Maricopa County Superior Court - ABUSE OF POWER AND CORRUPTIONS OVER MORE THAN 20 YEARS AGAINST THE BUSINESS SECTOR AND CIVIL RIGHTS Phoenix Arizona

Katie Hobbs, living proof of a party that has destroyed the state of Arizona with abuse of power and corruption against its own citizens with many skeletons in the closet, one of them being Janet Napolitano and her twisted and perverse past and her henchmen that until today Today they are still in their seats of power
 
THIS CASE HAS BEEN WAITING FOR JUSTICE IN THE DARKNESS OF THE ABUSE OF POWER AND CORRUPTIONS OVER MORE THAN 20 YEARS AGAINST THE BUSINESS SECTOR AND CIVIL RIGHTS.

Case CV 2002-011275
 
This case was manufactured with falsehood, lies, false witnesses, false reports, and false verdicts by the state of Arizona against an American family descendants of veterans who defended this great nation in the second world War, that their only mistake was creating a company in this great country and generating Decent, well-paying jobs in Arizona.
 
This is The $48+ million RICO case in the state of Arizona in the democrats era, there have been so many injustices committed against them to this day, after more than 20 years, they remain unresolved.
 
The origin of Judge John Hannah's empire that began more than 20 years ago with the help of the law firm Lewis & Roca and Janet Napolitano, an empire based on the abuse of power, corruption and the violation of civil rights hidden behind his already known secret formula "RICO" using it to their own benefits. 
 
Below are the broad-strokes about this case where John Hannah, as defense attorney in this case, ensured his path to the success of his judicial career, a case with a final verdict agreed upon without even having begun for the benefit of himself and his allies but against his own clients the victims.
 
Travis Mckeever
 
The witness prepared 
 
It started when a “witness” Travis Mckeever (disgruntled employee) using his privileged position close to his bosses as the personal driver, he disclosed private information about the personal lives of his bosses, such as their houses, cars, and all types of assets that they owned, and their family trips and crowded places, but the prosecutor General knew that there was no hard evidence in all this information that was being presented to him by Travis Mckeever. It would seem that his plan against his bosses had failed, but Dan Kelly the investigator for the Arizona Department of Public had another plan use R.I.C.O in this case but in order to use R.I.C.O he would have to build a new story with his own narrative Dan Kelly already had the most important thing, a possible witness with the necessary closeness to the victims to sustain credibility on the new narrative that he would build against of the victims and this is where Travis Mckeever, being the victims' personal driver, would fit perfectly into Dan Kelly's narrative.
 
Dan Kelly contacted Travis Mckeever again to offer him a deal where he would get 1 million dollars in exchange for changing his original narrative for a new one where he would include the keyword that would be "the mafia" to be able to use R.I.C.O against them. 
 
He would also have to get 2 witnesses more willing to follow and adhere to the new narrative. In exchange, each of these two new witnesses would receive 1 million dollars. Travis accepted the deal and got the 2 new witnesses who were Claudia Thomas and Jeremy Booher, both employees of the victims' company with a previous friendship between the three,Travis had gotten his position thanks to Claudia's recommendation to the company manager.
 
But these three witnesses never saw the million dollars promised by Dan Kelly, because Dan made sure to be clear that they would be paid once the case was closed.
 
-Based on this, the State obtained a forfeiture warrant and seized $48 million + in cash and assets in one fell swoop.
 
-Receiver testified that they had 10% in chargebacks and only willingly refunded 1%. Those numbers were the opposite. You Cannot get 10% in Visa/Master chargebacks.
 
-Receiver’s false statement in court ensured his $9.7 million in billings over 9.5 years from their seized assets.
 
-Criminal charges were never filed. They were hung over their head until they pleaded guilty and forfeited the assets (and signed that they’d not sue them).
 
-State forced them to admit in a plea agreement that they didn’t give refunds or alert customers of automatic shipments (this was false). And one of their attorneys was financially compensated to make them take the plea.
 
-They did not have funds for representation. State told their lawyers they’d put $200k or whatever into a pot to draw from (for their unpaid invoices) but only after they got them to take the plea deal. This was a conflict and turned their council into the State’s commissioned salespeople. To get paid, they downplayed the seriousness of the felonies and talked them into taking them. both defense attorneys used the same words to make them take the plea deal arguing that if they did not accept they would no longer have legal representation in this case. Once the victims decided to accept the plea agreement, one of the lawyers resigned from the case once he had already secured his payment his name is Marty Liberman and the other lawyer who remained until the end without doing anything for his clients, he became a judge the next year he's name is John HANNAH (still currently a Superior judge Court in Maricopa County az )
 
THE BEGINNING OF A PERFECT GAME 
 
These two lawyers john hanna and Marty Liberman were recommended to the victims by the firm Lewis & Roca after accepting the case and then deciding to abandon it due to a conflict of interest because one of their partners "JANET NAPOLITANO" had resigned from working in the Federal District Attorney's Office from Arizona. nominated by Democratic President Bill Clinton and becoming Attorney General of Arizona,
 
The firm knew that the victims' case would be left in the hands of its former partner JANET NAPOLITANO and decided to move the chess pieces by making the victims believe in the recommendation of the lawyers for their defense in the case, after the poor legal representation of these two lawyers and their clear intentions to follow the directions of the person who recommended them to This case was previously manipulated to make it fail in the court where the highest authority was a partner of that firm just a year before.
 
JOHN HANNAH 
 
and his sacred pact with the democrat's hand that blessed him with his consecrated chair
 
The future continues to confirm the sacred pact with every action he takes from his untouchable and well-protected seat., like when He also dismissed the state Republican Party's lawsuit in November 2020, but did not provide any reasoning at the time and simply said he would issue a full ruling at a later date. He issued the ruling Monday, writing that the Arizona Republican Party had no chance of success directly affecting the Republican candidate for the United States Senate for Arizona, Kelli Ward, the same judge who rejected (Kari Lake) request to examine signed ballot envelopes.
 
RON REINTESIN 
 
a two-way piece in a one-way game
 
Case CV 2002-011275
 
Prior to the plea, the mitigating judge who told them he’d find them guilty also became their real judge His name is Ron Reintesin he is currently retired, he is one of the main current opponents of Prop 137 in the state of Arizona also involved in the famous case: Ring v. Arizona, 536 U.S. 584 (2002), was a case in which the United States Supreme Court applied Apprendi v. New Jersey to capital sentencing schemes, holding that the Sixth Amendment requires a jury to find the necessary aggravating factors to impose capital punishment. death penalty. Ring overturned part of Walton v. Arizona, which had rejected that argument. where this judge used his same illegal ways and filed motions to confiscate under RICO any money he could obtain to hire lawyers who were not on the government payroll.

DAN KELLY DPS AGENT 
 
A piece that plays dirty to get a hakemate in the favor of his superiors
 
Case CV 2002-011275
 
Before sentencing, State’s witness came forward alleging the State’s DPS agent instructed him what to say and to outright lie- for the attorney General's office to gain a wrongful search and seizure warrants to obtain our assets the DPS agent name is Dan kelly the same agent who was involved in the scandal with ICE for unauthorized use of a government computer to try to get information for one of his cases which is a federal crime ,This happened in the same building that victims owned for their company and that they took from them. acting under the protection of the director of DPS (Roger Vanderpool) to receive financial compensation above and outside what was authorized by the legislature, generating a scandal the same year where both were involved “DPS raises unauthorized Agency head used $1.2 million above Legislature's allocation”
 
SAME BUSINESS DIFFERENT END 
 
Brandon Reece, president of Reece Marketing of St. Joseph, Mo., who has operated penilefitness.com since 1999. Who was in the same kinda business “You get tiny little fiber tears in the cells, similar to what happens with a muscle. It heals and becomes a little stronger, a little larger.” his company was never charged with any legal actions offering the same effects an non medical studies to support his and having the The Mayo Clinic is a non-profit, academic medical center that discredits his foundations and the credibility of his manuals and products to obtain the results he promises.
 
The same type of business promising the same results selling annual memberships and selling their own manual on the internet without any medical basis or research and with Mayo Clinic, a private American academic medical center focused on comprehensive health care and education, disapproving and discrediting the veracity and credibility of their "jelqin" exercises and theories that are not approved by the FDA to this day.
 
Both businesses located in different states Arizona and Missouri but in the same country with their own products and manuals available on the internet offering the same result to buyers these businesses and their respective founders had different endings

According to investigation conducted by the respectable and professional Arizona reporter
 
Dennis Warner about this case :
 
As the case dragged on in court, McKeever began hounding Kelly for financial help. He received $1,600 for a home-security system but not the reward that was promised to him, the one million dollars. 
 
Around the same time, McKeever turned on prosecutors. In a later interview with sheriff's deputies, McKeever explained that he had become increasingly upset because no monetary reward previously promised to him had arrived. McKeever said he warned Kelly: "Hey, you could tell whoever... that you forced me to say certain things" about this case.
 
ULISES FERRAGUT The new victims' lawyer
 
Mr. Ferragut, Phoenix Criminal Defense Attorney, has successfully litigated hundreds of criminal cases over the past two decades in numerous courtrooms throughout Arizona. Those cases include cases from misdemeanor and felony
 
Within days, McKeever spoke with the victim's new attorney, Ulises ferragut , claiming that Kelly Dan had pressured him to "lie outright" in an indictment and to have other witnesses make exaggerated statements about the case.
 
Ulises Ferragut asked Maricopa County Superior Court Judge Ronald Reinstein to revoke the plea agreement and dismiss the charges. He said Kelly induced McKeever to "fabricate" accusations and that the two men participated in a "conspiracy" to lie about C.P. Straight
 
As a result, he argued, the search warrant was tainted. He also complained that prosecutors withheld exculpatory evidence, including the immunity deal and $1,600 payment.
 
Based on the plea documents, Reinstein rejected those arguments and evidence from the lawyer to protect Dan Kelly, the victims' lawyer requested post conviction relief for the victims and this right was denied by the judge Ronald.
 
He says the criminal charges were false but they were forced to sign a guilty plea under the threat of prison for themselves.
 
"We had no choice," he said. "If you had a gun to your head, would you agree?”
 
Defense attorney ULISES FERRAGUT threatened by the attorney general's office that they would proceed to remove his law license if he continued his persistence in the case, this threat forced him to abandon the case and left the victims once again without legal protection
 
As you can see, the government courts in Arizona do not follow any law that interferes with their own agendas, even when that agenda is to imprison or kill innocent Americans This case is one of many where they used R.I.C.O against the victims to leave them destroyed, without a voice and without rights.
 
Arizona for the truth