Hubzu.com Altisource Highly Deceptive Practices Internet

I bid on a Hubzu property whereby a fire had occurred in the garage of the house, but Hubzu did not disclose this fact and infact said in black and white in an email that there had been no fire on the property.  I had been to the property and they had a large piece of plywood screwed over the garage opening and inside they had the garage access locked with a metal lock.  Then, when I said in returning to the property, I spotted charring, then they said "there was no active fire."  Then, when I pressed further by talking in more details about the neighbors witnessing the fire, then they said "there was not much fire damage and then when I told them the fire department was aware of the fire and I had spoken to the fire department, then they coughed up the report.  

They asked me what I would offer now in being unhappy and feeling I had overbid due to non-disclosure of the fire and I offered $1k over the second highest bidder and I formally requested they accept my modified bid or redo the auction WITH DISCLOSURE OF THE FIRE.  The seller refused my offer although it met their reserve and claimed it was "as is" and I knew it.  I told them that by law they must disclose a fire being on the property and should allow the public to see the garage, since they won't allow inspectors to inspect the premises.  They redid the auction with no disclosure again.  

Their defiance to disclose where disclosure is required by law is intentional deception.  I have all the emails to prove every bit of what I'm saying.  It is all in black and white.