Ripoff Report Needs Your Help!
X  |  CLOSE
Report: #162217

Complaint Review: NaviComm - Opticom - One Call Communications - Carmel Indiana

  • Submitted:
  • Updated:
  • Reported By: Colton California
  • Author Confirmed What's this?
  • Why?
  • NaviComm - Opticom - One Call Communications PO Box 3141 Carmel, Indiana U.S.A.

Show customers why they should trust your business over your competitors...

Is this
Report about YOU
listed on other sites?
Those sites steal
Ripoff Report's
content.
We can get those
removed for you!
Find out more here.
How to fix
Ripoff Report
If your business is
willing to make a
commitment to
customer satisfaction
Click here now..

I received a bill from my local telephone company which included 2 charges on the same date for One Call / Opticom / NaviComm totalling $64.92. When I called the phone number for billing inquiries I was told this was for long distance charges through the internet from my home phone number.

I told them no one in my household accessed long distance on the internet and asked what web site was used. They could not tell me the web site, only that it was accessed through my home telephone number.

I called my local phone company and had them remove the charges and block future usage on this company. I since received a bill directly from OneCall Communications Inc. telling me I am obligated to pay. I have sent a letter of dispute to One Call Communications and filed a complaint with the FCC.

Kimberly
Colton, California
U.S.A.

This report was posted on Ripoff Report on 10/26/2005 02:49 PM and is a permanent record located here: https://www.ripoffreport.com/reports/navicomm-opticom-one-call-communications/carmel-indiana-46082/navicomm-opticom-one-call-communications-fradulent-billing-ripoff-carmel-indiana-162217. The posting time indicated is Arizona local time. Arizona does not observe daylight savings so the post time may be Mountain or Pacific depending on the time of year. Ripoff Report has an exclusive license to this report. It may not be copied without the written permission of Ripoff Report. READ: Foreign websites steal our content

Search for additional reports

If you would like to see more Rip-off Reports on this company/individual, search here:

Report & Rebuttal
Respond to this report!
What's this?
Also a victim?
What's this?
Repair Your Reputation!
What's this?

Updates & Rebuttals

REBUTTALS & REPLIES:
0Author
4Consumer
0Employee/Owner

#4 Author of original report

FCC Reply

AUTHOR: Kimberly - (U.S.A.)

POSTED: Saturday, September 23, 2006

In March, 2006, I received a reply from my complaint to the FCC on Navicomm telling me that they forwarded my complaint to the company. The FCC went on to say that they received a response from Navicomm and I should have received one as well (which I didn't!). The FCC also said to write them a letter if I did not receive a response from the company.

I wrote back to the FCC on April 25, 2006, to advise that I did not receive a response. So far, I have heard nothing, but a least I haven't received any more bills.

What amazes me is that companies like this could still be in business.

Respond to this report!
What's this?

#3 Author of original report

FCC Reply

AUTHOR: Kimberly - (U.S.A.)

POSTED: Saturday, September 23, 2006

In March, 2006, I received a reply from my complaint to the FCC on Navicomm telling me that they forwarded my complaint to the company. The FCC went on to say that they received a response from Navicomm and I should have received one as well (which I didn't!). The FCC also said to write them a letter if I did not receive a response from the company.

I wrote back to the FCC on April 25, 2006, to advise that I did not receive a response. So far, I have heard nothing, but a least I haven't received any more bills.

What amazes me is that companies like this could still be in business.

Respond to this report!
What's this?

#2 Author of original report

FCC Reply

AUTHOR: Kimberly - (U.S.A.)

POSTED: Saturday, September 23, 2006

In March, 2006, I received a reply from my complaint to the FCC on Navicomm telling me that they forwarded my complaint to the company. The FCC went on to say that they received a response from Navicomm and I should have received one as well (which I didn't!). The FCC also said to write them a letter if I did not receive a response from the company.

I wrote back to the FCC on April 25, 2006, to advise that I did not receive a response. So far, I have heard nothing, but a least I haven't received any more bills.

What amazes me is that companies like this could still be in business.

Respond to this report!
What's this?

#1 Author of original report

FCC Reply

AUTHOR: Kimberly - (U.S.A.)

POSTED: Saturday, September 23, 2006

In March, 2006, I received a reply from my complaint to the FCC on Navicomm telling me that they forwarded my complaint to the company. The FCC went on to say that they received a response from Navicomm and I should have received one as well (which I didn't!). The FCC also said to write them a letter if I did not receive a response from the company.

I wrote back to the FCC on April 25, 2006, to advise that I did not receive a response. So far, I have heard nothing, but a least I haven't received any more bills.

What amazes me is that companies like this could still be in business.

Respond to this report!
What's this?
Featured Reports

Advertisers above have met our
strict standards for business conduct.

X
What do hackers,
questionable attorneys and
fake court orders have in common?
...Dishonest Reputation Management Investigates Reputation Repair
Free speech rights compromised

WATCH News
Segment Now