Ripoff Report Needs Your Help!
X  |  CLOSE
Report: #343296

Complaint Review: ScriptShark - Los Angeles California

  • Submitted:
  • Updated:
  • Reported By: Los Angeles California
  • Author Confirmed What's this?
  • Why?
  • ScriptShark 3415 S. Sepulveda Blvd Los Angeles, California U.S.A.

ScriptShark It costs only $155 for your screenplay to not be read by anyone! Los Angeles California

Show customers why they should trust your business over your competitors...

Is this
Report about YOU
listed on other sites?
Those sites steal
Ripoff Report's
content.
We can get those
removed for you!
Find out more here.
How to fix
Ripoff Report
If your business is
willing to make a
commitment to
customer satisfaction
Click here now..

I paid for ScriptShark coverage under the premise that they would read the screenplay, write an accurate synopsis, write coverage tailored for it, and possibly refer it.

They did none of these things.

The synopsis was obviously written by someone who had "thumbed" the screenplay. The entire thing was riddled with mistakes. Mistakes like repeatedly writing things that never happened in the screenplay. Mistakes like incredibly obvious, glaring, spelling/grammar errors in every other sentence.

The coverage was just a bunch of all-purpose general theory (the function of a protagonist, what a premise is, etc.). It seems that they just send the exact same coverage to everyone and sprinkle it with a few comments that are actually relevant to the screenplay at hand.

The company lures writers on the promise that they'll help promote a great screenplay if they get one. Read their "successes" page to see how laughable this is. They employ nine readers who can probably collectively handle a couple hundred scripts a day (it would only take twenty minutes to hammer out the type of crap coverage that I got) and yet they only have SEVEN "success stories" for the entire years of 2006 and 2007. What's more, if you look at the wording, only one of these modest successes seems to actually have anything to do with ScriptShark's involvement (and for some reason that success is listed twice - for both 2006 AND 2007). All the rest say something to the effect of, "John Doe, who once paid for ScriptShark coverage, signed with NoName management."

I'm betting John Doe got that success on his own. Save your money people. You have to go through enough heartache in this business as it is.

Writer_guy
Los Angeles, California
U.S.A.

This report was posted on Ripoff Report on 06/23/2008 03:30 PM and is a permanent record located here: https://www.ripoffreport.com/reports/scriptshark/los-angeles-california-90034/scriptshark-it-costs-only-155-for-your-screenplay-to-not-be-read-by-anyone-los-angeles-c-343296. The posting time indicated is Arizona local time. Arizona does not observe daylight savings so the post time may be Mountain or Pacific depending on the time of year. Ripoff Report has an exclusive license to this report. It may not be copied without the written permission of Ripoff Report. READ: Foreign websites steal our content

Search for additional reports

If you would like to see more Rip-off Reports on this company/individual, search here:

Report & Rebuttal
Respond to this report!
What's this?
Also a victim?
What's this?
Repair Your Reputation!
What's this?
Featured Reports

Advertisers above have met our
strict standards for business conduct.

X
What do hackers,
questionable attorneys and
fake court orders have in common?
...Dishonest Reputation Management Investigates Reputation Repair
Free speech rights compromised

WATCH News
Segment Now