X
What do hackers,
questionable attorneys and
fake court orders have in common?
...Dishonest Reputation Management Investigates Reputation Repair
Free speech rights compromised

WATCH News
Segment Now
Ripoff Report | Dealer Warranty Review - Saint Charles, Missouri
X  |  CLOSE
Report: #348550

Complaint Review: Dealer Warranty Services - Saint Charles Missouri

  • Submitted:
  • Updated:
  • Reported By: Rosemead California
  • Author Confirmed What's this?
  • Why?
  • Dealer Warranty Services 3710 Mueller Road Saint Charles, Missouri U.S.A.

Dealer Warranty Services, LLC Not a real car warranty repair service! Excludes everything, requires use of "Dura Lube" Saint Charles Missouri

*Consumer Suggestion: Jay Nixon

*UPDATE Employee: Dreadpiratepatty Reply

Show customers why they should trust your business over your competitors...

Is this
Report about YOU
listed on other sites?
Those sites steal
Ripoff Report's
content.
We can get those
removed for you!
Find out more here.
How to fix
Ripoff Report
If your business is
willing to make a
commitment to
customer satisfaction
Click here now..

My sister purchased this warranty as it was represented to her as an official GM warranty from the dealership. It was NOT. She and her grandchildren had a mechanical breakdown on their car in Death Valley! Got car to a dealership, and learned the warranty wasn't worth the paper it's printed on. Many unresolved complaints filed against this company by the Attorney General's Office in Missouri - Jay Nixon. Google that and you will see dozens and dozens of complaints.

My sister is now going to have to pay full cost of replacing the transmission which is 3500 and $900 for the rental car as they are on vacation and had to rent a vehicle to accommodate 7 passengers.

I had to call and tell her the bad news - she has looked forward to this vacation for 20 years and now this happens.

This company took $1703.00 from her, in full. She would be happy to just get them to refund the premium but that is going to be a fight as well.

Their policy is administered by "Marathon Administrative" Administrative Services PO Box 961, O'Fallon, IL 62269.

Payment was made to "Summit" as the finance company. Their address is 1232 Washington Ave, 3rd Floor, St. Louis, MO 63103

All smoke and mirrors if you ask me.

IF ANYONE HAS EVER GOTTEN A NICKEL OUT OF THIS OUTFIT OR A REPAIR COVERED PLEASE WRITE AND LET US KNOW WHAT YOUR TACTIC WAS!!!

Dreadpiratepatty
Rosemead, California
U.S.A.

This report was posted on Ripoff Report on 07/07/2008 11:17 PM and is a permanent record located here: https://www.ripoffreport.com/reports/dealer-warranty-services/saint-charles-missouri-63301/dealer-warranty-services-llc-not-a-real-car-warranty-repair-service-excludes-everything-348550. The posting time indicated is Arizona local time. Arizona does not observe daylight savings so the post time may be Mountain or Pacific depending on the time of year. Ripoff Report has an exclusive license to this report. It may not be copied without the written permission of Ripoff Report. READ: Foreign websites steal our content

Search for additional reports

If you would like to see more Rip-off Reports on this company/individual, search here:

Report & Rebuttal
Respond to this report!
What's this?
Also a victim?
What's this?
Repair Your Reputation!
What's this?

Updates & Rebuttals

REBUTTALS & REPLIES:
0Author
2Consumer
0Employee/Owner

#2 Consumer Suggestion

Jay Nixon

AUTHOR: Samil20 - (U.S.A.)

POSTED: Thursday, October 09, 2008

Attorney General's News Release
March 6, 2008

Nixons Operation Taken For A Ride targets sellers of extended service contracts for vehicles who use high-pressure, misleading tactics Jefferson City, Mo. " Attorney General Jay Nixon today took legal action against several businesses, most of them based in the St. Louis area, that used misrepresentation and deception to sell motor vehicle extended service contracts (MVESC) to consumers. Nixon said the coordinated filings of lawsuits and settlements, dubbed Operation Taken For A Ride,involve scores of consumers from across the country who were misled into paying for extended service contracts on their vehicles that, in most cases, they did not need.

Its rather insidious how these companies prey upon consumers fears, sending misleading letters informing them that their current motor vehicle warranties were about to expire, when in fact many of the consumers possessed factory warranties that wouldnt expire for several months, Nixon said. That was the hook to sell these consumers unneeded motor vehicle extended service contracts for hundreds or thousands of dollars. When consumers canceled the contracts, many received only a partial refund or no refund at all.

Nixon says the companies mislead consumers in letters and postcards with boldfaced statements such as Notification of Interruption! and Important Dated Material Enclosed" leaving the impression that they are sent from the manufacturers who produced the consumers vehicles or the dealers who sold the vehicles to them. In fact, Nixon said, the defendants fail to inform the consumers that they are not affiliated with the manufacturer, dealer or any local, state or federal government agency, and that the mailings amount to advertisements for the companys MVESC.

Many consumers confused, but not wanting their car warranties to expire went ahead and purchased the new, but in most cases unneeded, service contract the company was hawking, Nixon said.

In one case, an elderly consumer received a postcard stating that her motor vehicle warranty was expired or about to expire in March 2007, even though her actual extended warranty through General Motors wouldnt expire until November 2008. The consumer purchased a new MVESC for $1,898 from the company, and the company refused to issue a refund when it was requested.

Nixon filed one of his lawsuits against that company, Vehicle Services Inc., of St. Peters, in St. Charles County Circuit Court, requesting injunctions, restitution for consumers, penalties and other relief. In addition, the Attorney General filed lawsuits today against the following businesses:

TXEN Partners, which does business as Service Protection Direct of St. Louis; and a related company, United Warranty Solutions, for using misleading notification letters to pressure, confuse and intimidate consumers into purchasing MVESCs they did not need. The defendants failed to disclose coverage requirements to consumers who purchased MVESCs (such as the requirement to use a specific brand of oil to receive reimbursement for repairs); failed to honor contract terms and perform repair on consumers vehicles; and failed to issue refunds to consumers, including one consumer who is owed as much as $3,800. The lawsuit was filed in St. Louis County Circuit Court.
Dealer Warranty Services of St. Charles, for using misleading notification letters to pressure, confuse and intimidate consumers into purchasing MVESCs they did not need. The defendant also misrepresented to consumers the cost of purchasing the MVESCs and debited the bank accounts of several consumers without authorization. The lawsuit was filed in St. Charles County Circuit Court.

Certified Auto Warranty Services Inc., of Lenexa, Kan., which promised a 100 percent Money Back Guarantee to those consumers who purchased and canceled MVESCs, but then issued only partial refunds or no refunds at all. One consumer who paid $1,335 canceled her contract, but has received no refund to date. The lawsuit was filed in Greene County Circuit Court.
National Dealers Warranty Inc., of St. Peters, which sent consumers postcards and letters informing them that they had limited time to purchase renewed, extended warranties for their vehicles. The company neglected to inform consumers that it was not affiliated with the dealers or manufacturers of the vehicle, or that it was actually offering to sell MVESCs instead of warranties. The lawsuit was filed in St. Charles County Circuit Court.


National Auto Warranty Services Inc., of Wentzville, which also sent consumers postcards and letters informing them that their warranties were about to expire, and that it was offering them their final chance to purchase a renewed, extended warranty. The company failed to inform the consumers that it was not affiliated with the dealers or manufacturers of the vehicle, and that it was actually offering to sell MVESCs instead of warranties. In addition, the company violated the Missouri No Call Law by calling Missourians who were on the No Call list, as well as federal telemarketing laws by contacting consumers by phone and failing to honor their requests not to be called. The lawsuit was filed in St. Charles County Circuit Court.


Smart Choice Protection of St. Louis, doing business as Direct Dealer Warranties, which also sent consumers postcards and letters informing them that their warranties were about to expire, and that it was offering the final chance to purchase a renewed, extended warranty. The company failed to inform the consumers that it was not affiliated with the dealers or manufacturers of the vehicle, and that it was actually offering the sell MVESCs instead of warranties. The lawsuit was filed in St. Louis City Circuit Court.

In addition to the lawsuits, the Attorney General filed assurances of voluntary compliance with two companies to settle allegations of misrepresentation in the selling of MVESCs:

Carhill Enterprises, which does business as Consumer Protection Services, of 1232 Washington Avenue in St. Louis, will pay $7,209 restitution to eight consumers and $4,000 to the state to cover the costs of the investigation and enforcement of the case. The company also agreed to injunctive relief which requires them to inform consumers upfront of specific details of their product prior to purchasing. The agreement was filed in St. Louis City Circuit Court;
Warranty Activation Headquarters, of 12244 Tesson Ferry Road in St. Louis, satisfactorily responded to all consumers who complained. The company will pay $5,000 to the state to cover the costs of the investigation and enforcement of the case, which was filed in St. Louis City Circuit Court. The agreement also requires the company to provide full refunds to any consumers who cancel within 30 days.


Nixon encouraged consumers who have complaints about businesses selling motor vehicle extended service contracts to file complaints with his office, by either going online to ago.mo.gov or by calling the Consumer Protection Hotline at 1-800-392-8222.

Respond to this report!
What's this?

#1 UPDATE Employee

Dreadpiratepatty Reply

AUTHOR: Facts - (U.S.A.)

POSTED: Wednesday, August 13, 2008

There are no tactics. Dealer Warranty Services is a reputable business and any complaint is reviewed and responded to appropriately. In order to answer any complaint it is necessary to have all the factual information. For example: Did the customer fulfill the policy requirements of 30days/1000m before a claim was filed. Did her breakdown occur prior to this? Was the breakdown a covered component according to the policy? Dealer Warranty Services works with all of it's customers and often has assisted in paying repairs even though the warranty clearly states that a particular component is not a covered part. We do not represent ourselves as the automotive dealership. As an assurance of quality control, all phone calls are recorded and can be replayed to the customer to dispel any perceived inconsistencies that may arise. I encourage the customer to contact us via the number on the policy and ask to speak with the General Manager.

Respond to this report!
What's this?

Advertisers above have met our
strict standards for business conduct.