Ripoff Report Needs Your Help!
X  |  CLOSE
Report: #832567

Complaint Review: Larry Wickstrom - New Hope Minnesota

  • Submitted:
  • Updated:
  • Reported By: Concerned Citizen — Minnesota United States of America
  • Author Not Confirmed What's this?
  • Why?
  • Larry Wickstrom New Hope, Minnesota United States of America

Larry Wickstrom | NOTICE: Ripoff Report VIP Arbitration Decision: A neutral and independent Arbitrator has determined that the following report contained one or more false statements of fact. The false statements have been redacted (((Statement REDACTED as false pursuant to Ripoff Report VIP Arbitration))) | ((Statement REDACTED as false pursuant to Ripoff Report VIP Arbitration)) Beware wealthy single women New Hope, Minnesota

*REBUTTAL Individual responds: Angela J Bainey, Mona L Edick, Libel Suit Defendants', File # 86-CV-12-6088, 10th District Ct, Wright Co, Minnesota

*Author of original report: Nobody is the victim of Mona Edick

*General Comment: In response to Mona Edick

*Consumer Comment: I too was the victim of Mona Edick

*REBUTTAL Individual responds: Libel Suit Filing, District Court Wright County Minnesota. Angela J Bainey, Mona L Edick, Defendants'.

*REBUTTAL Individual responds: Slander & Malicious Libel

*REBUTTAL Individual responds: Required Notice of Subpoena to Acquire

*General Comment: Hilarious attempt at slander!

Show customers why they should trust your business over your competitors...

Is this
Report about YOU
listed on other sites?
Those sites steal
Ripoff Report's
content.
We can get those
removed for you!
Find out more here.
How to fix
Ripoff Report
If your business is
willing to make a
commitment to
customer satisfaction
Click here now..

RIPOFF REPORT VIP ARBITRATION

SUMMARY OF ARBITRATOR DECISION



Larry Wickstrom, Complainant

v.

Concerned Citizen, Author of Ripoff Report #832567
________________________________________________________________________

Complainant has challenged the truthfulness of 7 specific statements posted on ripoffreport.com by Author Concerned Citizen. The Author has not responded. In accordance with the Ripoff Report VIP Arbitration Rules (the Rules), the Arbitrator will decide whether each of the 7 statements is an opinion or a statement of fact. If, and only if, the statement is determined to be a statement of fact, the Arbitrator will then go further and decide if, by a preponderance of the evidence, the statement is true or not.

In this case, the Arbitrator has only the evidence submitted by Complainant to consider. The evidence submitted includes the Ripoff Report referenced, two Witness Statements and 7 documents.

Any portions of the statements that were deemed to be opinion were not ruled upon by the Arbitrator. The Arbitrator determined that the statements which have been redacted were false. Therefore, according to the Rules, those statements have been redacted.

Sandra J. Franklin, Arbitrator

* A copy of the full Arbitrators Decision is available upon request. Please e-mail arbitration@ripoffreport.com.
________________________________________________________________________

Please, please take this warning. ((Statement REDACTED as false pursuant to Ripoff Report VIP Arbitration)). I know him personally ((Statement REDACTED as false pursuant to Ripoff Report VIP Arbitration)). ((Statement REDACTED as false pursuant to Ripoff Report VIP Arbitration)). ((Statement REDACTED as false pursuant to Ripoff Report VIP Arbitration)). ((Statement REDACTED as false pursuant to Ripoff Report VIP Arbitration)). Larry is on Match ((Statement REDACTED as false pursuant to Ripoff Report VIP Arbitration)). If you know of anyone who hangs around this man, please warn them!

This report was posted on Ripoff Report on 02/01/2012 08:19 PM and is a permanent record located here: https://www.ripoffreport.com/reports/larry-wickstrom/new-hope-minnesota-55376/larry-wickstrom-notice-ripoff-report-vip-arbitration-decision-a-neutral-and-independen-832567. The posting time indicated is Arizona local time. Arizona does not observe daylight savings so the post time may be Mountain or Pacific depending on the time of year. Ripoff Report has an exclusive license to this report. It may not be copied without the written permission of Ripoff Report. READ: Foreign websites steal our content

Search for additional reports

If you would like to see more Rip-off Reports on this company/individual, search here:

Report & Rebuttal
Respond to this report!
What's this?
Also a victim?
What's this?
Repair Your Reputation!
What's this?

Updates & Rebuttals

REBUTTALS & REPLIES:
1Author
3Consumer
4Employee/Owner

#8 REBUTTAL Individual responds

Angela J Bainey, Mona L Edick, Libel Suit Defendants', File # 86-CV-12-6088, 10th District Ct, Wright Co, Minnesota

AUTHOR: Larry Wickstrom - ()

POSTED: Monday, June 24, 2013

I see by her June 3rd posting, that Ms Edick has assured everyone that she has not posted about anyone other than myself. When Mona Edick, filed her 15-2 ethics complaint against me with the Realtors Association for slandering a real estate professional, she stated under penalty of perjury that I was  “falsely accusing”  her of making this posting and though I appreciate her public acknowledgement of this posting; I can assure everyone that Ms. Edick’s assurances mean nothing to me. I also invite the posting (victim of Mona Edick) to contact either myself or the offices of Marcus Jarvis Law LTD., we are both listed in the phone book.

As one of these June 3rd posting statements had already been redacted from the original Feb. 2012 posting, the nice people at RippOff Report Arbitration were good enough to redact one of Ms Edick’s statements from this new posting. Unfortunately new arbitration is required to prove, or remove, the newly worded statements. Not wishing to spend another couple of grand to arbitrate a couple of sentences, I post this short rebuttal:   

Ms. Edick and her mother are Co Defendants’ in a libel suit. Defendants’ are not the ones who take action through the court system, Defendants’ are the ones against whom action is taken and being a Co Defendant in a law suit with someone; is not the same as stepping in to help. As to the rest of this June 3rd posting, I refer all readers to the bottom of this page where they can find my posted rebuttal of Feb. 2012.

Respond to this report!
What's this?

#7 General Comment

In response to Mona Edick

AUTHOR: another victim of mona edick - ()

POSTED: Sunday, June 02, 2013

No Mona, I have not been your victim via internet or legally.  I have known you for years, observed the way you treat people & spout off without thinking & without caring about how or who you hurt with your vile & malicious words.  On your linked in profile you say how you uphold the highest ethical standards.  This is totally untrue.  Nothing about you is ethical, be it in your personal life or your business.  What is really funny is that you actually believe all of your lies.  Someday, all of the hurt you have caused will come back to haunt you.  Hopefully Mr. Wickstrom will be able to be the instrument that finally delivers some of what is coming to you. If not, hopefully someone soon will be able to accomplish this.  And no, I do not want to contact you personally to resolve this.  I did attempt that & found out that there is NO DEALING with you.  You are lost in your own little world in which you believe that you are above reproach & nothing that I could ever say will change that.  Once again, good luck Mr. Wickstrom.  And one other thing.  You said that Mr. Wickstrom probably put me up to posting that.  This is also untrue, as I have never met the man.

Respond to this report!
What's this?

#6 Author of original report

Nobody is the victim of Mona Edick

AUTHOR: Concerned Citizen - ()

POSTED: Monday, May 06, 2013

This is NOT true.  Whomever wrote this should contact me immediately as I assure you I have not posted about anyone other than Larry Wickstrom.  My belief is that Larry Wickstrom posted this rebuttal or possibly put somebody up to it in an attempt to make me look bad and himself better. 

Larry and I are currently in a lawsuit because after dating my Mother he tried to get money from her to get him to go away.  I have stepped in and helped my Mother and we are currently taking the proper actions through the court system.

Meeting Larry was one of the worst things that has ever happened to my Mother and we are paying dearly because of it.  I hope that this reaches all of the women who are on online dating sites so they too do not fall victim to (((Statement REDACTED as false pursuant to Ripoff Report VIP Arbitration))).  Again, whomever posted this rebutall if you are in fact a real person who believes I have posted about you on the internet, please step forward so that we can clear this up. Thank you!

Respond to this report!
What's this?

#5 Consumer Comment

I too was the victim of Mona Edick

AUTHOR: another victim of mona edick - ()

POSTED: Sunday, May 05, 2013

 I do know Mona Edick & have known her for many years.  She is known for shooting her mouth off & saying anything she pleases to hurt someone. I too have been the victim of Mona Edick. I have no idea how a person as evil as Mona Edick can continue these behaviors & never get her just rewards. Just because she has money is no reason that she should get away with this. Someday hopefully someone will stop her spitefullness & vindictiveness.  Maybe deep down she does feel bad, & drinks to get over it.

Mona appears on the WCCO real estate hour on Saturday mornings. I question how someone with her immoral behavior can be a radio personality.  Someone with as many skeletons in her closet as she does, shouldn't be in the public eye. 

I wish you well Larry & hope you are able to deliver a just punishment to this evil witch.

Respond to this report!
What's this?

#4 REBUTTAL Individual responds

Libel Suit Filing, District Court Wright County Minnesota. Angela J Bainey, Mona L Edick, Defendants'.

AUTHOR: Larry Wickstrom - (USA)

POSTED: Monday, September 24, 2012

Required Notice of Subpeona to Acquire Evidence











Respond to this report!
What's this?

#3 REBUTTAL Individual responds

Required Notice of Subpoena to Acquire

AUTHOR: Larry Wickstrom - (USA)

POSTED: Sunday, September 23, 2012




Libel Suit Filing, District Court, Wright County Minnesota, Angela J Bainey, Mona L Edick Defendants'.



Respond to this report!
What's this?

#2 General Comment

Hilarious attempt at slander!

AUTHOR: canatnm - (United States of America)

POSTED: Tuesday, May 22, 2012

I've know Larry over twenty years.  Haven't found him to be the kind of man the writer states.  When someone writes things just to hurt the person they've decided to "pay back" for imagined sublimating of their position in the eyes of a loved one they have in common, we shouldn't be shocked by the lies being spewed.
By the way,  his mother and his family enjoy his company, I was at dinner with all of them at an enjoyable evening at his house recently.  We all had a great time.  

Respond to this report!
What's this?

#1 REBUTTAL Individual responds

Slander & Malicious Libel

AUTHOR: Larry Wickstrom - (United States of America)

POSTED: Monday, February 20, 2012

The best rebuttal to this type of malicious, slanderous, libel, is the strongest legal action possible culminating in the collection of compensatory and punitive damages.
This posting is not made by the anonymous friend of the wealthy woman; but is instead by best belief to have been posted by a daughter of a woman that I met through match.com. A woman who misrepresented herself as divorced and whose true marital status was not disclosed until after we had become and remained physically intimate. This posting is by best belief, a punitive, malicious and slanderous attack against my name and character, in response to a legal action of collect for monies expended on a property jointly titled to this woman and her mother. This is at present, an active breach of contract action. When this action is properly filed, or resolved before the court, the names of these defendants, case file number and court of jurisdiction, will be added to this rebuttal should this posting remain active.
A complaint of libel is now in process of preparation. When this action is properly filed before the court the names of these defendants, case file number and court of jurisdiction, will be added to this rebuttal should this posting remain active.
Signed:  /S/ Larry Wickstrom
New Hope, Minnesota

Respond to this report!
What's this?
Featured Reports

Advertisers above have met our
strict standards for business conduct.

X
What do hackers,
questionable attorneys and
fake court orders have in common?
...Dishonest Reputation Management Investigates Reputation Repair
Free speech rights compromised

WATCH News
Segment Now