OCWEN FELONY BANK 11/24/ CLASS HEARING KWEKU HANSON SAYS ALL WHO SENT IN AFFIDAVITS SHOULD TRAVEL TO BRIDGEPORT CONNECTICUT West Palm Beach Florida

I know there are "issues" for Kweku **** in his personal life but realistically I am only concerned with our Ocwen case. I have been unsuccessful in receiving a response from the attorneys from our side. Has anyone heard what is happening or where I can get the information to see where we stand. Kweku **** was there from the beginning for the Ocwen class action suit...lets keep our eye on the prize so to speak and not on things that would lead us astray.

Kweku Hanson, an attorney for over 18 years, who had stated many times in the past that he was well aware that both his office and computer had been broken into by those who oppose him; has now been arrested:

The lawyer, Kweku Hanson, 45, jailed in lieu of $750,000 bond on charges of second-degree sex assault, risk of injury to a minor, and possessing child pornography. Does this sound a bit odd that such an experienced attorney would fall into such a obvious trap. In the new case, Hanson was charged with two counts each of tampering with a witness and bribery of a witness. A Hartford Superior Court judge set bond on the latest charges at $1 million. Hanson - a married father - is representing himself in each case, the first of which dates to his arrest in September 2005. In that instance, police say they seized a computer that had stored images of Hanson having sex with a girl who worked in his office. Police say the girl was 15 at the time and that a relative of the girl confirmed that. But court records also show that the girl told police she was 16 at the time - legal age of consent in Connecticut - and that she knew she was being photographed and videotaped during the encounters. Hanson was arrested on March 1 and charged with having sex with another teenager - the first girl's cousin - whom police say was also 15. Hanson had been out on bond after his 2005 arrest and was continuing to practice law at his Main Street office.

In the affidavit supporting Hanson's newest arrest, Hartford police say the second victim's older sister told them that Hanson continued to provide her with money after his arrest in 2005. Hanson told her he was going to "sue everyone" over his arrest, the woman said, and "he was going to be a millionaire and he would take care of them."

The witness told police that Hanson contacted her in December and in January, and told her she would be getting a letter from prosecutor Thomas O'Brien "and to ignore it," police say.
Police say the woman met with Hanson at his office in January and that he threatened her "and said that he could have her whole family locked up if she did not help him and lie, and he kept saying that if he was going down, everybody was going down."
The woman told police that Hanson wrote a statement for her - presumably for him to use in his defense in the earlier criminal case - and that she signed it "because she did not want to get in any more trouble, and that he kept threatening her."

Police say they heard a similar story from one of the other girls with whom Hanson is accused of having sex.

That young woman said Hanson told her to tell police that she was of age when she had sex with him, and that "he would find a way to have her go to jail if they don't cooperate," police say.
Hanson returns to court April 27.

We have waited patiently for any updates. If anyone has any news (Kweku, where are you?) please post. Any news would be appreciated. Been out of the loop.

I'm the one that already lost my home to Ocwen after owning it for 18 years. I will do whatever I can to be present and to support my sworn affadavit when the date is decided, but my home went to Ocwen March 5,2003 after declaring bankruptcy. Will something be done for the many of us that have already been foreclosed upon?
My family is still living with friends due to another weird thing involving ocwen. I tried to get an apartment and when they ran a credit check on me nothing came up. I mean absolutely nothing. Now I wonder, how did my whole 45 years of living, be totally wiped clean as if I didn't exist? Even the gas and visa card I have in my pocket(not to mention the 18 years of mortgaging-5 with Ocwen) do not show up. The apartment people said, "sorry but no credit is worse than bad credit". Not only did Ocwen do a number on my past, they have ruined my future!
Thank you and please respond,

If there is a law firm willing to take OCWEN on in Califronia should we try and contact them?
Or is this another type of legal complaint against Ocwen? It sure would be nice to have both coasts fighting for the same outcome.

Dear Ocwen Victims:

My apologies to all of you for having to confirm yet another disappointment as first reported above by Robin - in Arkansas! It is indeed true that the CLASS CERTIFICATION and PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION hearing originally scheduled for 11/24/03 in Bridgeport, Connecticut has been canceled. We have NOT received formal notice of the cancellation, but the PACER entries have been modified to confirm that Class Certification and Injunction are NOt on the table for 11/24/03.

A hearing will go forward that date and time, but it will only relate to discovery disputes and NOBODY NEEDS TO SHOW UP AS IT WILL BE ALL ARGUMENT AND NO TESTIMONY. Please cancel any travel plans you may have initiated until further notice.

I know that this makes TWO STRIKES: First the Fairbanks settlement broadcast that I said would be on CBS on 11/12/03 and now this hearing. Well, in all these things I conveyed information which was absolutely accurate at the time I disseminated it. But life has its way of giving us ups and downs when we are involved in a fight with evil thugs who would render us homeless.

PLEASE TAKE HEART. Not only are we continuing to make slow but steady progress in our lawsuit efforts, but now one of the country's most powerful plaintiff's lawfirms, LIEF, CABRASER has also joined the fight, suing Ocwen in California's state court on behalf of ALL CALIFORNIA VICTIMS OF OCWEN.

I report their lawsuit because the enemy of my enemy (ocwen) is my friend, and because I have worked alongside them as a lawyer in other class actions and they are absolutely capable of pounding Ocwen (even as we on the East Coast also pound Ocwen on behalf of ALL UNITED STATES (and PUERTO RICO) VICTIMS OF OCWEN, MOSS CODILIS, and some LITTON LOAN VICTIMS.

The evil are like chaff before the wind. They will not flourish for ever. Those are time tested truths.

Stay alert for possible new emails from me before the end of the week on the Fairbanks Settlement. Thansk for your support and faith!

ALERT: THE HEARING IS OFF! (I think) PACER: A docket entry has been changed and the order for the hearing in Bridgeport has vanished! As this stands, NO plaintiffs need to go to CT on Nov. 24th. Mr. Hanson, CHECK PACER! What is going on? Is this legal?

I am not entirely sure what the heck is going on here. On Thursday, November 13, 2003 I checked the docket entries on PACER. Everything was a GO for the class certification and preliminary injunction hearing in Bridgeport, CT on November 24, 2003.

The document showing on Thursday had dire warnings that if plaintiffs did not appear in court on November 24, 2003 for testimony that their affidavits could be set aside as hearsay and dismissed from the suit. It appeared mandatory for plaintiffs to be there or risk dismissal of their complaints.

I did not check Friday to see if there had been any additions, so I logged on today to see. A critical entry has been changed and the document accompanying it has vanished!

That document (entry #191 on the docket) has entirely disappeared from the record. It has not been amended or superseded by something else; it has vanished! Evaporated like it never existed. It has been replaced with a one-page order scheduling a HEARING ON PENDING MOTIONS instead. The docket entry has been altered to reflect this.

Near as I can tell, this hearing does not require the presence of any plaintiffs, but will be just another one of those lets go to court and dance hearings that this entire suit has been littered with!

I was under the (perhaps mistaken) impression that once something has been entered into public record, it stands for all time. A motion may be filed to amend or supersede and ADDED to the record, but nothing should ever be entirely REMOVED from the record.

Is this legal, to just erase something from public record and make it seem that it never existed?

This case is absolutely nuts! Things are going on that should not be happening. If you are making travel plans to go to CT, you really need to check to see if it is necessary. It does not appear to be at this time.

I thought the purpose of sending a notorized affidavit was for the ones who couldn't come for the court hearing? What was the point of doing it? I live in California, all of my money is going to pay the foreberence that I have to pay now to keep my home.
I just lost all hope of ever getting out from under OCWEN.