London Brokers AMS scam, writing scam, internet scam Internet

I have worked for this company for several years now. I have never had a problem with my account being closed or not being paid. The pay isn't high but a good typing speed helps a person make more money. Yes, there is a process to go through once you have applied. They have higher standards than some companies. You have to pass some tests. I had to pass three articles but they all passed and I did get paid.

The site offers numerous video tutorials and articles to read concerning article quality and how to make the most from your work. It's important to use these.

This company normally offers writers a second chance when articles are rejected so that a person can make appropriate fixes. This depends on the mistakes made. There have been some glitches with the system at times but who doesn't.

LondonBrokers.net is a legit company that almost always pays on time. Although the amount of money might not be high, they are higher paying than some others and a lot less hassle than having to deal with individual clients.

As for the response given from Dayn, that might be a standard response to such complaints. It is a professional response that is polite for anyone who makes such claims against the company.

It's the right of every company to choose the right people and let others go. If you don't want to comply with our terms or can't meet our standards then fine. We don't have to accept everybody who comes along.

Mistake when posting my replies:  I am not an owner of LondonBrokers, but worked for them in the past.  

From my experiences, LondonBrokers is NOT a scam.  I did a small amount of work for them a couple of years ago, and there were no problems at all.  Although the pay rate was extremely low, the work I did was accepted and I was paid on time.  

As I needed to focus my time on higher-paying companies, the second articles I wrote for them didn't reach the payout requirement, but LondonBrokers paid me for them anyway.  I found them to be an honest, easy-to-deal with, company.  

What the author of this report has said is exactly of what happened to me.  I had signed up with them a few months back where they had me write some "test articles".  At the time they were acceptable, but I did not get paid for these.  Now, I am not a "newbie" writer.  I have written for websites, have done promos and articles, and even had a stint doing astrology reports for a very popular online astrology site.  I was looking for some work to do on the side when things were slow.

I went inactive for a while because of illness but had my account re-activated a few days ago after getting an email from them that they had loads of work in and had fixed some "payment woes".  Payment woes sounded dodgy enough but regardless,  I logged in today and picked up an article.  Spent a couple of hours doing research and writing the requested 3 versions of the same article.  Submitted the articles and had them come back as rejected with a link to their "reviews rejections" guideline pages.  No real details regarding what they didn't like aside from a minor revision regarding keyword usage.  I revised the articles as per their guidelines and resent them.

As far as I knew, all was well, and if not, then they would let me know.  At least, this is how reputable companies in the same business do things.  But not these people!  I later went to login and found my account had been disabled.  When I tried to find out why, i got a vague support reply that simply said "Your account was disabled as advise from the editor.  Thank you for trying AMS."

Hang on a minute..."thanks for trying"??  What was going off here?  I replied to the support email and never got a response.  So I got online to use their Live Support function.  They were even more  callous!  They seemed very reluctant to give me details as to why my account was disabled and what they meant by "thanks for trying AMS

The context of the conversation was as follows (leaving names out for legal purposes)When I asked why my account had been disabled and what I had done, I got a the reply "editorial review.  The instructions for revision were ignored. ACCOUNT IS DISABLED.  Read and apply the instructions at http://www.londonbrokers.net/reviews-rejections/.  Note the keyword density and placement instructions, particularly.

So I explained that I had done this and had not ignored the requested revisions at all.  I even had the original and revised edits as proof.  So I asked if someone could help me understand what it was exactly that i had not done.

All I got was a very cold "I'm sorry but the decision is final"

So I asked "Final? As in I can no longer work for the company?"  To which they replied "Thank you for trying AMS"I replied "I'd like an answer please"  to which they replied "

yes, that is final.  you can never work to AMS anymore"

I mean how is any of that fair?  They treated me with cold disdain and no respect at all.  Any of the companies I had worked for before would work with new writers and long time writers to get them started, go over any issues, etc.  These people just give you a bunch of links to read through as guidelines.  There is no support in the way of help for amateur writers.  What makes me laugh is on their "about us" page they claim "Our writers are our gold so we treat them well!" - yet I have since spoken to several, now ex, writers who have complained about how badly they were treated.  My advice - avoid this company!