Ripoff Report Needs Your Help!
X  |  CLOSE
Report: #232542

Complaint Review: H&R Block - Gainesville Florida

  • Submitted:
  • Updated:
  • Reported By: Gainesville Florida
  • Author Confirmed What's this?
  • Why?
  • H&R Block Nationwide Gainesville, Florida U.S.A.

Show customers why they should trust your business over your competitors...

Is this
Report about YOU
listed on other sites?
Those sites steal
Ripoff Report's
content.
We can get those
removed for you!
Find out more here.
How to fix
Ripoff Report
If your business is
willing to make a
commitment to
customer satisfaction
Click here now..

Our son went to get his taxes done at a local H&R block, who constantly brags about the size of the rebate they will get you and their little "scratch-off" contest for discounts, free service, and other prizes on national TV. I specifically asked him to make sure he received the $30 credit for Federal Excise Tax charged on his telephone.

The lady who did his taxes acted like she was in a hurry and told him, "I'm sorry, you only get that if you had a telephone with , you can't get that with your telephone". My son has Nextel (AKA as Sprint now, but we still have the "walkie-talkie" function, so I refuse to call them Sprint). It is not "prepaid card" service, and he has paid Federal Excise Tax between 4/2003 and 7/2006. (Sprint, how about a suit against H&R Block because they are telling customers that Nextel and Sprint customers are not eligible for this Federal Excise Tax rebate?)

Last time I checked the IRS, EVERYONE who paid Federal Excise Tax on long distance or "bundled service", to include cellular telephones that do not separate local from long distance, is eligible for this tax refund, and even more if they itemize the actual costs and have 41 months of bills to prove it. The IRS did not limit the refund to only one company's service, and any "bundled service" (service that includes long distance in a package price or per minute usage or fixed rate plan) is eligble. Only local service, pre-paid card service, internet-only service and 3rd party services cannot collect this rebate.

Basically, as long as you are not using a prepaid card, you can collect for Federal Excise tax that is either specifcally charged to long distance service or to any "bundled" plan that includes long distance, even if that service also provides local, internet and even Voice over Internet Protocol service, as long as the Federal Excise Tax for long distance is also bundled into the bill. Normal cellular telephones are qualified for this program. Individuals who have telephone service that is "pay as you go", "prepaid card", "3rd party billing" or break out the Federal Excise Tax between local and long distance and do not charge Federal Excise Tax on long distance phones are not qualified by the IRS in this program.

The bottom line is, if the Federal Excise Tax is seperated for Long Distance, you can claim only that amount. If the long distance service is bundled into other services and only one total is charged for the Federal Excise Tax, you can claim the total tax amount.

Instead of itemizing the deductions, single taxpayers can opt to select the one time payment of $30.00 instead of itemizing each month's tax for 41 months. Those with more than 1 dependent can take larger deductions.

It is obvious that at least one H&R Block tax preparer doesn't know anything about this year's tax law, and you are thinking about trusting them with your business??? If my tax preparer is this unprepared, she is not prepared to do my taxes!!! This is one more person that doesn't get my H&R Block's business!!!!

H&R Block: If you miss this one simple bone-head deduction, how many more are you going to miss from my ADULT taxes??? I think you don't get the chance to find out. Keep your silly "lottery" games to see who gets a "discount coupon" for the next sucker. Stay tuned: I printed the IRS paper about the deduction and my son is taking it back to the H&R Block for his $30 and a refund for not getting him the biggest refund. I can't wait to see what excuse they give this time!

John
Gainesville, Florida
U.S.A.

This report was posted on Ripoff Report on 01/24/2007 09:48 PM and is a permanent record located here: https://www.ripoffreport.com/reports/hr-block/gainesville-florida/hr-block-tax-preparer-lies-about-federal-excise-tax-gainesville-florida-232542. The posting time indicated is Arizona local time. Arizona does not observe daylight savings so the post time may be Mountain or Pacific depending on the time of year. Ripoff Report has an exclusive license to this report. It may not be copied without the written permission of Ripoff Report. READ: Foreign websites steal our content

Search for additional reports

If you would like to see more Rip-off Reports on this company/individual, search here:

Report & Rebuttal
Respond to this report!
What's this?
Also a victim?
What's this?
Repair Your Reputation!
What's this?

Updates & Rebuttals

REBUTTALS & REPLIES:
0Author
7Consumer
0Employee/Owner

#7 Author of original report

Agreed with me?

AUTHOR: John - (U.S.A.)

POSTED: Saturday, February 10, 2007

"I do not believe cell phone providers were charged the tax" and "While the preparer is technically correct..." is agreeing with me??? Didn't sound like it to me. There is nothing "technically correct" about being to lazy or stupid to follow up on a tax deduction that a client specifically asks about.

What amazes me is the excuses H&R Block employees give for not doing their job while taking large fees from one's wallet.

Respond to this report!
What's this?

#6 UPDATE Employee

Amazing

AUTHOR: Joseph - (U.S.A.)

POSTED: Friday, February 09, 2007

John,

You amaze me. I agreed with you, and you decided that I didn't know what I was talking about. It is evident that you do not want help, so you can fend for yourself. Good luck.

Respond to this report!
What's this?

#5 UPDATE Employee

Amazing

AUTHOR: Joseph - (U.S.A.)

POSTED: Friday, February 09, 2007

John,

You amaze me. I agreed with you, and you decided that I didn't know what I was talking about. It is evident that you do not want help, so you can fend for yourself. Good luck.

Respond to this report!
What's this?

#4 UPDATE Employee

Amazing

AUTHOR: Joseph - (U.S.A.)

POSTED: Friday, February 09, 2007

John,

You amaze me. I agreed with you, and you decided that I didn't know what I was talking about. It is evident that you do not want help, so you can fend for yourself. Good luck.

Respond to this report!
What's this?

#3 UPDATE Employee

Amazing

AUTHOR: Joseph - (U.S.A.)

POSTED: Friday, February 09, 2007

John,

You amaze me. I agreed with you, and you decided that I didn't know what I was talking about. It is evident that you do not want help, so you can fend for yourself. Good luck.

Respond to this report!
What's this?

#2 Author of original report

Then you are as ignorant of the tax law as the H&R Block employee

AUTHOR: John - (U.S.A.)

POSTED: Saturday, February 03, 2007

Then, apparently, you are also not aware of the tax law that involves the Federal Excise Tax refund.

Yes, cellular telephone companies did charge this tax. It is called "bundled" service. If you are an employee as you indicated in your response, I suggest you also learn about the tax law before you fill out any more tax forms. At least know the law before you advise anyone else about taxes.

Any service that charged Federal Excise Tax on Long Distance, or any service that bundled long distance in with other service and charged per-minute charges is eligible for refund.

Most cellular telephones did not distingush between local and long distance service and charged by the minute whether the call was across the street or across the country.

Therefore, your long distance service was "bundled" with your cellular telephone service.

I would suggest you pull up the IRS website and read about it. Even the IRS states that Cellular telephones specifically qualify.

Just to help you out, you can find it at:

irs.gov/newsroom/article/0,,id=161506,00.html

The only services that are not eligible for refund is Federal Excise Tax charged on local service, prepaid cards and prepaid cell phones, and third-party services, such as a service that billsb per minute but didn't add the Federal Excise Tax after the fact. If those 3rd Party billers paid Federal Excise Tax on long distance or bundled service that included long distance, they they, as a corporation, can request a refund of the Federal Excise Tax.

There are some other Long Distance services that are allowed to collect Federal Excise Tax, but most of them don't exist any more and has to do with distance billing, not per-minute charges. I would expect anyone in the tax preparation business to know this and give the person the rebate if they state they paid Federal Excise Tax.

The employee was in NO way "technically right" about anything and was either ignorant or lazy. Either answer is not acceptable.

To state that only one company's telephone service was eligible for the rebate and all the others was a completely bone-head response.

As it turns out, we had to go to the supervisor who also told us that this employee was wrong and did a 1040X for him for free. Still, we have to mail off the form and wait 6-8 weeks for the $30. And, ofcourse, we had to spend our own .39 stamp to mail the form. H&R block was, however, nice enough to give us an envelope. Thank you so much for that!

The fact remains, H&R block employs lazy, incompetent, and poorly trained individuals. If you want to not get ripped off, you have to know more about tax laws than the people who work there. That is no way to run a business.

Respond to this report!
What's this?

#1 UPDATE Employee

Excise Tax Rebate

AUTHOR: Joseph - (U.S.A.)

POSTED: Friday, February 02, 2007

You are somewhat correct in your complaint. I do not believe cell phone providers were charged the tax, but that is besides the point.

The standard rebate applies for everybody who had a telephone. The IRS is not auditing the standard deduction, so essentially anybody who files taxes can get the credit. Even if you are not required to file, you can still file an 1040-NZ to get the credit.

This is a one-time credit that will not be applicable next year, so everybody should take advantage of the credit. Your son's tax preparer should have applied the credit regardless of the type of service he may have had.

While the preparer is technically correct, the standard credit should have been applied if the tax payer is not providing 41 months of phone charges.

Respond to this report!
What's this?
Featured Reports

Advertisers above have met our
strict standards for business conduct.

X
What do hackers,
questionable attorneys and
fake court orders have in common?
...Dishonest Reputation Management Investigates Reputation Repair
Free speech rights compromised

WATCH News
Segment Now