Bank of America Probably everyone that works there is in on it caused me undue pain and suffering by causing checks to bounce like rubber balls Kansas City, Kansas

If you want to know when the stock market will crash again, simply type in 1512122 at this site and the answer can be found in Consumer Comment #1 at Ripoff Report #1512122.

Good luck to you!

”Knowledge is Power”

POWER TO THE PEOPLE

Are you beginning to understand that a cartel of corrupt and greedy bankers are ultimately in control of the U.S. Government and Wall Street, and that is precisely why there are so many problems in America and all over the world?

LONDON BRENT 
(Please sing to the tune of- "London Bridge")

Anyone can go to Bing and type in- MIDI TUNES FOR KIDS!, and click on 'London Bridge' and sing the following lyrics to that tune, correct?

Here we go- 1, 2, 3, 4....

London Brent is going up
 Going up, going up
London Brent is going up
 High gas prices!
London Brent is going up
 Going up, going up
London Brent is going up
 High food prices!
London Brent is going up
 Going up, going up
London Brent is going up
 Higher prices!

End.

Anyone can 'Google' this- BRENT CRUDE- WIKIPEDIA, and go to that site to see that Brent Crude is also known as "London Brent".

Thank You

"Knowledge is power."

POWER TO THE PEOPLE

"Wrong again. But I won't just post my full name and personal infornmation here on a public forum for trolls, stalkers, and sexual deviants like you to have and use. Here's the deal dickweed. You put up $5000 in an escrow account to cover my travel expenses to you, legal expenses to draft the confidentiality agreement, the cost of background checking you, and my time and misc. expenses, and I will provide any information you seek. The ball is in your court, put up or shut up."

I don't have to prove anything to you Steve.  You never stand behind anything you say anyway. There is no way in the world I would allow you access to any of my private information in any way so your challenge here is an empty one because you wouldnt allow me any info to do a background check on you.

You are done here because as usual you are exposed for the fraud you are.

SAUDEE POEM 2

Sex and drugs
Two brand new Audis
We are big-shots
We are Saudees
That is all
They have to say
Learned it all
From USA.

End.

Anyone can 'Google' this- WIKILEAKS: SAUDI PRINCES ENGAGE IN SEX DRUG PARTIES, and read the related articles on the web.

Thank You

"Knowledge is power."

POWER TO THE PEOPLE

SAUDEE POEM

Big-shots are skimming
Buy him an Audi
Need more rent money
Get it from Saudee
Can't trust our leaders
Some dress like ladies
Buy him two Bentleys
And three new Mercedes
This poem is over
Oh mamma mia
Luxury cars only
Won't drive a KIA.

End.

Anyone can 'Google' this- WIKILEAKS GOES AFTER THE SAUDI ROYAL FAMILY, and read the related articles on the web.

Thank You

POWER TO THE PEOPLE

Steve ole buddy. You should really make up your mind about what I have done or where I have worked.

Before you thought I worked for Tropicana. I just wonder how you managed to go over 2 million commercial miles while you worked for Tropicana (considering that you just drove around around the lot with your loader. But then again maybe you have justified in your mind that these were commercial miles since you have a CDL. Right??? Please tell us how many of these miles were OTR and can be verified.

As far as assisting others. Well that is questionable since half the time you provide them with tactics that are barely legal (if not more than a bit shady). Seems a shame that you use rules and regulations meant for good people that have had bad things happen to get away with what amounts to credit card fraud. That is the legal definition of credit card fraud - obtaining credit and using it with the intention of NEVER paying it back.

is available at this site!

*Just type in 502469 and it appears as 'Consumer Comment #50' at Ripoff Report #502469.

Thank You

Bman,

I read your post a few times, and you make some good points.

Please re-read some of the posts you have taken excerpts from to understand the progression of events so the statements are not out of context.

Also understand that I have been active on this site for approx 5 years, and early on I contributed tirelessly in helping consumers, and "rip off" victims in general.

But then, came the likes of Steven-Jacksonville, and all of that went out the window. You see, Steven - Jacksonville was [or is] a debt collector. Debt collectors have a very closed minded view of "debtors" and feel that every debt should just be paid with no excuses, and the amounts should never be challenged, and SOL means nothing, etc.

Furthermore, most of the posts nowadays are from people that clearly brought on their own problem through a lack of common sense, or sheer stupidity. Again, re-read some of these posts.

And then there are the posts from the illiterates. Well, sorry, no tolerance for illiteracy, because there is no excuse for it. Every single person living in this great country had the opportunity to soak up 13 years of education for free.

I tell it like it is. I don't sugar coat anything. That pisses people off. Too bad. That's the real me, and I'm not changing, as it works for me. That is who I am. I don't go along with the "system" as most sheep do. I fight the "system" around every turn, and by doing so for so long, I have learned to win in almost every instance. Some people are very jealous of that, like Steven-Jacksonville.

As far as walking away from the debts goes, that is easy, but it takes total discipline. A person has to "evaporate" for the entire SOL period. No bank accounts, nothing at all in your name. Nothing. I had fun doing it to those arrogant and greedy, and abusive banks. They got educated. Big time.

FYI..When I walked away from those debts, I was making well in excess of $2k per week, sometimes $4-5k weekly, and had plenty of money in the bank. That debt was debt that was carried seasonally in a business venture in Vegas. I carried that debt to maintain a high credit score, and high credit limits available based on usage. $170k sounds like alot, but not when that amount of income is involved.

I just got tired of being bent over by these banks who always wanted more. Whether it was higher interest rates, additional "fees", etc. I just woke up one day and had enough. I called each creditor to discuss these higher rates and additional fees, and get a resolution as a long term spotless paying customer, and got the same "take it or leave it" attitude from each. So, I left it. Don't give me only 2 choices as you may not like the one I pick!

I pisses people off only because they are in the same situation but do not have the backbone to do what I did, so they put me down instead. It's easier for the spineless.

>Here is the drivel that Steven-Jacksonville posted, and I will respons to each paragraph in bold. The bottom line here is that Steven-Jacksonville has a reading and comprehension problem, common to the third grade intellect of debt collectors.
>

"By asking Steve (from Bradenton) for his advice you are merely stoking him up".
False statement. I will help anyone that needs help, if I have the answer, As long as there is a legitimate problem, and not just stupidity.

"He racked up debt by doing things such as taking a 30,000 dollar 6 month road trip and then ducked out on the debt by making sure that there is nothing in his name".
Another false statement. Learn how to read and comprehend. The "debt" was "racked up" long before the road trip. I simply took the last $35k that was available on my credit cards and enjoyed a long vacation since I knew I was walking away from my credit. Yes, I did this intentionally, and successfully dodged every moron debt collector like Steven-Jacksonville in the process. That is why he is pissed off here.

"Another way to skip out on this debt (according to him) is to reply to a mailing from a credit card company by putting in false information such as maybe an old address or even a phony address".
Once again, learn how to read. This is NOT what was said. I never gave that information to anyone to "skip out on a debt". I did give that information to someone to put THIRD PARTY DEBT COLLECTORS [like you] on the wrong path. Just having fun with idiots. Nothing wrong with that.

"If you do a search on Steve (from Bradenton) you will see he is proud of these antics".
This is your only factual statement. yes, I am VERY proud of my "antics". Absolutely.

"What is even funnier is that he will put down others that have had a car repossessed. In a recent post he is on record as saying he would put making car payments a priority above a mortgage and other bills".
Another false statement. Taken out of context. Read the entire post once again. The OP indicated that the car was his/her "livelihood", etc. I simply said if that was the case, I would have made keeping that car my priority above all else. Again, learn how to read.

"Bottom line Bman is that Steve has a tendency to exaggerate his background as well as work experience".
Another false statement. Every single word I have ever posted regarding my background is factual, and under-stated if anything. Prove me wrong. Give me specifics that are "exaggerated".

"He will never provide proof to back any claims that he may make".
Wrong again. But I won't just post my full name and personal infornmation here on a public forum for trolls, stalkers, and sexual deviants like you to have and use. Here's the deal dickweed. You put up $5000 in an escrow account to cover my travel expenses to you, legal expenses to draft the confidentiality agreement, the cost of background checking you, and my time and misc. expenses, and I will provide any information you seek. The ball is in your court, put up or shut up.

We are done here.
>

By asking Steve (from Bradenton) for his advice you are merely stoking him up. He racked up debt by doing things such as taking a 30,000 dollar 6 month road trip and then ducked out on the debt by making sure that there is nothing in his name.

Another way to skip out on this debt (according to him) is to reply to a mailing from a credit card company by putting in false information such as maybe an old address or even a phony address.

If you do a search on Steve (from Bradenton) you will see he is proud of these antics.

What is even funnier is that he will put down others that have had a car repossessed. In a recent post he is on record as saying he would put making car payments a priority above a mortgage and other bills.

Bottom line Bman is that Steve has a tendency to exaggerate his background as well as work experience. He will never provide proof to back any claims that he may make.

Steve - Bradenton (U.S.A.) the vindictiveness, cruelty, bigotry, and anger you exhibit directed at anyone that contradicts your rants appears psychotic. None of this may be true, but this is what you are presenting about yourself in this thread. My suggestion is that you tone down the insults and give the advice that you could easily offer those of us that have not the approach that you seem to embrace. Your competitive style, if I can call it that, would be of benefit if it us used with empathy.  

For example I find this comment to be impressive and would like to know more: “So, given ONLY those 2 choices, I LEFT IT! That's right, I walked away from 32 creditors for a total ov over $170,000 and then I educated them as they tried to collect. I beat all 4 lawsuits, I beat down every collector like a punk, and have gone through the entire statute of limitations on each without any judgements on me at all. I never paid these arrogant idiots 1 penny, and never will.”  

I must admit it is hard to accept as you post endlessly on this site yet maintain:  “The bottom line here is that I just tell it like it is, and I don't care who likes it. Simply doesn't matter to me. You don't matter to me.” “I have nothing to prove to you or anyone else. You are nothing. Insignificant.” So why write rebuttals or offer your opinions if no one on the site matters to you? This doesn’t make sense?  

Then there is a confusion that you create when you write:  “I have only challenged businesses or alleged businesses to post proof they are legit. I have never challenged an individual to post private info here. Never.” This is bizarre since you are conflating your position by doing with the person (that you respond to) what it is you say you do not do. Then you attack women (using body parts), a specific state, and individuals, as you edge individuals on first, then claim you are only defending yourself? You started by attacking Ronnie G.  I know he can have an arrogant stance, yet he does try to offer advice more than offer insults.  

Lets review some of your best ignorant comments:  “Go away now and write some more gay poems.” “What the hell are you talking about? Do you even have a clue? You are obviously sharing that crack pipe with Karl and Ronny G! Put it down! Maybe it just has something to do with CA?”  “… you really do need to stay in CA with the rest of the mental midgets.” “So, dipsh*t, you are WRONG once again.”  

I believe that there is at least one derogatory term used in personal attack in each posted thread you offer. Nice touch with this one: “But, you must be very stupid if you would think for a minute I would post any specifics of my bank accounts, address, or any personal identifying information here with all of the wacko faggots and stalkers on this site.”  

Try to remember why most people come to this thread, for my part I wish to help people not fall into a financial hole, and had I known about this site before going through the Hell I experienced at the hands of banks in 2009, I may not be looking at this site at all. I offer my story and have on occasion attacked a liar when I found them telling other posts what I was told which threw me into my negative financial cycle. At the heart of my contribution I hope that others will benefit and do not sit on any high horse and proclaim my success, or insult them stating I will put my opinion here and I don’t care what you think. I would be lying to myself if I said that, which is what I think you might be doing? I also want to learn how to help myself and help others and offer what I can to help those that are suffering thanks to deregulation and being lied to for over 30 years. Credit cards were created because salaries were not raised significantly for 30 years, jobs closed down and went over seas, and prices of everything always goes up, and credit cards were sold to the public as a way to make ends meet. Then with lobbyists the rules were changed and usury laws were overturned, which helped place the American people onto the mess were are still in. I was ignorant, most people were ignorant, even Wall Street was ignorant. Yet the banks knew what they were doing and planned their attack against the poor since they worry about their credit ratings, and they hoped that many of the middle classes would fall into this debt cycle trap.  

If you can remember why we are all here and offer advise and not just say nasty inflammatory things against those that suffer (whether due to ignorance or the laws), and instead give us the benefit of your experience. For instance I do find this impressive: “So, given ONLY those 2 choices, I LEFT IT! That's right, I walked away from 32 creditors for a total ov over $170,000 and then I educated them as they tried to collect. I beat all 4 lawsuits, I beat down every collector like a punk, and have gone through the entire statute of limitations on each without any judgements on me at all. I never paid these arrogant idiots 1 penny, and never will.”

Attack the businesses like you say you do and please stop attacking those that have been victimized by a system they wrongly trusted.  I would never think to do what you did, and would like to know more about how you handled the creditors, and how you won out against these toxic entities that prey upon the American people? I like to learn so that I can help and try not to focus on narcissism. Thank you.

Guess what?

A man was crucified 1,978 years ago for his crimes, correct? In 33 AD a man by the name of Jesus Christ was crucified, according to information available on the web. If you 'Google' this- SANHEDRIN TRIAL OF JESUS- WIKIPEDIA, you can go to that site and read the following quote:

"Jesus was then put on trial by Jewish authorities to determine whether his guilt, in their eyes, justified handing him over to the Roman Governor Pontius Pilate with their request that the Roman Empire put Jesus to death on popular demand from the people."

It appears that the people who were in control of the government 1,978 years ago are the same people that control the U.S. government, the governments of Europe, and many other governments around the world today, wouldn't you agree? In 1913 the U.S. government basically handed control over to the Federal Reserve, right?

If you 'Google' this- WHO OWNS THE FED?, and go to the site with the 5 charts you can read the names of the people and companies who appear in those charts. 

Maybe Jesus was alerting the people back in 33 AD to the truth, and the ones in control of the government didn't like what he was doing so they had him arrested, right? I believe that Bradley Manning was arrested for allegedly alerting the people of the world to the truth about what was going on in Iraq, correct?

Maybe the government back in Jesus' day needed to operate in secrecy, just like governments of today, so the people aren't aware of the truth, huh? It's too bad that Jesus was sent to trial for awakening the people, wouldn't you agree? If Bradley Manning was the person responsible for leaking all of that information to WikiLeaks, then his crimes could be similar to the crimes that Jesus was guilty of, right?

You can 'Google' this- COLLATERAL MURDER, and watch that video on the web. I guess the ones who are controlling the U.S. government didn't like the fact that so much information was leaked, especially that video, right? Thank goodness Bradley Manning won't be crucified like Jesus if he is found guilty.

It seems that telling the truth can get someone put in jail for life in the USA, right? If Bradley Manning is found guilty, he could go to jail for life. It appears that Jesus Christ and Bradley Manning made the same mistake of exposing the Sanhedrin, which controlled the government in 33 AD and the current governments of the USA and Europe, wouldn't you now agree?

Have a nice day.

P.S. Don't forget to type in 646259 at this site and go to 'Consumer Comment #85' and sing- "LADY GAGA SONG".

he should know the answer to the following question:

*Is there a law that requires an American who earns a salary or a wage on his or her labor to pay Federal Income tax?

Make sure to 'Google' this- BARACK OBAMA, and go to the Wikipedia site and read where he taught constitutional law at the University of Chicago Law School, okay?

Then type in 529757 at this site and go to 'Consumer Comment #29' at Ripoff Report #529757 and get President Obama's address, and mail him a hand-written letter with the above question so he can provide you with the correct answer. Please let all of us know when he responds, and make sure to share the answer that he sends you with all of us, okay?

Thank You

Want to play? Well then we shall...you stated...

"Ronny G sits there and spews his jibberish about personal income taxes being unconstitutional, but then at the same time he admits to paying them anyway!"

I only answered a question left here by another nut case..Karl. I answered the question by CHOICE. I know of no written law that requires labor wages to be taxed,,and I feel it is unconstitutional. Do I pay it? Yes...why? Because I know I can get locked up regardless of if these laws are unconstitutional, or if I "believe" they are unconstitutional. Maybe there was a time that the way to fight this was to declare war on the Government but we are dumbed downed and disarmed..so I reluctantly pay income tax, and sales tax, and inheritance tax, and capital gains tax, and road tax, and license tax and DMV registration tax, heck I might as well pay tax to wipe my a*s.

"Well Ronny G, are you in the habit of doing things that are unconstitutional?"

No. But I am forced like the rest of us to live in a country that is supposedly based on a constitution , but apparently does not live up to it. I would request you read this since it might actually teach you something about the 16th Amendment...but I do not expect that you will..or if you did that you could possibly understand it. It is SO clearly apparent that the only reason you come here is to knock others and this some how makes you feel better about being a big fat LOSER. I do not know how else to describe anyone who would sign up with the SUB PRIME bank First Premier..and then have the nerve to criticize others for making a mistake? Read this you brain dead old grump...

Oh but before we do note that no one here cares that you lie about all this cash you have..but yet are a SUB PRIME LOSSSSSSSSSEERRRRR..nor does anyone care if you think I sit in some kind of cubicle at Best Buy with 1000 dollars in my account. I have been accused of everything by the f**king nut cases on this site and sicko stalkers and it means nothing to me or anyone else. Let's base information on facts as posted. I can say you are a child molester..right? Does that make it true? Or maybe I own tow truck companies? Or work for PayPal? Or maybe I own ebay? Give me a break..the only evidence of anything stated is what I have posted, and what you have posted. And what have you posted STEVE? PROOF.. that you ARE indeed a SUB PRIME LOSER..sorry for you to say. NOw do you wish to pst any bank statements? Or you can determine my net worth for posting one account I have that is just used for money transfers as I have posted on this very website several times regarding my Chase account well before we ever had the pleasure of dealing with you?

Defects in Ratification of the 16th Amendment The Sixteenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States was never ratified by a majority of the sovereign States. This is the Amendment that allegedly entitled the Federal Agent (government) in the federal territory of Washington, D.C. and their private collection company, the IRS, to collect "income tax" as falsely declared to be ratified in February 1913. After an exhaustive year long search of legislative records in 48 sovereign states (Alaska & Hawaii were not admitted into the Union until after 1913). The only record of the 16th Amendment having been confirmed was a proclamation made by the Secretary of State Philander Knox on February 25, 1913, wherein he simply declared it to be "ineffect", but never stating it was lawfully ratified. Even if the 16th Amendment were properly ratified, according to Article 1, Section 9 of the Constitution, it has always been unconstitutional for the U.S. Federal Government to directly tax We the People in their property, wages, salaries, or earnings. The judges of the U.S. Supreme Court rejected any claims that the 16th Amendment changed the constitutional limits on direct taxes in Brushaber v. Union Pacific R.R. Co., 240 U.S. 1, when they ruled that it "created no new power of taxation" and that it "did not change the constitutional limitations which forbid any direct taxation of individuals". Alleged defects in the ratification of the Income Tax Amendment After investigating the history of the 16th Amendment, the following defects were found in the ratification of the Income Tax Amendment by the 48 states then existing, three-fourths or 36 of which were needed to ratify it: 01 - Not ratified by state legislature, and so reported 02 - Not ratified by state legislature, but reported as ratified 03 - Missing or incomplete evidence of ratification, but reported as ratified 04 - Failure of Governor or other official to sign, although required by State Constitution 05 - Other violation of State Constitution in ratification process 06 - Other procedural irregularity making ratification doubtful 07 - Approval, but with change in wording, accepted as ratification of original version 08 - Approval, but with change in spelling, accepted as ratification of original version 09 - Approval, but with change in capitalization, accepted as ratification of original version 10 - Approval, but with change in punctuation, accepted as ratification of original version State 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 Alabama 1 1 1 Arizona 1 1 1 1 Arkansas 1 1 1 1 1 California 1 1 1 1 1 Colorado 1 1 1 1 Connecticut 1 Delaware 1 Florida 1 Georgia 1 1 1 1 1 Idaho 1 1 1 1 1 1 Illinois 1 1 1 Indiana 1 1 1 Iowa 1 1 1 Kansas 1 1 Kentucky 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Louisiana 1 1 1 1 Maine 1 1 Maryland 1 1 1 Massachusetts 1 1 1 1 Michigan 1 1 1 1 1 Minnesota 1 1 Mississippi 1 1 1 1 1 1 Missouri 1 1 1 1 1 Montana 1 1 1 1 Nebraska 1 1 Nevada 1 1 1 New Hampshire 1 New Jersey 1 1 1 New Mexico 1 1 New York 1 1 1 North Carolina 1 1 North Dakota 1 1 Ohio 1 1 Oklahoma 1 1 1 Oregon 1 1 Pennsylvania 1 Rhode Island 1 South Carolina 1 1 1 1 South Dakota 1 1 1 1 1 Tennessee 1 1 1 1 1 Texas 1 1 1 1 1 1 Utah 1 Vermont 1 1 1 1 1 Virginia 1 Washington 1 1 1 1 1 West Virginia 1 1 1 Wisconsin 1 1 1 Wyoming 1 1 1 1 1 1 Total 7 3 9 6 25 29 22 1 31 27 Additional 7 3 7 5 16 6 2 0 2 0 Accumulated 7 10 17 22 38 44 46 46 48 48 In the above table, the line "Additional" are the number of states for which that defect is in addition to previously indicated defects, and "Accumulated" is a running total of states with defects, from Defect 01 through 10. Since 36 states were required to ratify, the failure of 13 to ratify would be fatal to the amendment, and this occurs within the first three defects, arguably the most serious. Even if we were to ignore defects of spelling, capitalization, and punctuation, we would still have only two states which successfully ratified. Note that in the above we are counting Ohio as a state, even though it was not admitted into the Union until 1953 (retroactively, which is expost facto, and unconstitutional). We are not counting the failure to designate the Income Tax Amendment as the "XVII" amendment, since there was arguably a 13th Amendment that was ratified but which is not published in official copies of the Constitution with Amendments, and the number is not necessarily part of the amendment (It wasn't part of the first 10.). The authority usually cited for the criticality of ratification without errors of spelling, capitalization, or punctuation, is from DOCUMENT NO. 97-120, of the 97TH CONGRESS, 1st Session, entitled How Our Laws Are Made, written by Edward F. Willett, Jr. Esq., Law Revision Counsel of the United States House of Representatives, in which the comparable exactitude in which bills must be concurred under federal legislative rules is detailed: ...Each amendment must be inserted in precisely the proper place in the bill, with the spelling and punctuation exactly the same as it was adopted by the House. Obviously, it is extremely important that the Senate receive a copy of the bill in the precise form in which it passed the House. The preparation of such a copy is the function of the enrolling clerk. (at 34) (emphasis added). When the bill has been agreed to in identical form by both bodies (either without amendment by the Senate, or by House concurrence in the Senate amendments, or by agreement in both bodies to the conference report) a copy of the bill is enrolled for presentation to the President. The preparation of the enrolled bill is a painstaking and important task since it must reflect precisely the effect of all amendments, either by deletion, substitution, or addition, agreed to by both bodies. The enrolling clerk... must prepare meticulously the final form of the bill, as it was agreed to by both Houses, for presentation to the President...  each (amendment) must be set out in the enrollment exactly as agreed to, and all punctuation must be in accord with the action taken. (at 45) (emphasis added) It should be noted that in his report on ratifications of the Income Tax Amendment to then Secretary of State Philander Knox, the Solicitor of the Department of State, recognized many of the defects of wording, spelling, capitalization, and punctuation, although he seemed ignorant of the constitutional and procedural defects at the state level. He also pointed out similar defects in the ratifications of the 14th and 15th Amendments. Therefore, Knox had plenty of clues to the problems in the ratifications, sufficient to justify that he inquire into the matter further and demand corrective action by the states. Because he failed to do so means that we now have adopted and enforced legislation for more than 80 years that is plainly unconstitutional, requiring not only that it be repealed, but that all the funds collected be refunded. The states could, of course, re-ratify the Income Tax Amendment, but they could not do so retroactively. That would allow re-enactment of the Internal Revenue Code, and re-issuance of all the supporting regulations, but none of them could apply to the period prior to proper ratification of the amendment and due notices of the regulations. Readers are invited to independently confirm or refute these results and to similarly investigate the ratifications of other constitutional amendments, both at the federal and state levels, and to issue similar reports on what they find.

weren't Taft and Wilson both in support of this ammendment?  Which party was against?

Ronny G sits there and spews his jibberish about personal income taxes being unconstitutional, but then at the same time he admits to paying them anyway!

Well Ronny G, are you in the habit of doing things that are unconstitutional?

Read much? You say you cannot find the law. It is the 16th amendment to the constitution that created personal income tax.

So, dipsh*t, you are WRONG once again. Personal income taxes are constitutional.

If you had any backbone at all, you would not be paying income tax if you truly felt that it was unconstitutional. But, you are weak, and follow the herd even when you don't agree.

If I felt something was unconstitutional, I certainly would not do it, whatever it is.

Then your weak little self has to throw the "sub-prime" insults at me.
Well, loser, I don't depend much on credit because I have CASH to buy whatever I want, and everything I have is paid for.

So, go back to your cubicle at Best Buy now and drool over your little $1000 balance in your meager little bank account.

..for merely stating my opinion?

 Steve has been well known on this website to post information with no factual basis whatsoever..and then when caught, admits he was lying just for spite I guess? I don't know?..you figure it out.

I understand that not everyone can comprehend what a Libertarian stands for (and I have stated many many times on this website that I consider myself a Libertarian)...so I will not delve too much into it.  I simply can NOT find a specific LAW that states LABOR wages must be subject to Federal income tax charges. Do I pay them? Yes. But I still feel it is unconstitutional. I also suggested to Karl that it is disrespectful to hijack a post here with political and philosophical opinions and TO START HIS OWN BLOG...AND WHAT WAS THE RESULT??

Robert from Buffalo and Steve from Bradenton personally attack me and further hijack the thread.

Notice Steve states "personal income tax" and the question from the nutcase Karl was "labor wages"? Pay attention much SUB primer?

I do not have to explain to you why Snipes is in jail. But am I allowed to agree that I feel it is unconstitutional without having you of all people, the sub prime borrower Steve title a respnse directed at me personally as "another" moronic statement. Maybe THIS is moronic but I feel obliged to say this as any MANY here would agree..STEVE..you are a d****e bag.

Did I state anyone should not pay income tax? No, I did not. I simply stated that when ASKED I can find NO law that says labor wages should be subject to Federal income tax..and I still believe it is unconstitutional.

No one has to agree. But eventually this will be dealt with. I take no pleasure in agreeing with the nut case Karl on ANY issue...but Karl believes it is because the American people have become lazy..I believe they have become brainwashed..or "dumbed down" so to speak. To wit..read some of these reports and replies.

Oooops.  I mistyped.  I should have typed 1912.  The 16th was finally ratified in 1913.

is available at this website!

*Just type in 502469 and it appears as 'Consumer Comment #27' at Ripoff Report #502469.

Thank You

There is no law requiring an American who earns a salary or a wage on his or her labor to pay Federal Income tax. It's voluntary. Federal Income tax

You're an idiot Karl, and now you've dragged the other fool and liar into it.

Several YEARS ago (2 or 3) I posted the exact CITE of law about wages and income taxes.  In other words fool, I posted the CITE of law that deamed wages as taxable for income tax purposes.  At that time YOU refused any further comment.

The 16th Ammendment (circa 1812) is what made income tax a NON constitutional issue.  Do I like it?  Heck No!  Is it legal?  So far, until the constitution and/or federal law is changed, it is.  It was this ammendment that opened the flood gates for the Fed (and later the States) to tax and spend at will.

Oh, and as a pop quiz, what political party was FOR the income tax?  For extra credit, what political party opposed the income tax?

Here's a hint.  Originally, an income tax was imposed as a TEMPORARY TAX on the minority of earners (estimated as 1 % of earners) to fund our efforts during WW1.

100% correct!

There is no law requiring an American who earns a salary or a wage on his or her labor to pay Federal Income tax. It's voluntary. Federal Income tax is a tax on 'profits' and 'gains'. When a person earns money as a result of their 'labor', that is not a 'profit' or a 'gain' because there was an even exchange. The tax is mainly for companies and corporations.

However, a person who purchases a lottery ticket or a ticket at a horse track, which becomes a winning ticket, is required to pay Federal Income tax on the winnings because that is considered a 'profit' or a 'gain'. Winnings at a casino are also taxable, but one's labor is not taxable under any Federal law. 

***Suggestion to the OP: Get rid of your debit cards immediately and only use cash or checks. It's that simple. The banks will continue to manipulate their customers in order to make profits and gains. They are in a situation where they have to do this because they are not loaning money to customers like before. Banks used to make most of their money by loaning money out to consumers. The banks' business model has changed. They are now targeting the most vulnerable people who are living paycheck to paycheck. They know that these people can be manipulated into overdrafting their accounts, and the banks are making huge profits as a result.

P.S. To Ronny G: It appears that "OPINION POEM" could be entitled- "FACT POEM", right? Since the masses in America have been manipulated into believing that their 'labor' is taxable under Federal law, it becomes clear that the USA really is a lie, wouldn't you now agree?

WELCOME TO THE USA- ONE BIG LIE

************************************  Lie Alert  ***********************************
*Anyone can stay at this site and type in 608350 and go to 'Consumer Comment #21' and read- "ONE BIG LIE POEM".

Thank You

Ronny G posted the following jibberish:

But to appease you I will answer the question you asked me.."*Is there a law that requires an American who earns a salary or a wage on his or her labor to pay Federal Income tax?"No, there is not. I believe income tax on labor wages is unconstitutional.Now...Karl. why don't you start a blog to address this issue and not use other peoples legitimate reports to share your unrelated views? Oh, I am sure you can find some abstract way to make this a related topic but this is simply a COMPLAINT website...not a political or philosophical blog site. Can you have a little respect for others please.

Actually Ronny, you are dead wrong, once again.

The payment of personal income tax is FEDERAL LAW.

There is no constitutional issue here. People have challenged this thousands of times over the years and all have failed.

The IRS puts people in jail every single day for income tax evasion.
The IRS takes property and bank accounts every day for back taxes.

This is all done legally.

Do I like it? No, I do not.

But just the fact that we don't like it or agree with it does not make in "unconstitutional".

Just ask Wesley Snipes. He is doing 3 years in prison for personal income tax evasion.
So why didn't his high priced lawyer beat the case on constitutional grounds?
Explain that.

Idiot.

I am sure the OP is appreciative that you hijacked the thread..well that seems to be your job here..that and requesting others to 'google" the lousy poetry.

But to appease you I will answer the question you asked me..

" *Is there a law that requires an American who earns a salary or a wage on his or her labor to pay Federal Income tax?"

No, there is not. I believe income tax on labor wages is unconstitutional.

Now...Karl. why don't you start a blog to address this issue and not use other peoples legitimate reports to share your unrelated views? Oh, I am sure you can find some abstract way to make this a related topic but this is simply a COMPLAINT website...not a political or philosophical blog site. Can you have a little respect for others please.

Do you have any suggestions or comments regarding all the illegitimate bounced check fees this poster is complaining about? If not...why are you here?

OPINION POEM

This is my opinion
The USA's a lie
Confidence is low
Food prices are so high
Greed has taken over
Things aren't looking great
War continues on
Fueling all that hate
People losing houses
Others losing jobs
Politicians cheating
Most are stinky slobs
Guess this poem's over
Time to go outside
Sunshine feels good
All our leaders lied.

End.

do your best in answering the following question:

*Is there a law that requires an American who earns a salary or a wage on his or her labor to pay Federal Income tax?

P.S. Feel free to do research on the web prior to answering the above question. The following video and related articles can be 'Googled' and may be helpful in determining your answers that so many of us will be anxiously awaiting-

AMERICA: FREEDOM TO FASCISM
IRS LOSES CHALLENGE TO PROVE TAX LIABILITY

Thank You.

..nor do I feel I have been juvenile. I was accused of impersonating a moron. Why would I do that? Granted there are a few regulars here that have had differences in opinion from me and heated debate, But does anyone who knows me from this site honestly feel I have to hide my identity or impersonate anyone to get my point across?

It's not like I am known for holding back my opinions on this site.

...I think I speak for the class when I suggest that you both CHILL OUT and walk away from this thread. Neither of you are winning this argument - and as much as I hate to say it, you are both becoming as annoying as Karl's d****e bag poems.

is available at this Ripoff Report. It appears as 'Consumer Comment #33'.

Thank You

I see I struck a nerve here!

I just laugh at you with your juvenile attempts to be "tough".

This isn't high school, so stop acting like a teenager.

Grow up.

I appreciate that you noticed my grammar is "good"...but I am not the one impersonating you here. I have no trouble in any way shape or form debating, rebutting, discrediting or debunking you using the same sign on I always do which is ronny g.

If you think by implying I am anything like Karl helps your cred in the little "click" we have here..think again. Oh, I know there are a few I have shared words with on this site..but I know they have the ability to tell I am not ANYTHING like Karl. If anything, Karl is my nemesis on this site.

So if you wish to defend yourself for being busted and confronted for the FRAUD and outright...hmm..how do I out this gently...A*HOLE that you are clearly EXPOSED as..defend yourself like a man and not the pu*y a*s coward that you are. Tossing my name in with the likes of Karl and Charles or whatever does not do anything to make your case. I am MY OWN person, with my OWN opinions. Try that for yourself for a change you back woods welfare meth head sub prime LOSER.

HE'S A SHIRTLESS POLITICIAN
(Please sing to the tune of- "I've Been Working On The Railroad")
Anyone can 'Google' this- I'VE BEEN WORKING ON THE RAILROAD SONG LYRICS MIDI BOY SCOUT, and sing the following lyrics to that tune, right?

Here we go- 1, 2, 3, 4....

He's a shirtless politician
Doesn't he look cool
He's a shirtless politician
What did this guy learn in school
Searching for some hanky-panky
Craigslist is where he will go
He's a sneaky politician
Our system soon will blow
Congressmen are liars and they're cheaters
Congressmen are working for the Fed, we say
Government is broken and it's rotten
Flush it down the toilet today
Flush, flush, into-a-commode
Flush, flush, into-a-commode, we say
Flush, flush, into-a-commode
Flush 'em very far away!

End.

Anyone can 'Google' this- CONGRESSMAN SENDS SHIRTLESS PHOTOS OVER CRAIGSLIST, and read the related articles on the web.

Then 'Google' all of the following and watch them on the web for proof that the politicians are really working for the Federal Reserve-

FRONTLINE: THE WARNING
AMERICA: FREEDOM TO FASCISM
FRONTLINE: INSIDE THE MELTDOWN
YOUTUBE FALL OF THE REPUBLIC
THE OBAMA DECEPTION
WHO OWNS THE FED BANK, WHO CONTROLS WHO VIDEO

Make sure to go to CLEANAIRANDWATER.NET and watch those videos too!

Then 'Google' this- WHO OWNS THE FED?, and go to the site with the 5 charts. (Those are the same charts being displayed at the beginning of the video entitled- "Who Owns The Fed Bank, Who Controls Who Video".)

Thank You

"Knowledge is power."

POWER TO THE PEOPLE

It's either Karl or Ronny G as the grammar is good, so that leaves out Bill D or Charles!

Sounds alot like Karl because you would not reply to his stupid "google" crap.

Some jerkoff thinks he is just too clever.

Making posts impersonating me.

See #29. I did not write that.

STEVE IS A MIGHTY A**

seems to be an appropriate poem for everyone to read today, because a Congressman apparently sent shirtless photos of himself to a woman who had an advertisement on Craigslist, correct?

*Just type in 476868 at this site and the poem appears as 'Consumer Comment #5' at Ripoff Report #476868.

Thank You

***Anyone can 'Google' this- CONGRESSMAN SENDS SHIRTLESS PHOTOS OVER CRAIGSLIST, and read the related articles on the web.

Thank You

WELCOME TO THE U.S. CONGRESS- ONE BIG JOKE

After reading many of your childish rantings I have come to the conclusion that you are merely a troll and are enjoying getting people going.  Several people here have taken the bait and have lowered themselves to your level.

I think you're having fun with people and I don't believe a thing you say.

It's funny to read though.

You guys gotta chill.

I was with you all the way, Steve, until you admitted that you didn't pay your debts.

Everyone should be responsible for managing their own finances: check books, loans, credit cards, mortgages.  I accept my responsibility for all, and am rewarded that i have money in the bank and no debt at all.

Ronny, you may not be as well off as Steve, but I'll bet you pay your bills.  And if you pay them all off some day (and it can happen), you will feel above all the triviality of these posts

..have you posted any reasonable explanation how you are a better person then me regarding bank account balances that you claim but can not..and WILL not prove?

I posted the balance of an account on a report here..and you were one of the few assholes who chose upon your own free will to respond.

Now granted..this was one of my Chase bank accounts only used for money transfers..but how would you know this or why would it matter to you so much????

I GREATLY anticipate an answer of such great wisdom oh mighty ROR guru.

is a poem about a family. Donald and Bridgette are the names of the father and the mother. They have two children and a dog. It seems that Donald, who works for Acme Widget, may be a midget. The poem is available in the consumer comments section at this site!

*Just type in 502469 and it appears as 'Consumer Comment #34' at Ripoff Report #502469.

Thank You

Striderq,

If you think I'm going to post anything with my full name, bank account info, and my asset info here, you really do need to stay in CA with the rest of the mental midgets.

That will never happen.

People have a right to privacy, businesses don't.

I have only challenged businesses or alleged businesses to post proof they are legit. I have never challenged an individual to post private info here. Never.

Get it right fool.

And you accuse others of smoking drugs and being delusional???

BTW it is ironic that you badger people to prove their statemnts by posting the proof here on ROR but don't seem willing to live by the same standard. Oh well, as you said, just go on and please yourself, we don't matter at all.

I'd like to give you my answer, and perhaps you'll agree with it and we can move on, okay?

Here is how I would answer the question in 'Consumer Comment #8':

The U.S. government should use the same logic that all of us should use when figuring out our finances, but in 1913 the U.S. government decided to allow the Federal Reserve to control the finances of our country. It was obviously a mistake, because the Federal Reserve isn't an entity that concerned itself with the masses of people in America. The Federal Reserve is mainly interested in the people and the companies who are linked to it.

Since the politicians have benefitted tremendously from what the Federal Reserve has done since 1913, they continued to allow the ones at the Federal Reserve to make the decisions for our country. However, these decisions have mainly helped the Federal Reserve, Wall Street, and many in the government, like the politicians who work for them. 

Those who don't agree with this answer can simply 'Google' the following documentaries and watch them on the web for proof that the Federal Reserve controls most of the U.S. government, Wall Street, the Mainstream Media, and most of the elected officials in the USA-

FRONTLINE: THE WARNING
AMERICA: FREEDOM TO FASCISM
FRONTLINE: INSIDE THE MELTDOWN
YOUTUBE FALL OF THE REPUBLIC
THE OBAMA DECEPTION

*I believe that those five documentaries will clearly prove that the Federal Reserve is in control of the U.S. government. Pay close attention to what Congressman Ron Paul's brother stated at around 57 minutes 36 seconds into the documentary entitled- 'The Obama Deception', okay? Wayne Paul stated that the American people, and social security, were given as collateral to the Federal Reserve so they would continue operating our country. I believe he also said that the USA has been operating on an "emergency" basis, due to all of the debt.

It appears to me that things are beginning to unwind, and if the debt ceiling isn't raised the USA will most likely default on some of its obligations with other countries, who have provided the necessary funding to keep our government going, wouldn't you agree?

Please let me know what you think about my answer to the question, after you watch all of the above videos on the web, okay?

Thank you

P.S. In order to understand more about the Federal Reserve, simply 'Google' this- WHO OWNS THE FED?, and go to the site with the 5 charts. Make sure to visit the related websites and read what is stated for additional information, okay?

 

Actually, that person you spoke of was some debt collector that was all high and mighty on some sort of moral crusade. I had to just shut that c**t down, which I did as she has not come back.

As far as the "cut and paste" thing. That was exactly what happened, and I already figured it out. I did cut and paste as stated, but went to far with my highlight and copy and hit the red title which made the whole copy red. The next time, I figured this out, and avoided it. Real simple, even for you.

Furthermore, I will reiterate my position as far as your claim of me boasting, bragging, whatever. If you look at the progression of events, I never made any sort of financial claim unless it was in response to someone elses insult towards me.

But rest assured, you DO NOT know who I am, and you know nothing about me. Guaranteed.

I have nothing to prove to you or anyone else. You are nothing. Insignificant.

I live my life by my rules, and it works for me. It doesn't have to work for you, because you don't matter to me. Only my family and my close friends matter to me, and they are the only people who matter to me. You don't.

You are just pissed because you are some kind of self proclaimed expert in the financial industry, probably a bank teller or some other menial job, and I have consistently stepped on banks and collectors and have won every time.

Years back, I got pissed off at the greed of several banks in the way they feel they can just raise rates for no good reason and add fees, etc all with impunity. Well, that was not acceptable to me. I made phone calls to each, and each one gave me the same "take it or leave it attitude".

So, given ONLY those 2 choices, I LEFT IT! That's right, I walked away from 32 creditors for a total ov over $170,000 and then I educated them as they tried to collect. I beat all 4 lawsuits, I beat down every collector like a punk, and have gone through the entire statute of limitations on each without any judgements on me at all. I never paid these arrogant idiots 1 penny, and never will.

So, I guess I am some kind of expert in this area after all.

And the funny part was, I had plenty of money to make these payments, and had assets. I chose not to pay simply because they pissed me off. Now, I still have all of my money and all of my assets, and NO BILLS!

Only in America!

I don't remember the ladies name but she reminded you about debts you walked away from. One of the cut and paste responses to her was in red ink which you said happens when you cut and paste but then your next cut and paste wasn't in red ink.
You present yourself as some kind of financial guide but your suggestions are often wrong and almost always rude. When I first started posting on ROR you gave good information and were pleasent to people. However lately you've become quite rude to everyone.
And yes, if you boast that you have 3 or was it 30 times $1000 in your account and that you spend $1000 for dinner, then you're boasting. The only reports that should be about you are the ones you post as OP. But you seem to enjoy trying to show off your financial knowledge and be center stage. Basically all you've done is put yourself into a group with Charles and Karl as posters that are read for a laugh but not taken seriously.

Striderq,

Obviously you have me confused with someone else.

Exactly what "Friend", and what "report", and what "background" do you speak of?
I can't wait to see this, as I monitor ROR closely and have never seen such a report.

And, I'm not bragging about anything.
"Ronny G" called me a "subprime loser" and I posted ONLY in response to that false statement.

Furthermore, I have never claimed to be a financial whiz or instructor. Where did you get that from?

What the hell are you talking about? Do you even have a clue? You are obviously sharing that crack pipe with Karl and Ronny G! Put it down! Maybe it just has something to do with CA?

If you really had nothing to prove to us then you wouldn't "brag" so much about what you have. It was really funny when your friend posted and let us know your background. That you're really not this great financial whiz and instructor that you seem to think you are. And here comes the inane retort...

answered the original question that appears in 'Consumer Comment #8'. Please answer that question, if you're able to, okay?

Here is that question:

"Shouldn't the U.S. government use the same logic that all of us should use when figuring out our finances?"

Thank You

...like that last one more often?

I know why you post the "Google..." nonsense all the time. I get it. You want people to research corruption on the private and public levels.

But in truth, this is a consumer forum with real people who need advice HERE, not after Googling a slew of websites.

I say this in all sincerity: Please try to balance your posts with more of what you posted to Steve. I really think they would be more useful in that capacity.

If you really had nothing to prove to us then you wouldn't "brag" so much about what you have. It was really funny when your friend posted and let us know your background. That you're really not this great financial whiz and instructor that you seem to think you are.

And here comes the inane retort...

Karl,

I normally wouldn't even respond to you as you are a total waste of skin, and post so much jibberish here I have learned to ignore you.

But, you must be very stupid if you would think for a minute I would post any specifics of my bank accounts, address, or any personal identifying information here with all of the wacko faggots and stalkers on this site.

You will be waiting a very long time as it will never happen. None of you idiots mean anything to me and I have absolutely nothing to prove to morons of your type.

Go away now and write some more gay poems.

for an answer from you to my question in 'Consumer Comment #8'.

*Here's that question again, in case you didn't read it:

"Shouldn't the U.S. government use the same logic that all of us should use when figuring out our finances?"

P.S. Could you also prove to us that you have "well in excess of 30 times" in one of your bank accounts than Ronny G has in his bank account? Can you please provide copies of the restaurant receipt from last night, and copies of the receipts from the club you attended that will prove to all of us that you spent more than $1,000 last night?

Also, since everything you have is paid for, I'm certain that you'd have no problem proving it to all of us, right? Please make copies of the title to your car/cars, showing us that they are paid in full, okay? You can also take pictures of your car/cars, and your house/condo/town-home for all of us to see. And please make copies of the information proving that your residence is paid in full, okay?

You can also provide us with the information documenting your net worth. That would prove to all of us that you are a sincere person who wouldn't lie to anyone, okay?

*I'm anxiously awaiting the answer to my first question, and to all of the other questions in this consumer comment.

Oh, I almost forgot! You can stay at this site and type in 505850 and go to Tanya's Ripoff Report to see that she was able to prove what she stated in her Ripoff Report. (Make sure that all of your copies are clear. Also make sure that the photos of your home and autos are clear, and make sure that the address to the home you provide us with matches the paperwork you show that lists you as owner, okay?)

Thank You

Ronny,

The bottom line here is that I just tell it like it is, and I don't care who likes it. Simply doesn't matter to me. You don't matter to me.

The fact of the matter here is that you are an idiot. Fact. Go back to your cubicle at Best Buy now. You act like you are so smart and so successful, but just about a week ago, you posted your bank account info here on ROR and had just over $1000 total in your account, whining about $50 or so that wasn't showing as available.

You keep calling me a "sub prime loser", but I have well in excess of 30 times what you have in just one of my three bank accounts, everything I have is paid for, and I owe no one anything.

You are obviously jealous of my financial strength,and the fact I don't have to care what anyone likes. That pisses you off as you go off to your loser job everyday and try to bolster that meager $1000 bank account. I spent more than that for dinner and out to a club last night. YOU are the loser here, guaranteed.

Furthermore, I have NEVER bounced a check or paid an NSF fee in my life, and NEVER WILL. This is because I understand that I have to properly manage my account, and that keeping an accurate checkbook register is essential in achieving that goal.

Also notice that the OP has not come back here to respond, as she now realizes that she is just too stupid to live, and her problem was self inflicted and not the banks fault.

Those overdraft notices are automatically generated each time an NSF situation occurs. 10 nsf's, 10 notices. That's how it works. And, the rep is not going to waste time with someone over the phone who can't properly manage thier account. The OP should have gone into the branch in person and sat down with someone to get the problem taken care of. She failed to do that.

No rip off here, just stupidity and laziness.

..that some people are so stubborn, they are beyond reason.

You see, someone like Steve does not really care about the banks, or the customers...all he cares about is making others feel bad on this website since this is a great way for a COWARD to do so..or for him telling others they are stupid. All I can figure, is this is a way to somehow make himself feel better because he can not deal with the fact that he himself..is human, and makes mistakes.

It is almost a disease.

I read this report AGAIN..and I still do not get it enough to pass judgment either way..there are questions which are unanswered. Granted, I know people do make mistakes and overdraft the account, but at the same time and even the great Steve has lodged a complaint, the banks do try to scam customers.

This report states letters are piling up regarding overdrafts and bounced checks...but the bank will not even talk about the reason. So either the bank is hiding something, or the poster is. I only ask to post more info..then decide. I do not need a lesson from the sub prime welfare loser Steve on what a register is for.

*It appears in the consumer comments section at Ripoff Report #92641.

Thank You

Karl, Why don't you get your own website and on the comments you make on this website you can say "To see the opinons and comments of Karl, Click here".

So tired of your ramblings. and idiotic poems. good lord

that all of us should use when figuring out our finances?

If you 'Google' this- BERNANKE URGES CONGRESS TO ACT ON DEBT, you can read the related articles on the web where Mr. Bernanke stated that the outcome could be "catastrophic", in regards to what might happen if the debt ceiling isn't raised, correct?

Question: Why is it okay for the U.S. Government to spend money it doesn't have?

Thank You

***************************** DEBT ALERT ******************************

*Make sure to 'Google' the following article, and also take a look at the clock that shows where the U.S. National debt currently stands-

TREASURY: DEBT CEILING COULD BE HIT BY END OF MARCH

U.S. NATIONAL DEBT CLOCK: REAL TIME

Ronny,

Keeping the accurate checkbook register is the first step in the proper management of a checking account.

Spending only what is posted and available for use is the next step, and stop spending when there are no funds available.

Are you really too stupid to figure out what is "posted and available"?

REALLY??

This is where a person uses online banking or telephone banking in conjunction with the accurate checkbook register.

The telephone banking and online banking will tell you what transactions have posted.

Now you know!

Wow. Really Ronny?

Ronny, I just love your responses to the OP's who submit to this website and to your responses to that jerk Steve. You have been very helpful with your advice and I just want you to know that I, for one appreciate your comments.

I want to believe as a fellow human being you mean well and are trying to help and not just knock others around who post complaints here. So I need to ask..

I agree, there are many that incur a bank fee because they spent more then they had in the account, that is a given..no breakthrough or epiphany there.But my questions are..

1) How do you know this OP tried to float any checks?

2) If as you state the "register is key", and then state "Money must be in your account, being posted AND available BEFORE you initiate any transaction or write a check"...well how on EARTH does a register let anyone know what is posted or available? All the register tells anyone, is what they deposited, and what they spent. It does NOT tell anyone when a check has cleared, or if there are any holds or unauthorized charges in process.

I am not saying your advice is bad..but perhaps you should not be so condescending before you know the facts or at least inquire. Ar you that perfect that you feel you are in position to judge others so harshly? What did this bank do for you that inspires you to automatically assume they did nothing wrong and the customer is a dunce? What has any bank done for you Steve that they deserve your devotion to defending them on this website? What have any consumers done against you that you feel the need to devote your time to coming here to mock, ridicule, insult and belittle them without even knowing the facts..but just assuming they are dumber then you?

and it appears as 'Consumer Comment #42' at Ripoff Report #502469.

Thank You

***************************** DEBT ALERT *****************************

Anyone can 'Google' this- U.S. NATIONAL DEBT CLOCK: REAL TIME, to see where the U.S. National debt currently stands.

Then 'Google' this- TREASURY: DEBT CEILING COULD BE HIT BY END OF MARCH, and read the related articles on the web.

*It appears that we're getting very close to the debt ceiling, correct?

Keeping an ACCURATE checkbook register is the key. This is where MOST people fail who are having NSF issues.

Money must be in your account, being posted AND available BEFORE you initiate any transaction or write a check. Many people do not understand this.

You cannot "float" transactions. Those days are LONG GONE.

Your "deposit book"? Do you mean your checkbook register?

I can guarantee to you that the bank did not cause this problem. You did.

Pay attention and manage your account the right way.

Pain and suffering is really only the result of physical injury so that is a no go since I can not imagine bounced check fees causing any physical injuries.

However, can you post any evidence as to why this bank sent any checks back? If they did anything illegal, advice will be left on what the next course of action is..but evidence of wrongdoing needs to be presented first or it is hearsay.

 

Here is a question.

Is your boyfriend listed on the account?