Report: #519324

Complaint Review: Air Parcel Express, APX, shipping-worldwide.com, freight-calculator.com - Doral Florida

  • Submitted:
  • Updated:
  • Reported By: Paul — Willits California U.S.A.
  • Air Parcel Express, APX, shipping-worldwide.com, freight-calculator.com 2315 NW 107 th Ave, Unit M-128 Doral, Florida United States of America

Show customers why they should trust your business over your competitors...

Is this
Ripoff Report
About you?
Ripoff Report
A business' first
line of defense
on the Internet.
If your business is
willing to make a
commitment to
customer satisfaction
Click here now..

Air Parcel Express Breach of Duty, which by the way has nothing to do with SCAM, knowingly exposed me to a substantial loss, which any reasonable person in the same situation would clearly have realized.  It has been seven months and Air Parcel Express has failed to compensate me for me losses due to their companys incompetence.

This complaint arises due to Air Parcel Express (APX) sending my cargo to the wrong country. On the 8th of April 2009 my cargo was shipped to Riga, Latvia instead of St. Petersburg, Russia.

The contract given to me by Air Parcel Express (APX), clearly stated the Port of Discharge was to be in St. Petersburg, Russia.

I was accepted to live in Russia in November of 2008. The charges by customs in

Russia for household goods were to be minimal do to the fact that I am married to a

Russian citizen.

APX contracted Conterm Consolidation Services to ship my cargo to Russia.

Penta Maritime Agencies Ltd, was contracted to transport my cargo from Riga,

Latvia to Russia. APX did not inform me that his cargo was going to be

transported from New York to another country and then transported by truck to the

original destination, which was at the Port in St. Petersburg when I agreed to the

Contract with APX.

APX informed me that my cargo would arrive on the 8th of April 2009.

On the 5th of March 2009 I was emailed an insurance contract from ACIS Cargo

Underwritting Agency Ltd. (ACIS). The insurance certificate informed me that my

cargo was being sent to St. Petersburg, Russia and if damage occurred to cargo a Surveyor in St. Petersburg should be contacted. APX did not inform me at the time insurance was purchased on the 14th of January 2009 that there was a $500 deductible if my cargo was damaged.

On the 6th of April 2009 Penta Maritime Agencies contacted me to inform him that my cargo would be arriving on the 7th of April 2009 in Riga, Latvia.

I had to cancel train tickets to St. Petersburg due to his cargo being sent to another country.

On the 19th of April I took a train to Moscow. I had to be at customs on the 20th of April to present documents for my cargo.

I incurred extra fees due to my cargo being shipped to the wrong country and having paper work, which was incorrectly filed out in Riga, Latvia.

Due to several mistakes on APX behalf, I had to spend three days in

Moscow paying officials to redo paperwork to get clearance to have his cargo sent to

Belgorod, Russia.

I was at customs for two days, 16 hours before finding out that 2 of the 10 crates sent to Russia had been damaged. I was not able to exam damage at customs in

Moscow. I was only allowed to take photos of the crates.

When Penta Maritime Agencies Ltd unloaded my cargo in Riga they failed to inform me that one of my crates was severally damaged and that a second crate had minor damage.

Before my cargo was transported from Riga to Moscow I was having problems with the manager of Penta Maritime Agencies Ltd. The manager threatens my wife twice on two phone conversations saying to my wife that drugs could easily be placed into my cargo.

I was accepted to live in Russia this past year, so the charges by customs for me were to be minimal. The fees in Belgorod, Russia, by customs was zero and storage for the day was half the normal cost, which came to 1291.20 Rubles. This is because I had special documents to live in Belgorod Russia and because my wife lives in Russia.

I had to pay Penta Maritime Agencies a fee of $633.54 for cargo being delivered to the Port of Riga instead of he Port in St. Petersburg. Because paperwork was done in Riga Latvia it had to be redone in Russia before my cargo could be inspected by customs in Russia and before it could be transported through the Russian Federation.

I could not go through customs in Moscow because the Port of Discharge was in another country, Riga, Latvia instead of the Port of Discharge in St. Petersburg. The paper work from Riga had several mistakes, which forced me to pay extra for a special transport truck from Moscow to Belgorod. The trucking cost was 12885.36 Rubles

Customs paperwork in Moscow cost 8114.64 Rubles and storage fees at Moscow customs cost 15978 Rubles. The total cost that I would not have had to pay comes to 36978 Rubles. I would also not have had to pay the fee of $633.54

Penta Maritime Agencies Ltd.

In a letter to the Better Business Bureau the Director of APX writes the following:

Dear BBB:

The CARRIER "CONTERM" is at fault as they did not follow our instructions and did not follow what they confirmed ... we are in the process of making amends and correcting the situation with the shipper by forcing the carrier to respond.

If there is anything else I can do for you please let me know.


Andy x 105


Air Parcel Express, Inc.

This report was posted on Ripoff Report on 11/04/2009 07:39 AM and is a permanent record located here: https://www.ripoffreport.com/reports/air-parcel-express-apx-shipping-worldwidecom-freight-calculatorcom/doral-florida-33172/air-parcel-express-apx-shipping-worldwidecom-freight-calculatorcom-air-parcel-expres-519324. The posting time indicated is Arizona local time. Arizona does not observe daylight savings so the post time may be Mountain or Pacific depending on the time of year. Ripoff Report has an exclusive license to this report. It may not be copied without the written permission of Ripoff Report. READ: Foreign websites steal our content

Search for additional reports

If you would like to see more Rip-off Reports on this company/individual, search here:

Report & Rebuttal
Respond to this report!
Also a victim?
Repair Your Reputation!

Updates & Rebuttals


#4 REBUTTAL Owner of company

APX Acted in Accordance to Bill Of Lading - On-Forwarding Charges Shown On Quote Refers To A Stop Over

AUTHOR: Ceoapx - (USA)

POSTED: Thursday, November 15, 2012
Under the terms and conditions in every bill of lading from any shipping company there is a condition stating that the carrier can route cargo in any manner that get it to the final destination.  In this case Riga.  The fault of NACA was to NOT infom us APX - Air Parcel Express, Inc. that there was a Riga stop.  We communicated as communication was issued in the time of booking with no prejudice to the shipper or the logistics chain.
Respond to this report!

#3 Author of original report

Air Parcel Express, Silly That You Think We Shipped Your Cargo To Latvia Instead Of Russia!

AUTHOR: Paul - (U.S.A.)

POSTED: Friday, February 05, 2010

I received from Andy the CEO/Director of Air Parcel Express (APX).  Here is the email that he sent me on the 2nd of February 2010, Email 1:

Re: HELPTuesday, February 2, 2010 7:32 AM

From: "RATES@"

To: "Paul "

Paul ... your goods were not sent to the wrong country ... dont be silly ... they went to the place you booked them to ... your insurance was binded and your loss was less than $500 ... I am not going to pay you for something we are not liable for.

If there is anything else I can do for you please let me know.


Andy x 105



Andy refers to the 82 +/- page Conditions of Contract that was an email link sent to me the day before my cargo was delivered to Conterm C/O Safepack, in San Francisco, CA. (see attached Exhibit I).

There are several complaints and errors made by Air Parcel Express with my shipment and contract documents.  I am only going to give you the facts and documents, which relate to my cargo being sent to the country of Latvia instead of the contracted country of Russia. See Exhibits A,B,C,D,E,F &G.

On July 27, 2009 Andy states that, Email2: the Carrier Conterm is at fault as they did not follow what they confirmed(See Email 2 below).  My contract was with Air Parcel Express.  On every document given to me Air Parcel Expresss name and address are present. (see attached Exhibits A,B,C,D,E,F,and G).

Andy states in the above email Paulyour goods were not sent to the wrong countrydont be sillythey went to the place you booked them to (see Email 3 below).

I booked my cargo as stated in my contract to be transported by ship and delivered in the geographic limits of the port of discharge, which was located in the country of Russia and in the port of St. Petersburg. (see attached Exhibits A,B,C,D,E, and G).

Andy stated on the Rip off Report No scam on forwarding to St. Petersburg specified on Quote and Book. My first Quote From Air Parcel Express, dated November 11, 2008, Quote No:0774910, states the following: OCEAN PORT TO PORT RATES FROM SAN FRANCISCO TO ST. PETERSBURG (RUSSIA) [EUROPE], (see attached Exhibit G).

Andy mentions on forwarding from Riga to Russia and that it is stated in my contract as Fact and justification for the mistake of putting my cargo into the wrong container and then on the wrong ship is Misrepresentation of Facts, which they have had documents, which were given to Air Parcel Express back in April of 2009.  

When I asked Marita at Penta Maritime Agencies to supplied the documents stating that it was Air Parcel Expresss intention to have my cargo sent via Riga, Latvia and then forward to Russia, I was not given these documents (see Email3 below). Air Parcel Expresss name is typed on the Bill as shipper, which was given to me from Penta Maritime Agencies, located in Riga, Latvia (see Exhibit F).

Another fact, which indicates that it was not the intention to forward my cargo from Riga, Latvia to Russia is that when my cargo was taken out of a seal container in the United States my cargo was no longer being transported from the United States. As a Matter of Fact from that point on the United States is not mentioned nor is Conterm / Air Parcel Express on documents from Latvia.  The truck transport papers stated that I was shipping my cargo from Latvia into Russia (see attached Exhibit H).

On April 23, 2009 I informed Air Parcel Express (APX) that my cargo was sent to the wrong country and a representative from (APX) stated the following: let me pull out your file and have the agent look into this as well (see Email 3 below).  I did not hear back from Air Parcel Express (APX) until late July of 2009.

Because my cargo was sent to the wrong country Riga, Latvia and taken out of a sealed container and because the shipper did not provide documents for my cargo to be shipped from Latvia into Russia my wife and I were subjected to threats by the management at Penta Maritime Agencies in Riga, Latvia.  It was stated to my wife that the manager could easily have drugs put into my cargo.  This is also another reason why the documents, which I had for my cargo in the United States were now not being accepted by Russia due to the sealed container being open in a country were my cargo was not to be delivered to; and then having all document rewritten for that country, to ship my cargo to  Russia. Email 2

55093917 - RUSSIAMonday, July 27, 2009 9:38 AM

From: "RATES

To: inf

Cc: p

Dear B:

The CARRIER "CONTERM" is at fault as they did not follow our instructions and did not follow what they confirmed ... we are in the process of making amends and correcting the situation with the shipper by forcing the carrier to respond.

If there is anything else I can do for you please let me know.


Andy x 105


Air Parcel Express, Inc.

Email 3

Re: 774910Thursday, April 23, 2009 5:27 AM


To: "Paul "

Dear Paul,

let me pull out your files and have the agent look into this as well.


On Apr 23, 2009, at 12:46 AM, Paul wrote:

Hello Gina,

I have tried to reach your company by phone and email several times now without any reply..

The Port of Discharge of my crates was in Riga, which is not Russia.  I am now having to pay fees,which I would not have had to pay if my crates were delivered to Russia in the first place.

In my Booking Confirmation it clearly states the Port of Discharge is St. Petersburg. 

I do not live in St. Petersburg and the reason for delivery to the Port in St. Petersburg was so that my crates would go through customs in Russia and could easily be transfered to Belgorod, Russia where I am living.

Delivery of my crates to another country is Fraud in Fact.  If your company fails to correct this matter and compensate me for all of the extra expenses that I am now having to pay because of my crates being sent to another country first then I will have no other choice than to file charges against your company.

Several mistakes were made on my transport documents by Penta Maritime Agencies Ltd.

I spent the past three days in Moscow doing paper work and getting someone who knows the people in customs at Moscow to over look the errors on my documents. My crates are in a sealed truck on the way to customs in Belgorod.  Customs in Moscow knows that these mistake will have to be taken care of at customs in Belgorod before they will release my crates to me, which I paid $633.54 to Penta Maritime Agencies Ltd.

I paid another $720 in fees for paper work that would have been included if my crates were delivered to The Port of Discharge in St. Petersburg in the first place.

Please note the following letter:

April 23, 2009

 Hello Marita,

 I got to inspect my crates yesterday before they were put on another truck to Belgorod.

Crate #4 was severally damaged.  The side of the crate was crack opened and the lid of the crate, which was lock with pad locks, was completely broken.  Someone used shrink-wrap to hold the lid onto the toolbox.

Ivan your truck driver mentioned that he was not around when the crates were loaded.  He stated to Natasha that crate #4 was damaged before my crates were un-loaded from his truck.

The storage manager at customs also has stated that crate #4 had been damaged before it was unloaded from Ivans truck.

Where was this crate damaged?

Please email me the copies that you have from APX stating the Port of Discharge!

Please note that Port of Discharge is different from destination of cargo!

Thank you,



Andy presents documents to the public on this matter without reference to were in the document(s) that his company has the right to send my cargo, which was sealed in the United States (see attached Exhibit E) and have the cargo unload from the sealed container before shipping it to the final destination.  Andy also does not state that when they shipped my cargo to Riga, Latvia, which is not part of Russia, they did so without giving Penta Martime Agencies the paper work to send me my cargo in Russia. Further down in this article is an email from Penta Martime Agencies requesting my documents.

Andy does not acknowledge in any of his posting that my cargo was put in the wrong shipping container.  In my Bill of Lading (Exhibit E) dated March 10. 2009, from Conterm/Air Parcel Express it states that my cargo was shipped in a sealed container ID: CLHU903150-8.  When my cargo arrived in the country of Latvia, my cargo was unloaded from a container with the ID:OOLU8315655 (see attached Exhibit F), dated April 14, 2009.

It is my understanding that the geographic limits of shipping cargo is related to the port of discharge and that the port of discharge by definition is the port where cargo is unloaded from the vessel. It is also my understanding that the geographic limits is also related to what is stated on my Bill of  Lading as to where the port of discharge is stated on this document.  The Port of Discharge in my document states: St. Petersburg (see attach Exhibit E).

I spent two months researching information about shipping my cargo.  I spent lots of time on the phone with Freight Calculator and Air Parcel Express.  I presented special documents to Air Parcel Express, which would allow me to have minimal fees charged by customs in Russia if my cargo was delivered to the Port of discharge in St. Petersburg. 

My first document with Air Parcel Express in dated November 11, 2008.  At the bottom of the page under Rating Details it states the following: Ocean Port to Port Rates from San Francisco To St. Petersburg (Russia) [Europe] (see attached Exhibit G). In The Booking Confirmation dated January 7, 2009, it states the Port of Discharge St. Petersburg (see attached Exhibit B).  In the LCL Dock Receipt dated January 7, 2009, it states the Port of Discharge in St. Petersburg ( see attached Exhibit C). The Invoice statement dated January 14, 2009, it states the DEST. St. PETERS (see attached Exhibit A). In the Certificate Of Marine Cargo Insurance, dated March 5, 2009, it states Voyage To St. Petersburg, Russia (see attached Exhibit D).

The vessel  Liverpool Express 16 carrying my cargo did not reach the agreed geographic limits of the port of discharge, which was to be in St. Petersburg, Russia.  My cargo was delivered to a port in Riga, Latvia, which is its own country and way outside the geographical limits of the Ports of discharge located in St. Petersburg, Russia.

 20(Delivery) (A) The Ocean Carrier shall have the right to deliver the Goods at any time at the Vessels side, customhouse, warehouse, wharf, or any other place

designated by the Ocean Carrier, within the geographic limits of the port of discharge or place of delivery shown of the face of this Bill of Lading.

Due to my cargo being sent to Riga, Latvia instead of the Port of Discharge in St. Petersburg Russia I was charged extra fees due to my cargo being unloaded from a sealed container in a country that was not the intended destination of my cargo.

Penta Maritime Agencies, the agency that was contract to get my cargo into Russia did not have documents from Conterm or Air Parcel Express to ship my cargo from Riga, Latvia into Russia.  This is due to the fact that my cargo was to be delivered to the Port of Discharge in St. Petersburg Russia.

All of my documents for my cargo were presented to customs on the Passenger Customs Declaration form at the Moscow airport on the 4th of March 2009, which would allow me to move my cargo easily through Russia territory if my cargo had been shipped to the Port of Discharge in St. Petersburg in the first place. Because my documents for cargo were rewritten in another country and because my cargo was not being shipped from Latvia, my documents no longer matched what was given to me from Air Parcel Express (APX), because of this all of my documents had to be translated again and rewritten by officials in Moscow before my cargo could be transported through Russia and then inspected by customs.

The following email from Penta Maritme Agencies would not forward my cargo into Russia with out copies of all my original documents give to me from Air Parcel Express.  This is due to the fact that my documents were only valid in Russia to have my cargo transported from the USA into Russia.  I did not have documents to have my cargo to be sent from a third country Riga, Latvia into Russia.

Penta Maritime Agencies had to have my documents rewritten in order to come into Russia.

Re: ARRIVAL NOTICE MIA/SPG/C00000 OOLU8315655Monday, April 6, 2009 3:09 AM

--- On Mon, 4/6/09, Marita-Penta wrote:

From: Marita-Penta

Subject: ARRIVAL NOTICE MIA/SPG/C00000 OOLU8315655

To: p

Date: Monday, April 6, 2009, 12:37 AM

Dear Customer,


: MIA/SPG/C00000




We kindly inform you that ETA of above cargo to Riga in consolidated container is 07.04.2009.

Upon container arrival to Riga Port cargo will be reloaded from container to Customs Terminal in Riga.

Planned date of re-stuffing: 08.04.2009.

Pls. note : for shipment to Russia, we confirm trucking only up to Moscow or St.Petersburg.

To organize cargo transportation from Riga to Moscow / St.Petersburg we need:

1. Copy of all cargo documents (Packing List, Invoice, Certificate, is any, etc) issue and stamped by Shipper

2. Cargo documents translation on RU language with  TNVED cargo codes, quantity and weight for each TNVED position.

3. Address of CFS in Moscow / St.Petersburg

4. Payment of Destination charges as follows:

Destination charges: EUR 35,00 PER MEASUREMENT

   DOCS FEE = eur 35,00 per shipment

   Delivery to CFS, nominated by Cnee - EUR 100,00 per shipment

   Delivery from CFS to Bonded warehouse, after customs clearance - eur 100,00 per multistop.

5. Storage at Customs Terminal, Riga:

   1-3 days: free, after that eur 2,50 per day/per w/m

*  Customs clearance - responsibility of Cnee and on the acc.of Cnee.

** Free unloading time (including customs formalities) - 1 day

After receipt of all necessary cargo documents and payments, cargo will be scheduled to the first available consolidated truck.

Please confirm the receipt of the arrival notice by return. Thank you. Best regards, Marita

Penta Maritime Agencies

Riga LV-1010, Latvia

21. (On-Carriage and Forwarding)  (C) If the Goods cannot be found at the port    of discharge or place of delivery, or if they be miscarried, they, when found, may be forwarded to their intended port of discharge or place of delivery at the Ocean Carrier's expense, but the Ocean Carrier shall not be liable for any loss, damage, delay, or depreciation arising from such forwarding.

Ocean Carrier Air Parcel Express / Conterm miscarried my cargo under the theirs terms in the contract provide to me in section 21(c)

In my Bill of Lading (Exhibit E) dated March 10. 2009, from Conterm/Air Parcel Express it states that my cargo was shipped in a sealed container ID: CLHU903150-8.  When my cargo arrived in the country of Latvia, my cargo was unloaded from a container with the ID:OOLU8315655 (see attached Exhibit F), dated April 14, 2009.





Respond to this report!

#2 REBUTTAL Owner of company

APX Acted According to Terms and Conditions

AUTHOR: Ceoapx - (USA)

POSTED: Tuesday, February 02, 2010
METHODS AND ROUTES OF TRANSPORTATION. With respect to the Goods or Containers or other packages, the Carrier may at any time and without notice to the Merchant:
a) use any means of transport (water, land and/or air) or storage whatsoever;
b) forward, transship or retain on board or carry on another vessel or conveyance or by any other means of transport than that named on the reverse side hereof;
c) carry Goods on or under deck at its option;
d) proceed by any route in its sole and absolute discretion and whether the nearest, most direct, customary or advertised route or in or out of geographical rotation;
e) proceed to or stay at any place whatsoever once or more often and in any order or omit calling at any port, whether scheduled or not;
f) store, vanned or devanned, at any place whatsoever, ashore or afloat, in the open or covered;
g) proceed with or without pilots;
h) carry livestock, contraband, explosives, munitions, warlike stores, dangerous or hazardous goods or goods of any and all kinds;
i) drydock or stop at any unscheduled or unadvertised port for bunkers, repairs or for any purpose whatsoever;
j) discharge and require the Merchant to take delivery, vanned or devanned;
k) comply with any orders, directions or recommendations given by any government or authority or by any person or body acting or purporting to act with the authority of any
    government or authority or having under the terms of the insurance on the Vessel or other conveyance employed by the Carrier the right to give such orders, directions or recommendations.
l) take any other steps or precautions as may appear reasonable to the Carrier under the circumstances.
The liberties set out in subdivisions a) through l) may be invoked for any purpose whatsoever even if not connected with the Carriage covered by this Bill of Lading, and any
action taken or omitted to be taken, and any delay arising therefrom, shall be deemed to be within the contractual and contemplated Carriage and not be an unreasonable deviation.
In no circumstance whatsoever shall the Carrier be liable for direct, indirect or consequential loss or damage caused by delay.

and this link is in your booking.


  1. In tendering the shipment described herein for carriage, shipper agrees to these Conditions of Contract which no agent or employee of the parties may alter and agrees that this Air Waybill/SLI is non-negotiable and has been prepared by him or on his behalf by APX.
  2. The shipper shall solely be liable for all cost and expenses incurred in either returning the shipment to the shipper or warehousing the shipment pending of disposition.
  3. Limitations of Liability:The Liability of APX is limited to the lesser of (A) U.S. $100 (B) The amount of loss or damage to a document actually sustained or (C) The actual amount of loss or damage to a document actually sustained hereof, without regards to its commercial utility or special value to the customer.
  4. Actual Value: The actual value of a document (which term shall include any item of no commercial value which is transported hereunder) shall be ascertained by reference to its cost of preparation of replacement reconstruction, or reconstitution value at the time and place of shipment, whichever is less.
  5. Consequential Damages Excluded: APX shall not be liable, in any event, for any consequential or special damages or other indirect loss, however arising, whether or not APX had knowledge that such damage might be incurred, including, but not limited to loss of income, profits, interest utility or loss of market.
  6. Liabilities Not Assumed: While APX will endeavor to exercise its best efforts to provide expeditious delivery in accordance with regular delivery schedules APX will not under any circumstance be liable for delays in pickup transportation or delivery of any shipment regardless of the cost of such delay.

The insurance was binded prior to any loss known and is valid.  There is now way to know when the cargo was damaged.  We know for a fact it was not damaged at the origin warehouse since that would have been reported ... also there is very little handling at origin visa vi the rest of the trip.

Respond to this report!

#1 REBUTTAL Owner of company

SHIPMENT ARRIVED via RIGA in good order

AUTHOR: Ceoapx - (U.S.A.)

POSTED: Wednesday, November 04, 2009
The final destination was reached via RIGA where cargo was de-consolidated and then sent to St. Petersburg.  Russia is notorious for bad service and unreliable supply chain.  We did our best to get the cargo to its final destination however the co-load carrier did not inform APX that the trans-loading would be via RIGA ... where cargo did clear customs once en-route to St. Petersburg.  We have since STOPED servicing RUSSIA on LCL consolidated cargo and are in the process of remunerating the shipper once the issue is cleared up with the CO-LOADER which in this case was NACA Logistics "CONTERM".  We have not forgotten this shipper and we are settling this matter before the year is over with NACA.  As soon as this is resolved the shipper will be informed.  

We regret this incident and cannot corroborate any of the threats he is talking about stemming from his conversation with the NACA agent in RIGA.  Had we known that the shipment was going to trans-load via RIGA we would have given that information to the shipper ... however this information was never given to APX in any of the booking documents therefore we had no idea the cargo was going to be routed in that fashion.

I will be in touch with the shipper once there is clarity as to the amount if any owed to him.  We need to separate the legitimate destination charges with those that the shipper alleges are extraordinary.  As soon as this is clear we will settle this matter with the shipper.  Russia is a nightmare!



Respond to this report!

Advertisers above have met our
strict standards for business conduct.

What do hackers,
questionable attorneys and
fake court orders have in common?
...Dishonest Reputation Management Investigates Reputation Repair
Free speech rights compromised

Segment Now