Ripoff Report Needs Your Help!
X  |  CLOSE
Report: #497025

Complaint Review: Mann & Bracken LLP - Internet Internet

  • Submitted:
  • Updated:
  • Reported By: bettyjohnsonkelly — USA
  • Author Not Confirmed What's this?
  • Why?
  • Mann & Bracken LLP http://www.mannbracken.com/ Internet United States of America

Mann & Bracken - wolpoff & abramson - lourdes r. slinsky (attorney) HAVE BEEN SUED (June 4, 2009) FOR ILLEGAL COLLECTION PRACTICES...! Internet

Show customers why they should trust your business over your competitors...

Is this
Report about YOU
listed on other sites?
Those sites steal
Ripoff Report's
content.
We can get those
removed for you!
Find out more here.
How to fix
Ripoff Report
If your business is
willing to make a
commitment to
customer satisfaction
Click here now..

FMD Consumer Blog Consumer News | Consumers | Get Out of Debt | Personal Finance | Debt Collectors | Consumer Rights | Consumer Scams and Protection Sign in Home   Archive   Contact   Buy a Dot Dot Sponsor List   Subscribe Class Action Lawsuit Filed Against NAF, Mann Bracken, Accretive and Others Tags:  naf ,  national arbitration forum ,  mann bracken ,  accretive ,  agora fund ,  axiant ,  forthright solutions ,  class action ,  lawsuits , arbitration ,  fdcpa ,  fcra  | Categories:  Consumers ,  Debt Collectors Posted by  Allen  on 9/15/2009 6:35 AM | Comments (0) NEW YORK, NY -- (Marketwire) -- 09/15/09 -- The law firm of Milberg LLP has filed a class action lawsuit in the United States District Court for the Central District of California on behalf of all persons who used NAF's arbitration services during the period from June 1, 2006 to the present, inclusive (the "Class Period"). The complaint is available from the Court or can be viewed at Milberg LLP's website at www.milberg.com . Until recently, NAF held itself out as a leading forum for consumer arbitrations, which is how many consumer debt disputes are resolved. An arbitration forum must above all be impartial, so that consumers can be confident that their disputes with creditors (e.g., banks, credit card companies, phone companies, etc.) will be heard fairly, as would be the case if the dispute was resolved by a court of law. The class action lawsuit filed against NAF and related parties alleges that NAF has misled consumers for years in this regard because it was owned by and/or beholden to a debt collection agency and debt collection law firm, such that in reality it was a debt collector, not a neutral forum for resolving disputes by the debt collection industry against consumers. The result of these alliances was near perfect success rates by debt collectors against consumers in NAF arbitrations. More specifically, the complaint alleges that  NAF, National Arbitration Forum, LLC ("NAF LLC"), Mann Bracken, LLP ("Mann Bracken"), Accretive LLC ("Accretive"), Agora Fund I GP, LLC, Axiant, LLC, and Forthright Solutions  (collectively "Defendants"), falsely held NAF out to be independent and unaffiliated with any persons or entities within or outside the collections industry and falsely presented its arbitration services as neutral. According to the complaint, Mann Bracken is a law firm that claims to specialize in consumer debt collection matters, but is a debt collector in its own right. NAF and Mann Bracken are both owned by Defendant Accretive who owns and controls both NAF and Mann Bracken, and their related entities. According to the complaint, NAF is now "under siege by local and state prosecutors for working alongside creditors, rubber-stamping illegitimate arbitration awards against consumers, deceiving the courts and the public, and undermining the integrity of the arbitration system." The complaint specifically alleges that NAF maintained a near perfect success rate -- ruling in favor of business entities -- by engaging in improper, deceptive and corrupt acts, including: (a) establishing incentives for arbitrators to favor debt collectors over consumers; (b) disregarding consumers' evidence and/or arguments; (c) overlooking and violating its own Code of Procedure to benefit debt collectors, and ultimately, large creditors; (d) disregarding creditors' lack of evidence; and (e) failing to provide the bona fide arbitration services it promised to consumers. The complaint also alleges that NAF breached its contractual obligation to provide arbitration services to consumers, and that NAF directly benefitted from, and was unjustly enriched by the contractual breaches. About Milberg Milberg LLP has been representing individual and institutional investors for nearly 40 years and serves as lead counsel in federal and state courts throughout the United States. Please visit the Milberg website ( http://www.milberg.com ) for more information about the firm. If you wish to discuss this matter with us, or have any questions concerning your rights and interests with regard to this matter, please contact the following attorneys: California Office:  Jeff Westerman or Sabrina Kim  New York Office:  Peter Safirstein or Andrei Rado  Milberg LLP  Phone number: (800) 320-5081  Email:  contactus@milberg.com   (Principal Office):  One Pennsylvania Plaza  New York, NY 10119

This report was posted on Ripoff Report on 09/18/2009 01:15 PM and is a permanent record located here: https://www.ripoffreport.com/reports/mann-bracken-llp/internet/mann-bracken-wolpoff-abramson-lourdes-r-slinsky-attorney-have-been-sued-june-497025. The posting time indicated is Arizona local time. Arizona does not observe daylight savings so the post time may be Mountain or Pacific depending on the time of year. Ripoff Report has an exclusive license to this report. It may not be copied without the written permission of Ripoff Report. READ: Foreign websites steal our content

Search for additional reports

If you would like to see more Rip-off Reports on this company/individual, search here:

Report & Rebuttal
Respond to this report!
What's this?
Also a victim?
What's this?
Repair Your Reputation!
What's this?
Featured Reports

Advertisers above have met our
strict standards for business conduct.

X
What do hackers,
questionable attorneys and
fake court orders have in common?
...Dishonest Reputation Management Investigates Reputation Repair
Free speech rights compromised

WATCH News
Segment Now