Marietta Luxury Motors LYING GHETTO UNPROFESSIONAL SCAM ARTISTS Marietta Georgia

Look, I know this is most likely one of the pathetic idiots from that dealership, but whoever you are I need for you to mind your own d**n business.  Get a hobby and a real job and stop stalking posts from this website.  You clearly have a sad and useless life. I will not respond further to trash and someone of such a low caliber.

Will you let us know the venue and docket number of the lawsuit you claim to have filed, so we can follow it here and see how it goes.

If you couldn't see the paint flaws,   "The worst part about it is that their body shop painted over all of the trimmings and did not properly remove them and therefore they were ruined. "

You must have been blind and/or bought the car in the dark.  Dealers are under NO obligation to tell you a car has been painted and YOU should, at least have been able to see a paint job as bad as this one.

If they Ripped you off, YOU certainly co-operated with them in doing so. 

Your pseudo reasoning why the illegally ripped you of is just that...jailhouse lawyering.

There is a term used in law called misrepresentation and fraudulent concealment. They misrepresented the condition of the vehicle, and marketed it as a vehicle in excellent condition, which does not meet that criteria if it needs a $10k paint job you moron.

Here is the definition: Deliberate hiding, non-disclosure, or suppression of a material fact or circumstance (which one is legally or morally bound to reveal) with intent to deceive or defraud in a contractual arrangement.

Had I known about the condition of the paint job, I could have made a more informed decision on whether or not I was willing to take on the risk of the added expenses to get the car up to my satisfaction, and/or could have negotiated the price based on the consition of the car.   To establish a common law claim for fraud, the victim must show that the dealer omitted or misrepresented material facts, resulting in a financial loss for the victim. To qualify as material, the facts at issue must pass the “but for” test. In other words, but for the omitted or misrepresented facts, the customer would not have purchased the vehicle.This material fact was hidden and therefore there was not a true meeting of the minds seeing that I was not able to make the most informed jusgement call as a consumer.  Non-disclosure and lying by omission is also a form of concealment.  Please don't respond to things before you are informed. Don't rely on yourhigh school eduation.

 There is a term used in law called misrepresentation and fraudulent concealment.  They misrepresented the condition of the vehicle, and marketed it as a vehicle in excellent condition, which does not meet that criteria if it needs a $10k paint job you moron. 

Here is the definition:   Deliberate hiding, non-disclosure, or suppression of a material fact or circumstance (which one is legally or morally bound to reveal) with intent to deceive or defraud in a contractual arrangement.

Had I known about the condition of the paint job, I could have made a more informed decision on whether or not I was willing to take on the risk of the added expenses to get the car up to my satisfaction, and/or could have negotiated the price based on the consition of the car.  This material fact was hidden and therefore there was not a true meeting of the minds seeing that I was not able to make the most informed jusgement call as a consumer.  Please don't respond to things before you are informed.  Don't rely on yourhigh school eduation.

  You plan on suing these guys because they didn't tell you the car had been repainted??? If the paint job was as bad as you say it is, '$200 paint job' that should have stood out like a sore thumb on the day you bought it. Do me a favor, please let me know when this is going to court. I want to be there when the judge laughs you out of the place. Suing for not telling you the car is a repaint. Now I've heard it all.