Ripoff Report Needs Your Help!
X  |  CLOSE
Report: #771706

Complaint Review: mark cantrell attorney at law - Internet

  • Submitted:
  • Updated:
  • Reported By: jenna — corona California U.S.A.
  • Author Confirmed What's this?
  • Why?
  • mark cantrell attorney at law unknown 225 Internet United States of America

Show customers why they should trust your business over your competitors...

Is this
Report about YOU
listed on other sites?
Those sites steal
Ripoff Report's
content.
We can get those
removed for you!
Find out more here.
How to fix
Ripoff Report
If your business is
willing to make a
commitment to
customer satisfaction
Click here now..

Here is an email that I sent Mr. Cantrell. It is only the tip of the iceberg, but will give people an idea  of who he is

Mr. Cantrell. you have had sufficient time to issue us the refund that we requested based on your fraud, deceit and misrepresentation. I have done my research and I am preparing a small claims action. You may want to save yourself public embarrassment and settle this prior to filing.
As you know, your services were retained on three premises ...al three having been proven to be fraudulent /and/or misrepresented.
1. your advertising explicitly states that you are located in Temecula. When we contacted your office, we were told by your paralegal that you are in Temecula.  We knew the importance of hiring counsel that had a relationship with that local  District Attorneys office. We were assured that you did. After payment, you had Ryan meet you in Riverside and later found out that you have no Temecula office.
2. your online reviews which give you 5 stars turn out to be from a paid for service. These reviews are completely untrue and fabricated. I have copies of all of them, and the problem of course is that all of the reviews are for the same companies. I have contacted some of these other companies and they have verified that they had, indeed , paid a company for these fake reviews,. I am working on affidavits, so no need to try to deny it. How dare you...is this the type of professionalism that the public should expect from one with the highly acclaimed juris doctorate degree? It behooves a used car salesman, not an attorney at law. You were retained based on these fraudulent reviews.
3. The misrepresentation from your paralegal. She forced me to pay you before we had even had a consultation !!I thought this strange at the time, but she insisted that you handled these cases all of the time, and that you would have it thrown out of court within a month, just like she had seen you do with much more serious cases. It turns out that once there WAS a meeting, the only thing that came out of your mouth was doom and gloom. Now we were financially committed based on your employees misrepresentation.
As far as our complete and utter dissatisfaction with you throughout the process, disgust is an understatement. You were continually deceitful yes we can PROVE that you never discussed this case with the District Attorney's office and that you NEVER requested a plea on his behalf. Phone call after phone call were never returned, we have our phone bills to prove there were no returned calls . Your mission was to drag this out as long as you could in order to rob us of the maximum amount of money that you could and do nothing in return. Even with my pleas to you to give my son Ryan some hope due to his fragile  mental disabilty, you cruelly and continually taunted him with the fact that he might go to jail. When I tell other attorneys what we went through with you they are in utter disbelief until i show them the emails.

This report was posted on Ripoff Report on 08/31/2011 10:30 PM and is a permanent record located here: https://www.ripoffreport.com/reports/mark-cantrell-attorney-at-law/internet/mark-cantrell-attorney-at-law-fraudulent-and-deceptive-advertising-poor-communication-771706. The posting time indicated is Arizona local time. Arizona does not observe daylight savings so the post time may be Mountain or Pacific depending on the time of year. Ripoff Report has an exclusive license to this report. It may not be copied without the written permission of Ripoff Report. READ: Foreign websites steal our content

Search for additional reports

If you would like to see more Rip-off Reports on this company/individual, search here:

Report & Rebuttal
Respond to this report!
What's this?
Also a victim?
What's this?
Repair Your Reputation!
What's this?

Updates & Rebuttals

REBUTTALS & REPLIES:
2Author
1Consumer
1Employee/Owner

#4 Author of original report

Lies...

AUTHOR: 2haflingers - ()

POSTED: Thursday, May 22, 2014

Actually, Mr. cantrell, it was a matter of 2 teenagers...one 15 and one 19., and it was JUST A KISS !! But you knew all of this ..your ploy was to scare the kid into thinking the worst case scenario which everyone incuding theprosecutor knew would never happen ...this so that you could collect more money. You were fired, and there was a small finr. No registration. no jail...NONE of the things that you threatened would happen if you wrent paid thousands more. And guess what ? we used a FREE public defender.  We have received multiple contacts from others tha you have done similar things to..slimy habits are hard to break, are they not?

Respond to this report!
What's this?

#3 Consumer Comment

Wow a White Fight!

AUTHOR: This Is The Truth - (USA)

POSTED: Tuesday, September 06, 2011

I love it when these things occur and it is quite refreshing I must admit.  Its always is a memorable moment and a wonderful experience.  Apparently someone does not like being exposed and one out of the two in this fight is not telling the truth.  There is more legal evidence to be submitted in this case and let's see who comes out the winner in the end!

However that may be difficult to judge since both seem to be playing for the same team!

Respond to this report!
What's this?

#2 Author of original report

Wow...

AUTHOR: 2haflingers - (U.S.A.)

POSTED: Monday, September 05, 2011

Im astounded. thats it? thats all you've got? THAT is your rebuttal? Well, thank you for sharing Mr. Cantrell. Now readers of this forum can see with their own eyes the kind of defense that they will get when they pay you the big bucks. Keeping in mind that this was you defending YOU, I suppose that one can expect much less if they are an alleged "child molester"? huh? Firstly,let me state that no...the person posting this is NOT accused of a crime as you mistakenly purport. Wrong person, Mr. Cantrell. More evidence of your sloppy work. (Need I bring up when you charged MY credit card without my permission and then threw a huge fit when I corrected you? ...once again very sloppy for an attorney whose records SHOULD be in order). And, yes, you did contact my son RYAN and threaten to post HIS personal information all over the web if anyone dared to tell the truth about you...and yes I have a copy of that email which will also be posted on MY website    www.MARKCANTRELL-ATTORNEY.COM  which is in the process of being set up after all informational gathering. If you are accusing my son (who by the way is in his early 20's) of being upset that you couldn't defend a criminal charge wherein a sexually active young lady in her midteens states that they "made out" ie. kissing, then that is between you and him. I, for one, am upset about the items listed above for starters. However, since YOU brought it up, I personally believe that any attorney would be inept if he was to allow such a young man to register as a sex offender for that...that is NOT what the law was intended for. As a mother, i would want sexual predators to register so that I have notice of offenders to protect my "child". This was no child...and no predator. If anything, there may have been a lapse of judgment but no laws were broken, and that will be proven and posted on my website.

But after all, this is ABOUT YOU...but of course, that is the way you operate isn't it.? Let's go back to your reply, Mr. cCantrell.  you missed your opportunity to reply to any of the allegations that I have made. I assume that is because I have written documentation that it IS true and therefore it would only worsen things. What you have stated though, is that you " have an impeccable record.".".just look at the website that I have paid for and that I have created about ME". There is no doubt that people that take the time  to research an attorney are smart enough to know that you are going to pay homage to yourself on your own website...Come on, you're kidding right? "Oh, and if you dont believe ME that Im a great attorney...just look at this newspaper article that they wrote about me". Every local newspaper tries to make it a point to write a story on local business people. I can't think of a business without one...from the local bagel shop to the roofing supplies store...call the paper...ask them for a little promo article and they are usually more than happy to oblige.
I notice that you like to toot your horn that you went to law school, and although I do give you kudos...you don't mention ANYWHERE that the school that you attended, according to THEIR WEBSITE, is nonaccredited. "The degree-granting authority for California Southern Law School is the Committee of Bar Examiners, and the school is not an accredited law school." this is off of their webpage. basically, it is state accredited, such as the online course offered by kaplan...Concord Law School.  To surmise, the qualifications to attend are a high school diploma and a few CLEP test scores..I'm not disputing that you are licensed to practice law..but perhaps we got what we paid for.

Respond to this report!
What's this?

#1 REBUTTAL Owner of company

mark cantrell attorney at law FRAUDULENT AND DECEPTIVE ADVERTISING, POOR COMMUNICATION, THE WORST Internet

AUTHOR: Mark Cantrell - (United States of America)

POSTED: Monday, September 05, 2011

I am a criminal defense attorney who has been practicing since 1994.  I have a spotless reputation and have been featured in local newspapers as an excellent lawyer and a man of extremely high ethics. See www.attorneycantrell.com for newspaper articles.  This complaint was filed by one of my former clients who was accused of child molestation. He was unhappy because the District Attorney wanted him to register as a sex offender as required under Penal Code Section 290. 

Respond to this report!
What's this?
Featured Reports

Advertisers above have met our
strict standards for business conduct.

X
What do hackers,
questionable attorneys and
fake court orders have in common?
...Dishonest Reputation Management Investigates Reputation Repair
Free speech rights compromised

WATCH News
Segment Now