Report: #1448967

Complaint Review: Walden University - Minneapolis Minnesota

  • Submitted:
  • Updated:
  • Reported By: Liz — Pensacola FL United States
  • Author Confirmed What's this?
  • Why?
  • Walden University 155 5th Ave S, Ste 100 Minneapolis, Minnesota United States

Walden University Walden University Denied my Re-entry into my PhD Program without Cause Minneapolis, Minnesota

*Consumer Comment: walden PhD program

*Consumer Comment: Unclear

Show customers why they should trust your business over your competitors...

Is this
Report about YOU
listed on other sites?
Those sites steal
Ripoff Report's
We can get those
removed for you!
Find out more here.
How to fix
Ripoff Report
If your business is
willing to make a
commitment to
customer satisfaction
Click here now..

I was in my dissertation stage when Walden removed me from the program.  They asked that I write a letter for re-entry and I did - I was never notified of the reason for not being able to get back into the Program.  In fact, I had to keep emailing the Academic Advising Counselor who was working with me before he was able to find a letter in which he said was mailed to me, I found that to be interesting since the letter never arrived here at my house.  But when I asked for the reason for denial of re-entry into the program - No one ever got back to me.  

The Academic Advising Supervisor told me to get one of my Professors to write me a letter.  I told her that wasn't one of the requirements for re-entry.  Walden took my years of payment and time spent on my Ph.D. and gave me nothing.  I have a big student loan and nothing for it... but Walden has now more professor and larger base and because of mine and other funds.

This report was posted on Ripoff Report on 06/25/2018 04:42 PM and is a permanent record located here: https://www.ripoffreport.com/reports/walden-university/minneapolis-minnesota-55401/walden-university-walden-university-denied-my-re-entry-into-my-phd-program-without-cause-m-1448967. The posting time indicated is Arizona local time. Arizona does not observe daylight savings so the post time may be Mountain or Pacific depending on the time of year. Ripoff Report has an exclusive license to this report. It may not be copied without the written permission of Ripoff Report. READ: Foreign websites steal our content

Search for additional reports

If you would like to see more Rip-off Reports on this company/individual, search here:

Report & Rebuttal
Respond to this report!
What's this?
Also a victim?
What's this?
Repair Your Reputation!
What's this?

Updates & Rebuttals


#2 Consumer Comment

walden PhD program

AUTHOR: mouse - (United States)

POSTED: Sunday, November 25, 2018

Judge Not:

Walden screwed me over financially and time wise. She or he probably doesn't have the answers for many reasons. Don't blame the victim unless YOU TOO have all of the facts.

Respond to this report!
What's this?

#1 Consumer Comment


AUTHOR: Chaiya - (United States)

POSTED: Tuesday, June 26, 2018

I have a higher expectation for the report quality from someone who is (or was) in a Ph.D. program. Your report, however, is unclear but rather a rant.

First, you did not tell the reader why you were removed from the program in the first place. The removal reason may shed some lights to why they denied the re-entry. Second, the first AAC should have been able to tell you the reason if the person found the letter. He claimed to "send" you a "physical" letter, so it is very likely that he has seen its content. I don't believe that a letter is already printed and put inside an envelope when he found it (too odd). Why didn't you ask for the reason right there and then? Third, from your report, the first AAC and the second AAC are different persons (the first is he and the second is she). Couldn't you keep in touch with the first AAC? Last, why couldn't you get a letter from your professor when the second AAC asked you to do? It shouldn't be a problem at all regardless your knowledge of requirements. However, for this last question reason, then it goes back to the first question -- why were you removed from the program?

Your report is not a report at all but rather a kind of rant. With your education level, you should have known better that writing a report like this requires you to prove what you claim/accuse. I have no doubt that the uinversity does something wrong, but the burden is on you to prove it. If no further information of your proof, then this is not a report.

Respond to this report!
What's this?

Advertisers above have met our
strict standards for business conduct.

What do hackers,
questionable attorneys and
fake court orders have in common?
...Dishonest Reputation Management Investigates Reputation Repair
Free speech rights compromised

Segment Now