Ripoff Report Needs Your Help!
X  |  CLOSE
Report: #1115599

Complaint Review: Solano Property Management - Vacaville California

  • Submitted:
  • Updated:
  • Reported By: Toolguy1964 — Vacaville California
  • Author Confirmed What's this?
  • Why?
  • Solano Property Management 750 Mason St. Vacaville, CA Vacaville, California USA

Solano Property Management Unprofessional Vacaville California

*Author of original report: Not Unfounded

*UPDATE Employee: Unfounded

Show customers why they should trust your business over your competitors...

Is this
Report about YOU
listed on other sites?
Those sites steal
Ripoff Report's
content.
We can get those
removed for you!
Find out more here.
How to fix
Ripoff Report
If your business is
willing to make a
commitment to
customer satisfaction
Click here now..

Vendors Beware of Solano Property Management (SPM) ..... As requested by SPM, I submitted my application; licensing and insurance information to SPM to become one of their vendors to repair and maintain their rental properties. Tjhey required me to add them as an additional insured to my liability insurance which cost me $150.  I was contacted by Shannon Romo (Maintenance Coordinator) and after a short phone conversation, she indicated that she would be sending me work orders for properties that needed service, repair or maintenance.  After three months, I had received nothing and called her to inquire why I wasn't receiving any work orders; only to reach her voice mail.  I left multiple voice mail messages over the following two months inquiring what the problem could be but Shannon never had the common courtesey to return any of my calls.  I attempted to contact the president of  Solano Property Management, (Steve Spencer) but he too, never returned my calls.  This company obviously doesn't care about customer service or common courtesey and I would not recommend anyone do business with them.  

This report was posted on Ripoff Report on 01/14/2014 09:55 PM and is a permanent record located here: https://www.ripoffreport.com/reports/solano-property-management/vacaville-california-95687/solano-property-management-unprofessional-vacaville-california-1115599. The posting time indicated is Arizona local time. Arizona does not observe daylight savings so the post time may be Mountain or Pacific depending on the time of year. Ripoff Report has an exclusive license to this report. It may not be copied without the written permission of Ripoff Report. READ: Foreign websites steal our content

Search for additional reports

If you would like to see more Rip-off Reports on this company/individual, search here:

Report & Rebuttal
Respond to this report!
What's this?
Also a victim?
What's this?
Repair Your Reputation!
What's this?

Updates & Rebuttals

REBUTTALS & REPLIES:
1Author
1Consumer
0Employee/Owner

#2 Author of original report

Not Unfounded

AUTHOR: Kirk - ()

POSTED: Friday, January 17, 2014

My comments are not "unfounded". The vendor packet indicated I had to include SPM as an additional insured and I did. My carrier, United Fire Group charged me $150 to add SPM to my policy. What I find very unprofessional is that after multiple calls to Shannon Ramos or Steve Spencer , neither of them once returned my calls but you find it necessary to respond on this forum. This sure speaks volumes of how unprofessional SPM operates.

Respond to this report!
What's this?

#1 UPDATE Employee

Unfounded

AUTHOR: SusieSlankard - ()

POSTED: Friday, January 17, 2014

Dear Kirk:

Solano Property Management requires each and every vendor who works for our company to CARRY a specified amount of Liability Coverage. We require proof of said coverage, which we keep on file.

We also require Vendors to fill out a Vendor Packet that describes in detail our requirements to work for this company. We also require Vendors to sign a form indicating that they understand all that is required.
Nowhere on that form does it say that we require a Vendor to include us as an additional insured on their insurance policy, which we also keep on file.

We have your Vendor Packet on file with your signature that indicates you understood our requirements.

Your complaint is unfounded, and you are at fault for spending $150.00 that you did not need to spend.

Respond to this report!
What's this?
Featured Reports

Advertisers above have met our
strict standards for business conduct.

X
What do hackers,
questionable attorneys and
fake court orders have in common?
...Dishonest Reputation Management Investigates Reputation Repair
Free speech rights compromised

WATCH News
Segment Now