Ripoff Report Needs Your Help!
X  |  CLOSE
Report: #336411

Complaint Review: Flow BMW - Winston-Salem North Carolina

  • Submitted:
  • Updated:
  • Reported By: Kingsport Tennessee
  • Author Confirmed What's this?
  • Why?
  • Flow BMW 2565 Peters Creek Parkway Winston-Salem, North Carolina U.S.A.

Show customers why they should trust your business over your competitors...

Is this
Report about YOU
listed on other sites?
Those sites steal
Ripoff Report's
content.
We can get those
removed for you!
Find out more here.
How to fix
Ripoff Report
If your business is
willing to make a
commitment to
customer satisfaction
Click here now..

Through a cars.com search I located a (used) vehicle of interest at Flow BMW. I called the dealership and spoke with Bob Smith (Used Car Sales Mgr) to confirm details/availability. He confirmed that the vehicle met the listed specifications, and he verified that (a) the vehicle had never been in an accident, and (b) the vehicle had never been repainted, etc. Based upon his glowing report, my family decided to proceed with the 200mi-3.5hr trek to Winston-Salem. Oh yeah, Bob also mentioned that they had paid $1200 to get 4 new PAX tires put on the vehicle.

Upon arrival at the lot, I was greeted by salesman Ed Simmons. After a brief inspection of the vehicle, I noticed several anomalies with the paint: 1. left rear edge of roof was rough, 2. rear left corner of bumper cover kept popping loose, 3. bumper cover had an average quality paint job (i.e. the fact it had been repainted was glaringly obvious), and 4. the rear hatch (minivan) did not close evenly -- there was a large gap on the right but not on the left.

I was asking Ed open-ended questions about these issues, searching for an explanation since Bob Smith had assured me the vehicle was accident-free. At this point, Ed went inside to pull the CarFax report on vehicle. He came back a few minutes later and let me know that CarFax was reporting that the vehicle _had_ been in an accident, requiring work to the rear bumper cover and decklid.

At this point I was pretty annoyed that Bob had misled me about the condition of the car. To paraphrase Ed's response: "I'm sure Bob was just confused, and not trying to mislead you. Besides, the CarFax report was freely available on our website." Ed was actually getting a bit snippy at this point -- I definitely didn't need that. Honestly, I don't recall if I saw the link or not -- regardless, Bob obviously had access to this freely available CarFax report, too. However, he chose either to not read it, or to ignore it. Ed had no response for this.

Next I asked Ed to call the previous owner so that they could give me some details about the true severity of the accident. At first he refused, but he eventually relented and went inside. He came back outside ~20mins later and said that the previous owner was on vacation and could not be contacted, but he spoke with the sales rep that had handled theirr trade. She told Ed that the previous owner stated that they had backed into a mailbox, sustaining only minor cosmetic damage.

I pressed for Ed to try calling the ex-owner on their cell phone but he refused. While the family and I were deciding on our path forward, the General Manager of Flow BMW (forgot his name...) came out to meet me and apologize for the miscommunication. He assured me that no one at Flow BMW was deliberately trying to deceive me, and that Bob's error was merely an accident. Furthermore, he stated that he had personally worked on the trade with the previous owner and he confirmed that the damage was due to a minor "mailbox" impact.

Since it was getting late and I had no way of directly contacting the previous owner that evening, we agreed to make the 3.5hr trek back home and followup with Flow BMW on Monday morning. Ed agreed to contact the previous owner and ask them to contact me to discuss details of the accident.

By collecting the VIN and other information from the vehicle, I was ultimately able to track down the name/address/phone of the previous owner once I left the dealership. My sleuthing also determined that the previous owner had replaced one of the tires a week or two before trading the van in to Flow BMW. That casts quite a bit of doubt on Bob's claim of having to put 4 new tires on the van.

Over the weekend I called the previous owner's home, and spoke to their spouse (or maybe older kid). I gave them my name and told them I was looking at their previous vehicle, but I wanted more details about their mailbox incident. I could visualize their furrowed brow as they said "What mailbox? We were rear-ended in the left rear quarter at a stoplight."

It turns out that the rear bumper and decklid were replaced, and the rear left quarter-panel was moderately damaged. It was not a minor, cosmetic accident. I thanked them for their time, and let 'em go.

On Monday morning, Ed called to let me know that the previous owner had agreed to call me to discuss the details of the accident. He reiterated that it was a minor collision, but they would clear up the details later in the day.

I then informed Ed that I had spoken with the previous owner's family, and that I now had the factual details of the accident. I told him that the vehicle was no longer a candidate for purchase because of the repair history combined with their unethical behavior.

The only thing Ed could say now was that they were merely conveying the details as the previous owner had reported them. He then began attacking me for violating their legal agreements not to give out customer contact info, threatening lawsuits, etc. In other words, being quite rude & hateful since they had lied their way out of a car sale.

I calmly explained that as I am not an employee of Flow BMW, I am not bound by any agreements. Furthermore, the information that I used to track down the previous owner was not concealed or secured (e.g. the VIN is in plain sight). Also, the previous owner's family was happy to straighten out Flow BMW's misunderstandings with me.

At the end of this ordeal, I am most annoyed by the fact that I made my young kids ride in the car for 7 hrs and sit in the showroom for 2 hrs. The lesson for me is that I need to do even more investigation before heading off to a distant car lot. The lesson for others? Maybe this isn't typical behavior for car salesman these days -- but it's certainly stereotypical behavior.

Watch out for Flow BMW in Winston-Salem!

B
Kingsport, Tennessee
U.S.A.

Click here to read other Rip Off Reports on BMW

This report was posted on Ripoff Report on 06/02/2008 01:07 PM and is a permanent record located here: https://www.ripoffreport.com/reports/flow-bmw/winston-salem-north-carolina-27127/flow-bmw-misrepresented-the-condition-of-a-used-vehicle-ie-lied-several-times-winston-336411. The posting time indicated is Arizona local time. Arizona does not observe daylight savings so the post time may be Mountain or Pacific depending on the time of year. Ripoff Report has an exclusive license to this report. It may not be copied without the written permission of Ripoff Report. READ: Foreign websites steal our content

Search for additional reports

If you would like to see more Rip-off Reports on this company/individual, search here:

Report & Rebuttal
Respond to this report!
What's this?
Also a victim?
What's this?
Repair Your Reputation!
What's this?

Updates & Rebuttals

REBUTTALS & REPLIES:
0Author
5Consumer
1Employee/Owner

#6 Consumer Comment

Similiar Experience, same group of people

AUTHOR: Sparkiesdad - (U.S.A.)

POSTED: Saturday, August 08, 2009

I regret that I just now discovered this site or Mr. B from Knoxville may have avoided his trip to this dealership. On December 31, 2007, yes that long ago, I found a very attractive BMW convertible at a great price listed online by Flow BMW. I phoned the dealership, spoke with a female sales person, have forgoten her name, who answered all of my questions except two. Which she promised she would research and answer the next morning, New Year's Day. She phoned me at around 10 am with the answers. I told her I would leave right away to travel the 2.5 hours to see and likely purchase the vehicle. I told her I would be arriving by 1 pm at the latest. She assured me she would get the keys to the car and hold it until I got there. At approximately 12:15 pm, I was half an hour away and this sales person phoned me and said that the USED CAR SALES MANAGER was selling the car and there was nothing she could do about it.
I screamed and yelled to several people in management. And when I insisted on talking to "the man who's name was on the big sign out front" as I put it, I was promised a return phone call. A managing partner phoned me about an hour later and apologized and promised to send me a check for my gas. He did send $100.

Nevertheless, this type of behavior seems to be the norm at this dealership.

Respond to this report!
What's this?

#5 Consumer Comment

Similiar Experience, same group of people

AUTHOR: Sparkiesdad - (U.S.A.)

POSTED: Saturday, August 08, 2009

I regret that I just now discovered this site or Mr. B from Knoxville may have avoided his trip to this dealership. On December 31, 2007, yes that long ago, I found a very attractive BMW convertible at a great price listed online by Flow BMW. I phoned the dealership, spoke with a female sales person, have forgoten her name, who answered all of my questions except two. Which she promised she would research and answer the next morning, New Year's Day. She phoned me at around 10 am with the answers. I told her I would leave right away to travel the 2.5 hours to see and likely purchase the vehicle. I told her I would be arriving by 1 pm at the latest. She assured me she would get the keys to the car and hold it until I got there. At approximately 12:15 pm, I was half an hour away and this sales person phoned me and said that the USED CAR SALES MANAGER was selling the car and there was nothing she could do about it.
I screamed and yelled to several people in management. And when I insisted on talking to "the man who's name was on the big sign out front" as I put it, I was promised a return phone call. A managing partner phoned me about an hour later and apologized and promised to send me a check for my gas. He did send $100.

Nevertheless, this type of behavior seems to be the norm at this dealership.

Respond to this report!
What's this?

#4 Consumer Comment

Similiar Experience, same group of people

AUTHOR: Sparkiesdad - (U.S.A.)

POSTED: Saturday, August 08, 2009

I regret that I just now discovered this site or Mr. B from Knoxville may have avoided his trip to this dealership. On December 31, 2007, yes that long ago, I found a very attractive BMW convertible at a great price listed online by Flow BMW. I phoned the dealership, spoke with a female sales person, have forgoten her name, who answered all of my questions except two. Which she promised she would research and answer the next morning, New Year's Day. She phoned me at around 10 am with the answers. I told her I would leave right away to travel the 2.5 hours to see and likely purchase the vehicle. I told her I would be arriving by 1 pm at the latest. She assured me she would get the keys to the car and hold it until I got there. At approximately 12:15 pm, I was half an hour away and this sales person phoned me and said that the USED CAR SALES MANAGER was selling the car and there was nothing she could do about it.
I screamed and yelled to several people in management. And when I insisted on talking to "the man who's name was on the big sign out front" as I put it, I was promised a return phone call. A managing partner phoned me about an hour later and apologized and promised to send me a check for my gas. He did send $100.

Nevertheless, this type of behavior seems to be the norm at this dealership.

Respond to this report!
What's this?

#3 Consumer Comment

Thanx you poster!!!!!

AUTHOR: Anonymous - (U.S.A.)

POSTED: Monday, April 20, 2009

It could have simply been a miscommunication but it is best to err on the side of caution when you are spending over $50k on a car. I am currently in the market for a BMW and FLOW was one of the dealerships I have contacted regarding some used cars I was looking at, as well as some new ones. I will opt out of their dealership now. Thankfully you were able to find these problems before you bought the car, not all are so lucky. BTW, I'm originally from Kingsport, TN area as well (Gate City). That was quiet a drive!

Respond to this report!
What's this?

#2 Consumer Comment

Can't blame them for being misinformed

AUTHOR: E30matt - (U.S.A.)

POSTED: Friday, April 10, 2009

I'm a longstanding customer of Flow BMW, have bought thousands of dollars of parts there for various older BMWs I own/have owned, and I personally know many of the sales staff as well as the owner and employees you dealt with. I have to say, it is 100% not in the nature of any of the staff at Flow BMW/Mini to be dishonest in any practice. I'm sure the entire situation was all due to misinformation or simply incomplete disclosure of prior damages to the vehicle.

And bravo to whichever one of you at the dealership wrote the reply. Candor and honesty in dealing with a disgruntled customer are values you do NOT see just anywhere these days.

I'll be seeing you soon, I'm sure.

Respond to this report!
What's this?

#1 REBUTTAL Owner of company

Rebutal, Clarification, and Apology

AUTHOR: Flow Bmw - (U.S.A.)

POSTED: Thursday, July 10, 2008

First, let me state that Flow BMW does not dispute or rebut any of the feelings of frustration and disappointment expressed by Mr. B., Kingsport, Tennessee. In reading his report, we accept that he felt he was being misled. However, we do not believe that it is accurate to state that he was purposively given erroneous information.

From our perspective, the following is what happened: We had a signed Damage Disclosure from the previous owner that the vehicle had not been in any accident causing 25% damage to the value at the time of the occurrence. When asked by the customer if there had been any damage, we relied on both the signed statement of the owner and an additional statement of "casual damage" from backing into a mailbox. Unfortunately, we failed to run a CarFax report at the time we took possession of the vehicle.

Unlike what Mr. B stated, we fully reconditioned the vehicle and we have copies of all the bills to prove it. Additionally, we have the copy of the bill for four new tires (We do not dispute that the previous owner may have purchased one new tire. However, unmatched tires do not meet our standards for reconditioning so all 4 tires were replaced).

As regarding the issue of not providing contact information from one owner to another prospective owner, it is not a practice of our Company to provide any contact information of our customers to a third party without the express permission by the previous owner to do so.

While Mr. B was taking a test drive our General Sales Manager called the previous owner to ask permission for Mr. B to talk with them about the paint work on the rear of the vehicle. The GSM called his phone and when no one answered, he left a message. He then called the customer's office and was told the customer was on vacation and would return until the following Monday. All of this communication was relayed to Mr. B.

We do not question that when Mr. B contacted someone at the household (perhaps a son as stated by Mr B) that he was told the true cause of the the accident. Unfortunately, we did not have that information when we did the trade or when we spoke with Mr. B. When we did become aware of the situation we made a subsequent customer aware of the repair, as is always our practice.

Because we did not have the appropriate information available when he arrived, we offered to remiburse Mr. B for the fuel that spent coming to our dealership, In addition, we told him that if the issues were cleared up in a manner satisfactory to him that we would deliver the vehicle at not charge to his home in Tennessee. In retropect, we should have also offered to compensate him for the lost time that he incurred by traveling to our dealership. We have a commitment that in our company if we have failed then we will bear the cost of the failure. Part of the cost included the time of the customer and we are prepared to extend that offer to him.

We apologize for underperforming in our due diligence and our customer interaction with Mr. B. We failed to perform the necessary preparation for his visit and we wasted his time. We now pull a CarFax on every vehicle in ensure that we have the complete history of the vehicle.

We hope that Mr. B will contact us and allow us to reimburse him for his lost time. As a winner of eight consecutive years the "BMW Center of Excellence" distinction, we are greatly disappointed anytime we fail to live consistently with our core values of earning trust, doing everything with excellence, and providing more. We have a deep commitment to treating customers like guests in our home, earning their trust by always doing the right thing, and treating them with respect. We sell preowned vehicles all over the world off of our website based on our honesty, fair prices, high resolution photos, video walkarounds, and straightforward "nothing to hide descriptions." We make all of our information on the vehicle completely transparent to the customer. Being intentionally underhanded or misleading is antithetical to everything we stand for and how we do business.

Respond to this report!
What's this?
Featured Reports

Advertisers above have met our
strict standards for business conduct.

X
What do hackers,
questionable attorneys and
fake court orders have in common?
...Dishonest Reputation Management Investigates Reputation Repair
Free speech rights compromised

WATCH News
Segment Now