Ripoff Report Needs Your Help!
X  |  CLOSE
Report: #19285

Complaint Review: Judge Mary Kovack - Judge Mary Kovac And Mary Beth Corrigan - Medina Ohio

  • Submitted:
  • Updated:
  • Reported By: Cincinnati OH
  • Author Not Confirmed What's this?
  • Why?
  • Judge Mary Kovack - Judge Mary Kovac And Mary Beth Corrigan Medina County Courthouse Medina, Ohio U.S.A.

Show customers why they should trust your business over your competitors...

Is this
Report about YOU
listed on other sites?
Those sites steal
Ripoff Report's
content.
We can get those
removed for you!
Find out more here.
How to fix
Ripoff Report
If your business is
willing to make a
commitment to
customer satisfaction
Click here now..

No wonder fathers do not fight for custody, when all they get is biased judgments from people who are supposed to look out for the best interest of children. Who says a child is better off with his mother??? In my case, I am talking about my fiancee who is the BEST father I have ever known. He loves his four year old so much, but I guess that was not enough to prove anything to the judge. We have gone to trail, lost the case and now are appealing. The reason being is this: the boy's mother works 40 hours a week, puts him in daycare for that time, has a boyfriend who has been stopped three times for DUI's and put in jail for domestic violence. The police has been to her apartment for her fighting with her live in boyfriend IN FRONT OF THE CHILD!!!.

The mom also has a reocrd for various minor things, such as non payment of rent, etc. Now us: We have absolutely nothing on our record, have never had the poilce called on us; my fiancee works 4 days of the week, the same days every week, and I stay home with the child, and cok him meals and take care of him. Now which home seems more legit??

In the begininng, the GAL, who is suppossed to look out for the best interests of the child, was 100% on our side. She stated the mom as an angry person, and had made a home visit, only to notice the boyfriend with bloodshot eyes and the smell of liqour on his breath. She stated that the child should be with us. However, after a visit to the psychologist (for an evaluation for the two parents), she changed her mind. I guess she was too wimpy to stand firm on what she believed in.

The psychologist is another scam. He basically said "the domestic violence and substance abuse on behalf of the boyfriend is not significant enough to warrant a change of custody" HELLO?? So what IS significant? When the child gets beaten??

Well, the judge was very one side, taking everything the mom had to say as truth and things the father said as "accusations". She also put me down, quoting me as saying "the girlfriend feels it is a woman's duty to stay at home"--something I DID not say.

The whole courthouse is corrupt. The judge was buddy-buddy with the mom's lawyer, they are all from that small town (we are from 4 hours away).Obviously, the 10 or 11 trips we made in our car everytime we had court did not count for commitment to the child. The 8 hour roundtrip was not seen as anything!

I am sick and tired of these biased judgements that the woman is a better parent, THERE ARE CASES WHERE THAT IS NOT TRUE!! Many women, such as this one are nothing but power, control, jealous freaks who just want to have an upper hand in everything. This mom did not even care about the child until I came into the picture.

The the jealously of another woman drove her insane, so she decided to fight for custody. I could go on but I won't. just beware of that corrupt courthoue. they are all racist, biased one side small town people who buddy up with each other to get a ruling. How unfair. Fathers out there--I encourgae you: fight for your rights. Your children need you too! And please remember us in the appeal!!

Christina
Cincinnati, Ohio

This report was posted on Ripoff Report on 04/21/2002 08:59 PM and is a permanent record located here: https://www.ripoffreport.com/reports/judge-mary-kovack-judge-mary-kovac-and-mary-beth-corrigan/medina-ohio-44256/judge-mary-kovack-mary-beth-corrigan-biased-dishonest-cheated-inconsiderate-only-cares-19285. The posting time indicated is Arizona local time. Arizona does not observe daylight savings so the post time may be Mountain or Pacific depending on the time of year. Ripoff Report has an exclusive license to this report. It may not be copied without the written permission of Ripoff Report. READ: Foreign websites steal our content

Search for additional reports

If you would like to see more Rip-off Reports on this company/individual, search here:

Report & Rebuttal
Respond to this report!
What's this?
Also a victim?
What's this?
Repair Your Reputation!
What's this?

Updates & Rebuttals

REBUTTALS & REPLIES:
0Author
6Consumer
0Employee/Owner

#6 Consumer Comment

So Sad

AUTHOR: JakesdadJoe - ()

POSTED: Thursday, October 31, 2013

Christina,

 I am curious who is the mother's attorney?  Are his initials DM or KA?  I am also a victim of this Judge and have gone broke on what is a simple case.  I have an attorney with 25 years on the Domestic Bench for Cleveland as well as he served for a few years on the Ohio Supreme Court.  He has been overwhelmed with what he has seen from this court.  The Magistrate Owens actually re-wrote R.C. 3109.04 and added a line to it to justify her ruling.  A law that was in both counsel's legal briefs and worded correctly.  The trial was set for the only week my original attorney was out of town.  When I called Medina Attorney's to find someone that was available for the trial I was told to bring in someone from out of Medina who would not be afraid to rock the boat.  The Magistrate didn't seem to read our legal brief at all.  So, we have a Magistrate that basically read the opposing counsels brief and changed Ohio law to rule for the Mother.  I was told by an Attorney in Medina that Magistrate Owens will have to rule for the father in one of his cases and Jackie Owens has been sitting on it for almost 18 months.  She refuses to rule for the father.  2nd, Rule 53 that is set by the State of Ohio says that both parties get 15 days to object to a Magistrate's decision before the Judge can sign off on it.  Judge Kovack signed off on it within 2 hours not allowing us to object to the ruling.  

I am only trying to be the Residential Parent for School Purposes.  My ex moved in with her BF and she was the RP since he was 2.  He is now 8.   His mother works 31 seconds from the day care he has attended since he was 3 years old.  They have been my co-parent in raising him.  They have actually spent more time with him as my ex-wife.  She works 1 min and 12 seconds and now lives 11 mins from MCS elementary that he attended.  It is more of an inconvience for her to have him in the new school but she has used him as a pawn from the beginning 6 years ago.  My wife and I purchased a home that has his bedroom looking into his old bedroom where is mom lived for 2 years before she moved in with her boyfriend.  What I was asking for only gave me a title to keep my son stable.  We have split custody down the middle, I volunteered and taught math every other Monday at his old school, helped with class parties and field trips.  I am a Modern Dad and this Judge and Magistrate has broken my son's heart.  He had a closed chamber meeting with Magistrate and was ruled competent and addemant that he remain at his day care and elementary school.  In our legal briefs we stated we have a residence within 500 feet of his home where his mother lived.  We then decided to sweetent the deal and send in an addendum to the original legal brief all the closing papers and deed to the Magistrate.  My wife and I moved our lives for my son.  He is the kindest and sweetest young man you will ever meet and deserves to be happy.   This magistrate actually rewrote the law and state if I am awarded this title the child would have to attend the school district I used to live in?? So she will uphold the previous order when he was 2.  Even if I hadn't bought a home, Medina City Schools allows up to 90 days to move into the district after enrollment.  So how is that the case but we actually BOUGHT a home before school started and he was still enrolled in that MCS  2 weeks before she made her ruling.  Since the Judge violated Rule 53 we didn't even get a chance to object.  So we filed the appeal.  Then the Judge sent us a letter stating a hearing 60 days out, that held up our 9th district appeal.  We all showed up yesterday and since we filed an appeal she won't hear our case.  Our attorney asked to speak to the Judge and the baliff was rude and said no she isn't talking to you.  This is a former Ohio Supreme Court Justice, they still have to call him your honor!  

I am now still dealing with my son crying once a week at least, I am heartbroken seeing him so torn, his mother uses him as a pawn and he senses it and doesn't like it.  My heart is broken and I am broke.  It has cost us over $15k, we moved into a small place and all any of us wants to do is cry.  I try to remind myself to find justice and pursue this but they have nearly broken me.  Our appeal is filed and we will have to wait 4 months or so to be heard.  They will kick this back and I pray they use common sense and put my sons wishes and see me as a dad worthy to pick his school.  Re-written law, ignored briefs, judicial court rules violated and my son who misses his other family at his old day care, who have helped me raise him since he was 3.  They have taught him the bible, god, how to treat others and instill in him the values I cherish.  Magistrate Owens also took away my midnight service on Christmas Eve.  She felt it was too late for a child under 12 to be out.  I had that worked into my original custody when he was 2 and we were divorced.  At midnight at our church the lights go out and we light candles to mark the birth of Jesus.  We only go to church a couple of times a year.  He looks so forward to that service.  She doesn't care that his mother takes him to bond fires and keeps him up until 2 am, or she lets him watch movies all night while she sleeps.  I argued for 10 minutes with her attorney on why an earlier service on Christmas Eve isn't Jesus's birthday.  It starts at Midnight, he is home by 12:20 even though I have until 1 am to bring him home.  That was taken away because the Magistrate said so....I just hope I can see my son smile and feel safe again, he is not having a good time at his new school.  I am trying to help him to adjust but there are factors there that just keep it from happening.  Sorry to vent.  Christina I hope your misery has ended and you recieved justice.  Maybe knowing what we are going through and the sacrifices we have made will help you.  For the haters, I am married to a Physician Assistant with a Master's degree.  We met 3 years ago and she is amazing with my son.  They have an amazing relationship.  Shacking up doesn't change Judge Kovack's opinion.  My son's mother moved in with her BF and her BF has actually threatened me infront of my child.  The mother works, shops, dines and parties (which we don't do) in Medina, her bf Works, shops, dines and parties in Medina.  They only live in Lodi and my son now goes to school there.  BTW I was her 2nd husband.  So the fact they are not married doesn't matter.  

Respond to this report!
What's this?

#5 Consumer Comment

Dear In Need Of Reading Comprehension

AUTHOR: Michael - (U.S.A.)

POSTED: Thursday, October 06, 2005

I guess you didn't read the, well, entire report? Quite clearly it states the child is in the custody of the mother and her BOYFRIEND. Telling this woman she's required to marry the child's father in order for them to get custody is a bit ridiculous considering the mother who has custody isn't married to the man she lives with...



Perhaps a re-read is in order?

Respond to this report!
What's this?

#4 Consumer Suggestion

Working moms

AUTHOR: Jenifer - (U.S.A.)

POSTED: Thursday, October 06, 2005

What the hell does the fact that his mother works 40 hours a week have to do with anything??? Were it not for you being home at your 'boyfriends' house, then the child would also be in daycare while he was visiting there...and I say shame shame for downing a mom who is working to take care of her kid...is she neglecting him? abusing him? is he hungry? dirty? denied medical care? probably not...no, I am not a mom advocate---I know plenty of mother's who should not have their children with them...however, the reasons you put in your first paragraph are crap!!

I am a full time working mother---and that, by no means, should be a factor in my daughter being able to be taken from my custody....

Respond to this report!
What's this?

#3 Consumer Suggestion

Working moms

AUTHOR: Jenifer - (U.S.A.)

POSTED: Thursday, October 06, 2005

What the hell does the fact that his mother works 40 hours a week have to do with anything??? Were it not for you being home at your 'boyfriends' house, then the child would also be in daycare while he was visiting there...and I say shame shame for downing a mom who is working to take care of her kid...is she neglecting him? abusing him? is he hungry? dirty? denied medical care? probably not...no, I am not a mom advocate---I know plenty of mother's who should not have their children with them...however, the reasons you put in your first paragraph are crap!!

I am a full time working mother---and that, by no means, should be a factor in my daughter being able to be taken from my custody....

Respond to this report!
What's this?

#2 Consumer Suggestion

Working moms

AUTHOR: Jenifer - (U.S.A.)

POSTED: Thursday, October 06, 2005

What the hell does the fact that his mother works 40 hours a week have to do with anything??? Were it not for you being home at your 'boyfriends' house, then the child would also be in daycare while he was visiting there...and I say shame shame for downing a mom who is working to take care of her kid...is she neglecting him? abusing him? is he hungry? dirty? denied medical care? probably not...no, I am not a mom advocate---I know plenty of mother's who should not have their children with them...however, the reasons you put in your first paragraph are crap!!

I am a full time working mother---and that, by no means, should be a factor in my daughter being able to be taken from my custody....

Respond to this report!
What's this?

#1 Consumer Suggestion

Shacking Up

AUTHOR: Rob - (U.S.A.)

POSTED: Thursday, October 06, 2005

I don't supposed that the fact you two are shacked up would have anything to do with it? Like it or not a Judge has to look at the family situation. Is it better to have a child live with its mother or the father and his shack up honey? I would say morally it would be better for the child to live with its mother. Also it is proven in study after study that there is an increase in abuse to children who live in household where one biological parent is living with a girlfriend or boyfriend who has no biological or emotional attachment to the child. I have no doubt that you fiance loves his child. If he wants the child you two need to get married and prove your commitment to the child and then go back to court.

Respond to this report!
What's this?
Featured Reports

Advertisers above have met our
strict standards for business conduct.

X
What do hackers,
questionable attorneys and
fake court orders have in common?
...Dishonest Reputation Management Investigates Reputation Repair
Free speech rights compromised

WATCH News
Segment Now