Shandakr Shanda Lancaster/Maddox Shanda Hill aka Reynolds aka Ross singsnap, shandakr,mental illness,prescription drugs, harassment, libel, lawsuits, criminal charges, liar, adulterer Dickson, Tennessee

On August 25th, 2011 a lawsuit was filed against SingSnap.com founder and CEO Trevor McGuire as well as three other members of the SingSnap website. This lawsuit filed in Pennsylvania Federal Court by Diane Patchen and her fianc Robert Smik, alleged, among other things, a conspiracy to defame and copyright infringement. Eatsleepmusic Corporation, owner of SingSnap, was later added as a defendant.

Diane Patchen was banned from the SingSnap community in February of 2010 and soon after made numerous inaccurate posts around the web regarding Mr. McGuire and his business. Filing this lawsuit against him was, Mr. McGuire believes, the culmination of her vendetta. As soon as the lawsuit was filed, it was publicized on dozens of Internet complaint boards by anonymous posters.

McGuire and SingSnap immediately retained counsel to fight these ridiculous and baseless allegations.

On September 27th, 2012 the Judge William H. Yohn Jr. of the United States District Court DISMISSED all of the Plaintiffs claims and Denied the motion for severance and transfer of the claims as not in the interests of justice because the claims were frivolous. The parties later resolved the litigation, including motions by McGuire and Eatsleepmusic Corporation seeking sanctions and their attorneys fees, to the satisfaction of all parties.

Beauty is in the eye of the beholder.

Everyone is beautiful in their own way.

I do not think that personal remarks about the former defendants appearance will help you now. 

These people could look like the elephant man for all people care. You still lost.

Most people, while perhaps not catwalk models still have beauty on the inside, not a black soul intent on inflicting as much misery as possible. I wonder what you see when you look in the mirror each day, how you sleep at night and how you can live with the guilt of spreading your hate as far and wide as it can possibly go. There will come a time when you will ask for forgiveness, I hope it is denied.

Katie and Shanda are beautiful?  Lol  Doesn't take much to impress you and you dont set your standards very high.

One has nothing to do with the other, eh?  Oh, how wrong you are!  You obviously owned or at least partially owned that hate site, you know, the one responsible for posting defamation and libel all over the Internet for two years or so?  You may think we are all stupid but we are not.  As for crazy... I think a trip to a doctor may be wise for you (before someone forces you there). 

That hate site was behind the uploading of a video my husband made on SingSnap... THAT was copyright infringement since ESM owns the video.  DMCA did a take down on it otherwise I would post the URL now. It's just as well though since I really don't care anymore... there are much more important things to me now.  So, grow up, get over it, move on... surely you can find something better to do in your spare time (at least until your time is up).

December 3rd... that's 2 days before my birthday... maybe I will get my wish.

First of all, most men prefer their women to have curves. Unless they prefer men of course, or a close facsimile thereof. I can't figure out why a woman in her sixties would be referring to others in a ridiculing way regarding perimenopause. Shanda and Katie are beautiful, talented and happy women and you are jealous. Katie has had several careers you say? Well at least she has one! You do too I guess if being a Hater counts. It seems to be full time work for you and you are dedicated to your craft but this does not look very good on a resume.

Another point that needs to be clarified is the constant references to the Plaintiff and the Defendants. This should be former Plaintiff and former Defendants, cause this case is closed. In fact the former Plaintiff is now on the defensive in the next hearing but that is another story. Also, the former Plaintiff lost her case. She tried and she lost. It seems even the other haters have abandoned her.

More threats of continued litigation I see. This is too funny to pass up. Not going to happen. Not notwithstanding the fact that there has been no crime, there is no lawyer on the planet who would take this case on given the current ruling and the pending hearing for sanctions against the former Plaintiff and her attorney.

This case has ten foot pole marks all over it. (for you haters, this means no one would touch it with a ten foot pole, further simplified, it ain't gonna happen Bertha! LMAO)

You must be in an absolute rage having suffered such a damning defeat. A complete loss. It must hurt all the more given your bravado at the outset, how you rallied the haters around you to spread the word when you filed this frivolous lawsuit. Now everyone is laughing at you. You have no idea how much joy your lunatic ramblings are giving people. Very fitting and unbelievably satisfying.

Not so funny now, is it?

#46 Individual RespondsOMGosh... LOL!!!

really? doesn't matter does it in the scheme of things. you know WHO uploaded the video so you prove you didn't use his account. he has no idea really what u did and stop mixing up your crap with the site and the case one has nothing to do with the other. sue them or shut the f up about them. 

think it is u that is delusional or just nuts. well everyone knows and i am sure including the judge as well. you 2 fat peri menopausal women need the mall walking now dontcha ? I can see those bellies on u both spreading day by day and u say i don't get it i hardly eat a bite lol in fact u both have been fat your entire lives. so nothing too alarming for you both. katie u are so hung up on your nasty vicious comments u can't even breathe when u type.

lets just say the lies u have told in your life to people is more amusing than any book i have ever read. yes people talk about u nutty women even people from snap. can't believe the crap i have heard about katie especially. she has so many possible career's it is hysterical. she claims to have a masters in pr and she has none. she claims to have had an offer for a recording contract. nope she said she was a hopeful Olympic skater .

nope not with that lard a** . she claims a lot of things but the truth is she is nothing more than a health care worker who cleans bed pans . shanda became an advocate against online bullying after learning it so well from all her practice on a hate site she was a member of. katie was a member there too well after their out in the open online confessions of harassment. u two are as nuts as the man u follow so you have some nerve calling anyone insane.

where is your made up brother by the way? judge seemed to have dismissed a person who didn't exist. loony tunes so next time u want to call women old look at that ugly witch face of yours in the mirror and you have not even hit 50 yet and u look like an old hag. shanda let up on the bottle blonde sh*t your putting in your hair or take ur fat a*s to a place that knows how to color hair must be some in hick town. see how d u like being called names.

oh and katie u can't sing. u are not adele never will be and u will never be anything but a loser karaoke singer. at least shanda's lies were only to protect herself from not getting in trouble. she did not create an entire pretend life beginning with that pic of a young pretty girl named caterina as if a persons face changes that much as they age to 40 lol u are hysterical.

as for the plantiff pretty sure whether u all think she is insane and u are off the hook u probably will be hearing from her again if she has the good sense we think she does. . after all the judge said she could. take that and stuff it up the crack of your fat a*s. lol  so who am i? sally? judy? michael? do u realize there are people who knew what was going on all along other than the people u claim are haters who thought what u all did was despicable and a lot are members of snap.

so guess away oh smart bleached blonde witch a long with the lot of u lol. your comments only help for a new case idiots. but by all means keep it up. oh and yes katie they may come after u too better run and hide. maybe to your fake brothers house . go  and do your witches cackle on halloween or save it for the next judge. blahhhhhhhhhhhh mental case witches on their brooms beware their faces alone are enough to scare. 

Yes, we understand the point you are trying to make, repeatedly. We get it. She can file again. People can sue the lot of you too, or anyone else for that matter. Every last hateful one of you. Like I said it is a free country. Judges obviously enjoy these grade school spats as you can tell from the ruling. (that was sarcasm, for you haters that means the judge does not really enjoy it, I was making fun of you) lol

Of course the definition of Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results, so knock yourselves out. 

Now, you can say what you like to try to intimidate Shanda but I do not think you do at this point. She knows this is over, case closed. No one else is intimidated by the empty threats either. I do wonder one thing and do give it some thought. Do you have any idea at the amusement this situation must bring some people? The sheer joy and howls of laughter that ring out when reading your barely legible drivel? Awesome!

So keep on with the threats and endless possibilities from your astute legal minds. Whatever floats your rickety boat! 

Yawn. Seriously, you old girls need to get out more or something. Maybe try a mall walking group?

That is the comment I put on the video SingSnapSucks2 stole and uploaded of my husbands!  Unbelievable.

the screen shot u posted has no relevance regarding the plaintiff as you said in a previous comment you posted her video for tit for tat. if u had issue with the site why go after the plaintiff personally? the date of that video is april 9th. it is your hubbys nic . It still does not explain why no1knows is on the email from youtube in regards to the link you admitted sending to singsnapsucks2. but then again as another posted mentioned you accused her of being the owner of this site which was libel. 

the burden would be on you to prove you did not use your hubbys account to upload the video to youtube of Diane. You said investigation will prove who it was that uploaded that video and you still claim it came to you anonymously. no such thing if there was an email address that the link was on. and again the chances of just coming across a video on u tube are one in a million unless you did it or u know who did it. but keep on with your stories they are amusing and well u did say u did not care anymore. you should. 

(To number 42 AND 43) Based on how you write and spell it would appear not smart but I believe all that bad grammar is just an act.  I know who you are and why you are doing what you are doing.  You have a heart full of hate which really has nothing to do with me, other defendants, the video, or even the case! 

You are not confused, you are not unintelligent... you are evil.  I rebuke you and your evil.  THE CASE IS DISMISSED!  I find it enormously unlikely you were ever embarrassed or humiliated since you had over FOUR HUNDRED views and numerous comments while the video was on SingSnap.  You enjoyed those views and comments, did you not?  Yes, you did.

no that was not u sending an email of a video of your hubby. and again the date of the video being put on u tube april 22nd the date u opened the account ALLhatersSUCK april 22nd. The day u opened the other account allthehaterssuck april 22nd. why prey tell would u be sending a video of your hubby to anyone? and it clearly states what the video was. try again. and u tube will be able to identify the video so have no doubt.

you made a statement here earlier that u did send the email but u received the email anonymously that too is not true and can be found out. u said u did not care because u did not upload the video.  fact is again u did not do this as a tit for tat as you stated in another of your comments here. you posted it out of pure evil to embarrass someone and humiliate them. the fact that u also said u commented on her video with a lol was to secure u thought it was amusing. so stop already. save it for next time.

oh and to miss piggy oink oink. this is what being dismissed without prejudice means. sometimes there are missing pieces to a puzzle not there the first time. just means need to make sure next time it is all done in the right place with your ducks all lined up in a row.  

no that was not u sending an email of a video of your hubby. and again the date of the video being put on u tube april 22nd the date u opened the account ALLhatersSUCK april 22nd. The day u opened the other account allthehaterssuck april 22nd. why prey tell would u be sending a video of your hubby to anyone? and it clearly states what the video was. try again. and u tube will be able to identify the video so have no doubt.

you made a statement here earlier that u did send the email but u received the email anonymously that too is not true and can be found out. u said u did not care because u did not upload the video.  fact is again u did not do this as a tit for tat as you stated in another of your comments here. you posted it out of pure evil to embarrass someone and humiliate them. the fact that u also said u commented on her video with a lol was to secure u thought it was amusing. so stop already. save it for next time.

oh and to miss piggy oink oink. this is what being dismissed without prejudice means. sometimes there are missing pieces to a puzzle not there the first time. just means need to make sure next time it is all done in the right place with your ducks all lined up in a row.  

...did not show so here it is...

u are confused. no one is saying that any video of your husbands is on your u tube channel. what the other poster was saying is that when u sent the email from your ALLhatersSUCK account from u tube what u probably did not notice is that youtube mentioned the actual name of the uploaded song onto the other account allthehaterssuck. It was probably missed by the plaintiff because perhaps she had no idea what your hubbys account name was. it was probably brought to her attention by someone who did know and maybe too late to show u lied once again. 

to interesting. to call someone a pig would have to be someone who is a pig. oink oink yourself. 

back to shanda. what u did was and one only knows at this point who gave u the video in question to down load to your computer and we could guess i suppose being only one person would have access to a persons closed account of their hard drive. but that is besides the point. what u did when it was down loaded was to remove the name that would appear ie. singsnap sexyback by Ladydi821 and put on that flv no1knows so when u uploaded it onto that other account you made to display it on u tube they only picked up the flv name which you will see in the email from pacer. if you can explain away why your hubbys name is on an email from u tube please do we all love to hear you explain away things u do. 

since ur dense put on those specks again and read this. you can conclude that the judge in this case dismissed because you thought it was a frivolous case but he did not think the entire case was frivolous or without merit. if he did he would have dismissed with prejudice which would not allow the plaintiff to refile and sue again. again for the dense. this case was dismissed without prejudice. 

Civil law Within legal civil procedure, prejudice is a loss or injury, and refers specifically to a formal determination against a claimed legal right or cause of action.[1] Thus, in a civil case, dismissal without prejudice is a dismissal that allows for re-filing of the case in the future. The present action is dismissed but the possibility remains open that the plaintiff may file another suit on the same claim. The inverse phrase is dismissal with prejudice, in which the plaintiff is barred from filing another case on the same claim. Dismissal with prejudice is a final judgment and the case becomes res judicata on the claims that were or could have been brought in it; dismissal without prejudice is not.

In short it means that the case was dismissed inconclusively. There may have been missing evidence or procedural requirements not met, and therefore the case could potentially be brought before the court again by the parties involved. 

It is an order issued by a judge actually dismissing the charges that were brought in the case - usually for some legal insufficiency, or lack of evidence, in the case itself. Dismissal WITHOUT Prejudice means that the charges MAY be re-instituted and brought before court again AFTER the legal insufficiency is cured. 

It is usually a term used in the context of case being dismissed. The significance of it is that the Plaintiff/Prosecution retains the right to re-file the lawsuit a second time. 

Another screenshot for you.  This shows all the uploads I've made on ALLhatersSuck on YouTube.

Just accept the fact that you lost. Nothing that you said would happen did happen. There is no way to paint this any other way. You are trying to put lipstick on a pig but it is still a pig. Oink, Oink!
Sure, anyone can sue anyone for anything whenever they want including the parties involved in this lawsuit. This is a free country. There does not even have to be a basis for the lawsuit as this claim has proven. But there are consequences! :)
You haters painted the net up and down with your predictions, false accusations and blatant lies. 
Now anyone who reads your previous quasi illiterate, rambling posts and predictions of what will happen will know the truth. You were wrong. You lost. You look like fools. Bullying fools. 
Not so fun now is it? oink, oink! :)

A screenshot photo is worth a thousand words.  Note the YouTube username... note the name of the video... note that it is a video of my HUSBAND.

the judge although made a lot of comments. the case was dismissed on personal jurisdictions. the need for the judge to post the whys and laws for each state is expected of him. but again for those not paying attention. dismissing a case in civil court regardless of no severs granted in this case. the plaintiff is free to refile in their jurisdiction. it is was his opinion not to sever 2 defendants. again u all should maybe before claiming a victory should see what another judge may think. not all judges will see things the same way. good luck to you all for the second go around that will most likely happen. sure can't wait myself to see what the plaintiff decides because imo knowing all the people involved u all deserve what u have coming to you. tit for tat as shanda put it right. how shanda turned this all into about her amazes me. the woman spat crap out of her mouth this past yr that was amazing and then switches up to the holier than thou crap. she knows what she did. you all do. and u all lied. 

ur the complete idiot or idiots. anyone can pick and choose how they want to read into something. copyright was not the only issue in the case was it? and because a judge in the state of Pa said he doesn't think something would hold up doesn't mean new suits on other things not mentioned can't be filed for. so again if the judge thought this case held no merit at all he would have dismissed it with prejudice meaning that the plaintiff can not sue again. he did not do that. nice try too on the shanda messing with people. try she missed something and now is feeling a bit cornered. so maybe while u may feel the plaintiff should not sue in each jurisdiction of each defendant is a waste of time. u are entitled to your opinion. pretty sure her legal counsel would advise her what to do and what can be done. see people who think like u is the reason why the laws need to be changed. u still have that tone of harassment even typing here. but keep on posting in a negative manner calling the plaintiff names and calling it a playground spat and see where that gets ya lol that is what ya all said it was right? i think i am going to send a letter to the judge lol and tell him what a bunch of losers u are not being able to comprehend his words. u need an attorney to read it to u and pretty sure u had none all along while being sued. that too is on pacer who is represented and who is not. looking forward to see what happens next. in the mean time i am writing a book on this lol  

Quotes from his ruling. Say what you like but you can't argue with the facts. She sued and she lost. This is over. Only a complete idiot would sue again. Maybe read, or get someone to read it to you next time, before you make false statements hater. 

I conclude that the IIED, copyright, and defamation claims against Dickerson and the other defendants are frivolous under Washington law.

Since I have found that Patchens underlying claims should not be transferred for lack of merit, neither should the civil-conspiracy claim.

"As explained above, transfer of the copyright claim would not be in the interest of justicefrom the evidence presented, Singsnap owns the copyrights in the video and Patchen is not entitled to bring suit.

I also conclude that transfer is not warranted for Patchens defamation claim. Patchen is unlikely to be able to make out a claim for defamation under Tennessee law.

Patchens IIED claim against the defendants is similarly meritless.

Give it a rest already and get a new hobby. I am sure you have had lots of laughs but it is not so funny now is it?

also not a good thing ur friend shanda  came here the second she could while she posts her mother died to go shouting from the roof top she is in the clear. then admitting she sent the email. then forgetting that she used her hubbys account name to post it on u tube. and then to say in a cryptic manner to go searching for who did do it. looks like she is worn out. and worn down. maybe the plantiff did not know that was the name of her hubbys account at the time. maybe the plantiff at the time could not link the two defendants together. oh well always another chance to have a go at it. 

hey lookie here.  and maybe re read with a pair of glasses before shooting ur mouth off defendant. the case u are talking about was dismissed without prejudice. 

Civil law Within legal civil procedure, prejudice is a loss or injury, and refers specifically to a formal determination against a claimed legal right or cause of action.[1] Thus, in a civil case, dismissal without prejudice is a dismissal that allows for re-filing of the case in the future. The present action is dismissed but the possibility remains open that the plaintiff may file another suit on the same claim. The inverse phrase is dismissal with prejudice, in which the plaintiff is barred from filing another case on the same claim. Dismissal with prejudice is a final judgment and the case becomes res judicata on the claims that were or could have been brought in it; dismissal without prejudice is not.

In short it means that the case was dismissed inconclusively. There may have been missing evidence or procedural requirements not met, and therefore the case could potentially be brought before the court again by the parties involved.

It is an order issued by a judge actually dismissing the charges that were brought in the case - usually for some legal insufficiency, or lack of evidence, in the case itself. Dismissal WITHOUT Prejudice means that the charges MAY be re-instituted and brought before court again AFTER the legal insufficiency is cured.

It is usually a term used in the context of case being dismissed. The significance of it is that the Plaintiff/Prosecution retains the right to re-file the lawsuit a second time.

and i would think with any new evidence things can turn in another direction. sometimes things are missed first time around or maybe filed in the wrong court or jurisdiction in this case for some of you. u probably should zip it 

u are wrong defendant. case dismissed without prejudice. means a plaintiff can refile a case.  if it was with prejudice than that would be the judges final ruling and no one can refile. judge did not as far as i can see say the case was frivolous. u would like to think that but tis not true. go read your law books and there u go again defendant number? guessing names. back to your same ole posts. if u did not want to be sued in the first place why did you even bother this plaintiff?

u were according to pacer told to do it. that is why.  i do hope as someone said here that the plaintiff whether it be on a copyright or not doesn't stop for justice. u people seem off the wall to the max. and out of the lot of u only 2 of the defendants had an attorney. so no skin off your nose eh? but next time that could change right? i mean if the plaintiff does sue in your jurisdiction what will u do? so posting more inaccurate info won;t help u will it? 

News Flash for the Haters: This case has been dismissed. The judge said it was "frivolous". He also said the Plaintiff has no rights in the video. I quote from Judge Yohn's ruling "I conclude that Patchens copyright claim is similarly without merit." End of story, done. Whether the video was posted or not and who posted the video is a moot point. 

It is pathetic that you people do not have anything better to do than attempt to retry this BS lawsuit in front of your self appointed jury of fools. 

Your queen of hate lost. You backed the wrong horse, lol. All the crap you have posted: just wait till discovery, computer forensics and all the related nonsense is even more hilarious now. LMAO

Your selective reading of Pacer is equally funny. You all seem to miss the part where you lost the lawsuit. Case Dismissed. That means it is finished. I know the lot of you collectively are not too bright but surely you can understand that?

But wait, there are the empty threats of this case being picked up in other jurisdictions. The judge in his ruling went into detail how transferring the case "would not be in the interest of justice" and went on explain how the whole thing was frivolous. So that would make a lot of sense now wouldn't it?

You are all obviously directed by your dark queen in an attempt to intimidate Shanda but it is not working. This time she is messing with the bunch of you and laughing. Now that is worth the price of admission!

OK Judy, Sally, Michael?, this is the part where you say "I never talk to her, I do not even know her, I just stumbled onto this" and lets not forget the threats of more, continued and new litigation, feds taking computers, discovery, etc. 

Yawn, you old girls are getting pretty tiresome.

can't someone if they lie under oath be charged with the crime of perjury? i mean if she said she didn't upload the video a million times and it is proven she did doesn't that then turn into criminal charges? even if its a civil case? i wonder what she will do next time she is sued. i think she already did commit perjury now seeing that no1knows on that email. in fact she is saying it here. and these posts cant be deleted can they? glad i am not her. 

well u hit the nail on the head on that one about her hubby. 

he has an account on snap but no recordings at present. he did have some posts if u google him and wow that was pretty careless of u to not even notice that before u sent out that email under ALLhatersSUCK  i wonder if he even knows u used his user name from snap? prolly not . oh well. as the last poster asked i too wonder how u got ur hands on that video. i know forencis will still show u are not the person who put the video on u tube . ok guess u will find out soon enough. 

here is hubby's snap profile page . prolly she made that too lol. 

I wrote the wrong acct name regarding the email sent to singsnapsucks2.

It should have read..."allhaterssuck want to share a video no1knows.flv with you". (The allhaterssuck acct uses some capital letters. For simplicity, I've left them out).

So, making things even more simple...

Shanda put her husbands ss acct name on Dianes video... uploaded it to the "allthehaterssuck" acct

Then, from her other acct of nearly the same name "allhaterssuck" she sent singsnapsucks2 the email giving them the link to a video by "no1knows" thereby connecting Shanda to both "haterssuck" accts when she made the mistake of renaming the video with her husbands info. Theres no need for a subpoena (although like I said before I believe the plaintiff has already had this info for quite some time now) because this is finished already by failing to think this through.

It was simple revenge for thinking and assuming Diane had posted her husbands video. Retaliation.

Sigh.....

Problem for you now Shanda is maybe a blend of annoyance, grief and an attitude of not caring made you careless. You admitted to sending the email to singsnapsucks2.

The email said "allthehaterssuck would like to share a video no1knows.flv. with you".

So, let me spell this out for you so your med-soaked mush can comprehend the grave you just dug yourself.

First, you downloaded a copy of Dianes video to your computer. Next, you "renamed" the video.

The video used to say "singsnap sexyback" Then, you backspaced all that out and renamed the video "no1knows". That is your husbands accout name on Singsnap. Currently, he has no videos but the server still contains his name. Next, you uploaded the video to youtube. Then, you sent an email to singsnapsucks2. Since your current youtube acct was created the same day that you sent that email, you created 2 accts that day. Youtube does not allow the user to change his/her name. Youd have to have made more then one acct. However, those multiple acct details dont really matter. You fuuckked up by erasing Dianes original name and song on her video and put yoyr husbands singsnap account name on her video instead. You are now directly tied to having a copy of her video, changing the name, uploading it to Youtube and then sending out that email. You thought Diane was the owner of that forum and also responsible for putting Chris's video on youtube so to get back at her you thought you'd do the same by posting a video of her. Tit for tat. With me so far? You should have never erased the name on the video and put "no1knows" instead. Now for the fun part.

Where'd ya git the video dearie?

If you dont care why do you keep coming back and posting? I think most folks are way past the subtle youtube name change. The acct allthehaterssuck was created on april 22. The acct you use now allhaterssuck (w/out the "the") was also created on april 22. Conspiracy and intent. No judge in the world would believe its a coinkeedink

But whatever. As far as getting a "geek" to get the acct info isnt necessary. From what i understand theyve had the acct info from youtube for a long time now so the plaintiffs dont need to do anything else. For anyone here, its conversation. For you? Everything you say is used against you. Im not in legal trouble....you are.

You should care as well. If you have a very pissed off plaintiff thst keeps reading more and more from you, this wouldnt ever go away. Why didnt you just do evetything you could to make things right and have all this behind you? All youve done is continue harassing without stopping. Not once. Why do all this to yourself? I dont really want the answers. Im just blown away by the attitude you take while faced with all this. And didnt your husband make that video about that site with barely contained threats? Heck. Id post it too Why would you expect them to just sit there and put up with it. Again. Dont want the answer. So. Anymore relatives dropping dead, or are the ones left still hangin in there? ps: dont think anyone said theyve never sinned dear. Theyre just not facing court and prosecuting lawyers like you are. Somehow, your sins got you where you are and where youll be for quite some time. Does that make all of us better then you? Heeelll yeah!!! Im also pretty sure no one cares if you care either. Kinda a lazy attitude but whatever.

u say u did a tit for tat because someone posted a video of ur husband? what in the hell does that have to do with u commenting and sending a video of the plaintiff to this site? ur intent was not to harm  the site it was to harm and embarrass the plaintiff. u had already been involved prior to the video in harassing the plaintiff under several fake names on another site. So u admit u sent the link via email. now the nutty part is u say you have no idea who sent u that video. so are we to assume then it came to you with no email address? that email address would be on ur computer even if you deleted it. but it all sounds a bit off because anyone with half a brain would know from the case on pacer you had it in for the plaintiff. and whoever it was that sent that video to you also did. it doesn't really matter because like you said with investigation of both your hard drive and u tubes assistance it can all be revealed at some later date. here is to hoping u did not ditch that computer. that too can be found out with investigation. u seem to have a thing about people who want to spend or waste their money. well maybe for some people it is all worth it for the truth to be revealed. u seem to think this was all some kind of game u were playing. pass the video around lol. good luck 

The link was sent to me anonymously so I do not know who uploaded the video; I am not covering for anyone.  I SENT the link to SingSnapSucks because I felt it was tit for tat... after all, SingSnapSucks YouTube username stole my husband's video from SingSnap, in which he defended me, uploaded it to YouTube, and then belittled him in comments.  I'm sure that can be proven as well.  Personally, as I've stated before, I don't care about any of this anymore.  He who has not sinned, cast the first stone..!

The username who uploaded the video was AllTheHatersSuck;  my username, still in existence, is ALLhatersSUCK.  Note the absence of the word "THE"?  Similar name?  Yes.  Did I send the link to the YouTube username SingSnapSucks via pm?  Yes.  Did I upload the video?  NO.  Go hire a good geek if you don't believe me and have them trace all uploads from my account:  http://www.youtube.com/user/ALLhatersSUCK?feature=mhee.  Kthnxby

ok so not so hard to go find you on u tube. the date on your account is april 22nd . the date on the email from this exact account is april 22nd. the date the video was put on u tube? can we all guess? 

this is not rocket science. even if the bs answers are out of this world. 

there you go peeps.  she knows who uploaded the video.

not only is she being dogged in the courts hopefully for the rest of her disgusting life but shes also withholding information and is a witness.

you also avoided most of the question btw.  you didnt mention anything about when you were asked about giving the acct info to someone else.  what?  someone stole your acct info?  hacked into your acct?

really?  its YOUR acct woman.  lol  who else would upload the video?  you should read back the things you say.  you must walk around with a shovel for when you dig yourself deeper and deeper into your hole.

doesnt matter if you DID NOT (using capitals like you did as if) upload the video.  you know who did.  you already said you "commented" on it.  know what THAT means?  (yes, using capitals as well for deep impact on you)
that means you know who uploaded the affing video because its YOUR acct dweeb.  think before you speak.

well, okay so u are saying u didn't put the video on u tube but it is clear from pacer you were the messenger. I don't think i need to upload the exhibits on pacer that clearly show you sending an email from your present u tube account which is dated as opened the exact day the video was put on u tube with the little note that says your account has shared a video. 

so what are we to assume then? there is no way in hell you came accross that video by just surfing u tube. odds are better to win a lottery than to just come across a video. so you know who uploaded it but won't say. so you want someone to go find out who it was. see what is kind of odd is why you would even get involved with the person who sent you the link and send it via email to the person whose video it was. see now u being a christian woman if u really were one would have to had said i will not take part in this and walk away. but you didnt do that.

i can upload the images right off pacer showing it was u and your u tube account but what is the point to that? u already are caught as the accomplice. why u would not to save your own hide not say who did it is beyond anyone who read pacer. 

at some point i am sure this will come up again in your future. hell u even said u commented on the video. at the scene of the crime and still won't roll. well your choice i suppose but any christian people i know would never get involved in such madness. you should feel some kind of voice that is saying what u did was wrong. but keep posting from the bible it makes people wonder what god you really serve.  hey i have the time i will put up the image off of pacer for u 

The reason I can honestly say I did not upload the video is because I DID NOT.  That FACT can be proven through computer forensic techniques... whomever wishes to go to that extreme (and expense) will find out WHO uploaded the video.  That is all I have to say on the matter.

So like if you say you only commented on the video and didnt upload it, youre still just as guilty as the person who did. If your version is true, that means you gave someone your youtube acct login information so THEY could upload it. That means you know who did it. Just say who did it and try to get yourself out of at least some of the trouble????????
Not too many people hand over their password to someone else for online harassment.
Why are you protecting the other person? (This, assuming you didnt do it as you say)

...which is why everything happened the way it did.  I already told you I don't care how many enemies I have.  I already said 'Do whatever you will'.  I mentioned sanctions because it had not been mentioned... I mentioned it so others reading would know.  It IS important and it WILL make a difference.  I've never threatened anyone at anytime.  I NEVER had possession of a certain video either.  Did I comment on it?  Yes.  Did I smear anyone's reputation?  NO.  Has my reputation been smeared?  YES.  Do I care about that?  I used to but I do NOT anymore.  NO ONE CAN HURT ME.  Call me stupid, ignorant... say it's a good thing my parents are dead... say any d**n thing you please.  I DO NOT CARE.  A change of jurisdiction will likely end the same way this whole ridiculous thing did.  Even if it doesn't, I DON'T CARE! 

GET THEE BEHIND ME EVIL ONES IN THE NAME OF THE FATHER THE SON AND THE HOLY SPIRIT - GOD AND I REBUKE YOU!

first, im surprised u only had 3 things to say

number 2............. filing sanctions is a typical defense move.  a move to rattle the cage of the other attorney.  ruthless sneaky money sucking lawyers do it all the time.  my uncle whos been a lawyer for 20 + yrs said

"Courts rarely award sanctions against attorneys for filing frivolous motions. ... The sanctions motion is often denied only after both sides brief the issue, and a ... No matter who starts the fight, both lawyers win, and both clients lose."

by playing devils advocate for a second.................
say it did happen dearie

how does that change things for u?????  it doesnt.  you still could be sued in ur home state so wtf????
it wouldnt change anything.

i have a feeling ur misery has only begun and plz stop the stuupid threats in ur status messgaes on snap.  u dont get anywhere with i.t and u will jus have to deal with peeps that dont like u there.

live with it

i hope this person comes after u and after u and after u til the cows come home

ur actions create the actions of others. stay quiet get along with others and be kind.  if u were actually like that u wouldnt be in the legal mess ur in doll

u have never admitted u were or have been wrong about anything.  ive never seen it.  hun, everyone is wrong about something in their life. ur not exempt from that.  own the crap u pull.  if u did ud probably wouldda been outta this mess a longggg time ago

One - I am posting here now because I need to.  It is helping me forget what I don't want to think about yet.

Two - The people who I am 'speaking to' know who they are.

Three - There is one last document which apparently no one here wants to bring up so I will... it has to do with SANCTIONS.  It's on PACER so go read it.

Oh, one more thing... my mother and father both loved me very much and they were proud of me.  I know because they both told me so.  I am not the evil person certain people make me out to be by LYING.  My family knows it... my friends know it... I know it... most importantly GOD knows it. 

The cross I wear around my neck was given to me by my husband over 10 years ago.  I've taken it off 3 times since then (because of my son's c-section and medical tests).  I wear this symbol of faith because I love GOD above anyone and everything.  It is a way to testify to others.

I pray for my enemies daily because it is what GOD wishes of me.  I don't mind having enemies... it means I stood up for something... oh, yes, I DID and I shall continue to so.

If thine enemy be hungry, give him bread to eat; and if he be thirsty, give him water to drink:
For thou shalt heap coals of fire upon his head, and the LORD shall reward thee. - Proverbs 25: 21-22

...and last but not least...

So that we may boldly say, The Lord is my helper, and I will not fear what man shall do unto me. - Hebrews 13:6

Do what you will; you cannot and will not hurt me anymore.

...I do NOT CARE.  My mother just died yesterday... 6 months to the day of my father's death.  Do what you want to continue to try to ruin me.  You cannot ruin what is already ruined.

thats cuz shes not too bright.  anyone knows you can file in her home state and thats the next step.  posting ridiculous justice comments when this is only the beginning just means she has no idea whats happening around her.  If she had a lawyer that actually WORKED and DID SOMETHING, hed tell her that.

lask of education always rears its ugly head with retarded comments like hers. 

be a good idea to wipe the self satisfied smug smirk off ur face.  lol  the plaintiffs are 10 steps ahead of you and dont u think they anticipated this and hav their next move planned???

u r a stoopid silly gurl!  uve got enemies commin outta ur ears too  even ur parents didnt wanna stick around and watch u self destruct.

It may be dismissed in Pa, but it just means the lawsuit can be filed now in your home state of Tennessee and for the other yahoo, Washington.

The plaintiff can file in Canada as well.

Have a great day.

Case 11-5388 DISMISSED.

You are so predictable!! You did have to have the last word. I or anyone else here knows that although you state you are disabling you alerts, you wont. 

And when have you ever been civil? I have read your numerous posts, and you are far from civil. Childish yes, civil no. 

So is glue your choice of drug? It is cheap and available at your local neighborhood store I'm sure. And it would surely explain the brain damage you seem to have. 

Let's face it when Shanda thinks she's on a roll there is no stopping you. I think you are probably have reached some kind of record here for the most posts that make no sense. But hey knock yourself out. 

We only wish we knew what the hell you were talking about! We don't so it is all so amusing.

Well here is to the New Year and Shanda not posting anymore!! Let's all give her a huge round of applause!! You go girl!!

Go easy on that glue sniffing this New Years Eve. You may be better off sticking to your normal moonshine lol 

...all you people can spend your time slurring me up one side and down the other all over the Internet but if I defend myself in a civil manner I am the devil incarnate?  Carry on then because it just doesn't matter to me anymore.  I'm changing my settings here so I no longer get alerts when someone posts.  Besides, people who know me understand what you people say is ridiculous.  My husband says y'all should stop sniffing glue 'cause it does dain bramage.  :D

Well first I would like to say. The eye rolling and sighing you do must tire you out. Next again the guessing game of who is who. 

We all wonder how it is Shanda knows who everyone is on this site? Do you know who I am? Of course you don't. But I am pretty sure you will say you do. Go for it! 

We all know who you are. We all know you are the obsessed person here. We all know that Shanda needs to prove she above the entire world. We all know she is a self proclaimed Christian yet she doesn't act like one. We all know she has to be right or you are on her s**t list. We all know although she pretends to not be afraid of anyone she is afraid of everything. We all know Shanda has created a persona on snap as this person who is compassionate and kind and a huge advocate against hate of any kind. We all know that to be a huge lie. I could go on and on but what's the point? She will just say it's libel lol. 

One would have to wonder why anyone who reads any of this crap could care less how pretty your ring is. And the need to post it no less. I am sure not a soul really cares. 

Well Shanda, What's next for you? Where do you see yourself a year from now? Still playing games? Still professing to anyone who will listen what a wonderful human being you are? That you forgive? You don't forgive. If you as you claim have forgiven and moved on, why are you still posting here? And exactly who is you're posting to? About who? You are so confusing that no one can keep up with your outrageous rants and accusations. 

Do yourself a favor. Make a New Years resolution to shut up and as you claim you have better things to do with your time, energy and money, stick to your own words. Go find a hobby. Go feed the poor, save an animal. But for God's sake stop making a complete a** of yourself here. And trust me you look like an a**. 

You are like a child who must have the last word. I am positive you will need to have the last word here too. If you actually can stop yourself, I myself will give you an award. 

2012 is approaching and perhaps you will actually move on and be a productive human being. Now that would be a miracle! You believe in miracles don't you? I wish I did. If I did then my first one would be is to see you actually behave like a grown woman instead of a whining child. I would ask your God but I don't believe in God so my only resource would be to ask you to grow up. 

Tag you're it. 

Bonnie, Bonnie, Bonnie... sigh.  I know as well as many others that is not your name.  It is obvious, at least to me, who you are. 

Unlike some folks I am not a 'sue me baby'.  I've been raked over the coals via Internet but I prefer to just forgive and move on.  I really have much better things to do with my energy, emotion, time, and money.

As for my marriage license?  I decline your advice to post it online (although I do have the original and a scanned copy on my pc).  However, feel free to call or write here for confirmation of my marriage to Chris Lancaster (February 14, 2005 in Burns, TN):

Charlotte
Dickson County Courthouse
P.O. Box 220
Charlotte, TN 37036
(615) 789-5093
(615) 789-0128 fax
Hours: Monday - Friday,
8:00 a.m. - 4:00 p.m.

At the time of my marriage my legal name was Reynolds (my maiden name).  I'm certainly not ashamed of it.  I married one of the best men I've ever known and I love him dearly.  Chris is a wonderful husband and father who works hard, supports me when I'm down, and treats me with the utmost respect.  Wanna see the wedding set he picked out and bought for me when he proposed?  It is very pretty.  Maybe you can catch a glimpse of it on one of my videos sometime.  I have no doubt you are watching.  Even those people who claim to hate SingSnap just can't seem to stay away and I find that extremely odd.  The word obsession comes to mind...

I think you should sue also.  I mean, of course if it's untrue that three people appointed admins on singsnapsucks last year matched up your ip *99.179.112.116* to MULTIPLE fake accounts including all the names mentioned above (and some not even mentioned).

If you have every receipt from your income (outside of your disability income) and have receipts from the charity (s) you donated it to, then yeah...you should sue.

If you can show your web site posted the information about all proceeds going to charity BEFORE you were questioned about it, then that would be something.  You know, not added afterwards.  If saying that Mrs. Maddox is currently under investigation with a private party regarding internet harassment and libel is an untrue statement, then H**L YEAH, you should sue except for the fact that Maddox was a name used by you at some point during your life so, you own it.  You should also sue if you're not under investigation and not being sued for harassment and libel but wait...

Not only are you under investigation, you WERE investigated,  sued and then you LOST the bloody case.  The federal court found you guilty of ASSAULT, LIBEL, HARASSMENT, SLANDER and COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT. Now, if there's some way you can show this isn't true, then by all means, sue, but usually, under most circumstances, evading a federal lawsuit multiple times don't have happy endings.

If you're LEGALLY married, then you may want to post a copy of the marriage cert online.  Recent investigations cannot locate any legal marriage doc on you.  All studies done show you as single. Common law marriage does not jive in the state of Tennessee as Tennessee does not recognize any common law relationships as "marriage".

Your own words state your parents purchased the home your currently reside in and after you make "improvements", some type of plan will be made to somehow change ownership in the future.  You do not own this home at present.  In fact, you could not qualify for a home loan under your present circumstances. I mean heck, the sale date of the house and how much it was sold for is easy information to find.  Finding the name of WHO purchased the home is easy information to find.

So, take all you feel is terribly untrue and libelous and please, get a lawyer.

Every word is in this report is a lie which, in turn, makes it LIBEL/DEFAMATION.  I am so very grateful ROR does not delete reports.  THIS report is exactly what I need to sue manthissitesucks from Toronto, Ontario Ontario Canada (if I so choose).  Thank you!