Health Capital Investors Steve Nitsberg, Steven Nitsberg, HCI Keeps financial deals tied for long periods of time with no financial conclustion New York, New York Nationwide

I am a former employee of Steven Nitsberg.  I was the last employee to resign, after concluding that he is a manipulative, sneaky criminal that did was more than a pushy salesman (but was a clever conman/criminal) who did everything to test the boundaries of the law (if he thought he had a chance of getting away with it). 

He violated employment tax laws (state, federal, local, worker's compensation, social security, contractual obligations, duped his landlords out of many thousands of dollars, and tricked companies into granting him credit (with who he had not intention of paying).

I hired a personal investigator to track him down, but he is withholding his current mailing address to avoid evidence of receiving subpoenas.  Please contact the financial fraud division of your local police dept.

I would like to contact you and give you my Steve Nitsberg narrative and proof.  As a broker he strung deals along with no mention of an upfront fee.  In the 11th hour he wanted an underwriting fee which there was nothing left to underwrite and a lifetime background check agreement from the client.  He had already completed a background check and spent months going through the clients records etc.  There was nothing left to underwright.  As a result no funding and the client never wants to hear from me again.  Clearly this guy is not who he says he is.

please email me at bcoop22@gmail.com to discuss further. 

So now the public sector is seeing what everyone else has seen as it relates to Greg Sundem.  Gre Sundem is getting beat up pretty goos on the pennystock boards etc.  I wonder if the SEC will buy into his non or unsubstantiated spews.

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=124023401

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=124018193

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=123982466

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=123979623 

"Something to ponder, what is PXYN’s product that they claim they are getting licensed in other states? To simply deliver more overpriced compounds with existing NDC numbers is not a business model. Which is not the correct terminology but since they use it lets go with licenses. It’s more like submitted (6 months just to say yep we have it and will start testing now. That is on fast side) tested, assigned, listed, indexed, xxxxxok (Purposely misspelled because I want to see if they figure out what they need to-do) and then you need someone to sell it deliver it etc. There is nothing exclusive there and the external markets from southern CA will not pay $2,500 for a tube of cream. If and if they are currently still selling compound creams in Southern California, thereimbursement rate which is public information – they should disclose what that number is and how are they going to make $10.00 much less millions with that business model. 

So they want us to believe that in a few months time, they were able to identify a product get it through the FDA process, get an NDC code, identify the proper distribution channels in the new to them external markets, get in the system, deliver product. Key question for the CEO what is “it”? How long should this BS be allowed to go on, there is absolutely no tangible business here, not even a “hobby” business as Mr. Wonderful would quickly say. I would so love to know what the end game is?"

Dean Chase Untrustworthy

Dean Chase has not been in the medical funding industry for as long as he claims.  He entered the space 8 years ago by stealing his employer at that time business plan.  He then called all over the country looking for money and consistently misleads and lied just like he still does.

His next move was to recruit employees away that are already working in the space.  Make big offers only to capture their customer base and knowledge.  After doing so cuts pay and benefits.  Kind of like the car sales man game.

His current track record with his business is of no significance. In fact it is barley a company structure at all.  Dean Chase via their website makes claims highly exaggerated claims.  He has several disgruntled employees posting online just what a sham operation where Dean Chase is trying to pass off himself off as an expert and a major player in the space.   

It’s the same thing with Dean Chase and it just goes on and on.

https://www.glassdoor.com/Reviews/HMR-Funding-Reviews-E798223.htm

http://www.indeed.com/cmp/Hmr-Funding

https://www.kununu.com/us/hmr-funding-llc/reviews

He has one of many legal actions taken against him in Texas

ndigo Secured High Income Note, Ltd. v HCI Secured Med. Receivables Special Purpose Corp. 2016 NY Slip Op 05044 Decided on June 23, 2016 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports. 

Decided on June 23, 2016 
Tom, J.P., Friedman, Richter, Kapnick, Gesmer, JJ. 
650487/13 -1561 1560 1559 

[*1]Indigo Secured High Income Note, Ltd., Plaintiff-Respondent, 

v

HCI Secured Medical Receivables Special Purpose Corporation etc., et al., Defendants-Appellants, Michael Nitsberg, Defendant. 

The Law Offices of Daniel S. Steinberg P.C., New York (Melissa Cohen of counsel), for appellants.

Kreisberg & Maitland LLP, New York (Gabriel Mendelberg of counsel), for respondent.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (O. Peter Sherwood, J.), entered February 27, 2015, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by the briefs, awarded plaintiff the total sum of $42,564,205.29 as against defendants Steven Nitsberg (Nitsberg) and Health Capital Investors, Inc., (Health Capital), unanimously affirmed, with costs. Appeals from orders, same court and Justice, both entered February 20, 2015, which, to the extent appealed from, granted plaintiff partial summary judgment on the first count of its first amended complaint as against Nitsberg and Health Capital, and denied Nitsberg's motion to dismiss that count, unanimously dismissed, without costs, as subsumed in the appeal from the judgment.

The motion court correctly determined that defendants Nitsberg and Health Capital are liable for the obligation of defendant HCI Secured Medical Receivables Special Purpose Corporation (NY) (HCI-NY) to make payments due to plaintiff under a settlement agreement (SA) and accompanying promissory notes. It is undisputed that Health Capital is the sole owner, and Nitsberg is the president and sole officer and director, of HCI-NY. Further, Nitsberg executed the SA and the notes in his capacity as president of HCI-NY almost two years after that entity was dissolved by proclamation pursuant to the Tax Law. Owners and officers of a corporation that is involuntarily dissolved under the Tax Law are individually liable for the debts of the corporation undertaken while dissolved (see Sunquest Enters., Inc. v Zar, 115 AD3d 486 [1st Dept 2014]; Benfield Elec. Supply Corp. v C & L El. Controls, Inc., 58 AD3d 423, 423-424 [1st Dept 2009]; Pennsylvania Bldg. Co. v Schaub, 14 AD3d 365 [1st Dept 2005]).

We reject defendants Nitsberg and Health Capital's argument that plaintiff waived any claims based on HCI-NY's dissolution because it was aware when it entered into the SA that [*2]HCI-NY had been dissolved. In the SA, defendants clearly and unambiguously "represent[ed] and warrant[ed]" that HCI-NY is "duly organized, validly existing and in good standing under the laws of the jurisdiction of its organization." Moreover, the SA is the best evidence of the parties' understanding and should be enforced according to its terms (Ashwood Capital, Inc. v OTG Mgt., Inc., 99 AD3d 1, 7 [1st Dept 2012]), especially in view of the SA's valid merger clause. Moreover, there is insufficient evidence that plaintiff was aware of the dissolution at the time the parties entered into the SA.

We also reject the argument of defendants Nitsberg and Health Capital that they should not be held liable for HCI-NY's obligations under the SA and notes because those instruments were entered into as part of HCI-NY's postdissolution "wind up," during which HCI-NY enjoyed "de facto" corporate status. When HCI-NY was dissolved prior to entering into the SA and notes, it had no remaining assets or liabilities. Under the SA and Notes, however, it assumed about $31 million in new obligations. Further, under a management services agreement, HCI-NY agreed to pay a monthly management fee for a prospective 10-year term. HCI-NY's assumption of these obligations are not "acts directed toward [its] liquidation" (Matter of 172 E. 122 St. Tenants Assn. v Schwarz, 73 NY2d 340, 349 [1989]; Business Corporation Law § 1005[a]), and, therefore, do not shield defendants Nitsberg and Health Capital from liability for HCI-NY's obligations to plaintiff (see Pennsylvania Bldg. Co. v Schaub, 14 AD3d 365, 366 [1st Dept 2005]).

We have considered defendants Nitsberg and Health Capital's remaining contentions and find them unavailing.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER

OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

ENTERED: JUNE 23, 2016

CLERK

http://law.justia.com/cases/new-york/appellate-division-first-department/2016/650487-13-1561-1560-1559.html

So now all of the truths are starting to come out.  I would like to be contacted by anyone who has paid a fee to Steven Nitsberg or his company for funding.  If you paid the fee and was never funded PLEASE RESPOND, we want to put the claim together with the attorney generals office as soon as possible.  

Steven Nitsberg sued again, but now for $43,000,000

By the looks of things he has been at since 2003 and before

casetext.com/case/healthcare-capital-management-llc-v-abrams

Here’s another .plainsite.org/dockets/2t58rydkb/superior-court-of-california-county-of-los-angeles/beverly-oncology-and-imaging-centers-et-al-v-hci-secured-medi/

More unhappy clients for Steven Nitsberg.  Cleary the first review was written by “a fan” but it backfired, the next person was not so much a fan!

whereorg.com/health-capital-llc-11589338/reviews