Complaint Review: class action site -
- class action site United States
- Phone:
- Web: https://www.classaction.org
- Category: Advertising / Deceptive
class action site classaction.org classaction.org is guilty of removing comments from actions to protect companies they endorsed! Internet
*General Comment: Inaccurate Information
listed on other sites?
Those sites steal
Ripoff Report's
content.
We can get those
removed for you!
Find out more here.
Ripoff Report
willing to make a
commitment to
customer satisfaction
Click here now..
classaction.org presents itself as a non bias fair trade side advising people how to file a class action against companies that injured them financially, how ever you wont get far with filing a class action or even discussing it if its a company they will protect such as DJI (Drone manufacture), as DJI sells drones that had features such as RTH (return to home) as a safey measure if the remotes loose communication with the drone, battery is weak or drone is too far..whenever the remotes malfunction and the RTH does not work the DJI drones fly away posing a serious threat to public safety.
Trying to start a class action against DJI at classaction.org never got anywhere, in fact even comments where removed.
This is deceptive practice.
This report was posted on Ripoff Report on 01/28/2018 05:28 AM and is a permanent record located here: https://www.ripoffreport.com/reports/class-action-site/class-action-site-classactionorg-classactionorg-is-guilty-of-removing-comments-from-acti-1425739. The posting time indicated is Arizona local time. Arizona does not observe daylight savings so the post time may be Mountain or Pacific depending on the time of year. Ripoff Report has an exclusive license to this report. It may not be copied without the written permission of Ripoff Report. READ: Foreign websites steal our content
If you would like to see more Rip-off Reports on this company/individual, search here:



#1 General Comment
Inaccurate Information
AUTHOR: Kevin - (United States)
SUBMITTED: Monday, January 29, 2018
So, in the image used as evidence, you can see a classaction.org page without any comments - sure. But the only page on classaction.org to even mention (it was a blog post covering several lawsuits and DJI barely gets a paragraph) DJI is this one: classaction.org/blog/news-in-brief-june-29-pepsi-ikea-and-more This is probably where they got the screenshot on the left.
The side by side image (from Disqus) shows comments on a page titled "DJI Drone Manufacturer Hit with Class Action Lawsuit Over Firmware Update" - which doesn't exist on the accused site and actually came from a site called dataprivacyandsecurityinsider.com. Here's the link to that page:dataprivacyandsecurityinsider.com/2017/02/dji-drone-manufacturer-hit-with-class-action-lawsuit-over-firmware-update/
It looks like dataprivacyandsecurityinsider.com was the one who deleted the comments and not classaction.org.


Advertisers above have met our
strict standards for business conduct.