Complaint Review: Boost Mobile - Irvine California
- Boost Mobile 9060 Irvine Center Dr. Irvine, California United States of America
- Phone: 949-748-3200
- Web: www.boostmobile.com
- Category: Cellular Phone Companies
Boost Mobile BooMo; False, misleading advertising. Co cannot deliver. Irvine, California
*Author of original report: Update: BooMo consents to return of phone, but
*Author of original report: Update: BooMo consents to return of phone, but
listed on other sites?
Those sites steal
Ripoff Report's
content.
We can get those
removed for you!
Find out more here.
Ripoff Report
willing to make a
commitment to
customer satisfaction
Click here now..
I received a BooMo Motorola i856 as a gift on or about Nov 18, 2009. I turned it on and started working through the instruction manual. When the GPS and web access would not work, I called their tech support number and went through their diagnostic check-list with their Tech Support.
Tech support concluded that the i856 was defective and that I should contact Motorola to schedule a RMA and repair. I did so and sent the phone off to Motorola's repair facility in El Paso, TX on Nov 19.
The unit was returned on December 3, 2009. I turned it on and the GPS and web access still did not work. Call BooMo support and again ran through their diagnostic check list and again they said the phone was defective and to call Motorola's repair service.
Motorola was great. This time they sent a Fedex overnight package in which to return the "defective" i856. On December 7, 2009 FEDEX came to pick up the package. This time Motorola kept the phone until December 18. I received it on December 21, 2009. The GPS and web access still did not work the next morning.
A Motorola CSR called later that morning and after listening to my complaint said that the non-working features were a network/carrier problem, NOT a hardware problem.
I again called BooMo support and invested an hour and a quarter, first with a friendly CSR who tried everything she knew how to do before handing me off to a Tech Support guy who apparently knew less than the initial CSR. I asked for and was handed off to a supervisor who told me that the phone was defective and to take up my problem with Motorola. Is this beginning to sound like a circular runaround?
On December 23, 2009 I called the number on the packaging for a return and refund. This time I was told that because it was more than 30 days since I had the phone, they would not refund or exchange. I asked for an escalation.
The escalation person said that because of the Xmas holiday, (yeah, Merry Xmas BooMo, I'd send you a SMS greeting, but your effing phone DOES NOT WORK!!), I should not expect a response until the following week.
I waited until December 28 and then called them and was told that "corporate" hasn't responded to the escalation request, but they definitely would call back by today, January 7, 2010.
I waited until 4 pm CST (their time) and then called them. Once again was told, that "corporate" hasn't responded yet. Well I said, if I don't hear back by Monday, January 11, 2010, I am going to give them an opportunity to tell their side of the story to a judge over here in rural Hawaii.
Maybe someone at "corporate" will run the numbers and figure out that giving me a phone that works as advertised or ALL my money back is dramatically cheaper that hiring a lawyer at several hundred dollars an hour to lie to the court, and then still have to give me back my money PLUS my attorney fees and court costs.
Stay tuned.
This report was posted on Ripoff Report on 01/07/2010 04:51 PM and is a permanent record located here: https://www.ripoffreport.com/reports/boost-mobile/irvine-california-92618/boost-mobile-boomo-false-misleading-advertising-co-cannot-deliver-irvine-california-550914. The posting time indicated is Arizona local time. Arizona does not observe daylight savings so the post time may be Mountain or Pacific depending on the time of year. Ripoff Report has an exclusive license to this report. It may not be copied without the written permission of Ripoff Report. READ: Foreign websites steal our content
If you would like to see more Rip-off Reports on this company/individual, search here:



#2 Author of original report
Update: BooMo consents to return of phone, but
AUTHOR: Sanford - (United States of America)
SUBMITTED: Sunday, March 07, 2010
BooMo finally consented to the return of the phone for a refund which they claim will take up to six weeks, but referred me to another CSvc 800 number to file a claim for the prepaid service I did not use because I could not access their service.
"Tough," they said, "It is company policy, NOT to issue refunds for service. We can give you a credit."
"But," I said, "I can't access your service as I no longer have your phone. Therefore your credit is worthless to me. Give me a refund."
"No can do."
So I filed a complaint with the state's Consumer Protector who forwarded the report to the California Attorney General's equivalent to the Hawaii Consumer Protector. No response yet, but if nothing happens (CA's in virtual bankruptcy. No gov't services.), I intend to file a claim in the Hawaii courts under the statute that permits the award of triple actual damages and punitive damages. My attorney says that if there a sufficient number of others who have been ripped off by BooMo, he can bring a class action. If and when we win, BooMo can expect to take a multi-million dollar hit. I can't wait.
You'd think a reasonable person would think refunding my lousy $50 would be a cheaper solution to put an end to my complaint, and institute a policy that treats their customers with a little more respect.

#1 Author of original report
Update: BooMo consents to return of phone, but
AUTHOR: Sanford - (United States of America)
SUBMITTED: Sunday, March 07, 2010
BooMo finally consented to the return of the phone for a refund which they claim will take up to six weeks, but referred me to another CSvc 800 number to file a claim for the prepaid service I did not use because I could not access their service.
"Tough," they said, "It is company policy, NOT to issue refunds for service. We can give you a credit."
"But," I said, "I can't access your service as I no longer have your phone. Therefore your credit is worthless to me. Give me a refund."
"No can do."
So I filed a complaint with the state's Consumer Protector who forwarded the report to the California Attorney General's equivalent to the Hawaii Consumer Protector. No response yet, but if nothing happens (CA's in virtual bankruptcy. No gov't services.), I intend to file a claim in the Hawaii courts under the statute that permits the award of triple actual damages and punitive damages. My attorney says that if there a sufficient number of others who have been ripped off by BooMo, he can bring a class action. If and when we win, BooMo can expect to take a multi-million dollar hit. I can't wait.


Advertisers above have met our
strict standards for business conduct.