Ripoff Report Needs Your Help!
X  |  CLOSE
Report: #336296

Complaint Review: Paul Randle-Jolliffe - Ryde Internet

  • Submitted:
  • Updated:
  • Reported By: Portsmouth Other
  • Author Confirmed What's this?
  • Why?
  • Paul Randle-Jolliffe Salvation Army Or Doss House Ryde Or Portsmouth Internet United Kingdom

Show customers why they should trust your business over your competitors...

Is this
Report about YOU
listed on other sites?
Those sites steal
Ripoff Report's
content.
We can get those
removed for you!
Find out more here.
How to fix
Ripoff Report
If your business is
willing to make a
commitment to
customer satisfaction
Click here now..

This Tramp is the lowest of low.
He never works and never wants to. He uses the old "it's not my fault" for what goes wrong, it's always someone else.
He is a serial liar and con Man. I caught him driving with no license, extracting funds for his wild a*s schemes of business to which all have a similar note. They are basically "Invest in my idea" and for your return I will claim from the State for my Rent, food and living cost. For your Investment, I will stay in bed until at least 2.00pm each day, always be late for any proposed meetings and generally F*ck Up Everything I am left to deal with.
I can confirm that I saw Mr Paul Randle-Jolliffe's report by someone from South Africa and can confirm that he left many people out of pocket with his Telecom Scheme to which he blames BT for the mistakes which is pure "BULL SH*T". Mr Jolliffe, take it on the chin, it's like everything you do, it's your lazy attitude and failure to put in more than 20 minuets in one day that is the problem.
You are a liar, you left your family in debt with phone bill's, credit cards etc. You are Con Man, a Fraudster and General all round "Lazy Bast*rd".
You should be reported on www.freewebs.com/name-shame which I have sen and con confirm you fit all the requirements to be on.

James
Portsmouth
United Kingdom

This report was posted on Ripoff Report on 06/02/2008 06:14 AM and is a permanent record located here: https://www.ripoffreport.com/reports/paul-randle-jolliffe/internet/paul-randle-jolliffe-fraudster-thief-lazy-bastrd-bum-tramp-twt-pervert-freak-dru-336296. The posting time indicated is Arizona local time. Arizona does not observe daylight savings so the post time may be Mountain or Pacific depending on the time of year. Ripoff Report has an exclusive license to this report. It may not be copied without the written permission of Ripoff Report. READ: Foreign websites steal our content

Search for additional reports

If you would like to see more Rip-off Reports on this company/individual, search here:

Report & Rebuttal
Respond to this report!
What's this?
Also a victim?
What's this?
Repair Your Reputation!
What's this?

Updates & Rebuttals

REBUTTALS & REPLIES:
0Author
0Consumer
4Employee/Owner

#4 REBUTTAL Individual responds

defamation removal by google

AUTHOR: Myconcept - (United Kingdom)

POSTED: Wednesday, April 20, 2016

this report has now been removed by google.co.uk search for defamation

 

Respond to this report!
What's this?

#3 REBUTTAL Individual responds

Peter Hulbert the Fraudster

AUTHOR: Myconcept - ()

POSTED: Saturday, November 23, 2013

walesonline.co.uk/news/wales-news/fraudster-jailed-over-600000-welsh-5907959

 

Fraudster jailed over £600,000 Welsh Government hovercraft racing scam

11 Sep 2013 15:17

Peter Hulbert, 54, from Sheffield, sentenced to four years in prison after trying to convince the Welsh Government to back a racing hovercraft scheme

 

Accessories and Abettors Act 1861

AUTHOR: Fraud by poster - ()

In English Law the above and others posts about me are criminal offences under the Malicious Communications Act 1988 as they are 1 filed in false names and 2 are false and misleading.
 
THE REAL POSTER IS ONE PETER HULBERT OF SHEFFiELD UK
 
In English Law  any assistance to a criminal in this case by Rippoffreport and Google etc are offenders under the 

Accessories and Abettors Act 1861

8Abettors in misdemeanors.

Whosoever shall aid, abet, counsel, or procure the commission of [F1any indictable offence] , whether the same be [F1an offence] at common law or by virtue of any Act passed or to be passed, shall be liable to be tried, indicted, and punished as a principal offender. 

This serves as notice that they should be removed by Google and Ripoffreport.

1Offence of sending letters etc. with intent to cause distress or anxiety.

(1)Any person who sends to another person—

(a)a [F1letter, electronic communication or article of any description] which conveys—

(i)a message which is indecent or grossly offensive;

(ii)a threat; or

(iii)information which is false and known or believed to be false by the sender; or

 
And
 
Protection from Harassment Act 1997 CHAPTER 40 and as amended by 
 
s44 Criminal Justice and Police Act 2001, ss1(1A)
 

s1 Prohibition of harassment

(1) A person must not pursue a course of conduct-

(a) which amounts to harassment of another, and

(b) which he knows or ought to know amounts to harassment of the other.

(1A) A person must not pursue a course of conduct -

(a) which involves harassment of two or more persons, and

(b) which he knows or ought to know involves harassment of those persons, and

(c) by which he intends to persuade any person (whether or not one of those mentioned above)-

(i) not to do something that he is entitled or required to do, or

(ii) to do something that he is not under any obligation to do

 

I.E. TO STOP ME PERUSING MY LAWFUL RIGHTS IN COURT which also constitutes and attempt by him to pervert the course of justice.

 

2A Offence of stalking

(1)A person is guilty of an offence if—

(a)the person pursues a course of conduct in breach of section 1(1), and

(b)the course of conduct amounts to stalking.

(2)For the purposes of subsection (1)(b) (and section 4A(1)(a)) a person’s course of conduct amounts to stalking of another person if—

(a)it amounts to harassment of that person,

(b)the acts or omissions involved are ones associated with stalking, and

(c)the person whose course of conduct it is knows or ought to know that the course of conduct amounts to harassment of the other person.

(3)The following are examples of acts or omissions which, in particular circumstances, are ones associated with stalking—

(a)following a person,

(b)contacting, or attempting to contact, a person by any means,

(c)publishing any statement or other material—

(i)relating or purporting to relate to a person, or

(ii)purporting to originate from a person,

(d)monitoring the use by a person of the internet, email or any other form of electronic communication,

 
You will see I am accused of serious criminal offences and yet no report has been made to the police.
 
 
They are all posted by one Person Peter Hulbert of Sheffield 
 
As the posts have directly affected my ability to earn money, IE caused a loss of income to me the posts also constitute fraud under section 2 of the Fraud Act 2006
 
2 Fraud by false representation
 
(1)A person is in breach of this section if he—
(a)dishonestly makes a false representation, and
(b)intends, by making the representation—
(i)to make a gain for himself or another, or
(ii)to cause loss to another or to expose another to a risk of loss.
(2)A representation is false if—
(a)it is untrue or misleading, and
(b)the person making it knows that it is, or might be, untrue or misleading.
(3)“Representation” means any representation as to fact or law, including a representation as to the state of mind of—
(a)the person making the representation, or
(b)any other person.
(4)A representation may be express or implied.
(5)For the purposes of this section a representation may be regarded as made if it (or anything implying it) is submitted in any form to any system or device designed to receive, convey or respond to communications (with or without human intervention).
 
“Loss” includes a loss by not getting what one might get, as well as a loss by parting with what one has.
Respond to this report!
What's this?

#2 REBUTTAL Individual responds

Accessories and Abettors Act 1861

AUTHOR: Rebutal - ()

POSTED: Saturday, November 23, 2013
Respond to this report!
What's this?

#1 REBUTTAL Individual responds

AnotherPeter Hulbert Hoax

AUTHOR: Myconcept - (United Kingdom)

POSTED: Thursday, June 19, 2008

Just like the others another Peter Hulbert Hoax.

Yawn!!!!

Respond to this report!
What's this?
Featured Reports

Advertisers above have met our
strict standards for business conduct.

X
What do hackers,
questionable attorneys and
fake court orders have in common?
...Dishonest Reputation Management Investigates Reputation Repair
Free speech rights compromised

WATCH News
Segment Now