Wal-Mart Holding my paycheck Canton Ohio

So.....let me get this straight. You stole from them and that's OK. However, when you think they've stolen from you, it's not OK? How can you justify this to yourself? Maybe you should be mad at your mail carrier. May he/she stole your check from you! You may not belive in "What comes around, goes around", but you're living it!!!

So.....let me get this straight. You stole from them and that's OK. However, when you think they've stolen from you, it's not OK? How can you justify this to yourself? Maybe you should be mad at your mail carrier. May he/she stole your check from you! You may not belive in "What comes around, goes around", but you're living it!!!

So.....let me get this straight. You stole from them and that's OK. However, when you think they've stolen from you, it's not OK? How can you justify this to yourself? Maybe you should be mad at your mail carrier. May he/she stole your check from you! You may not belive in "What comes around, goes around", but you're living it!!!

So.....let me get this straight. You stole from them and that's OK. However, when you think they've stolen from you, it's not OK? How can you justify this to yourself? Maybe you should be mad at your mail carrier. May he/she stole your check from you! You may not belive in "What comes around, goes around", but you're living it!!!

Apparently the judge thought that WalMart had plenty of evidence against you to make you pay restitution.They most likely are withholding your paycheck as partial payment of the costs associated in prosecuting you for theft. Do something unethical or dishonest, it will bite you in the rear. Lesson learned.

If you were innocent of the charges and could prove it, then the judge would have found in your favor. People who are innocent do not pay restitution. Guilty people do. I see no rip off here. Apparently the judge thought you were trying to rip off WalMart, and gave justice as he or she saw fit.

Apparently the judge thought that WalMart had plenty of evidence against you to make you pay restitution.They most likely are withholding your paycheck as partial payment of the costs associated in prosecuting you for theft. Do something unethical or dishonest, it will bite you in the rear. Lesson learned.

If you were innocent of the charges and could prove it, then the judge would have found in your favor. People who are innocent do not pay restitution. Guilty people do. I see no rip off here. Apparently the judge thought you were trying to rip off WalMart, and gave justice as he or she saw fit.

Apparently the judge thought that WalMart had plenty of evidence against you to make you pay restitution.They most likely are withholding your paycheck as partial payment of the costs associated in prosecuting you for theft. Do something unethical or dishonest, it will bite you in the rear. Lesson learned.

If you were innocent of the charges and could prove it, then the judge would have found in your favor. People who are innocent do not pay restitution. Guilty people do. I see no rip off here. Apparently the judge thought you were trying to rip off WalMart, and gave justice as he or she saw fit.

Apparently the judge thought that WalMart had plenty of evidence against you to make you pay restitution.They most likely are withholding your paycheck as partial payment of the costs associated in prosecuting you for theft. Do something unethical or dishonest, it will bite you in the rear. Lesson learned.

If you were innocent of the charges and could prove it, then the judge would have found in your favor. People who are innocent do not pay restitution. Guilty people do. I see no rip off here. Apparently the judge thought you were trying to rip off WalMart, and gave justice as he or she saw fit.