Walden University Walden University Denied my Re-entry into my PhD Program without Cause Minneapolis, Minnesota

Judge Not:

Walden screwed me over financially and time wise. She or he probably doesn't have the answers for many reasons. Don't blame the victim unless YOU TOO have all of the facts.

I have a higher expectation for the report quality from someone who is (or was) in a Ph.D. program. Your report, however, is unclear but rather a rant.

First, you did not tell the reader why you were removed from the program in the first place. The removal reason may shed some lights to why they denied the re-entry. Second, the first AAC should have been able to tell you the reason if the person found the letter. He claimed to "send" you a "physical" letter, so it is very likely that he has seen its content. I don't believe that a letter is already printed and put inside an envelope when he found it (too odd). Why didn't you ask for the reason right there and then? Third, from your report, the first AAC and the second AAC are different persons (the first is he and the second is she). Couldn't you keep in touch with the first AAC? Last, why couldn't you get a letter from your professor when the second AAC asked you to do? It shouldn't be a problem at all regardless your knowledge of requirements. However, for this last question reason, then it goes back to the first question -- why were you removed from the program?

Your report is not a report at all but rather a kind of rant. With your education level, you should have known better that writing a report like this requires you to prove what you claim/accuse. I have no doubt that the uinversity does something wrong, but the burden is on you to prove it. If no further information of your proof, then this is not a report.