Complaint Review: Josh Belcastro - Bradenton Florida
- Josh Belcastro 4836 77th St Bradenton, Florida USA
- Phone:
- Web: http://www.redlionnetwork.com/
- Category: Computer Programmers
Josh Belcastro Red Lion Network LLC Game Programmer Bradenton Florida
*REBUTTAL Owner of company: The other side of the story...
listed on other sites?
Those sites steal
Ripoff Report's
content.
We can get those
removed for you!
Find out more here.
Ripoff Report
willing to make a
commitment to
customer satisfaction
Click here now..
I went into a partnership with Josh BelCastro/ Red Lion Network in a 50-50% partnership. I provided $4,000 in seed money to develop an online game. Once online game was developed we would manage game equally split with detailed responsibilities. After a year the game was finally ready to launch. In addition to his time programming (Presumably with the $4,000 seed money) He also required server fees and advertising whne needed. THis all fell into our written agreement.
When it finally launched all went well for a month or two without any profit just additonal fees for server. This was paid but then Josh started complaining about his time and other issues not in original contract. He also made arbitrary demands on my time that became difficult to commit to and were not in our original contract. This eventualy gave him cause to tell me I was out.
I never recieved any profit from game which is now online for mass market consumption. I asked for my $4000 to be returned but he declined unless i divulged my other business dealings and other personal information not privvy to our deal.
He has refused to refund me my money and presumably continues to have game we jointly developed online with 100% proceeds going directly to him.
My biggest concern at this point is other people doing business with him. He has bragged that any complaints just boost his online rankings and if anything I owe him more money for all the time he spent developing. He is in a bit of denial and refuses to acknowledge the origianal written agreement where the $4000 investment covered his game development.
Any contractor of repute understands they have to live by the contract and if it goes over budget thats the risk they take. He feels that his time wasted (He said originally 4-6 months of developemnt and it would be completed) should be covered. It actually took over a year to complete due to his mismanagment of time and overall incompetance.
I would be very wary of interacting with this individual. His inability to properly quote a project and live by said quote is a dangerous precadent to investors. His outright fraud in taking over a business dealing and not refund money demonstates a classic scam.
This report was posted on Ripoff Report on 08/23/2015 07:40 PM and is a permanent record located here: https://www.ripoffreport.com/reports/josh-belcastro/bradenton-florida-34203/josh-belcastro-red-lion-network-llc-game-programmer-bradenton-florida-1250435. The posting time indicated is Arizona local time. Arizona does not observe daylight savings so the post time may be Mountain or Pacific depending on the time of year. Ripoff Report has an exclusive license to this report. It may not be copied without the written permission of Ripoff Report. READ: Foreign websites steal our content
If you would like to see more Rip-off Reports on this company/individual, search here:



#1 REBUTTAL Owner of company
The other side of the story...
AUTHOR: Josh Belcastro - (USA)
SUBMITTED: Monday, January 09, 2017
Matt Harper had contacted inquired with my company about having a custom game developed that had similar features to another game we developed. I personally reviewed his request and estimated a quote in the range of $10,000+ to complete. I had explained the challenges of game development though, and made it very clear that a first quote would be difficult with a game.
As we had liked some of the concepts that Matt was proposing, we had offered to help him out with a 50/50 partnership arrangement named “Sweet Decay-Red Lion Joint Venture” according to our agreement. Our agreement stipulated that Matt Harper would provide initial capital funding of $4,000 for development, $1,500 marketing commitment, and $1,000 future budget or major graphical improvements. This would ensure Matt a playable game on the market, versus a incomplete project.
As per the agreement, our company successfully created and launched the online game titled Pirates of Zaia with public access. As expected our labor investment brought the total development costs to around $13,000 at the time of launch with no additional funding being requested from Matt Harper. Matt had tested the game and said it was fun, but needed some improvements. As a result of the requested changes, there was much more development work to be added after the initial release. My company had agreement to continue to handle the development, at our expense, which brought our total labor investment to approximately $18,500.
Following the game launch the game Matt had already violated our operating agreement which stipulated he would not recruit players from other game projects I currently operate. Prior to beginning this venture, our partnership agreement outlined many delegated tasks and shared tasks that were to be handled by each party. Matt did not uphold his agreement and as a result the burden of his workload fell solely on my team at my expense. After several months of successful gameplay, I confronted Matt about his lack of involvement and he was adamant that he could not invest more than a few minutes a day.
Matt had violated the agreement on numerous times since beginning the partnership. This included direct spam marketing players on other games I operate, as well as refusing to do their share of work. Throughout this process I was consistently praised for my good work in bringing the game to life and it being fun to play. After finally confronting Matt that I could not work under our initial agreement with his little time involvement, he had admitted that he was working with other partners on developing a different game project because he did not find the current game fun to play. As he had consistently failed to uphold his agreements of the partnership, I had made the decision to end the partnership.
As a fair offer to Matt I had offered to sell the full game at our total development cost, or to lease the initial release of the Pirates of Game at cost, with the responsbility of covering any further development costs and building the game community. This offer remains on the table!


Advertisers above have met our
strict standards for business conduct.