Dale Buziecki must have had a moment of clarity.   The BBB label boasting that House of Brides has an A+ rating has been removed from the website.

So glad to see that Dale Buziecki sought the help he needed to resolve this issue.

I suppose it is possible that Dale Buziecki owner of House of Brides truly believes he has an A+ rating with the BBB.

Maybe he's told the lie so many times he actually believes his own lie.

Dale Buziecki should seek help with his problem.  Rational, normal thinking people can see that the BBB offers no rating for House of Brides dot com.

Misleading or psychiatric disorder?

Checked the BBB site again today and continue to wonder where the A+ rating is.  Still shows no rating but house of brides dot come continues to claim they have an A+ rating.

Does the BBB approve of Dale Buziecki's misleading claim? 

House of Brides World's Largest Online Wedding Store Inc.

BBB's information on this company is being updated, and no report is available at this time.

House of Brides website boasts that they have an A+ rating with the BBB but when I fact check this the above is the only claim the BBB makes. NO RATING does not equate to A+ rating does it?

I've checked the BBB site for the past 3 days and I am unable to find an A+ rating.  I'll keep checking.

While I worked at House of Brides the website was selling "Compare to Davids Bridal" dresses.  It was my understanding that Dale Buziecki and his marketing team created the title for this collection of dresses.

Apparently, Davids Bridal (New Jersey) is suing House of Brides.  In part a summary:


This case arises from a dispute between two competitors in the retail bridal business. Defendants are The House of Brides, Inc. and House of Brides World's Largest "On-Line" Wedding Store, Inc. (collectively, "Defendants" or "HOB"). Plaintiffs are David's Bridal, Inc. and DBD, Inc. (collectively, "Plaintiffs" or "DBD"). In brief, HOB owns and operates a commercial website (the "HOB Website") for the retail sale of bridal gowns under the domain name www.houseofbrides.com. DBD owns and operates 305 DAVID'S BRIDAL retail stores in the United States.

On November 28, 2006, DBD filed a Complaint against HOB in this Court and, subsequently, a Second Amended Complaint which asserts seven claims. In short, these claims relate to allegations that HOB sold dresses that were copies of dresses sold by DBD and infringed DBD's trademarks and copyrights.

On January 21, 2009, HOB filed a Third-Party Complaint ("TPC") against Emme, alleging that Emme supplied it with the dresses at issue. The TPC asserts two claims: 1) breach of warranty of title and against infringement; and 2) implied indemnity. On October 1, 2009, Emme filed its instant motion for summary judgment.

THE OPINION STATES FURTHER THAT DALE BUZIECKI'S AFFIDAVIT CLAIMS THAT EMME WAS AWARE OF THE SUIT DAVIDS BRIDAL VS HOUSE OF BRIDES. THE OPINION REFERS TO DALE BUZIECKI'S AFFIDAVIT AS A SHAM AFFIDAVIT ( indicates only that the affiant cannot maintain a consistent story or is willing to offer a statement solely for the purpose of defeating summary judgment. A sham affidavit cannot raise a genuine issue of fact because it is merely a variance from earlier deposition testimony, and therefore no reasonable jury could rely on it to find for the non-movant.)

OUTCOME:
This Court has determined that HOB failed to give Emme the required notice. Pursuant to 2-607(3)(b), HOB is barred from "any remedy [] for liability established by the litigation." This forecloses any and every possible claim for indemnification, since indemnification requires that liability be established by the litigation. No matter how the indemnification claim were to be repled, it would be barred under the Illinois U.C.C. As to the second count of the TPC, Emme's motion for summary judgment will be granted, and judgment will be entered in Emme's favor.


IN SHORTAND MY OPINION: Dale Buziecki tried to blame Emma for his "Compare to Davids Bridal" trademark and copyright infringements.

Since there is an ongoing investigation regarding House of Brides I thought I would add this bit of info:

Jason Buziecki (Warrenville, IL) no longer works at hob. He used to be the shipping manager. Google lists his address.

Alisa Buziecki Goss (married to Laurance Goss) recently adopted a baby and no longer works at hob. She was the website Director of Operations.

These family members (Son & Daughter of Dale & Eva Buziecki) should be investigated as well since they did participate in the unscrupulous if not criminal behavior at hob while I worked there.

Ashley Buziecki (student) has had limited connections to hob.  She did model some dresses posted on he website and at one time used the name Ashley Bree when trying to sell Mary Kay products on the website.

Currently, Michelle Buziecki Barnas is very involved with the website department as she is married to Dan Barnas the new Director of Operations. Michelle sells jewelry on the website. (Michelana Designs)  Michelle and Dan are last known to live in Chicago.

 Extremely loyal but not family to the Buziecki's are:

Megan Bremmer (she's recently married so her name may have changed) works as the website administrator.  She will lie for the Buziecki's for a quarter.

Marlene Eggers aka Pat Weiner will lie for a quarter as well.

Ralph Eggers - building maintenance. Retired postal worker who works at all stores for cash.

Joan Willems website manager, goes along with anything Dale Buziecki tells her to go along with.  She lives in Shiller Park, IL.

Hope this helps. Let me know if you need more.

I don't know who you are but I wish I did. 

I contacted every official I could think of back in 08 and was told these things take time.  Maybe it's time that I contact them again.

If you want to post your email address go post it on yelp.  On yelp you can even send messages to posters.  I'd love to discuss this with you.