Ripoff Report Needs Your Help!
X  |  CLOSE
Report: #462204

Complaint Review: Bayview Law Group - Long Beach California

  • Submitted:
  • Updated:
  • Reported By: Pottstown Pennsylvania
  • Author Confirmed What's this?
  • Why?
  • Bayview Law Group 1 World Trade Center Long Beach, California U.S.A.

Bayview Law Group A Victim of Bayview Long Beach California

* : The Other Side of this Story

Show customers why they should trust your business over your competitors...

Is this
Report about YOU
listed on other sites?
Those sites steal
Ripoff Report's
content.
We can get those
removed for you!
Find out more here.
How to fix
Ripoff Report
If your business is
willing to make a
commitment to
customer satisfaction
Click here now..

In October of 2008 I contacted Bayview and talked to a Mr. Larry Van Woerkom. Mr. Van Woerkom was encouraging and assured me that I could resolve my debt issues, based on the information I gave him within four to five years. I was also informed of tax and credit consequences and so agreed to pay an initial fee of $1,054.60 and then a monthly fee of $955.60, which would be placed into an escrow account to accrue until an adequate amount could be accumulated to begin to pay off a reduced settlement on my debts. I approved the withdrawal of these funds from my primary bank account and the automatic withdrawals were made on November 4, 2008, December 4, 2008, January 5, 2009. Unfortunately, I was in more financial trouble than I thought and in February I asked if I could have Bayview not withdraw the funds until I could get straightened out. Mr. Van Woerkom asked me to fax him a letter asking this, and I did. I used moneys from my bank to pay some other debts, but Bayview attempted to withdraw the funds anyway and I ended up being penalized by my bank for insufficient funds. I talked to a person at Bayview and informed him of this problem, and during the month of March 2009, Bayview did not make a withdrawal, however I sent a letter again asking Bayview not to withdraw any funds for the month of April as well, and again, they ignored my request and again I had insufficient funds in my bank account. this also happened in May, at which time I was having a number of other serious financial problems so I contacted a person named Media at Bayview and informed her that I wanted to terminate my agreement with Bayview. Media was very kind but persistent and very much tried to talk me out of terminating, but finally agreed to take care of my request. She later called me and left a message indicating that my request was approved. By this time Bayview had withdrawn $4,750.42 from my bank account, which I had believed that approximately three thousand dollars would have been placed into an escrow account.

I made the request to terminate on May 25, 2009, and on Saturday, May 30 I received an envelope, hand written from Crowder/Bayview, 350 S. Figueroa, Street, #190, Los Angeles, CA with a check made out to me from a Wells Fargo Bank account min the amount of eight hundred and twenty-nine dollars and two cents, with a memo notation of 386 williams refund Bay View Law Trust. The check had a signature which appears to be Suzanne Eisen... My current circumstance is that my wife and I are filing for bankruptcy, which has been a difficult route to tread, but we received some very good counseling and can at least see some way out of this mess. My sense is that Bayview has simply found a way to rip off people who are already down and out and are willing to trust them.

Ron
Pottstown, Pennsylvania
U.S.A.

This report was posted on Ripoff Report on 06/17/2009 07:03 AM and is a permanent record located here: https://www.ripoffreport.com/reports/bayview-law-group/long-beach-california/bayview-law-group-a-victim-of-bayview-long-beach-california-462204. The posting time indicated is Arizona local time. Arizona does not observe daylight savings so the post time may be Mountain or Pacific depending on the time of year. Ripoff Report has an exclusive license to this report. It may not be copied without the written permission of Ripoff Report. READ: Foreign websites steal our content

Search for additional reports

If you would like to see more Rip-off Reports on this company/individual, search here:

Report & Rebuttal
Respond to this report!
What's this?
Also a victim?
What's this?
Repair Your Reputation!
What's this?

Updates & Rebuttals

REBUTTALS & REPLIES:
0Author
1Consumer
0Employee/Owner

#1

The Other Side of this Story

AUTHOR: Bay view law employee - (U.S.A.)

POSTED: Thursday, September 10, 2009

Our former client, Ron, of Pottstown, PA, brands us thieves falsely. We are a law firm that represents clients who need help in settling their credit card debts with their creditor banks. We negotiate hard on behalf of our clients, and give the same zealous defense of clients positions that litigation attorneys provide. Debt settlement is a complicated procedure that should be handled by attorneys. We strongly suggest a law firm that is large enough to negotiate and process each case in a timely and ethical manner. Hiring a firm consisting of laymen does NOT provide legal representation for the client.

We did not in ANY way deceive Ron, or fail to deliver the representation he requested. On 5/29/08 one of our client service specialist spoke with Ron and because of the hardship he explained she offered to him our services pro bono in other words, for FREE. Ron declined. He then faxed in a cancelation notice and specifically requested a refund of his trust account. As he stated, he received a check for $829.02. He requested no further refunds and did not contact us again. Once he cashed the check, he posted his note here without any attempt to discuss his dissatisfaction with us. We refunded his trust money and offered him free service. Those actions are not the actions of thieves. Its what a law firm does to insure their actions are in the best interest of the client.

Respond to this report!
What's this?
Featured Reports

Advertisers above have met our
strict standards for business conduct.

X
What do hackers,
questionable attorneys and
fake court orders have in common?
...Dishonest Reputation Management Investigates Reputation Repair
Free speech rights compromised

WATCH News
Segment Now