Ripoff Report Needs Your Help!
X  |  CLOSE
Report: #666979

Complaint Review: Sugar Daddy Productions - Internet

  • Submitted:
  • Updated:
  • Reported By: Bridgette — Seaside California United States of America
  • Author Not Confirmed What's this?
  • Why?
  • Sugar Daddy Productions 4389 Oakridge Road Internet United States of America

Sugar Daddy Productions Steven Reinshuttle and Angel Lynn Potts You will work, but they WILL NOT pay you Internet

*Author of original report: Don't Trust Sugar Daddy Productions

*REBUTTAL Owner of company: Response to Complaint from Alana Ringle aka Bridgette

Show customers why they should trust your business over your competitors...

Is this
Report about YOU
listed on other sites?
Those sites steal
Ripoff Report's
content.
We can get those
removed for you!
Find out more here.
How to fix
Ripoff Report
If your business is
willing to make a
commitment to
customer satisfaction
Click here now..

Sugar Daddy Productions (SDP) is an internet webcam model company that promises excellent service and highly competitive" pay with great bonuses. Don't Be Fooled! I began working for SDP approx. 3 months ago, and in that short amount of time SDP has proven to be complete liars. In October I "supposedly" won one of their halloween contests for best costume. I was promised a cash reward, to this day I've recieved Nothing! They promise to pay you every 2 weeks. I've recieved pay twice in the 3 months and both times I had to email them asking for it. If you don't ask for your pay, you won't get it. Or they'll wait until 10pm on payday to pay you.

They sent out emails to all their models exposing everyone elses email addresses and simi-personal information. Therefore confidentiality has been compromised. They will yell and use profanity to "pimp" you into making more money and threaten termination if you don't. They will vanish for a day or two with no communication, phone is disconnected, no email responses,...etc. They promise photo uploads and training, but never produced. When I brought all my concerns to their attention, they started dumping a bunch of personal crap on me..., like, "I'm pregnant and on bed rest." or "Steve's mom is sick" or "We just moved and our house is a mess right now." These are the excuses I got when I asked for my pay, or training, or my prize, or anything. This "company" is a joke. They claim to have been in business for 10 years..., not according to the Bay County Courts. I have emails to back up every claim I've made. DO NOT work with this company or these people.

This report was posted on Ripoff Report on 12/01/2010 10:06 AM and is a permanent record located here: https://www.ripoffreport.com/reports/sugar-daddy-productions/internet/sugar-daddy-productions-steven-reinshuttle-and-angel-lynn-potts-you-will-work-but-they-wi-666979. The posting time indicated is Arizona local time. Arizona does not observe daylight savings so the post time may be Mountain or Pacific depending on the time of year. Ripoff Report has an exclusive license to this report. It may not be copied without the written permission of Ripoff Report. READ: Foreign websites steal our content

Search for additional reports

If you would like to see more Rip-off Reports on this company/individual, search here:

Report & Rebuttal
Respond to this report!
What's this?
Also a victim?
What's this?
Repair Your Reputation!
What's this?

Updates & Rebuttals

REBUTTALS & REPLIES:
1Author
0Consumer
1Employee/Owner

#2 Author of original report

Don't Trust Sugar Daddy Productions

AUTHOR: Bridgette - (United States of America)

POSTED: Monday, January 03, 2011

If anyone is truly interested in what I've stated in my report, please respond to this ad and I will gladly supply you with each and every email from Sugar Daddy Productions, exposing them for the frauds they are. In their response they accused me of slander..., it's not slander if it's true and I have proof in writing of all my claims.

Respond to this report!
What's this?

#1 REBUTTAL Owner of company

Response to Complaint from Alana Ringle aka Bridgette

AUTHOR: Sugar Daddy Productions - (United States of America)

POSTED: Friday, December 10, 2010

In response to this complaint, We would like to begin by saying that this is the only complaint we have ever received.  We have a nice track record with our models, and strive for open communication. 

I would like to address the first issue of Ms. Ringle's complaint, by saying it is out and out untrue that she was only paid twice in her three months of working with SDP.   To say that we pay at 10 pm on payday is correct.  We pay by greendot card as a courtesy to our employees, so they do not have to wait for a check to be mailed. An employee must earn no less than $25 to be paid, as it is explained to all contractors, as that is the Debit cards policy, not mine. We do payroll at 6 pm on the Day we receive the wire transfer from our media company. 

Miss Ringle was offered training 19 times during her relationship with our company, and declined 14 of them, while being a "no show" the other 5.  

On the day in question, that Ms. Ringle accuses us of not being around, or having the phone disconnected, We were in the process of moving our office to a new location.  All models were informed of this in advance, and we had no other problems with an other contractor. 

Ms. Ringle accuses alot of other things in her report, such as not receiving a prize of some type, our personal time, and her pay. She states we say we have been in business for 10 years, when in fact it is stated that I have been an internet model with various companies over the past ten years.  We do always pay, we do always answer all questions on a first come, first serve basis.  We are only human, there fore we are not open 24 hours a day, however we do always give our models the attention they deserve.  However, when there emergency situations, we make every attempt possible to keep everyone informed. 

It is our company policy that all models work 20-25 hours a week, and are informed of this during the interview, and training process.  The complaintant only worked, on average, 4 hours a week, and was verbally warned by the company on several instances, that this is not something that we tolerate. She was never sworn at, or threatened in any way.  It was simply, either work as agreed upon or leave the company. 

Simply put, this is a slanderous complaint from an ex employee who is upset that she could not make something for nothing.  Plain and Simple.  As I have stated above, we have worked with several dozen models, and this is the first complaint we have EVER received.

 

 

Respond to this report!
What's this?
Featured Reports

Advertisers above have met our
strict standards for business conduct.

X
What do hackers,
questionable attorneys and
fake court orders have in common?
...Dishonest Reputation Management Investigates Reputation Repair
Free speech rights compromised

WATCH News
Segment Now