American Interlock Total Court Services Why you should not do business with American Interlock Royal Oak Michigan

Yes your story does clear it up.  It shows how even though you tried to infer that you shouldn't have to go through this because it has been 24 years isn't really the full story.  The reality is that you got your license back in 1999. You admit that you were aware that one of the conditions was to have one of these devices put in. You never "manned up" and put the device in your car.  For various reasons it took them 22 years to catch up to you, and if you didn't run that red light probably would still be driving without the device.

Now you are paying the consequences you should have done a couple of decades ago to put this behind you.  One curious thing is how did you get a Canadian Drivers license with 2 DUI convictions. They have just as strict laws, in fact I believe a bit stricter.   Also, Canadian Provinces and US States often share information like this and I am sure they would have wanted to know your current DL status.  I won't say you outright lied but I would bet you were "less than honest" when filling out the applications.

You are trying to make it about this company, and that is fine. If they were really this bad why didn't you change well before this? But what it really comes down to is that you are the one who put yourself in this situation and while you are taking SOME responsibiltity you are still trying to make excuses and not taking FULL responsibility.

Robert, I am not certain why it's so important considering I am on here to warn people about American Interlock, but you asked so I will tell you. I had two drunk driving cases six months apart. In 1999 I applied for a driver license, I was awarded a driver license with the device only. At the time it didn't matter anyway because I did not own a car, when I would get a car I would get the device. I got married. My wife was from Canada and that's where we decided to live. I applied for and was granted a driver license in Ontario. I was stopped in Sterling Heights for running a red light a few years back, and the process began to have the device put on my vehicle, Robert. The sentence of two years with the device was upheld from the 93 conviction. Hope that satisfies your curiosity, Robert.

It is good that you stopped drinking years ago, but you say this happened 24 years ago, and only had this device in your car for 20 months?

I know the courts are slow but 22 years to hear a Drunk Driving case? 

As according to MI state law it appears to take at least 2 convicitions within a period of time to even have this device required. So on that it can't be that single conviction unless it was more serious than for just drunk driving.

So what is the rest of the story here?