Ripoff Report Needs Your Help!
X  |  CLOSE
Report: #202477

Complaint Review: Inphonic - Cellular Choices - Washington District of Columbia

  • Submitted:
  • Updated:
  • Reported By: Pembroke Massachusetts
  • Author Confirmed What's this?
  • Why?
  • Inphonic - Cellular Choices 1010 Wisconsin Avenue, Suite 600 Washington, District of Columbia U.S.A.

Inphonic - Cellular Choices Rebate Ripoff Washington District of Columbia

*Consumer Suggestion: Send your complaint to DC's Attorney General -- They're suing InPhonic

Show customers why they should trust your business over your competitors...

Is this
Report about YOU
listed on other sites?
Those sites steal
Ripoff Report's
content.
We can get those
removed for you!
Find out more here.
How to fix
Ripoff Report
If your business is
willing to make a
commitment to
customer satisfaction
Click here now..

I purchased a Motorola RAZR in May '05 from Cellular Choices (Inphonic). Cellular Choices advertised a $200 mail-in rebate. After I purchased the phone, the rebate terms and conditions were revealed. I had to be sent in between 180 and 210 days after purchase. I marked the date and sent in the forms at the required time (December '05). Months later, Inphonic informed me the rebate would not be honored using an excuse that my mobile number was not shown on one of the forms. Retained copies of the forms showed that my mobile number was included (as well as my order number, Cingular acct. number, name, address, etc.).

After many phone calls and 15 emails back and forth to Inphonic, they changed the terms and conditions of the rebate, and refused payment of my $200. My primary contact at Inphonic has been Doreen Dennis (ddennis@inphonic.com).

Dave
Pembroke, Massachusetts
U.S.A.

This report was posted on Ripoff Report on 07/23/2006 08:23 AM and is a permanent record located here: https://www.ripoffreport.com/reports/inphonic-cellular-choices/washington-district-of-columbia-20007/inphonic-cellular-choices-rebate-ripoff-washington-district-of-columbia-202477. The posting time indicated is Arizona local time. Arizona does not observe daylight savings so the post time may be Mountain or Pacific depending on the time of year. Ripoff Report has an exclusive license to this report. It may not be copied without the written permission of Ripoff Report. READ: Foreign websites steal our content

Search for additional reports

If you would like to see more Rip-off Reports on this company/individual, search here:

Report & Rebuttal
Respond to this report!
What's this?
Also a victim?
What's this?
Repair Your Reputation!
What's this?

Updates & Rebuttals

REBUTTALS & REPLIES:
0Author
1Consumer
0Employee/Owner

#1 Consumer Suggestion

Send your complaint to DC's Attorney General -- They're suing InPhonic

AUTHOR: Jana - (U.S.A.)

POSTED: Sunday, July 23, 2006

Dave,

First, forget Doreen Dennis and her cohort, Jon Delahay (they both claim they're from the office of the president of InPhonic ? as though that would authorize them to write you a check).

I have not seen or heard of any tangible help they've given to anyone -- neither here nor any other site -- other than the usual runaround and stalling tactics.

All they seem to do is monitor the internet for complaints against Inphonic and respond with their insincere offers to look into your claim or post "important information" about how they're changing their rebate processing centers and suggest that you keep holding your breath (hopefully, you'll be dead before they actually have to deal with you).

What you need to do is file a complaint with the DC Attorney General. The AG is suing InPhonic regarding their rebate practices. The suit is on behalf of all consumers in the country, but you DO need to send them a complaint to be included.

You can get more information from the AG's website http://occ.dc.gov/occ/cwp/view,A,11,Q,636576.asp

or call Assistant Attorney General, Wendy Weinberg, for more information. Her direct phone number is (202)727-2870.

Respond to this report!
What's this?
Featured Reports

Advertisers above have met our
strict standards for business conduct.

X
What do hackers,
questionable attorneys and
fake court orders have in common?
...Dishonest Reputation Management Investigates Reputation Repair
Free speech rights compromised

WATCH News
Segment Now