TLC NM LLC Andrius Vilcinskas Sells Real Estate by Misrepresentating the true fact. Rio Rancho, New Mexico

I was able to get two court judgement on both, jura Vilcinkas and her son andrew from Florida  and Michigen courts for aMy attorney is working on more states to sue them , any and every state they reside, I will not let go until I see them in jail.

The reason I dropped the case is because I reside in California and wasn't able to attend the hearing and contacted the defendants attorney to drop the case, because I was medically unable to attend the hearing scheduled and medically not able to travel to Detroit. Vilcinskas has made statements that simply are not true. The agreement with the Attorney to drop the matter was I would not be charge for any court fees. That was one matter, but I have another matter which I will be taking Vilcinskas back to court, because he breached a written contract we had with eachother. This second matter is pending. Unless he is willing to contact me and make arrangement to settle out of court. He and his mother Jura claim to have a LLC out of Long Beach, California. According to the California Secretary of State, they have no record of such a business. 

On 03-21-12, the case against me and my company was dismissed. Please see attached the bill from my attorney, that Mr Simpson will have to pay me back. Thank You for reading this, and our company looks at this as some unintentional marketing. So, if You need to buy a wholesale property at any point, we can be reached at 1-800-946-9031, ext 1. We are functioning in 5 states now.

My father's name is Arvydas Vilcinskas. Google it, and swallow back Your lies. I may not like the guy, but they are serving time on a stage, not jail.

Inspection Contingency is a powerful tool for the closings on the property to go right, which You probably failed to use. If You care about Your property, You care about Your property. We will be taking You to court for slander. How come Your interest in the property came out 2 years after You bought it? You know very well that whatever You wrote here is an absolute lie, and we're not responsible for whatever situation You've managed to get Yourself into.

This is our last response, we have to take care of our legitimate customers. We're very amazed that You can get away with any false information that You posted here. We're waiting for a response from the editor.

I don't have much trouble believing events transpired as the OP has stated, BUT, and this is a major heavy duty BUT, the OP CHOSE, of his own free will, to throw money into a rental investment flip, apparently sight unseen, in a city where wrecks of homes in wrecks of neighborhoods commonly sell for a few thousand, plus any liens or back taxes.

I have no problem believing that the OP got himself, sight unseen, into waters over his head, looking to make a quick easy few extra bucks a month in rent from some poor soul trapped renting a home in Detroit.

The seller says it all; nobody put a gun to your head to make you close, especially when you had red flags in front of you.
If I were the seller, I'd be doing exactly as the seller is doing now. A court would have every expectation that you had reasonable ability to at least know how many rooms were in the house. That you chose to rely on a ad as factual information is totally your fault. You could have gone yourself to see it and ask the renter questions. You should have had a lawyer or broker working for you to verify info. A court would probably find it UNREASONABLE that you did none of those things and therefore hold the seller blameless.

I'll bet you're a pleasure as a landlord too. The only one I feel bad for is whoever is renting the house.

The individual you allude to never intended to be a real estate investor, but a home owner. The home was purchased in April 2010 which is less than 2 years ago. You claimed this was one of your best properties. Morton Grove is noted to be one of Detroit's high crime areas. I don't understand your statement "Ran down the property while collecting rent and doing nothing over the last 2 years." What are you referring too? Documents showing I paid for items you were suppose to fix prior to the sale can be provided and will be provided in court. Section 8 was in the process of closing funding because you failed to fix the dozen things that needed fixing. You claim this case was all but thrown out of court. The truth is the court scheduled it for a March 12, 2012 settlement conference. Where is your proof that I deframed anybody? It is not defamation if the matter is the truth. You should be ashamed of yourself for being a slum lord especially taking advantage of poor black renters trying to make a descent living, and doing the right thing. Leaving a tenant with a leaky roof in the middle of winter is one of the most implorable thing anybody could do to another human being, especially when their are small children living in the house. There was a problem, and I did say something to the Title Company, but you already collected the money and ran off to New Mexico, happy as a lark that you ripped off another person.  

I would like to state that TLC has nothing to do with this property or this individual. In addition, the court will be notified of his posting of personal information online. Mr Simpson purchased the property in question from Power Savers, LLC, which is an absolutely different organization than TLC, which he is slandering at this point. Any loss of revenue from his actions will be brought to the court's attention.

This individual decided that he wants to be a real estate investor, and purchased a property from us almost 2 years ago. This was one of the best properties that we had to offer, and had a Section-8 tenant, who, apparently to this day, still pays his rent. The closing was through a title company, with an inspection contingency. Obviously, he ran down the property while collecting rent and doing nothing over the last 2 years, and decided to get some money going after our company. He took us to court, as well, where his case was all but thrown out. Any and all facts stated here are lies, I believe we will have to take him to court to straighten him out. Defamation, among other actions are overtly illegal, as well as handing out another person's information, spreading lies about their family, lying to get said personal information, and harassment. This individual misrepresented himself to us, and seems to find it alright to start lying by the end of this. It would be better for this individual to take some tools and repair his property, just like every other legitimate investor out there. If he had a problem, he should have said something to the Title Company. End of Story.

It is interesting to note that you paid an appraiser to give you an appraisal for a house that was appraised by the Wayne County Tax Assessor for a third of the true value of the property you sold to me. It is apparent the appraiser you privately hired in June 2009, did not physically go to the house, to do any inspection, but relied on information you provided him. Had he physically went to the house, he would have seen that is was only a two bedroom home not three as you advertised it to be. A converted loft without a closet is not a bedroom. It is not a 3 bedroom/2 bathroom house.

What you fail to mention in your rebuttal is the fact that if I not closed I would have lost the earnest deposit money $2,246.00 that was paid to you up front. You failed to disclose the true nature of the property. It has nothing to do with any budget on my part. The truth of the matter is I tried in vain to rectify the problem with you within the time frame provided in the Real Estate Purchase Agreement, but you ignored my correspondence even refusing certified mail sent to you.

Filing court papers from California to Detroit, Michigan takes time, and then trying to locate you, after you left Rio Rancho, New Mexico are some of the reasons, it took a little over a year to get the matter served on you.

You lied when you advertised this property was renting for $900 per month, knowing very well it only rented for $700 per month, then you further lied, stating Section 8 reduced the rent to $700 when they didnt. Your own Residential Lease dated January 20, 2010 clearly shows you were renting the property for $700. That was four month prior to me purchasing the property. You claimed the renter was aware the rent was $900 per month, another lie, the renter whom you refused to give me his telephone number prior to closing stated the rent has always been $700.

You can file all the counter-suits you want, but once in court, you will have plenty to explain to the judge of your criminal activities perpetuated in California, Florida, and other states including Michigan. You continually claim misunderstanding by other people, but the misunderstanding is you lying. You state that I just give the property back, You reimburse me all the money I paid out for this property, $30,000.00 I would consider it, but you dont have any inclination on doing that, because youre all talk and no action.   

This was a Section-8 rented property, with paying tenants, for a third of the appraisal price. Mr Simpson could have brought up any problems at the closing, and if there were problems, not closed. This is more of a matter of Mr Simpson not being able to work on his budget, and coming after me instead, well over a year later. We just want to warn You that our Attorney and ourselves are preparing for a counter-suit if You keep up this behavior, lying about who You are included. This will make for a much harder time than dealing with Your own budget problems Yourself. The high debts that You incurred in other aspects of Your life are not my problem, nor my old company's problem. If a property that gives You income every month is such a problem for You, just give it back. No one appreciates dis-honest intentions.

I hope things improve,

-Andrius Vilcinskas