Complaint Review: Douglas Hauck DDS - Corona Del Mar California
Ripoff Report on CBS 19
Ripoff Report on CBS 19 - Global Marketing Alliance
Ripoff Report on ABC 15 - Smart Shopper
Ripoff Report - Girls Gone Wild
Ripoff Report on Fox 11 - Car Repair
- Author Not Confirmed
- Douglas Hauck DDS 2121 PCH Corona Del Mar, California United States of America
- Phone:
- Web:
- Category: Doctors
Complaint Review: Douglas Hauck | Notice: Ripoff Report VIP Arbitration Decision: A neutral and independent Arbitrator has determined that the following Report contained one or more false statements of facts. The false statements have been redacted as ((Statement REDACTED as false pursuant to Ripoff Report VIP Arbitration)) | Furthermore, the Arbitrator was unable to determine if the Author of the Report was a patient or a competitor. | Douglas Hauck DDS In my opinion he is a hack, my teeth turned out terrible and ((Statement REDACTED as false pursuant to Ripoff Report VIP Arbitration)). Corona Del Mar, California
*REBUTTAL Individual responds: notice
*Consumer Comment: Notice
*UPDATE Employee: No patient of record to match above noted treatment
Show customers why they should trust your business over your competitors...
listed on other sites?
Those sites steal
Ripoff Report's
content.
We can get those
removed for you!
Find out more here.
Ripoff Report
willing to make a
commitment to
customer satisfaction
Click here now..
RIPOFF REPORT VIP ARBITRATION
SUMMARY OF ARBITRATOR’S DECISION
Douglas J. Hauck, Complainant
v.
Anonymous, Author of Ripoff Report #551625
________________________________________________________________________
Complainant Douglas J. Hauck (the “Complainant”) has challenged the truthfulness of 2 specific statements (each, a “Statement”) posted by Author Anonymous (the “Author”) on the Ripoff Report website at www.ripoffreport.com on January 9, 2010, identified as Ripoff Report No. 551625 (the “Report”). The Author accused the Complainant of providing non-satisfactory dental services. The Complainant denies all allegations contained in the Report, contending that the Author is a competitor. The Author did not submit a response to the Complainant or any contact information. Therefore, in accordance with the Ripoff Report VIP Arbitration Rules (the “Rules), the Author waived their right to participate in this Arbitration.
In accordance with the Rules, the Arbitrator was asked to decide whether the challenged Statements were an opinion or a fact. If, and only if, the Statement was determined to be a statement of fact, the Arbitrator was asked to further decide, by a preponderance of the evidence, if the Statement was true or false. If the statement identified by the Complainant is determined to be an opinion, no determination will be made as to that particular Statement because an opinion cannot be determined to be true nor false.
The Arbitrator was further asked to decide, by a preponderance of the evidence submitted to establish if the identity of the Author of Ripoff Report No. 551625, shown as “annonymous” was a patient or a competitor. Complainant essentially believes the Author who posted Ripoff Report No. 551625 is a competitor. Although given all of the evidence in this case, the Arbitrator is unable to determine if the Author of Report No. 551625 is a patient or competitor.
In this case, the Arbitrator had only the evidence submitted by the Complainant to consider. The evidence submitted included a Witness Statement, Superior Court of California County of Orange search results, and Dental Board of California search results for Dental License.
Each Statement challenged by the Complainant has been considered, together with any Witness Statements and Documents provided by the Complainant for determination of the truth or falsity of the Statement. The Author did not provide a response to the Complaint.
The Arbitrator determined that certain statements in the challenged Report were false. Therefore, according to the VIP Arbitration Rules, those statements have been redacted.
Decided July 12, 2013
Bruce E. Meyerson, Arbitrator
* A copy of the full Arbitrator’s Decision is available upon request. Please e-mail arbitration@ripoffreport.com with the name of the Complainant and Report number.
I had a bad experience when Dr. Hauck fixed my front teeth. The teeth did not fit and it took months to get a result of teeth that I hated! In my opinion, he does not know what he is doing. ((Statement REDACTED as false pursuant to Ripoff Report VIP Arbitration)). I can speak properly now. I had a terrible time dealing with Dr. Hauck and his staff. He says that he treats all of these famous people but I do believe that he treats any of them. They would not put themselves through this and end up with bad teeth.
This report was posted on Ripoff Report on 01/09/2010 03:12 PM and is a permanent record located here: https://www.ripoffreport.com/reports/douglas-hauck-dds/corona-del-mar-california-92625/complaint-review-douglas-hauck-notice-ripoff-report-vip-arbitration-decision-a-neutra-551625. The posting time indicated is Arizona local time. Arizona does not observe daylight savings so the post time may be Mountain or Pacific depending on the time of year. Ripoff Report has an exclusive license to this report. It may not be copied without the written permission of Ripoff Report. READ: Foreign websites steal our content
If you would like to see more Rip-off Reports on this company/individual, search here:
#3 REBUTTAL Individual responds
notice
AUTHOR: doug hauck - ()
SUBMITTED: Wednesday, January 22, 2014
Please take notice that Dr. David Eggleston (Dr. Eggleston) has issued subpoenas in the Superior Court of the State of Arizona, in the County of Maricopa, Case No OCSC 30-2012-00592583 (The "Arizona Action"). In the Arizona Action, Dr. Eggleston seeks to subpoena Xcentric Ventures, LLC ("Xcentric"), the company that owns and operates ripoffreport, for your contact and identifying information. Dr. Eggleston is a party in an action in the Superior Court of the State of California, in the County of Orange, Case No. 30-2012-00592583 (the "California Action"), and seeks this information in connection therewith.
Arizona law requires that you be provided notice of the discovery request (i.e. the subpoena) via the same medium that the false and defamatory statements were originally published. By this post, notice is hereby given to you of Dr. Eggleston's pending discovery request.
You have a right to timely and anonymously file and serve a response to the subpoena. Such a response can include an objection to the subpoena. Any response to the subpoena should be mailed by February 11, 2014, to Katherine M. Harwood, Esq., Ford, Walker, Haggerty & Behar, LLP, 1 World Trade Center, 27th Floor, Long Beach, California 90831. If a response is not received, Xcentric may respond to the subpoena and produce the records as outlined above.
This notification is being provided to you pursuant to the Court of Appeals, State of Arizona Division One holding in the matter entitled Mobilisa, Inc. v. John Doe 1, et al., 217 Ariz. 103, 170 P.3d 712 (Ariz. App. 2007).
#2 Consumer Comment
Notice
AUTHOR: David - ()
SUBMITTED: Tuesday, January 21, 2014
Please take notice that Dr. David Eggleston (Dr. Eggleston) has issued subpoenas in the Superior Court of the State of Arizona, in the County of Maricopa, Case No. OCSC 30-2012-00592583 (the “Arizona Action”). In the Arizona Action, Dr. Eggleston seeks to subpoena Xcentric Ventures, LLC (“Xcentric”), the company that owns and operates ripoffreport.com, for your contact and identifying information. Dr. Eggleston is a party in an action in the Superior Court of the State of California, in the County of Orange, Case No. 30-2012-00592583 (the “ California Action”), and seeks this information in connection therewith.
Arizona law requires that you be provided notice of the discovery request (i.e., the subpoena) via the same medium that the false and defamatory statements were originally published. By this post, notice is hereby given to you of Dr. Eggleston’s pending discovery request.
You have a right to timely and anonymously file and serve a response to the subpoena. Such a response can include an objection to the subpoena. Any response to the subpoena should be mailed by February 10, 2014, to Katherine M. Harwood, Esq., Ford, Walker, Haggerty & Behar, LLP, 1 World Trade Center, 27th Floor, Long Beach, California 90831. If a response is not received, Xcentric may respond to the subpoena and produce the records as outlined above.
This notification is being provided to you pursuant to the Court of Appeals, State of Arizona, Division One holding in the matter entitled Mobilisa, Inc. v. John Doe 1, et al., 217 Ariz. 103, 170 P.3d 712 (Ariz. App. 2007).
#1 UPDATE Employee
No patient of record to match above noted treatment
AUTHOR: doug - (United States of America)
SUBMITTED: Tuesday, February 15, 2011
In rebuttal to the report listed above. We attempted to locate a patient with the above referenced name and city, and are unable to locate a patient of record with that information. In addition, we attempted to identify a treatment plan similar to that being described above, in the timeframe noted above, and we were unable to find a match. This claim is erroneous, and please feel free to contact us personally with your questions at 949-729-9950.
Advertisers above have met our
strict standards for business conduct.
