Complaint Review: Dow Corning - houston Texas
- Dow Corning houston, Texas United States of America
- Phone:
- Web: info@sfdct.com
- Category: Drug Manufacturers
Dow Corning In 1972 I had an i u d implant by the name of Dal-con shield. It ruptured. houston, Texas
*Consumer Comment: NO
*Consumer Comment: Mislead? Really?
*Author of original report: Did you have one?
*Consumer Comment: Why Dow Corning?
listed on other sites?
Those sites steal
Ripoff Report's
content.
We can get those
removed for you!
Find out more here.
Ripoff Report
willing to make a
commitment to
customer satisfaction
Click here now..
In 1972, I had an interuterine device dalkon shield. It ruptured and had to be removed.
This report was posted on Ripoff Report on 04/30/2010 08:47 AM and is a permanent record located here: https://www.ripoffreport.com/reports/dow-corning/houston-texas-/dow-corning-in-1972-i-had-an-i-u-d-implant-by-the-name-of-dal-con-shield-it-ruptured-ho-598542. The posting time indicated is Arizona local time. Arizona does not observe daylight savings so the post time may be Mountain or Pacific depending on the time of year. Ripoff Report has an exclusive license to this report. It may not be copied without the written permission of Ripoff Report. READ: Foreign websites steal our content
If you would like to see more Rip-off Reports on this company/individual, search here:



#4 Consumer Comment
NO
AUTHOR: Stacey - (U.S.A.)
SUBMITTED: Friday, April 30, 2010
The Dalkon Shield was a contraceptive intrauterine device (IUD) developed by the Dalkon Corporation and marketed by the A.H. Robins Company. The Dalkon Shield was found to cause severe injury to a disproportionately large percentage of its users, which eventually led to numerous lawsuits in which juries awarded millions of dollars in compensatory and punitive damages.
Robert is right - and my question would be did your Physician state that your disability was related to this IUD? Wyeth now owes the defunct company

#3 Consumer Comment
Mislead? Really?
AUTHOR: Robert - (USA)
SUBMITTED: Friday, April 30, 2010
So the NY Times articles from the late 80s are wrong?
So the Federal Court Records are wrong?
So the women who DID COLLECT from the class action and over 1 BILLION SETTLEMENT FUND are wrong?
What makes you believe that Dow Corning is responsible rather than A. H. Robins Company?
All the historical media articles, COURT RECORDS, and text books state A. H. Robins Company. This case is FAMOUS for a company (share holders) being REWARDED for marketing a dangerous product. Many law students were required to read up on this during the early 90s.

#2 Author of original report
Did you have one?
AUTHOR: dixie - (USA)
SUBMITTED: Friday, April 30, 2010
I think you better do a little more research and uncover the truth. Evidently you have been mislead.

#1 Consumer Comment
Why Dow Corning?
AUTHOR: Robert - (USA)
SUBMITTED: Friday, April 30, 2010
Why is your report about Dow Corning? Dow Corning had nothing to do with the shield- it was A. H. Robins Company.


Advertisers above have met our
strict standards for business conduct.