Ripoff Report Needs Your Help!
X  |  CLOSE
Report: #712628

Complaint Review: AT&T - Internet Internet

  • Submitted:
  • Updated:
  • Reported By: Mike S. — Pelham New Hampshire United States of America
  • Author Not Confirmed What's this?
  • Why?
  • AT&T Internet United States of America

AT&T ATT Wireless Forced Changing of Rate plan , Internet

*REBUTTAL Owner of company: Good luck

*Consumer Comment: Why wait?

Show customers why they should trust your business over your competitors...

Is this
Report about YOU
listed on other sites?
Those sites steal
Ripoff Report's
content.
We can get those
removed for you!
Find out more here.
How to fix
Ripoff Report
If your business is
willing to make a
commitment to
customer satisfaction
Click here now..

I've been notified that AT&T is forcing me to upgrade my service.  I've been a very very long-term customer.   I had AT&T before they sold my contract to Cingular, and maintained that contract even when they bought it back from Cingular.    The plan rate I had was National Plan 200 $23.09 and had originally included mmode.

At some point they included a $52/month rate plan fee and upped my additional minutes charges from $0.35 to $0.45/minute, and the monthly rate went from $23.09 to $29.99 as well.

Now I'm being told that as of May 31st, if I do not upgrade my service plan, then I will be terminated.
I called them to ask them what they were offering and was told I could have a free phone (of lesser quality than the one I have, presently), and I wouldn't have to sign a new contract (whoopie!) but the lowest price upgrade would cost me $10 more per month.    

This seems to be very bad business, and I can assure you that come May 31 I will no longer be an AT&T wireless customer.



This report was posted on Ripoff Report on 04/01/2011 08:21 AM and is a permanent record located here: https://www.ripoffreport.com/reports/att/internet/att-att-wireless-forced-changing-of-rate-plan-internet-712628. The posting time indicated is Arizona local time. Arizona does not observe daylight savings so the post time may be Mountain or Pacific depending on the time of year. Ripoff Report has an exclusive license to this report. It may not be copied without the written permission of Ripoff Report. READ: Foreign websites steal our content

Search for additional reports

If you would like to see more Rip-off Reports on this company/individual, search here:

Report & Rebuttal
Respond to this report!
What's this?
Also a victim?
What's this?
Repair Your Reputation!
What's this?

Updates & Rebuttals

REBUTTALS & REPLIES:
0Author
1Consumer
1Employee/Owner

#2 REBUTTAL Owner of company

Good luck

AUTHOR: Cadpro07 - (U.S.A.)

POSTED: Saturday, June 25, 2011

Good luck finding a competing carrier that will offer you a rate plan like that. Any Carrier with decent coverage certainly wont. You could switch to metro or boost and pay that much then have very poor coverage/ signal. 
Time to get with the times. If I had a cable provider from 1979 and never changed my plan I would expect my bill to be the exact same today. Inflation happens

Respond to this report!
What's this?

#1 Consumer Comment

Why wait?

AUTHOR: Robert - (U.S.A.)

POSTED: Friday, April 01, 2011

It does not sound like you are under the contract anymore, so you wouldn't incurr any early-termination fees.  If that is the case why wait until May 31st?  Why not leave now?

However, while you seem to have left out some details, and right now it does not seem like a RipOff. 

Because if you have kept this "plan" through the ATT-Cingular-ATT period, it appears that your rate has only increased just under $7 in about 5-6 years as all of that started in about 2005-2006.  Although I don't know where the $52/month comes in.  It is hard to tell if they were giving you a $52/month plan for $29.99 a month, or the $52/month was what it was costing you.  If it is the former that hardly sounds like a RipOff.  If it is the later it sounds like you have a lot of overage minutes, in this case you probably could have gotten a more expensive base plan but because it includes more minutes the net cost would have been less per month.

You are also talking "mmode" and that is very old technology, I am not even sure if they use "mmode" anymore.  So you probably have a very old phone.  It is unlikely that any phone you get now would be worse than the one you have.

But on what you have written it looks like you would be better off with a Pay-As-You-Go phone.  That way you have no contracts and you can pay the amount you want.

Respond to this report!
What's this?
Featured Reports

Advertisers above have met our
strict standards for business conduct.

X
What do hackers,
questionable attorneys and
fake court orders have in common?
...Dishonest Reputation Management Investigates Reputation Repair
Free speech rights compromised

WATCH News
Segment Now