X  |  CLOSE
Report: #1349978

Complaint Review: One Dog at a Time - Lewistown, PA

  • Submitted:
  • Updated:
  • Reported By: AAPI — parker Pennsylvania USA
  • Author Not Confirmed What's this?
  • Why?
  • One Dog at a Time 225 Meadow Wooods Drive Lewistown, , PA USA

One Dog at a Time Kari Coble Accepted stolen property and hid it to keep it parker Pennsylvania

*Author of original report: NOT CIVIL

*Consumer Comment: It's a civil matter, not a criminal one.

Show customers why they should trust your business over your competitors...

Is this
Report about YOU
listed on other sites?
Those sites steal
Ripoff Report's
content.
We can get those
removed for you!
Find out more here.
How to fix
Ripoff Report
If your business is
willing to make a
commitment to
customer satisfaction
Click here now..

Kari Coble accepted a horse from Vickie d**k, whom adopted horse named Sozo from AAPI. Ms Coble knew the horse was under adoption contract and has refused to give the hose back to AAPI. Coble has adopted him out under One Dog at a Time and has done so illegally. Vicke d**k was sued in court and AAPI won. Coble still refuses to return Sozo to AAPI. It has come to our attention that Ms. Coble has LIED to alot of dog owners by promising to help them and then adopting out thier dogs and again refusing to return them. Ms. Coble is currently being sued for the return of Sozo and all costs involved in his return to AAPI. Now how could any so called rescue be so shady and be involved inillegal action? I have attached a picture of Sozo and the results of Vickie d**k lawsuit. So if you have Sozo you have him illegally and need to contact AAPI immediately at 724-698-5147 before the sherrif comes knocking on your door which will not be long now as  procedure has been filed thru Court of Common Please. 

 

This report was posted on Ripoff Report on 01/15/2017 07:50 AM and is a permanent record located here: https://www.ripoffreport.com/reports/one-dog-at-a-time/lewistown-pa-17044/one-dog-at-a-time-kari-coble-accepted-stolen-property-and-hid-it-to-keep-it-parker-pennsyl-1349978. The posting time indicated is Arizona local time. Arizona does not observe daylight savings so the post time may be Mountain or Pacific depending on the time of year. Ripoff Report has an exclusive license to this report. It may not be copied without the written permission of Ripoff Report. READ: Foreign websites steal our content

Search for additional reports

If you would like to see more Rip-off Reports on this company/individual, search here:

Report & Rebuttal
Respond to this report!
What's this?
Also a victim?
What's this?
Repair Your Reputation!
What's this?

Updates & Rebuttals

REBUTTALS & REPLIES:
1Author
1Consumer
0Employee/Owner

#2 Author of original report

NOT CIVIL

AUTHOR: - ()

POSTED: Friday, October 13, 2017

sorry VD has not EVER owned the horse named SOZO he was adopted under contratc agreement that clearly states she does NOT own said animal. AAPi is the rightful legal owner.  ODAAT has stolen property and refused AAPI the right to regain their LEGAL property. Ms VD admitted in court giving sozo to ODAAT/Keri Coble instaed of returning sozo as per her contract which she breeched. If you see AAPI has sued VD and won. As you have seen ODAAT//Coble are being sued in the court of common please to the sum of $7,000 and the return of Sozo. NOw what so called rescue would take another rescues property (KNOWINGLY) and hide it and refuse to return it knowing it is under contract??? do your homework! The court of common Pleas will prove sozo in fact is stolen property and return him.

Respond to this report!
What's this?

#1 Consumer Comment

It's a civil matter, not a criminal one.

AUTHOR: Steve - (USA)

POSTED: Thursday, October 12, 2017

VD is a well-known hoarder.  The dog warden has a large file on her and she has been banned from adopting from various shelters throughout the country.  In any case, if VD violated her contract with AAPI, then AAPI has every right to pursue that matter in court.  However, the horse is not "stolen property" as VD was the legal owner and transferred ownership, legally, to ODAAT.  The matter you describe is purely a civil one, which I am certain you have already been told by the police else you wouldn't have taken the matter to civil court.  By stating that she has committed a crime when you know this matter is in fact a civil one, you have opened yourself up to the possibility of a civil suit for libel.

FWIW, I have no stake in this matter and no relationship with ODAAT or Coble.  I simply came across this when searching for another matter related to this rescue.

Respond to this report!
What's this?

Advertisers above have met our
strict standards for business conduct.

X
What do hackers,
questionable attorneys and
fake court orders have in common?
...Dishonest Reputation Management Investigates Reputation Repair
Free speech rights compromised

WATCH News
Segment Now