Complaint Review: Prime Properties - DFW Prime Properties - Dallas Texas
- Prime Properties - DFW Prime Properties www.PrimeProp.com Dallas, Texas United States of America
- Phone:
- Web:
- Category: Property Management
Prime Properties - DFW Prime Properties I was harrassed, lied to, had false charges filed against me, found company was in violation of Code of Ethics from TREC and NARPM, their actions fell under Improper Collection Tactics, and much more! Dallas, Texas
* : Prime Properties Response
listed on other sites?
Those sites steal
Ripoff Report's
content.
We can get those
removed for you!
Find out more here.
Ripoff Report
willing to make a
commitment to
customer satisfaction
Click here now..
I've been through so much with Prime Properties the past 6 months, I almost don't know where to begin. I have called into their office disputing fees charged to my bill only to have my phone call returned via email with a definition of how the contract reads, and what certain terms in the contract mean to me. 2 months later, I received another email in response to a phone call defining these same exact terms a completely different way--basically to say I owed more money than I really did. I've received countless false eviction notices on my door claiming I was being evicted for unpaid rent, eventhough Prime Properties already had my payment, processed my payment, and emailed me a statement. Then they actually had the nerve to include a filing charge on my next bill.
After countless degrading emails, I decided to do a little investigating of my own. I found 47 complaints on BBB, and 4 open Investigations with TREC (How are these guys still in business). In my situation alone, they have violated numerous Code of Ethics standards set by TREC, and 7 out of 10 standards set by NARPM. They have used "Improper Collection Tactics" as a way to humiliate me and my family in our neighborhood in an effort to get us to not renew our lease. They most recently were found in Breach of Contract which they say is a matter between the Landlord (owner) and myself---eventhough they signed the contract as acting on behalf of the Landlord. They claim to not have known they were In Breach because previous tenants never requested access to the ammenities they advertised (don't even get me started on False Advertising and Misrepresentation).
This month, they received my payment no later than the 2nd (not sure of exact day since it was sent by my bank--but we'll give them the benefit of the doubt that they didn't get it till the 2nd). They waited till the 5th (1:26pm--a Saturday--just after the banks had closed! Prime Properties isn't even open on Saturday!), to claim that they were sending my payment back without depositing it because the bank couldn't verify the funds via the phone. Oh yes......and they were going to conviently charge me late fees since they started accruing yesterday. I checked my account--just in case--and funds are there. I guess this is their attempt to keep my deposit since my lease is up next month. I'm considering filing civil and criminal charges. Any suggestions?
This report was posted on Ripoff Report on 09/05/2009 10:25 PM and is a permanent record located here: https://www.ripoffreport.com/reports/prime-properties-dfw-prime-properties/dallas-texas-75252/prime-properties-dfw-prime-properties-i-was-harrassed-lied-to-had-false-charges-filed-490840. The posting time indicated is Arizona local time. Arizona does not observe daylight savings so the post time may be Mountain or Pacific depending on the time of year. Ripoff Report has an exclusive license to this report. It may not be copied without the written permission of Ripoff Report. READ: Foreign websites steal our content
If you would like to see more Rip-off Reports on this company/individual, search here:



#1
Prime Properties Response
AUTHOR: Kevin martin - (U.S.A.)
SUBMITTED: Wednesday, September 16, 2009
It is unfortunate that this person has had the difficulties which they
have had. The real root of their problems lie in the fact that they
have repeatedly paid their rent late or with checks that were returned
as NSF (three times in less than a year). Their lease requires rent be
paid on or before the first day each month. Their lease also requires
they pay the rent in certified funds as a result of the fact that in
the first ten months of their tenancy they have had three personal
checks returned as NSF.
It is true that their landlord waived a portion of a late fee early on
in their tenancy but their landlord no longer wants to make allowances
for this tenant. All tenants who have not paid on time receive a
notice. The content of this notice is defined by Texas law and it says
you must leave immediately. This tenant agreed to do certain things
when they signed the lease. Some of these include 1) they agreed to
pay rent on or before the first each month 2) they agreed that if the
rent was not in on time they would pay specific late fees as defined in
the lease 3) they agreed that if the landlord incurred any expense to
collect on unpaid rent they would reimburse the landlord these fees.
There have been no fees assessed to this tenant other than what this
tenant agreed to in the lease.
It is clear that this tenant did not fully understand the content of
the lease, but they were advised before they signed the lease and again
recently that if they did not understand what their obligations are
they should consult an attorney to help them understand. Their
landlord feels this lease is fair and does not want to change the
lease. Prime Properties suggested the tenant, who is almost at the end
of the lease, ask the landlord for an early release from the lease so
they can find a different Landlord with a different lease, and they
refused this suggestion.
Regarding their issue about breach of contract on the lease. The lease
requires that the Landlord stay current on their mortgage and all HOA
dues. The tenant found out the Landlord was behind on their HOA dues
which meant they did not have access to HOA facilities like the
community pool. This is a breach on the landlords part. In response
to this issue the Landlord authorized a payment to the HOA and their
account was brought current within seven days of notification of their
delinquency. In our experience we do not know what recourse the tenant
has for the fact that the Landlord was not current with their HOA dues
(we are Realtors, not lawyers). Our response was to work with the
Landlord to assist them in solving the deliquency, which they did in a
prompt manner.
This month the landlord has not received the rent at all, because this
tenant has decided to send a bank draft after they had already been
notified that a bank draft is no longer acceptable way to pay their
rent because of their three prior NSF's. Again, this is clearly
spelled out in the lease. We do not make up the rules, the rules are
what is in the lease which both the tenant and the landlord agreed.
Since no rent has yet been received, late fees are accruing up to the
maximum amount defined in the lease.
Regarding the deposit. One of the services Prime Properties provides
landlord is the accounting of security deposits after a tenant leaves.
All deposits are accounted for in strict accordance with the lease and
the law. Texas law states if a tenant leaves and still owes rent the
Landlord is not required to send any of the deposit back to the tenant
ir even account for how the deposit is applied (Chapter 92 of Texas
Property Code). For Landlords which Prime Properties represents an
accounting is always sent to the tenant regardless so they can see how
the deposit is applied. The deposit is first applied to satisfy any
unpaid rent obligations. The next thing a deposit may be applied to is
any collection fees the owner paid to collect outstanding debts from
the tenant, then any repair expense the Landlord incurs to fix things
which are beyond normal wear and tear, and last to any late fees the
tenant may owe. Prime Properties does not get to keep any of these
monies, if money is sent to a Landlord after a tenant leaves it is
strictly to reimburse them for owed rent or expenses that they have
already paid for. Of course there can sometimes be mistakes, so Prime
Properties offers all tenants the opportunity to bring any errors in
their accounting to our attention so the Landlord can fix it by sending
additional funds which may have been incorrectly withheld.
This tenant says they have considered filing civil and criminal charges
and asks for suggestions. I have already reminded them of the fact
that should talk to a lawyer. I have reviewed this situation
thoroughly and believe the problems stem from a basic misunderstanding
of their obligations. I cannot see where they have been treated
unfairly, and their landlord has responded to each and every issue in a
timely manner.
Regarding their comments about the BBB. It is true that Prime
Properties has had complaints filed through the BBB from unsatisfied
tenants. Prime Properties responds to each and every compliant sent to
us by the BBB. Most of the complaints at the BBB have to do with
security deposits not returned. Prime Properties does not get to make
these final decisions, but we do assist the Landlord in these
accountings, providing them our experience on what is allowed in the
lease and the law. Prime Properties will not assist or represent a
Landlord who will treat a tenant unfairly or knowingly default on their
obligations to a tenant. We have been in business for over twenty
years and we have never had a client withhold funds from a tenant in
bad faith in an attempt to cheat the tenant. We appreciate the work
done by the BBB by providing consumers a vehicle to make sure their
complaints are heard. We do not depend on the BBB to provide this
function for us, but if someone files a complaint through the BBB we
will respond in a prompt and thorough manner.
This person also mentions TREC complaints. We have only had one TREC
complaint filed which I am aware of and a TREC investigation determined
that Prime Properties was at fault for not properly registering our
Austin, Texas branch office. This was remedied by filing the proper
form with TREC in Austin along with a $20.00 fee. I am not aware that
any of our clients or their tenants were harmed by this infraction.
After all of the above
I do not want anyone to think that Prime Properties is always faultless
and never makes a mistake. In the business we are in there are many
opportunities to be far less than perfect. We at Prime Properties have
a strong commitment to listen to our clients and their tenants, to take
every suggestion and strive to continue to improve. When we are made
aware of an error our goal is to understand the issue and fix it as
quickly as possible wherever possible. I had a tenant complain because
I raised my voice to them in a phone conversation. I could not fix
that, but I did apologize and I try to never do that again. This
person accepted my apology, but not everyone would.
Last, I invite anyone who has a rant or rave about our firm to contact
me directly. I can only fix the issues which I am aware of. In the
issue of the person who wrote this complaint, Prime Properties cannot
fix their issue, as the landlord has told me that because they cannot
pay their rent as they agreed to do in their lease, then they cannot
continue to rent from them.


Advertisers above have met our
strict standards for business conduct.