Ripoff Report Needs Your Help!
X  |  CLOSE
Report: #1218904

Complaint Review: AT&T Wireless - Internet

  • Submitted:
  • Updated:
  • Reported By: Firefishe — Missouri USA
  • Author Not Confirmed What's this?
  • Why?
  • AT&T Wireless Internet USA

Show customers why they should trust your business over your competitors...

Is this
Report about YOU
listed on other sites?
Those sites steal
Ripoff Report's
content.
We can get those
removed for you!
Find out more here.
How to fix
Ripoff Report
If your business is
willing to make a
commitment to
customer satisfaction
Click here now..

I called AT&T Wireless on March 28th to inquire about my bill.

I owe quite a bit of money, and AT&T has extended me payment arrangements/extensions before.   This has been a good thing--a courtesy!--and I appreciate the privilege.  However, this does not excuse what happened.

I owe quite a bit of money, but I was informed that if would pay $177.25, then I would be eligible for a new payment arrangement.  My payment arrangement/extension was up at Midnight of March 28, 2015.

 

So I called my wife, who paid $178.00--.75 Cents *over* the aformentioned $177.25--to make sure that the amount was paid in full.  Having verified it through her checking account information online, I proceeded to call AT&T Wireless Customer Service to fulfill their part of the matter.

At length, I was informed that I couldn't have a new payment arrangement until I paid $589 to catch up February's (2015) bill.  This is not what I was told before.  I went through multiple levels of management, and am waiting on a call back from an upper-level manager.  This person may have to contact me via email due to my phone service possibly being disconnected this weekend, probably before Monday.

 

Summary:  I was told I would be able to make another payment arrangement/extension if I paid $177.25.  $178 was paid, .75 Cents over the required amount.  This payment has been verified.

 

I require AT&T to fulfill their part of the agreement, and agree to extend my service to an agreed-upon date (I was asking for the 17th of April, 2015).

If not, and nothing can be resolved, I feel I will have no alternative other than to file a complaint at the Missouri Attorney General's Office of Consumer Complaints.  As I live in the Capital, I'm within walking distance.

 

However, that said, I would like to maintain a positive relationship with AT&T--whom I prefer over other carriers!--and have this matter resolved.

This report was posted on Ripoff Report on 03/28/2015 11:06 PM and is a permanent record located here: https://www.ripoffreport.com/reports/att-wireless/internet/att-wireless-att-company-accepted-payment-refused-to-honor-new-payment-arrangement-tha-1218904. The posting time indicated is Arizona local time. Arizona does not observe daylight savings so the post time may be Mountain or Pacific depending on the time of year. Ripoff Report has an exclusive license to this report. It may not be copied without the written permission of Ripoff Report. READ: Foreign websites steal our content

Search for additional reports

If you would like to see more Rip-off Reports on this company/individual, search here:

Report & Rebuttal
Respond to this report!
What's this?
Also a victim?
What's this?
Repair Your Reputation!
What's this?

Updates & Rebuttals

REBUTTALS & REPLIES:
3Author
5Consumer
0Employee/Owner

#8 Consumer Comment

To Tad...

AUTHOR: Robert - (USA)

POSTED: Wednesday, April 01, 2015

I'll make this very simple..from your statement.

Both of my accounts are well paid, with large financial credits constantly ensuring services.

The original poster's account is not only NOT "well paid" but they are so delinquent that unless they make a $500+ payment their phone will most likely(if it hasn't already) get disconnected. 

If you want to report a RipOff then post your own report.  Don't try and hijack some else's report with your nonsense.

Respond to this report!
What's this?

#7 Consumer Comment

Tad

AUTHOR: Tad - (USA)

POSTED: Wednesday, April 01, 2015

Hi Stephen, 

 
My comment was more addressed to Robert and Tyg (it didn’t place the below as a “rebuttal”).   The closest dot to you would be not phrasing “preference” with a “least bad” connotation, and I’m sorry my wording was too vague and misplaced for you to connect the dots as against the first two commenters.
 
Under the law, the company provides me with essential services, with the landline services and the wireless as back-up services when the landline is down.  Both of my accounts are well paid, with large financial credits constantly ensuring services.
 
The company’s landline was down the other day, and I relied on the back-up wireless with the company.  The wireless part of the company apparently exercised their option to terminate services anytime they wanted to, without any notice and/or refunds.  With “binding arbitration” determinations as being effectively mandatory (a U.S. Supreme Court Case involving A.T.&T. and what is a “free” cell phone with sales taxes including such arbitration and horrendous legal expenses), such conduct of American companies is permitted.  But, with me, with the company asserting their right of anytime cancellation/no-refunds, they had the additional audacity to request more money before they “might” let me use services still owed me, sans the spontaneous cancellation (as if they wouldn’t immediately do it again after getting even more of my money).
 
Such companies are probably more interested in public image, and Comcast has set a very low bar for ATT to drop down to while not being quite as low (perhaps).
I’m certainly going to look for different landline services also along with maybe getting a non-vanishing wireless service.   But, the government seems to be allowing mainly morally bankrupt monopolies, with only tons of propaganda confounding citizenship with corporations.
 
If I owed the company money, and the company promised partial services with partial payment and my promises of future payment, they still could terminate services and ignore their own promises of restoration of services under the contract clauses, with my resort, under the contract, only to binding arbitration.  In strategy with such companies, I would be in a better financial position with my owing them money, but such would leverage company justification of denial of services in most law & shallow public opinion, but my losing money to them without any services in return is allowed by most law, just bad for deeper than shallow public opinion.  (I’ve had much better financial luck suing companies that try to deny me rights protected by law when the company seeks legal remedies they erroneously think they are entitled to from me). 
 
I’m fairly sure I’ll get a future “love or leave it” response from another herd, or flock, but it is about time for more energetic tries to take back the laws and the courts from corporate tyranny.
 
Good luck with trying to get the government to enforce company responsibilities inherent in their licenses to operate;  more likely, Company Image concerns will win.
Respond to this report!
What's this?

#6 Author of original report

Vitriol Is Not Necessary, Nor Conducive To Constructive Commenting

AUTHOR: - ()

POSTED: Monday, March 30, 2015

I've seen responses like this before.  I'm responding because I'm wanting to be cordial.

 

I will keep this brief.

 

1.  I asked before submitting payment.  They agreed to give me a new payment arrangement/extension.

2.  After my call, the $178 was paid.  I'm not being mean here.  I paid what was stated.

3.  I called back and they now said they wanted over $500 to make the arrangement/extension.  Not what was originally stated.

4.  My family's out $178 until my wife's next pay day.  If AT&T had initially stated that "we can't do any more payment arrangements," or something similar, that would have ended it and I would've let the phones disconnect, waited until I had enough to pay it off--with the $40.00 reconnection fee--and that would've been that.

5.  However, that's not what happened.  I just wanted a three week extension.  I paid for it.  I should receive what was promised or have my $178 refunded.

 

That's it.  Nothing more need be said.

 

Warm Regards,

-Stephen

Respond to this report!
What's this?

#5 Author of original report

Geese?

AUTHOR: - ()

POSTED: Monday, March 30, 2015

Geese in the morning?  Please keep the comments relevant to this particular complaint.  Nothing mentioned in your response makes any sense, whatsoever.

 

--Stephen

Respond to this report!
What's this?

#4 Author of original report

Update As of March 30, 2015

AUTHOR: - ()

POSTED: Monday, March 30, 2015

I called AT&T Mobility (a/k/a AT&T Wireless), and talked to an upper-level supervisor at length about my account.

 

During the course of the conversation, the conversation was consistently 'deflected' away from the primary element, that of my $178.00 and the agreed-upon ability to have a new payment arrangement/extension granted after having received said payment.

 

Unfortunately, I was not able to get anything resolved.  I have filed a complaint on the FTC web site, and hope to hear from someone soon.

 

Regards,

Stephen A. Brown (3/30/2015 Monday 11:40pm Local/Central Time)

Respond to this report!
What's this?

#3 Consumer Comment

Geese in the morning

AUTHOR: Tad - (USA)

POSTED: Sunday, March 29, 2015

How much will you geese take???

 
When my ATT land-line/Internet is down, I rely on my ATT GoPhone (about the only times I use it).
 
Landline was down off & on last couple days, down today, so used GoPhone with about $150 still on it, but near the 90 day limit for renewal.  They wanted $10 more in payment so I could report to others that ATT landline was down with the Living Dead company ATT and its affiliates, and GoPhone allowing me to speak only with their Zombies at their customer services, with them having prematurely devoured my $150 into nothingness without me paying more to save the $150.
Respond to this report!
What's this?

#2 Consumer Comment

The audacity of some people

AUTHOR: Robert - (USA)

POSTED: Sunday, March 29, 2015

It is just amazing.  You have failed, apparently many times, to meet your payment oblgiations as you originally agreed to.  Yet, when they ask for more money to continue allowing you to make arrangements you come to a public site post a complaining and are willing to walk to the State Capital to put in a formal complaint.  All for what agin?  Because they want you to pay an additional amount of a balance you owe.

Contrary to what you think you are in no position to "require" that they do anything you want.   I think the funniest part of this entire thing is you stressing that you paid an entire $0.75 extra on the first amount.  As if that is some huge feat where you should have a parade down main street honoring your efforts.  The fact is you said it yourself, them extending payment arrangements is a privillege..NOT a requirement.  If you use the privillege one too many times, which apparently you have, they will stop extending it.

Think of this this way.  Sure they could have said that after you paid the $177.25 they will make a new arrangment.  But they don't have to do the arrangement you wanted.  They can(and apparently did) say that you now must make another payment...that is the arrangement they are now willing to do.

You also need a bit of a reality check here.  You do NOT have a positive relationship with AT&T, well at least they don't think so.  After all they don't disconnect service for people that they have a positive relationship with and are paying on time.  They only disconnect service for people who have "stiffed" them on payments and think that AT&T must do what ever the customer wants.

Perhaps it is time for you to start to look toward cheaper service more in your ability to pay. 

Respond to this report!
What's this?

#1 General Comment

then...

AUTHOR: Tyg - (USA)

POSTED: Sunday, March 29, 2015

Then pay your bill. YOU ARE IN BREACH OF CONRACT. How in any stretch of the imagination canYOU sit there and DEMAND that they honor a agreement that YOU are in breech of? Pay what you owe THEN try to keep on top of it. YOU singed the contract  so YOU are the responsible party.Stop blaming them for YOUR INABILITY TO PAY. 

Respond to this report!
What's this?
Featured Reports

Advertisers above have met our
strict standards for business conduct.

X
What do hackers,
questionable attorneys and
fake court orders have in common?
...Dishonest Reputation Management Investigates Reputation Repair
Free speech rights compromised

WATCH News
Segment Now