Complaint Review: Henry Olusola Davies - Birmingham Select State/Province
Ripoff Report on CBS 19
Ripoff Report on CBS 19 - Global Marketing Alliance
Ripoff Report on ABC 15 - Smart Shopper
Ripoff Report - Girls Gone Wild
Ripoff Report on Fox 11 - Car Repair
- Author Not Confirmed
- Henry Olusola Davies Albert House, Albert Street Birmingham, Select State/Province United Kingdom
- Phone: 0808 159 7216
- Web: www.kingscourtchambers.com
- Category: Legal Services
Henry Olusola Davies Kings Court Chambers Birmingham Internet
*General Comment: Convicted by a Tribunal
Show customers why they should trust your business over your competitors...
listed on other sites?
Those sites steal
Ripoff Report's
content.
We can get those
removed for you!
Find out more here.
Ripoff Report
willing to make a
commitment to
customer satisfaction
Click here now..
Henry Olusola Davies
Henry Davies is a barrister who is a tenant at three chambers. He is the sole barrister at Trinity Chambers in Birmingham, a member of Holborn Chambers, London but the Bar Standards Board lists his main practice as Kings Court Chambers, Birmingham which he joined in 2013. Henry denies that his main practice is at Kings Court Chambers.
Henry appears to be a meek, humble and somewhat effeminate man; at least that is the impression I got when I spoke to him by phone some weeks ago. I pointed out that Kings Court Chambers is controlled by a company trading as UK Immigration Barristers which, in turn, is run by persons linked to numerous multi-million pound frauds.
Henry readily admitted that he had heard about the fraudulent activities at the Chambers from another source but that Kings Court Chambers brought him a lot of business. I sent Henry very convincing evidence of the fraud at UK Immigration Barristers/Kings Court Chambers but he still continues to work there.
Some time before becoming a tenant at Kings Court Chambers, Henry made a claim on his website that he is affiliated to the Immigration Law Practitioners Association…
web.archive.org/web/20130605163340/http://henrydavies1.com/
The problem is that Henry’s not a member of ILPA and, according to the ILPA, never has been.
Henry’s false claim of affiliation to the ILPA may well have been one reason he obtained a tenancy at Kings Court Chambers as almost all work coming into the chambers relates to immigration law. When Henry joined the set earlier this year, Ian Macdonald QC was head of Kings Court Chambers and Macdonald has been president of ILPA since its inception in 1984.
You can read of Ian Macdonald’s involvement in Kings Court Chambers here…
ripoffreport.com/reports/specific_search/Ian+Macdonald+QC
Ian Macdonald set up Kings Court Chambers two years ago, with another barrister, Tariq Rehman, who you can read about here…
Henry quickly withdrew any claim of affiliation with ILPA from his website, but the same claim still appears on the Kings Court Chambers website…
kingscourtchambers.com/henry_olusola_davies_profile.php
Almost all of the work coming into Kings Court Chambers relates to immigration law - specifically assistance in UK visa applications. Barristers at the Chambers are paid a fee for giving advice over the phone to prospective visa applicants before their application is dealt with on a conveyor belt basis. You can read about the problems that leads to here…
ukvisaadvice.wordpress.com/tag/kings-court-chambers/
betterthanimbd.wordpress.com/tag/kings-court-chambers/
Henry’s false claims of affiliation to ILPA could lead to a disciplinary tribunal hearing for dishonesty or otherwise disreputable conduct. Additionally, accepting work through the chambers in the knowledge that this work is coming via an intermediary (UK Immigration Barristers) with more than a strong hint of fraudulent activity could lead to similar charges, with the possible outcome that Henry Davies could be disbarred from working as a barrister.
I don’t make such a claim lightly; solicitors working at a now-closed solicitors practice were struck off or suspended even when they had no managerial control at the practice. That practice was called Wolstenholmes LLP and it too was infiltrated by the very same fraudsters that now control Kings Court Chambers…
solicitorstribunal.org.uk/Content/documents/10840.2011.Ilyas.et.al..pdf
This report was posted on Ripoff Report on 11/14/2013 03:21 PM and is a permanent record located here: https://www.ripoffreport.com/reports/henry-olusola-davies/birmingham-select-stateprovince-b4-7ud/henry-olusola-davies-kings-court-chambers-birmingham-internet-1099367. The posting time indicated is Arizona local time. Arizona does not observe daylight savings so the post time may be Mountain or Pacific depending on the time of year. Ripoff Report has an exclusive license to this report. It may not be copied without the written permission of Ripoff Report. READ: Foreign websites steal our content
If you would like to see more Rip-off Reports on this company/individual, search here:
#1 General Comment
Convicted by a Tribunal
AUTHOR: - ()
SUBMITTED: Wednesday, May 07, 2014
Disciplinary Finding Details
- Name:
- Henry Olusola Davies
- Barrister Status:
- Self Employed
- Called:
- November 1999
- Inn:
- Middle Temple
- Type of hearing / finding:
- Disciplinary Tribunal (3 person)
- Tribunal Panel Members:
- Mr Robert Roger Peel (Chair)
- Mr John Conrad Hamilton
- Mrs Alison Thorne (Lay)
- Date of decision:
- 22 January 2014
In breach of
Paragraph 301(a)(iii) of the Code of Conduct of the Bar of England & Wales (8th edition)
Details of Offence
Henry Davies, a barrister, engaged in conduct which was/is likely to diminish public confidence in the legal profession or the administration of justice or otherwise bring the legal profession into disrepute in that:
On 25 August and/or 1 September 2009 in a personal matter Mr Davies abused his position as a barrister by threatening to sue his dentist, Dr S, for negligence and take him to Court and seeking to seeking to fortify this threat by:
(1) stating to Dr S that he, Mr Davies, was a barrister, a trained mediator and expert in medical negligence and asserting that he would win the case; and
(2) stating to Dr S that the legal principle of restitution applied to the case (when it did not) and that this meant that Dr S should return the fees paid to him by Mr Davies and restore Mr Davies’s state of dentition to that which obtained when Mr Davies first saw Dr S in February 2007.
- Sentence:
- Fine of £500
- Costs:
- N/A
- Status:
- Appeal Pending
Advertisers above have met our
strict standards for business conduct.
