Ripoff Report Needs Your Help!
X  |  CLOSE
Report: #1223369

Complaint Review: New Clients Inc. - Mullica Hill New Jersey

  • Submitted:
  • Updated:
  • Reported By: Tony — Lake Worth Florida USA
  • Author Not Confirmed What's this?
  • Why?
  • New Clients Inc. 124 Bridgeton Pike Mullica Hill, New Jersey USA

New Clients Inc. New Clients did not bring in any new clients Mullica Hill New Jersey

*REBUTTAL Owner of company: More than just facts are important

*REBUTTAL Owner of company: Everything he stated is correct except...

Show customers why they should trust your business over your competitors...

Is this
Report about YOU
listed on other sites?
Those sites steal
Ripoff Report's
content.
We can get those
removed for you!
Find out more here.
How to fix
Ripoff Report
If your business is
willing to make a
commitment to
customer satisfaction
Click here now..

I engaged New Clients Inc. (NCI) to help me increase the client base of my accounting and consulting business.  NCI offers business development services to accounting and CPA firms nationwide.  They guarantee that over a two-year period, a total of $300,000 in new annual billings would be achieved.  The program was set to begin in August, 2014. 

The NCI program includes the hiring is two part-time telemarketers/appointment setters plus a full-time salesperson.  NCI provides training as well as all materials required to initiate the program.  They will monitor the results and provide weekly phone calls to help increase the knowledge of the sales person.  The cost of the program had to be paid in advance.  In addition, NCI recommends that the client has working capital on hand to set up and run the program before it reaches the breakeven point.  They mandated that an office be leased and set up, which I did.

My program was initiated on August 18, 2014, at which time a representative of NCI came in for a week to interview telemarketer and sales person prospects.  I had placed an ad in the newspaper to find prospects to come in.  During this week, the interviews were held and the salesperson prospect and telemarketers were hired.  The telemarketers were to begin making calls and setting up appointments to lists of potential clients.  The NCI rep provided some initial training with the idea that the telemarketers would begin making calls and the salesman would start after a couple of weeks. 

Upon completion of the training, the sales operation would begin.  In my case, however, the sales rep quit before he really even started.  The people from NCI knew of a person that had served as salesperson for a local CPA firm and brought him in as a replacement.  The NCI rep would return in a couple of weeks to train the salesperson, going out on appointments together. 

Things went as planned and the operation began the week after Labor Day.  The telemarketers had made just a few appointments, which the rep and the salesperson went out on.  One client was signed up during the week.  However, that client canceled before we ever started working on it. 

Over the next several weeks, the marketing process was run, following the script and instructions of NCI.  The telemarketers did not achieve the number of appointments each week as NCI said should be achievable.  The salesperson did not sign up any other clients.  After a couple of months, I let one telemarketer go and left one on to see what the results would be.  In October, the salesperson quit because was not getting any clients and, consequently, making much money.  I figured that I could go out on appointments when any were booked.  There were very few booked and as the holiday period approached, I let the one remaining telemarketer go.

The NCI rep had thought that getting 20 or more new clients would have been possible in the path to the $300k in billings.  In reality, I had zero clients and zero revenue.  Because I had spent several thousand dollars and was low on funds, I had to put the program on hold while I worked consulting projects to pay the bills and make some money.  It was my hope that I might restart the program after the first of this year. 

I remained busy with client work and could not muster much enthusiasm for taking my hard-earned money and spending on the program that had proven totally ineffective in the past.  Does that make sense as a business decision?  If I had achieved even some lower-level results that would show promise that the program would work and sticking with it would get me to the $300k in annual billings.  But when the results were exactly ZERO, that was a hard leap for me to make.

I requested a refund of the amount that I had paid less their out-of-pocket costs in sending the rep in to my location.  I felt like that was more than fair.  I know that the guarantee for a two-year period of time, but it was clear that my market area was a tough nut to crack.  I was hoping that NCI would demonstrate a sense of honor and integrity and show that they prioritized the needs of their clients.  If so, I thought that a partial refund of the fee was not too much to ask for.

However, the response was a definite “No” and that I should go ahead and start over by hiring new people, with NCI’s help.  They would not come in to interview or train the telemarketers, but they would send someone in to train the salesperson. 

I must admit that I just couldn’t do it.  The thought of spending thousands of dollars more when the previous time failed so miserably was too much for me.  As it is, I am still paying for an office that I have no need for and virtually never use. 

I again asked for some help from NCI.  They offered to refund me the amount that they would not be spending to send in another rep, but that’s it.  Apparently, they thought that keeping my fee that was not earned and was not used to cover actual expenses was not a reasonable expectation on my part.

After going through this process, an accountant looking into the program could do all of this without the help of a firm like NCI.  The NCI phone script is very basic and ineffective.  They really don’t help much.  I engaged them thinking that they would achieve the promised results but that just didn’t happen. 

I would encourage anyone looking into this program to think very hard about it.  I would be happy to share my experience with anyone who is interested.

This report was posted on Ripoff Report on 04/18/2015 07:17 PM and is a permanent record located here: https://www.ripoffreport.com/reports/new-clients-inc/mullica-hill-new-jersey-08062/new-clients-inc-new-clients-did-not-bring-in-any-new-clients-mullica-hill-new-jersey-1223369. The posting time indicated is Arizona local time. Arizona does not observe daylight savings so the post time may be Mountain or Pacific depending on the time of year. Ripoff Report has an exclusive license to this report. It may not be copied without the written permission of Ripoff Report. READ: Foreign websites steal our content

Search for additional reports

If you would like to see more Rip-off Reports on this company/individual, search here:

Report & Rebuttal
Respond to this report!
What's this?
Also a victim?
What's this?
Repair Your Reputation!
What's this?

Updates & Rebuttals

REBUTTALS & REPLIES:
0Author
0Consumer
2Employee/Owner

#2 REBUTTAL Owner of company

More than just facts are important

AUTHOR: Tp florida - (U.S.A.)

POSTED: Friday, June 12, 2015

 

We are both stating "facts".  NCI is correct that I could have restarted the whole program from scratch.  But the program didn't just underperform, meaning I got clients but not as many as expected.  I got ZERO clients.  They recommend an amount of working capital to have in order to establish the program and you eventually reach a breakeven point.  I spent all of that and more.  Now they want me to spend that most of that same amount of money again but expecting entirely different results.  Is that reasonable?  I don't have that amount of money to risk a second time when the only information that I have different from the time I originally launched the program is that it completely failed. 

How many business owners would repeat a marketing approach that got absolutely nothing as a result?  I imagine not many.

So think very hard before getting involved with these guys.  They stand behind their written agreements, but they don't support their clients.

Respond to this report!
What's this?

#1 REBUTTAL Owner of company

Everything he stated is correct except...

AUTHOR: New Clients INC - (USA)

POSTED: Monday, June 01, 2015

Everything this client states is correct from a factual standpoint. It's what he does not state that is telling. NCI's Plan 2 program and been very successful for hundreds of CPAs and accountants nationwide but is not without certain risks. These risks are clearly outlined in 'exhibit e - statement of risk factors' in our Plan 2 contract. Those risks are loss of clients due to natural attrition, low productivity of marketing personnel and turnover of marketing personnel. Anyone who has ever hired any employee knows that it is far from an exact science. While we are very good at selecting and training salespeople and appointment setters, the people we hired and trained failed to perform as expected in this case. As is called for in our contract, we then attempted to hire and train a new marketing team for this client. At first the client agreed to this then decided to delay the process and finally decided not to re-implement. While we respect this decision we can also cite numerous instances with other clients where a second salesperson was the one that made the program a huge success. This client decided to quit after only nine weeks of effort. Had I quit after my first salesperson didn't work out I would not be in business today. Neither would many of our successful clients. NCI also offered to refund to the client our direct cost to reinstall the program, he declined our offer and chose to take his grievance public.

Respond to this report!
What's this?
Featured Reports

Advertisers above have met our
strict standards for business conduct.

X
What do hackers,
questionable attorneys and
fake court orders have in common?
...Dishonest Reputation Management Investigates Reputation Repair
Free speech rights compromised

WATCH News
Segment Now