Meir J. Westreich Meir J. Westreich, Meir Westreich, Attorney Meir Westreich, Anders Karlsson, Anders H. Karlsson, Michael Stone, Holotropic Breathwork LA, Marcia Araujo, The Karlsson Group, Charles Lynn Simmons, Potash Cosortium, Karlsson Potash Filled frivolous lawsuit to extort money Pasadena California

BE CAREFUL of ATTORNEY MEIR J WESTREICH.  He is a scam artist and partner of his only client Anders Karlsson. Both of these characters have made a living suing people they meet. Yes, people they meet in business dealings not in doing business. 100% of the lawsuits that these two crooks have filled are with oral contracts or conversations. They file complaints in Federal Court as a form of extorsion and blackmail.

Meir J. Westreich HAS BEEN BUSINESS PARTNERS WITH ANDERS KARLSSON SINCE 2003 AND THAT BUSINESS IS STILL ACTIVE TODAY.

IN 2003, WESTREICH WAS SUSPENDED FOR 6 MONTHS BY THE STATE BAR.  SEE BELOW

This so called attorney only has one client, his partner in crime Anders H Karlsson and his shady corporations and business entities. His business is to sue innocent people in Federal Court and extort money from victims by filing frivolous lawsuits. People pay these crooks instead of fighting the complaints in court as it is too expensive.

Also, it looks like scumbag attorney Meir Westreich is allergic to open court trials and any other difficult situations. According to public records, he likes to postpone trials claiming that he is too sick to appear in court. He finds enough idiot judges that believe him. I wonder why judges don’t ask for proof of medical condition.

In 2003 when the State of California BAR Association requested his presence in a hearing to indict him for wrongdoings, he also claimed to be too sick to attend. In 2003, this guy was 37 years old. How sick can a 37 year old guy get not to attend a hearing?

MEIR J. WESTREICH [#73133], 52, of Pasadena was suspended for six months, stayed, and placed on one year of probation. The order took effect Oct. 10, 2003.

A State Bar Court judge recommended a stayed suspension for Westreich after he did not comply with three of four probation conditions attached to a public reproval in 1998. The stay was recommended because Westreich was seriously ill after the public reproval and because of favorable character testimony.

Westreich sought review, arguing that his illnesses and other personal circumstances warrant only an admonition.

The bar court's review department acknowledged Westreich's problems, but found that during the year he did not comply with probation conditions, he traveled extensively and engaged in both legal and personal business matters.

It found that the stayed suspension was not excessive.

The public reproval was imposed for Westreich's conduct in his client's malpractice case against another lawyer. Westreich thought the client had agreed the case should be dropped, but he did not confirm this with the client. The case was dismissed for failure to prosecute, but Westreich did not receive the notice because he had relocated his office.

He had several conversations with his client about the lawsuit without ever telling her "specifically and definitively" that it was dismissed.

The court gave mitigating weight to Westreich's considerable pro bono and community service in a variety of political and social causes.

Westreich suffered a series of serious injuries and health problems and sought three extensions to comply with his probation. Nonetheless, the court found that he did not comply with probation conditions in a timely manner.