Mr. Livingston, "at the request of a group of people", myself being one of them, who are extremely happy with the progress he is making in the case against them. Until now they have been enriched by the monies of those who trusted them to do the right thing. And they did not. So the legal system that they used as a facade for "acquiring their clients" will hopefully put them right where they belong ;-)

If you'd like to see what they are really all about, at the top of this page just type in CCDN for starters, my story may or may not still be there.......it's been a long ride. I would be Karma911. Also you might like to see what's out there for Richard Russ, Robert Lock, Tracey Webster, Phil Manger - there all part of the story behind this fear based nonsense.

And if this is written by Richard Russ? You must have forgot "have no fear" is part of your motto to live by. While I typically consider anyone who has been part of the military with high regard, you have not earned it, in fact you have disgraced it. Wear the uniform with respect for what it stands for - not just to gain respect for wearing it.

Richard,

Ouch.  That's gotta sting.  Just sayin'.

I was going to post on this page about this thread, but now that it's known who the "coward" is, I don't feel the need to try and argue regarding this on ROR.  How do you argue with someone who KNOWS the truth already?  Pointless.

Fraud.

 

You're such a coward, Richard D. Russ aka Rick Russ aka Richard Russ, threatening my family.  You're a fake claiming to have been a Marine.  If you ever were, you're an absolute disgrace to the Corps.  You've also been falsely claiming to have an Air Medal with three oak leaf clusters.  Why don't you tell your (nonexistent) FBI friends about your criminal violations of the Stolen Valor Act?  People go to jail for that.

My status with the State Bar is member in good standing.  Look it up.

Well, Richard D. Russ aka Rick Russ aka Richard Russ, since you lie about your capabilities to eliminate people's debt and conduct "forensic loan audits" and anything else you dream up to ruin people's lives, you must be lying about your FBI contacts too.  You can have all the contacts at the local and state police you want.  They won't save you from prosecution, and if they exist, then when they find out what a complete criminal you are, they'll turn on you as they do with all fakers and posers.

Oh, yeah, Coward Richard D. Russ aka Rick Russ aka Richard Russ, did you see what U.S. District Judge Anderson did to your little racket?  Here you go:

The court will conduct a damages h 1 earing in June 2010, in order to ascertain Capital Ones damages and to enter a final default judgment.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA ROCK HILL DIVISION

CAPITAL ONE BANK (USA), N.A., ) C/A No.: 0:08-2274-JFA ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. )) CAREFREE DEBT, INC. A/K/A ) PERMANENT INJUNCTION CDI, FEDERAL DEBT RELIEF ) SYSTEMS, CREDIT ) COLLECTIONS DEFENSE ) NETWORK, ELIZABETH ) SALAZAR, and SUZAN AZEREDO, ) ) Defendants. ) )

Plaintiff Capital One Bank (USA), N.A. (Capital One) commenced this action on June 19, 2008 (Dkt. No. 1). Defendant Credit Collections Defense Network (CCDN) waived service of the summons and complaint (Dkt. No. 21). All remaining defendants were properly served with the summons and complaint. On January 4, 2010, the clerk entered default as to defendant Federal Debt Relief Systems (Dkt. No. 83). On March 9, 2010, the clerk entered default as to CCDN (Dkt. No. 99). This matter came before the court on May 12, 2010, upon an Order and Rule to Show Cause against CCDN (Dkt. No. 108). CCDN failed to appeared at the hearing. Based upon CCDNs failure to appear, and the other corporate defendants failure to responsively plead or otherwise respond, the court directed the clerk to enter default against all corporate defendants. (Dkt. Nos. 108, 109). The court also granted Capital Ones request for injunctive relief. This order serves to memorialize and more fully set forth the courts rulings announced at the March 9, 2010 hearing. 0:08-cv-02274-JFA Date Filed 06/01/10 Entry Number 113 Page 1 of 5 2

I. Factual and Procedural Background Capital One brought this action in an effort to enjoin the defendants participation in a nationwide fraudulent credit counseling and debt relief service. As alleged in Capital Ones complaint and established by the defendants default, the defendants use television and internet advertisements to encourage individuals with debt problems to contact the defendants and explore opportunities allegedly provided by the defendants program. To participate in the program, individual debtors are required to sign a document entitled a Debt Termination Education Agreement where the individual agrees to make payments to the defendants and the defendants purport to educate the individual on the United States banking system and to assist the individuals with written communications to creditors, collections agencies, and attorneys in order to terminate the individuals unsecured debt obligations. The corporate defendants share clients and pass client information from one to the other, actually providing little or no useful services to their customers. Customers receive worthless literature regarding the banking system, are encouraged to stop making payments to their creditors, and are provided form pleadings in the event legitimate creditors commence debt-collection processes in court. In addition, the defendants have executed fraudulent documents, purporting to be acknowledgments from creditors, including Capital One, that individuals debts have been discharged. Typically, these documents are prepared on what appears to be the creditors letterhead and are signed by persons purporting to be authorized agents or officers of the creditor. These documents are then sent to credit reporting agencies in an effort to induce the credit reporting agency to cease its credit reporting concerning the consumers debt.

0:08-cv-02274-JFA Date Filed 06/01/10 Entry Number 113 Page 2 of 5 3 II. Discussion 1. Standard The district court may grant permanent injunctive relief where a plaintiff establishes: (1) that it has suffered an irreparable injury; (2) that remedies available at law, such as monetary damages, are inadequate to compensate for that injury; (3) that considering the balance of hardships between the plaintiff and defendant, a remedy in equity is warranted; and (4) that the public interest would not be disserved by a permanent injunction. Palmetto Conservation Found. v. Smith, 642 F. Supp. 2d 518, 531 (D.S.C. 2009) (citing eBay, Inc. v. MercExchange, LLC, 547 U.S. 388, 391 (2006)). Furthermore, the Lanham Act allows the owner of a registered trademark whose rights have been knowingly and intentionally violated to obtain injunctive relief to prevent further violations. 15 U.S.C. 1116.

2. Capital One is Entitled to an Injunction The facts alleged in Capital Ones complaint, and established by the corporate defendants defaults, support the issuance of a permanent injunction. The corporate defendants fraudulent debt elimination scheme has deprived Capital One of business revenues, and will continue to do so in the future if not enjoined. The nature and full extent of Capital Ones future damages cannot be readily ascertained, because it is impossible to predict what ongoing damages Capital One may suffer if the corporate defendants activities were allowed to continue. Furthermore, the corporate defendants unlicensed and intentional misappropriation of Capital Ones registered trademark for use in the defendants scheme violates the Lanham Act, and entitles Capital One to a permanent injunction. A balancing of the relative hardships between Capital One and the corporate defendants weighs in 0:08-cv-02274-JFA Date Filed 06/01/10 Entry Number 113 Page 3 of 5 4 favor of Capital One. The public interest also supports the issuance of an injunction against the defendants.

The defendants Carefree, Federal Debt Relief Systems and CCDN, as well as the officers, agents, employees, attorneys, successors and assigns of each of the corporate defendants are permanently enjoined from engaging in any of the following activities: a. Publishing written or oral false, fraudulent, materially misleading or unsubstantiated declarations that any Capital One account holder has satisfied or closed his/her Capital One consumer credit account; b. Publishing any written or oral communications which may lead the recipient of such communication to believe that any one or more of the corporate defendants, or the officers, agents, employees, attorneys, successors or assigns of such defendants are authorized to take any action or make any representation on behalf of Capital One; c. Publishing any written or oral communications which may lead the recipient of such communication to believe that Capital One, or its authorized agents or assigns, is the publisher of such communications; d. Publishing any written or oral communications which may lead the recipient of such communication to believe that Capital One authorized the communications to be made on behalf of Capital One; e. Reproducing, imitating, incorporating, copying, disseminating, distributing or publishing in any form any of Capital Ones trademarks, logos, slogans, letterhead or trade dress. This prohibition includes any use of colorable imitations of Capital Ones registered trademarks which are likely to cause confusion, or to cause mistake, or deceive; 0:08-cv-02274-JFA Date Filed 06/01/10 Entry Number 113 Page 4 of 5 5 f. Contacting, communicating with, and/or representing any customer in regards to a Capital One account; and g. Engaging in any conduct which constitutes the unauthorized practice of law.

III. Conclusion Because each corporate defendant is in default, the court hereby grants Capital Ones request for injunctive relief as set forth in its complaint and memorialized in this order. Within thirty days after the service of this injunction upon the defendants, each corporate defendant, Carefree, Federal Debt Relief Systems, and CCDN, shall file with the court and serve on Capital Ones attorney a report in writing, and under oath, setting forth in detail the manner and form in which it has complied with this injunction. Any violations of this injunction may be enforced by proceedings to punish for contempt, or otherwise, in this court, or by any other United States district court in whose jurisdiction the defendants may be found. See 15 U.S.C. 1116 (1982). IT IS SO ORDERED. June 1, 2010 Joseph F. Anderson, Jr. Columbia, South Carolina United States District Judge 0:08-cv-02274-JFA Date Filed 06/01/10 Entry Number 113 Page 5 of 5

Still with us, Coward Richard D. Russ aka Rick Russ aka Richard Russ?  Wasn't that fun?  Hey, that's the scam YOU used to sell!  No wonder you're so mad at me, you criminal coward.  You're out of business!  Ha!

Enjoy the bitter end of your scam, before you go to prison.  You'll be all mad at us, of course, because you're nothing but a criminal and you blame everybody else in the world for your own wrongdoing.  Enjoy the rest of your long, bitter, meaningless, miserable life, Coward Richard D. Russ aka Rick Russ aka Richard Russ.  Cherish those old pictures of what you could have been, but threw away because you love crime and evil and fraud and cowardice.

By the way, if you insist on cowardly dragging innocent people into this, you'll go to jail sooner than I thought.  They don't have the internet there, Coward Richard D. Russ aka Rick Russ aka Richard Russ.

Christopher W Livingston are you by any chance related to the famous "hog industry" Livingston family? Also while your thinking maybe you would like to bring the class up to date with where you stand with the North Carolina State Bar......when do you have your review?

Do you feel like you can file frivolous and malicious lawsuits because your old man is big in the hog business? Does your rich daddy pay your bills because he feels sorry for his retarded son?

I will check into your status with the NC BAR association and let the people make a collective decision about your credibility. By the way stop throwing around references to law enforcement like it should scare me I have close friends in the FBI (best man at my wedding) as well a the local and state police.

I knew you were a coward, Coward, and a liar too, since you're such a fan of Robert K. Lock, Jr. and Philip M. Manger and CCDN and the Credit Collections Defense Network.  But now we know you're also a functional illiterate.

That is a quote from the COMPLAINT, not the final order or judgment, and if you read the actual SUMMARY JUDGMENT ORDER, you would see that this part of the complaint was DISMISSED as a matter of law.  You see, the Disciplinary Hearing Commission, when I pointed out to them that TRUTHFUL criticism of a judge is constitutionally protected speech under the First Amendment, THREW OUT THAT PART of the complaint.  And the Bar counsel did not appeal it, so it's the law of the land. 

You do know the difference between a COMPLAINT and an ORDER or JUDGMENT, do you not, Coward?  Well, maybe you don't.  You need to work on that, when you can spare time from scamming innocent people and ruining their lives.

But someday, you'll have all the time in the world to improve your reading comprehension--when you're sitting in prison.  Before that, you'll get some therapy for your irrational fear of guns, because you'll find yourself looking down all those rifle, pistol, and shotgun barrels of the police or deputies or federal agents who come to arrest you and take you to jail, where you belong.  We all look forward to it, Coward.

14. On or about September 17, 2004, Livingston filed a motion to
disqualify Judge Boyle in the North Carolina federal case alleging the Judge had
exhibited bias against Livingston's clients at the September 8, 2004 hearing.
15. In the motion to disqualify, Livingston used language and tone
exhibiting a lack of respect for the judicial office which was the subject of the
motion. In the motion Livingston also claimed that Livingston had filed a
disciplinary complaint against Judge Boyle with the Fourth Circuit Court of
Appeals, thereby revealing in a public document a proceeding that would
otherwise be a confidential process.

In short Christopher Livingston likes to threaten judges and try to bully people around.....Christopher W Livingston is a punk who uses defamation and highly unprofessional practices to further his frivolous shakedown RICO lawsuits. Christopher W Livingston I bet you will lose your license to practice law very soon and rightfully so. When do you go before the BAR to defend your license? Christopher do you drink during the day?? The reason I ask is that your nose and complexion look like a neon sign for Gordons Gin, drunk and threatening judges in open court is no way to go through life son.

Chris are you really judgement proof...lol.....do you worry about Rule 11 and sanctions? 

Christopher w Livingston was admonished for professional misconduct partially for trying to bully and intimidate a sitting judge who was hearing a case he was involved in..lol. That is typical behavior for a punk like Chris Livingston, however he would have you believe that he was nailed for professional misconduct for some insignificant administrative flaw...........I say again Christopher W Livingston was admonished for professional misconduct for threatening a sitting judge in open court.  Chris savor your license while you have it because it looks like that law license may be going on a permanent vacation.


14. On or about September 17, 2004, Livingston filed a motion to
disqualify Judge Boyle in the North Carolina federal case alleging the Judge had
exhibited bias against Livingston's clients at the September 8, 2004 hearing.

15. In the motion to disqualify, Livingston used language and tone
exhibiting a lack of respect for the judicial office which was the subject of the
motion. In the motion Livingston also claimed that Livingston had filed a
disciplinary complaint against Judge Boyle with the Fourth Circuit Court of
Appeals, thereby revealing in a public document a proceeding that would
otherwise be a confidential process.

Chris lol...you are a class act!

Coward, I'm in complete awe of your private detective work.  What a horrifying scandal.  Next thing you know, you'll find out about that speeding ticket in 2002, or the failure to yield in 1988, or even the ones for expired registration or safety inspection, dismissed after compliance of course.  This is the lowest slap on the wrist they can possibly give in public, and if you read the order, you'll see no aggravators and eight mitigators, including "lack of dishonesty or selfish motive."  The Illinois Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission sure won't say that about Robert K. Lock, Jr. when they get around to starting a case on him that will end in disbarment.  They do that to thieves and fraudsters, y'know.  Philip M. Manger ought to have that happen too, but he just let his law license expire before they could take it away from him.

Say, ghostwriting pleadings for nonlawyers (which the Bar changed the rules to allow, AFTER my case) ... isn't that what CCDN does all day long?  They sure used to, before we put them out of business.  So you're saying I'm a bad person for doing the exact same thing YOU do, Coward?  Only I know what I'm doing and I saved my innocent clients from $100,000 judgments each, while you, Coward, tell people to do the wrong thing that only gets them in more trouble.  No wonder you won't identify yourself, Coward.  You're a criminal thief and fraudster who ruins lives, with the use of crooked lawyers.  Could be, Coward, you're a crooked lawyer yourself.  If so, Coward, enjoy it while it lasts.  And don't spend your money all in one place.  You'll be giving it to me for restoration to those you stole it from.

Is this all you got, Coward?  You sure are desperate.

Now back to work on my latest RICO case, and after that I'll finish up another one and file it, and so on and so forth.  Repeat: People love me because I do the right thing and I help good people and I hurt bad people, very legally.  People hate you, Coward, because you're a thief and a criminal and you're gonna pay for it in many ways.  I'll be a lawyer long after you've gone to prison and come out penniless, Coward.

The North Carolina Disciplinary Hearing Commission admonished Christopher Livingston of White Oak on December 31, 2007 (filed January 3, 2008) for engaging in the unauthorized practice of law by appearing in the US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina without being properly admitted and by preparing pleadings for clients to file pro se in the US District Court in Utah, where he was not admitted.

The full text in pdf format for Christopher Livingston, Disciplinary Order # 06DHC11 can be found on the North Carolina State at Bar web site at http://www.ncbar.gov/orders/06dhc11.pdf

Identify yourself, Coward, and I'll answer all your questions.  But maybe I can guess who you are.

Let's see, Coward--you're a criminal fraudster who I know from somewhere, and though I know a lot of criminal fraudsters, that does narrow it down.

You hate guns because you don't need any to commit your crimes.  You are afraid of guns because you know that when the police or FBI or Postal Inspectors come to arrest you, they'll have guns.  And the deputy sheriffs and U.S. Marshals who come to take your property away for sale and distribution to your victims will have guns too.  You know that day is coming, Coward, and it haunts your sleep and frays your nerves.  But I think primarily you hate guns because they are the symbols and instruments of freedom that people can use to protect themselves from face-to-face criminals, who you are more like than unlike.  Probablly it's cultural, your attitude, meaning you're from a big city, Coward, a big city with lots of strict gun control laws that only help you criminal brethren.

What else?  Unlike most criminal fraudsters, such as the ones you hire to sell your scam, you use correct grammar and spelling.  Maybe you're even one of those college boys or girls?  Maybe a bit of grad school, too?  Yes, Coward, you learned a lot, and now you're misusing your twisted intellect to hurt people instead of help people.

You accuse me of being mentally ill and having a bad temper.  No, Coward, look up the term "projecting" in the pop-psych dictionary.  You know the secret to propaganda, and it is to look at what you're doing and then obstreperously accuse the other side of doing it.  Also "denial" is a good word for you to know.  Recommended viewing: "Shutter Island."  You never knew Leo DiCaprio could portray you so accurately, did you, Coward?

You have something personal against me, that's for sure, Coward.  Maybe I won't have to wait to sue you.  Could be, I already am, and you know in your heart it's the end of the criminal life you loved so much.  For that matter, if I'm suing you, your business is likely already gone, because most of the debt elimination and mortgage modification scams I've sued are out of business.  No wonder you're irrationally angry at me, Coward.  Too bad your false claims of "soon to be disbarred" are just wish-projection.  Not gonna happen, soon or anytime.

Speaking of lawyers, and speaking of criminals without guns, I suddenly recall a line, from the Godfather I believe, that one lawyer with his briefcase can steal more than a hundred men with guns.  Plus, you sure are obsessed with what the Bar does to lawyers.  Say, Coward, maybe YOU'RE a lawyer!  A very, very, very, bad lawyer who uses his or her law license to defraud and destroy people instead of protecting them.  I just betcha, Coward, YOU'RE the one in trouble with the Bar, wherever you are.  Yes, that's it ... YOU'RE the one soon to be disbarred.  And you're projecting it on me.

Well, if you're a lawyer I'm suing, you're likely represented, so I can't communicate with you directly.  Unless, of course, you're "represented" by Lee W. Bettis, Jr., Esq., who has abandoned you.  If so, Coward, you didn't pay him for his work and he quit, but he and his firm Emanuel & Dunn PLLC are too embarrassed to move the court for discharge, because it would mean admitting I was right all along ... so very right.  Lee Bettis (and I know, Coward, you're not Lee Bettis because he can't spell or use correct grammar) and Emanuel & Dunn are also hopelessly conflicted, because they represent all of the following: Bob Lindsey, who supposedly stole $469,035 from CCDN and Robert K. Lock, Jr. and Colleen Lock and Philip M. Manger, and then Philip M. Manger ratted Lindsey out to the Texas Attorney General.  That, folks, is a conflict of interest.  And now Robert K. Lock, Jr. is all mad at Philip M. Manger, so their lawyer in the Greene case quit on grounds of conflict of interest.  Would you believe, in that same Greene case, Robert K. Lock, Jr. is now representing all the defendants, including Phil Manger?  The judge has asked Robert K. Lock, Jr. to examine the situation carefully for conflict of interest.  Wonder what Robert K. Lock, Jr. will say?  It'll be public record, Coward, so if you know him, be sure to ask Robert K. Lock, Jr. to tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth.

As if.

What else ... Sorry, Coward, I can't discuss the terms of the settlement that ended the Me v. Jesse L. Riddle and Riddle & Associates, PC case.  It was confidential.  Unlike you, Coward, I keep my word.  But I can tell you I would easily have beaten their defamation claims, and won my tortious interference claims against them (you left that part out, didn't you, Coward?).  And it wasn't an email threat, Coward.  For one thing, I never issue threats; I only tell people what will happen next, and they can do with it what they want.  For another, the other side in that case was all exercised about certain perfectly true and applicable posts I wrote concerning their FDCPA compliance level.  Jesse Riddle, by the way, is no longer in the debt collection business.  I'm sure you saw the press release at InsideARM announcing his retirement.  But I'm still here ... hee hee.

You're more than welcome to reproduce all the public records and genuine "vile and threatening emails" you want.  While you're at it, Coward, how about identifying yourself and telling us all about your wonderful scam?  Or your former wonderful scam?  Enjoy your Internet access while you can, Coward.  They don't let you online in prison.

Christoper W Livingston why don't you answer the question regarding why you were formally admonished for professional misconduct.......I think as a member of the BAR you should happily disclose to this forum the intricate details surrounding your professional misconduct.  

Also I believe you were a defendant in a defamation lawsuit in which you you agreed to settle with the Plaintiff because you had been caught sending vile and threatening emails......quite frankly a sordid ethical void.

Christopher W Livingston I do not believe you are going to answer why you have been admonished for professional misconduct so in my next post I will go into detail for the benefit of the forum collective......I plan on telling this forum everything about your professional schemes and misdeeds.  Christopher W Livingston admit the wrongs and unprofessional, unethical behavior you have perpetrated on the public......remember Chris salvation lies within.

And I have a lot more friends than you do.  People hate you because you're a fraudulent criminal coward who ruins lives for the sake of your own greed, and then you're too cowardly to say who you are and take responsibility for your crimes.  People love me because I destroy scams like yours, whichever one that may be.

Speaking of friends, you need to talk with some of my fellow law enforcement officers.  They'll assure you that I am very patient and even-tempered, and they have never seen me angry in all these years.  Professionalism always, courtesy to the extent that your conduct allows.

Today I'm finishing up the records on appeal in the CCDN cases in state court.  It's a lot of work, but well worth it.  Say, why don't you ask CCDN's lawyers where they are?  Did you know they refused delivery of the transcript on appeal?  Looks like they've just given up and won't be defending the appeal.  I fully expect them to return my proposed records on appeal, unread.  So much for CCDN, Bob Lock, Phil Manger, Colleen Lock, Tracy Webster, and all that crew.  Oh, wait, they're already out of business.  Would you believe Bob Lock is actually going to represent Phil Manger in the Greene case in Chicago?  Wonder if he'll sell out Phil?

Keep gnawing the ends of your tired plots, Coward.  I look forward to meeting you someday in a courtroom near me.

Christopher w livingston I think you should answer the question "Why were you admonished for professional misconduct" the word is that you may be disbarred very soon.....so you may not be practicing law for a long time to come.

You may also want to get hold of that explosive temper of yours, remember temper flare ups are not good for your rosacea. Also a temper like yours combined with your gun ownership which you parade as well as a documented history of threatening people via email is a toxic recipe.

My suggestion to you Christopher W Livingston is to seek mental health counseling, practicing law is not for you, maybe you should take an art class.  Best of luck to you sir.

Certainly, Coward, I'll be glad to answer any and all questions as soon as you identify your cowardly self.  Everybody knows who I am and where I live.  You do the same and I'll change your name from Coward to whoever you really are.  But you won't, because you are a coward and very likely one of the criminals I'm suing.  In which case, Coward, I'll find out who you are and I'll tell the world anyway.  Crime doesn't pay; cowardice doesn't either.

Say, looks like ol' Phil Manger has quietly allowed his law license to expire, before it could be taken away.  You know Phil, don't you, Coward?  Yeah, Philip M. Manger, who plastered his name and bio and picture all over those CCDN ads, that's the Credit Collections Defense Network, the same Philip M. Manger who just filed an affidavit with a federal court swearing he hasn't been doing law since 1980.  This means that either the sworn affidavit or the CCDN ads were false.  In Philip M. Manger's latest scam, oddly enough known as the Philip M. Manger Group, he doesn't claim to be a lawyer.  But he still claims he can fix your credit, eliminate your debt, get you a job, etc. etc., law license or not.  So, Coward, why don't you go ask Philip M. Manger why he let his law license expire.  Normal lawyers don't do that.

And here's another name you know, Coward: Robert K. Lock, Jr.  Yes, that other guy in the CCDN ads.  Why don't you ask Robert K. Lock, Jr. how much longer he'll keep HIS law license?  Will you do that for me, Coward?  I'm not allowed to talk to Robert K. Lock, Jr. because he's still represented (until one court or another orders his hopelessly conflicted lawyers off the case), but Coward, you can find out for all of us how much longer ol' Robert K. Lock, Jr. will get away with crime and fraud and still keep his law license.  I'd appreciate it if you could take care of that for us, Coward.

As to the RICO suits I'm running (which ones are wrong, and how? but you're too cowardly to answer that), I'm sure that cowards like you get very afraid at the prospect of another batch of my trademark hand-addressed-with-a-Sharpie certified mail envelopes landing on your desk, with yet more summonses and complaints.  Because I'm sure you've noticed, Coward, that when I sue scams like the one you're doubtless running, they tend to go out of business.  Camco, JBC Legal Group, CCDN, CCRN, Legal Debt Cure, Secure Property Solutions, Custom Asset Solutions ... all gone now.  I look forward to doing the same to your scam, Coward.

And one or more of your distraught victims will be calling me before long--count on it.  Thank you again, Coward, for bringing my name to the forefront as somebody who puts litter in its place.  After all, there's no such thing as BAD publicity.

P.S. Don't get too attached to your scammed money, Coward.  We'll be getting it all back from you.

Chris,

Will you please explain the AVVO post which includes the statement below. Specifically what "professional misconduct" were you cited and admonished for??

This lawyer has been cited for professional misconduct by a state disciplinary authority.

I think it will be beneficial for everyone to know why you were cited for professional misconduct. Look forward to a thorough and expeditious response Mr. Livingston.

$('more_sanctions').visualEffect('blind_down', {'duration': 0.5});

$('more_sanctions_link').hide();

$('less_sanctions_link').show(); ; return false;" rel="nofollow">See sanction details

Another cowardly lion roars ... or the same one who's been at it for a year or two.  Notice how it's not helping your cause.  Notice how the more you spread untruths, the more people come to me seeking justice for your frauds and crimes.  Notice how the people I sue somehow always go bankrupt, or go out of business, or get raided, or go to prison, or all of the above.  You DID notice that CCDN or The Credit Collections Defense Network is now out of business, right?  Looks like I'm not the one in trouble.

I'll be practicing law for centuries to come, perhaps unlike some of your favorite lawyers who are still counsel of record for both CCDN/Lock/Manger and Lindsey/The Credit Card Solution even though the former accuses the latter of stealing oh say $400k and even though the latter is suing the former because it's all somebody else's fault.  That's what we mildly call a conflict of interest.  And your favorite lawyers love to get paid with the money that your scam defrauded from my clients.  That's money laundering.  Again, I'm not the one in trouble.

The lawsuit that you're particularly upset about (because it helped take down the scam that you were running and making a lot of money off of by destroying peoples' lives) will not be settled.  It will go to judgment, and thence to execution, lien, levy and sale.  That's the only time when firearms come into it--because the deputy sheriffs who come to take away your property will be carrying them.  So be nice to them, and before they get there, don't spend all your money in one place.

"pigboy"? ... I am reeling before the power of your searing intellect.  At your sentencing for mail and wire fraud and money laundering, my parting gift to you will be a reading list to help you fill the hours in medium security prison.  After you get out, you'll be unable to find any real job, but at least you'll be well read and can think of more creative insults.