Complaint Review: Honorable Judge Michelle K. Palmer-Percy - Sturgis South Dakota
- Honorable Judge Michelle K. Palmer-Percy 1425 Sherman Street Sturgis , South Dakota USA
- Phone: 6053474411
- Web:
- Category: Questionable Activities
Honorable Judge Michelle K. Palmer-Percy Judge Storms Out Of Courtroom In the Middle of Small Claims Civil Suit Proceeding Sturgis South Dakota
*Author of original report: Evidence Provided in Chronological Order by Exhibit(s)
*Author of original report: Documentation of evidence presented is not in order.
*Author of original report: Exhibits presented are not in order.
*Author of original report: Here are the facts and evidence presented accordingly.
*Author of original report: Here are the facts and evidence to support this complaint.
listed on other sites?
Those sites steal
Ripoff Report's
content.
We can get those
removed for you!
Find out more here.
Ripoff Report
willing to make a
commitment to
customer satisfaction
Click here now..
This matter involves CIV 46SMC1100317. This civil small claims suit was presented on August 30, 2011. I presented the facts, evidence, and photos accordingly. Refer to exhibits A., B., C., D., and E.. The defendant in this matter neglected his fiduciary responsibilities and under the penalty of perjury, lied in court. Overwhelming evidence presented in this small claims suit should have been rendered in my favor. There was no court reporter in this small claims civil matter. In addition, the Judge slammed a book and stormed out of the court room in the middle of a small claims civil court proceeding. The Judge rendered no final conclusion in this matter. Under the Freedom of Information Act, I have requested in writing a copy of your final verdict on 3/4/2016 by fax. In addition to this matter, this is in violation of the following:
1. South Dakota Law under 40-1, 2.3
2. South Dakota Law under 40-1. 2.4
3. South Dakota Law under 40-1, 14
4. South Dakota Law under 40-1, 27-which is a Class I Misdemeanor
5. Breach of Contract Law
6. Title 38, U. S. C., under section 701. The first violation is a $55,000 fine for theft of property of a veteran.
7. EEOC violations regarding discrimination regarding a former member of the armed services regarding discrimination which is tiered in with the Americans with Disabilities Act of 2010 under Title II
8. Veterans with Disabilities Act of 2010
10. South Dakota Law regarding theft.
11. Civil Rights Act of 1964
12. Dishonor of the court by storming out of the court room in the middle of a small claims civil suit court proceeding and rendering no final conclusion in this matter.
13. South Dakota Codified Laws under Title 16, subsection 16-19-34 regarding deceit and collusion as grounds for disbarment---Treble damages. The Treble damages are in the amount of 1890.09 at this juncture. This initial small claims suit was initiated against the defendant in the amount of 630.03.
14. War Crimes Act of 1996
15. Genocide
The United States has signed the fourth Protocol confirmed by the ICRC.
Geneva Conventions of 1949 Protocols under the 4th Treaty regarding criminal repression are as follows:
- Principle I-Any person who commits an act which constitutes a crime under international law is responsible therefor and liable to punishment.
- Principle II-The fact that internal law does not impose a penalty for an act which constitutes a crime under international law does not relieve the person who committed an act from responsibility under international law.
- Principle III-The fact that a person who committed an act which constitutes a crime under international law acted as Head of State or responsible Government Official does not relieve him or her from responsibility under International Law.
- Principle IV-The fact that a person acted pursuant to order of his/her government or of a superior does not relieve him/her from responsibility under international law, provided that a moral choice was in fact possible to him/her.
I am seeking a restitution amount of 630.03 for failure to render a judgment with relevant facts and evidence presented in this small claims civil suit. Thank you for your attention to this matter.
This information is true, accurate, and to the best of my knowledge with no intent to deceive the public at large. This information is protected under U. C. C. 1-207 and 1-308. These documents are not to be sold, distributed, or transferred to a third party without my expressed written consent. This information is protected under Title 108 and 107 of the copyright and publishing laws. Freedom of speech is secured under the Declaration of Human Rights under International Law. All rights are reserved worldwide.
This report was posted on Ripoff Report on 03/08/2016 08:30 PM and is a permanent record located here: https://www.ripoffreport.com/reports/honorable-judge-michelle-k-palmer-percy/sturgis-south-dakota-57785/honorable-judge-michelle-k-palmer-percy-judge-storms-out-of-courtroom-in-the-middle-of-s-1292517. The posting time indicated is Arizona local time. Arizona does not observe daylight savings so the post time may be Mountain or Pacific depending on the time of year. Ripoff Report has an exclusive license to this report. It may not be copied without the written permission of Ripoff Report. READ: Foreign websites steal our content
If you would like to see more Rip-off Reports on this company/individual, search here:



#5 Author of original report
Evidence Provided in Chronological Order by Exhibit(s)
AUTHOR: - ()
SUBMITTED: Thursday, March 24, 2016
This is the correct order of sequence starting with exhibits A., B., C., D., and E. These events are listed in correct order by exhibits A., B., C., D., and E.

#4 Author of original report
Documentation of evidence presented is not in order.
AUTHOR: - ()
SUBMITTED: Thursday, March 24, 2016
The reader needs to be informed that these documents presented are not in chronological order. The CORRECT chronological order of events that took place are exhibits A., B., C., and D. accordingly. These documents listed above are not in the correct order. They are listed as exhibits D., C., B., and A. and this is not how these events unfolded. Thank you for your attention to this matter.
In addition, the documents and evidence presented were sent by e-mail with no names listed as 3/24/2016. They are to be uploaded to this complaint in order. This also included a copy of the Judge's final verdict in this matter. The Judge's final verdict is listed as exhibit E. I do have in my posession the original documents with the names of the individuals involved in this matter accordingly.

#3 Author of original report
Exhibits presented are not in order.
AUTHOR: - ()
SUBMITTED: Thursday, March 10, 2016
UPDATE 3/10/2016:The reader needs to be aware that these exhibits presented are not in chronological order accordingly. Please ensure that you read Exhibits A., B., C., D., in order. Exhibit E., F., and G. is currently missing at this time. I have requested that these documents be posted in order. Thank you for attention to this detail. This information presented is true, accurate, and to the best of my knowledge with no intent to deceive the public at large. In addition, any reponse that is not rational and does not pertain strictly to this matter above will be ignored.

#2 Author of original report
Here are the facts and evidence presented accordingly.
AUTHOR: - ()
SUBMITTED: Thursday, March 10, 2016
Please refer to the following exhibits A., B., C., D., and F.
Update: As of 3/10/2016, I received the Judge's final verdict in this matter by regular mail.

#1 Author of original report
Here are the facts and evidence to support this complaint.
AUTHOR: - ()
SUBMITTED: Thursday, March 10, 2016
Please refer to Exhibit A., B., C., D., E. and F.


Advertisers above have met our
strict standards for business conduct.